‘We will not go quietly': The Māori Harvard student fighting for his future
The American government's decision last week to ban Harvard University from certifying visas for international students is a direct assault on academic freedom and integrity. It undermines the United States' standing as the centre of global academic collaboration and innovation, and holds the futures of some of the brightest, most passionate young people in the world hostage.
This isn't just political – it's personal. I know, because I'm one of the international students whose future now hangs in the balance. When I was 11 or 12, on the opposite side of the world in Aotearoa New Zealand, I decided that I was going to go to Harvard. I'd heard that it was the best school in the world and I wanted to prove that I deserved to be there. From then on, I worked to turn my dream into a real goal – and I achieved it in 2019 when I was admitted to Harvard College to study political science and economics. Now, everything I worked for – everything thousands of international students have worked for – is at risk, through no fault of our own.
Earning a place at Harvard is the dream for many young people around the world. It takes dedication and sacrifice, offering an opportunity to change lives in return. Harvard is unique among American universities for charging international students the same tuition as domestic students and offering them equally generous financial aid. In exchange for giving international students this extraordinary opportunity, Harvard gets a student body enriched by our unique perspectives and insights that no American-only university could replicate.
All throughout Harvard, international students play a vital part in scientific and sociological discoveries that change the world. The government's decision means, effective immediately, one of the most important research institutions in the world will be critically damaged. To justify its actions, the Trump administration has accused Harvard of 'fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus' and 'employ[ing] racist diversity, equity, and inclusion policies'.
On the basis of these accusations, the government has made sweeping demands – including access to private records and changes to university policies – that would effectively end free speech on campus. Complying would not only undermine Harvard's academic integrity and violate international students' constitutional and legal rights but also, given the government's treatment of immigrants and international students recently, put us in real danger.
My peers aren't violent antisemites or Chinese Communist Party spies, nor has Harvard made them so. They're passionate, dedicated, gifted young people with the potential and the desire to change the world – and they're being punished for it.
This conflict is bigger than Harvard, though. This administration is not only attacking our university, but every university in America. If the country's oldest and wealthiest school can be bullied into submission – for daring to defy the president, and on the thinnest of pretexts – then no institution in America will be safe from arbitrary, authoritarian crackdowns on free speech. As long as this decision stands, no international student will ever feel secure in their place in the United States. The door will slam shut on bright, talented people who came from across the world in search of a better future – and who would have given back in return. The spirit of discovery that has defined the last century of American life will find a new home.
Harvard has challenged this decision in court, and while I'm hopeful that the courts will find in its favour, I'm not confident that we'll be safe. I'm angry, and I'm upset, and I'm scared for my future and for the futures of my friends, peers and classmates whose lives have been thrown into uncertainty.
But this is about more than Harvard's international students. It's about the lives of every international student and scholar who comes to the United States in pursuit of a better life – and a better world. If this attack succeeds, it won't just end our dreams – it will trample on the very values that make Harvard, institutions like it and the United States great: free speech, academic integrity, global collaboration and the pursuit of knowledge.
This is not just a fight for international students – it's a fight for the principles that underpin education in America. We will not go quietly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
House approves Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill ahead of July 4 deadline
House Republicans propelled US President Donald Trump's US$4.5 trillion (NZ$7.4 trillion) tax breaks and spending cuts bill to final congressional passage overnight, overcoming multiple setbacks to approve his signature second-term policy package before a Fourth of July deadline. The tight roll call, 218-214, came at a potentially high political cost, with two Republicans joining all Democrats opposed. GOP leaders worked overnight and the President himself leaned on a handful of skeptics to drop their opposition and send the bill to him to sign into law. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York delayed voting by holding the floor for more than eight hours with a record-breaking speech against the bill. "We have a big job to finish," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. "With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before." The outcome delivers a milestone for the President, by his Friday goal, and for his party. It was a long-shot effort to compile a lengthy list of GOP priorities into what they called his "one big beautiful bill", an 800-plus page measure. With Democrats unified in opposition, the bill will become a defining measure of Trump's return to the White House, aided by Republican control of Congress. Tax breaks and safety net cuts ADVERTISEMENT At its core, the package's priority was US$4.5 trillion (NZ$7.4 trillion) in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This included allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a US$6000 (NZ$9900) deduction for most older adults earning less than US$75,000 (NZ$123,619) a year. There was also a hefty investment, some US$350 billion ($577 billion), in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the US. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion (NZ$2 trillion) in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. House staffers carry American flags through a corridor outside the House chamber which will be used for a ceremony with Speaker of the House Mike Johnson. (Source: Associated Press) The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the package would add US$3.3 trillion (NZ$5.4 trillion) to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people would go without health coverage. "This was a generational opportunity to deliver the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history, and that's exactly what we're doing," said Representative Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the House Budget Committee chairman. Democrats united against 'ugly bill' ADVERTISEMENT Democrats unified against the bill as a tax giveaway to the rich paid for on the backs of the working class and most vulnerable in society, what they called "trickle down cruelty". Tensions ran high in the chamber. Jeffries began the speech at 4.53am EDT and finished at 1.37pm EDT, 8 hours, 44 minutes later, a record, as he argued against what he called Trump's "big ugly bill". House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., left, speaks in the House chamber as House Democrats stand to applaud him. (Source: Associated Press) "We're better than this," Jeffries said, who used a leader's prerogative for unlimited debate and read letter after letter from Americans writing about their reliance of the health care programmes. "I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene," Jeffries said. "It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people." And as Democrats, he said, "We want no part of it". ADVERTISEMENT Hauling the package through the Congress has been difficult from the start. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way quarrelling in the House and Senate, and often succeeding only by the narrowest of margins: just one vote. The Senate passed the package days earlier with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie vote. The slim majority in the House left Republicans little room for defections. Political costs of saying no Despite their discomfort with various aspects of the sprawling package, in some ways it became too big to fail — in part because Republicans found it difficult to buck Trump. As Thursday's stalled floor action dragged overnight Trump railed against the delays. "What are the Republicans waiting for???" the president said in a midnight post. "What are you trying to prove???" Donald Trump presses for votes to his big beautiful bill. (Source: Truth Social) ADVERTISEMENT Johnson relied heavily on White House Cabinet secretaries, lawyers and others to satisfy sceptical GOP holdouts. Moderate Republicans worried about the severity of cuts while conservatives pressed for steeper reductions. Lawmakers said they were being told the administration could provide executive actions, projects or other provisions in their districts back home. The alternative was clear. Republicans who staked out opposition to the bill, including Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, were being warned by Trump's well-funded political operation. Tillis soon after announced he would not seek re-election. Rollback of past presidential agendas In many ways, the package is a repudiation of the agendas of the last two Democratic presidents, a chiselling away at the Medicaid expansion from Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, and a pullback of Joe Biden's climate change strategies in the Inflation Reduction Act. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., the top Democrat on the House Rules Committee, waits on the marble stairway outside the House chamber. (Source: Associated Press) Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that cuts to Medicaid, which some 80 million Americans rely on, would result in lives lost. Food stamps that help feed more than 40 million people would "rip food from the mouths of hungry children, hungry veterans and hungry seniors," Jeffries said. Republicans say the tax breaks will prevent a tax hike on households and grow the economy. They maintain they are trying to rightsize the safety net programmes for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. ADVERTISEMENT The Tax Policy Centre, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a US$1750 (NZ$2885) tax cut for the middle quintile and a US$10,950 (NZ$18,053) tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Trump wins major victory as flagship bill passes Congress
By Ben Sheppard and Frankie Taggart, AFP The US is the hottest country in the world, US President Donald Trump said just before theb ill was passed. Photo: SAUL LOEB / AFP US President Donald Trump on Thursday (US time) has secured a major political victory when Congress narrowly passed his flagship tax and spending bill, cementing his radical second-term agenda and boosting funds for his anti-immigration drive. The bill underlined the president's dominance over the Republican Party, which had been wracked by misgivings over a text that will balloon the national debt and gut health and welfare support. A small group of opponents in the party finally fell into line after Speaker Mike Johnson worked through the night to corral dissenters in the House of Representatives behind the "One Big Beautiful Bill." The bill squeezed past a final vote 218-214, meaning it can be on Trump's desk to be signed into law on the 4 July Independence Day holiday. "One of the most consequential Bills ever. The USA is the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, by far!!!" Trump said on social media as he scented victory. The timing of the vote slipped back as Democratic minority leader Hakeem Jeffries spoke against the bill for nearly nine hours to delay proceedings. Democrat Hakeem Jeffries after his marathon speech. Photo: AFP / Getty Images / Kevin Dietsch The legislative win is the latest in a series of successes for Trump, including a Supreme Court ruling last week that curbed lone judges from blocking his policies, and US air strikes that led to a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. His sprawling mega-bill just passed the Senate on Tuesday and had to return to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp of the senators' revisions. The package honours many of Trump's campaign promises: boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing $4.5 trillion to extend his first-term tax relief. "Today we are laying a key cornerstone of America's new Golden Age," Johnston said. But it is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while shrinking the federal food assistance programme and forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their insurance coverage under the bill at 17 million. Scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. While Republican moderates in the House fear the cuts will damage their prospects of reelection, fiscal hawks chafed over savings that they say fall far short of what was promised. Johnson had to negotiate tight margins, and could only lose a handful of lawmakers in the final vote, among more than two dozen who had earlier declared themselves open to rejecting Trump's 869-page text. Trump has spent weeks hitting the phones and hosting White House meetings to cajole lawmakers torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring the president's wrath. Democrats hope public opposition to the bill will help them flip the House in the 2026 midterm election, pointing to data showing that it represents a huge redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest. Jeffries held the floor for his Democrats ahead of the final vote, as he told stories of everyday Americans who he argued would be harmed by Trump's legislation. "This bill, this one big, ugly bill - this reckless Republican budget, this disgusting abomination - is not about improving the quality of life of the American people," he said. Extra spending on the military and border security will be paid in part through ending clean energy and electric vehicle subsidies, a factor triggering a bitter public feud between Trump and former supporter Elon Musk. -AFP
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Nothing so shocking as a democratic-socialist in New York
Even here, at the bottom of the world, the phenomenon that is Zohran Mamdani is making an impact. In case you have been living under a rock for the past fortnight, Zohran Mamdani is the 33-year-old democratic-socialist Muslim who has just become the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for mayor of New York City. Just six months ago this young, energetic, and extraordinarily telegenic New York assemblyperson (member of the state legislature) was given a 6% chance of winning. By the evening of 24 June had amassed 43% of the popular vote in the primary election — 7 points ahead of the Democratic Party's favoured candidate, former New York governor Andrew Cuomo. Described by President Donald Trump as "a 100% communist lunatic", Mamdani, by his success, has set the entire American political class back on its heels. New York City, with a population of 10 million, is America's largest city. It is also the place where cultural trends and political movements get started. What happens in New York will, almost invariably, end up happening in your neighbourhood. That is what is generating so much vitriol and bile on the Right. That is the reason the airwaves are carrying red-baiting messages last heard at such volume 70 years ago during the hearings of Senator Joe McCarthy's House un-American activities committee. "Are you now, or have you ever been, a card-carrying member of the Communist Party?" That was the question McCarthy's witch-hunters put to terrified American citizens subpoenaed to testify before Congress. There was no right answer. If you said "Yes" then your career was over. If you answered "No" — and you were, or had been, a party member — then you would face perjury charges. And if, as many chose to do, you opted to "plead the Fifth" (the constitutional amendment protecting citizens against self-incrimination) then the committee members just smirked and exchanged knowing glances. But, that was then, and this is now. Joe Stalin is long dead, and so is the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. For those born after 1991, the Cold War might as well be the Peloponnesian War. In the early-1950s, however, the USSR loomed like a fearsome giant over Western Europe. The discovery, in 1949, that Stalin's "Reds" — ably assisted by their elaborate spy networks in the US and the United Kingdom — had acquired atomic weapons, infuriated the American population. (In much the same way a discovery that Iran had amassed a small arsenal of nuclear weapons would infuriate Americans today.) 1949 was also the year in which Mao Zedong, leader of the Chinese Communist Party, drove the US-aligned government of Chiang Kai-shek into exile on the island of Formosa (now Taiwan) and proclaimed the Peoples Republic of China. Less than a year after that, in June 1950, the Cold War turned very hot indeed as the Moscow and Beijing-backed communist government of North Korea attacked the US-backed capitalist government of South Korea. In the early 1950s communists were very scary people. Indeed, in the eyes of many Americans (some of them in very high places) communism was (gulp!) winning. But that was then, and this is now. We (that is to say, the capitalists) won, you (that is to say the communists) lost. But, if that is true, then why are the Reds not eating it? Have they not received the memo about "The End of History"? It would seem not. Which is why Mamdani's victory has come as such a shock. A self-proclaimed "democratic-socialist" should have about the same chance of becoming the mayor of New York City as — what? — a convicted felon becoming president of the United States. Ummm ... Bob Dylan gets it: People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range. You see, I used to care, but Things have changed. You could call Mamdani a communist and all he would do is deliver a witty little lecture about the difference between democratic-socialism and authoritarian communism. Then he would release a cut-down version on TikTok and watch it go viral. Pretty soon "Hot Girls for Zohran" (yes, they're a thing!) would start wearing T-shirts saying "I only date Reds". Things really have changed. And who in our neighbourhood gets it? Labour? "Hot Girls for Chippie"? Unlikely. Te Pati Māori? Possibly. The Greens? Definitely! Why else would Chloe Swarbrick be folding away her keffiyeh and raising the Red Flag? ■Chris Trotter is an Auckland writer and commentator.
