NDA govt firm on BC welfare, say ministers
State ministers Anagani Satya Prasad (Stamps and registration), S Savitha (BC welfare) and Satya Kumar Yadav (Medical & health) attended the BC Atmagourava Bharosa meet in the city on Sunday.
Anagani Satya Prasad criticised the previous YSRCP government, accusing it of humiliating BC communities and undermining their dignity.
He emphasised that CM Chandrababu Naidu has played a key role in restoring the community's self-respect, declaring that the TDP is the only party BCs can truly depend on.
Satya Kumar Yadav highlighted the alliance government's prioritisation of BC welfare, noting their significant share in all welfare schemes. Adding to this, S. Savitha reaffirmed the state government's commitment to extending benefits to every last member of the Backward Classes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
9 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Kavitha backs Telangana government on BC quota, slams BRS for opposing ordinance
HYDERABAD: BRS MLC and Telangana Jagruthi president K Kavitha on Thursday supported the state government on BC reservations while slamming her own party for opposing the move. During an informal chat with reporters, Kavitha said that the draft ordinance prepared by the state government for BC quota was 'absolutely correct' and the BRS leaders opposing it was 'wrong'. Kavitha went a step further and said that the BRS had no other option but to toe her line on BC reservations. 'The BRS leaders may take four days' time to accept it,' she said. 'Amending the 2018 Act and bringing the ordinance to provide 42 per cent reservations to BCs in local body elections was justified,' Kavitha added. 'I have supported the ordinance only after discussing it with legal experts,' she said. The former MP lamented that the BRS leaders did not respond to the derogatory comments made against her by MLC Ch Naveen Kumar alias Teenmaar Mallanna and added that she would leave it to the wisdom of the BRS leaders. Meanwhile, at a press conference, Kavitha demanded that Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy should lead an all-party delegation to Delhi, coinciding with the commencement of the Parliament session next week, to bring pressure on the Centre to protect the interests of Telangana regarding the Banakacherla project. The delegation should also make all possible efforts to ensure early clearance for the Bill on 42 per cent reservations for BCs in education, employment and public life, pending with the President.
Hans India
11 hours ago
- Hans India
42% BC quota: ‘State govt to face many legal hurdles for taking ordinance route'
The Telangana Government has chosen the Ordinance Route for BC Reservations in Panchayat Polls, which has many legal and political ramifications. This ordinance route, just before the upcoming Panchayat elections, is to enhance Backward Classes (BC) reservations in local bodies. This move carries serious legal and political implications, especially since it attempts to exceed the 50% reservation ceiling imposed by the Supreme Court. The Triple Test Doctrine The Supreme Court, in K. Krishnamurthy v. Union of India (2010) and reaffirmed in Vikas Kishanrao Gawali v. State of Maharashtra (2021), laid down the Triple Test for granting OBC reservations in local bodies: ♦ Empirical Identification: A rigorous study identifying social and educational backwardness. ♦ Political Backwardness Analysis: Unit-wise examination of backwardness for each local body to determine the exact quota percentage. ♦ 50% Cap Compliance: The total reservation should not exceed 50%, unless backed by extraordinary justification based on quantifiable data. The Supreme Court has categorically held that this ceiling is part of the basic structure of equality, and any deviation requires robust evidence and exceptional circumstances. Telangana's Plan and Legal Complexities The Telangana Cabinet approved a draft ordinance to implement 42% BC reservation in Panchayat Raj institutions, supported by two Bills already passed in the State Assembly for BC reservations in education and employment. The percentage is based on a comprehensive caste survey report submitted to the BC Commission headed by B. Venkateshwara Rao. Once approved by the Governor, the ordinance will apply this enhanced quota in the upcoming local body elections. However, this raises several constitutional and judicial concerns: ♦ The Governor, Jishnu Dev Varma, is reportedly seeking legal opinion before giving assent. ♦ There are doubts about the legality of using an ordinance to bypass pending constitutional processes, as two original Bills are still with the President for assent. ♦ The Telangana High Court, while directing the government to conduct local body elections by September 30, did not address the reservation policy. Using this as urgency for an ordinance could be seen as colourable legislation- a misuse of power for political ends. Conflict with the Supreme Court's 50% Ceiling The proposal directly challenges the SC's rulings in Indra Sawhney and subsequent cases, which strictly maintain that reservations should not cross 50%, except in rare situations backed by empirical data and transparency. Telangana argues that its caste survey shows 56% of the population belongs to BC communities, including BC Muslims, thus creating an 'extraordinary situation.' However, the report remains confidential, raising questions: ♦ Can empowerment of BCs be achieved without transparency and accountability? ♦ Does withholding the report undermine public trust and judicial scrutiny? Key Constitutional Issues ♦ Article 213(1)(a) – The Governor cannot promulgate an ordinance on a subject requiring the President's prior sanction. Here, the subject overlaps with pending Bills awaiting Presidential assent, making the ordinance potentially unconstitutional. ♦ Doctrine of Colourable Legislation – Proroguing the Assembly at 3 PM and sending an ordinance on the same subject at 4 PM indicates an attempt to circumvent constitutional checks, disturbing the delicate federal balance. ♦ Violation of Equality Principle – A sudden move to exceed 50% without full disclosure of data and compliance with the triple test is open to challenge as a breach of constitutional equality. ♦ Subversion of Presidential Power – Proceeding with an ordinance while the Bills are pending before the President could be viewed as undermining Article 200 and 201 processes. Political Dimension The urgency behind this ordinance appears linked to Panchayat elections and political gains among BC voters. Earlier attempts to pass similar laws were stalled at the central level, with state leaders even urging the Centre to include enhanced BC quota in the Ninth Schedule to shield it from judicial review. Why Was the Education and Employment Bill Passed? Passing two significant Bills—on education and employment—alongside Panchayat reservations indicates a broader BC empowerment strategy. However, pushing an ordinance while Bills are with the President creates an impression of political expediency rather than constitutional propriety. Legal Challenges The proposed ordinance, if signed by the Governor, will face serious legal challenges for violating: ♦ Supreme Court precedents on reservation limits ♦ Article 213(1)(a) of the Constitution, and ♦ Principles of transparency and equality. The controversy underscores a fundamental question: Can social justice measures be pushed through opaque, politically timed ordinances, bypassing constitutional safeguards? The answer will likely emerge in the courts in the coming months.
Hans India
11 hours ago
- Hans India
Bandi Sanjay urges clarity, cooperation on inter-state water disputes
Hyderabad: Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar expressed deep concern over the ongoing discord between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh regarding the Banakacherla issue. Speaking at a media conference in Huzurabad, the Minister emphasized that it is inappropriate for both states to issue conflicting public statements. At the same time, efforts are being made to resolve longstanding water disputes. He said that the Central Government recently facilitated a meeting between the Chief Ministers of the two Telugu states to address water-sharing issues harmoniously. Despite the states presenting differing agendas, the Center appointed an expert committee comprising senior officials and specialists to examine the concerns fairly and equitably. The Minister called this the Center's first success in resolving the matter and urged both governments to cooperate fully with the newly formed committee. Bandi Sanjay welcomed Telangana CM Revanth Reddy's acknowledgement of the Center's constructive role. However, he expressed surprise at the contradictory remarks made by the states' leaders following the meeting. He called for transparency regarding the discussions held. The Minister also condemned alleged attempts by political parties to exploit water disputes for electoral gains and highlighted concerns over forest land disagreements being politicized. He criticized the previous BRS government's actions regarding Krishna water sharing, accusing them of compromising Telangana's interests. Addressing reservation issues, Bandi Sanjay reaffirmed the BJP's support for 42% reservation for Backward Classes (BCs), rejecting any proposal that diverts a portion of this to religious communities. He cited past electoral outcomes to caution against potential injustices to BCs in local governance. In addition, Sanjay Kumar condemned corruption in the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project (KLIP), citing the recent ACB raids. He accused both Congress and BRS of resorting to political theatrics and collusion. He expressed that the Center is prepared to investigate all alleged scams by the CBI. Regarding the ongoing phone tapping case, Bandi Sanjay confirmed he will cooperate with SIT authorities and attend the scheduled inquiry on July 24.
