
Oman Announces 5% Income Tax: Everything You Need to Know
Oman will introduce the Gulf region's first personal income tax on high earners starting January 1, 2028, marking a historic shift in its fiscal strategy.
The personal income tax (PIT) for high earners marks a major shift in Oman's fiscal policy as part of the broader Vision 2040 agenda to diversify national income and ensure long-term financial sustainability.
The Personal Income Tax Law, issued by Royal Decree No. 56/2025, comprises 76 articles across 16 chapters. It imposes a 5 per cent tax on the taxable income of individuals whose gross annual income exceeds OR42,000 ($109,100), derived from income categories defined in the legislation.
The law will officially come into force at the start of 2028. Effective Date: January 2028
Threshold: Income above OR42,000 ($109,100) annually
Tax Rate: 5 per cent
Exemptions: 99 per cent of citizens, plus deductions for key social needs
Purpose: Fiscal sustainability, economic diversification, social equity
Impact: Minimal GDP effect, no expected impact on foreign investment
Dr. Said Mohammed Al Saqri, Minister of Economy, said: 'The tax serves as a new revenue stream to diversify public income sources and mitigate risks associated with reliance on oil as the primary revenue source.
'It will help maintain current levels of social and service spending while preserving Oman's achievements in financial and economic stability under 'Oman Vision 2040' and its first executive phase, the Tenth Five-Year Plan (2021-2025).'
According to Oman's Tax Authority, the exemption threshold was determined after a comprehensive economic and social impact study based on income data from multiple government bodies.
As a result, approximately 99 per cent of Omani citizens will not be affected by the tax.
To address social equity, the law includes deductions for education, healthcare, housing, zakat, donations, and inheritance, among others.
Karima Mubarak Al Saadi, Director of the Personal Income Tax Project, confirmed that all necessary preparations and requirements for implementing the tax have been completed.
The Tax Authority confirmed the development of a digital tax declaration system integrated with other government entities to promote voluntary compliance.
The executive regulations of the law will be issued within one year of its publication in the Official Gazette.
Currently, 68 per cent to 85 per cent of Oman's income is derived from oil and gas, depending on global prices.
While prices have been favourable recently, the government warns of long-term volatility. The PIT law seeks to secure sustainable funding and mitigate reliance on hydrocarbons.
Dr. Said Mohammed Al Saqri, explained that the (PIT) is a fiscal tool adopted by most countries worldwide as a key revenue source to fund state-provided services.
More than 190 countries impose this tax, and in many, income taxes constitute the largest component of total tax revenues at federal and local levels, financing public goods and services.
He noted that implementing the tax in Oman will yield significant economic benefits, supporting income diversification strategies and long-term fiscal stability as a pillar of economic growth.
He added that the foreign investment is expected to remain unaffected, as the tax applies to individuals—not corporate entities—and Oman's rates remain competitive globally, the minister concluded.
The 2025 national budget allocates more than OR5bn ($13bn) to essential services: Education: 39 per cent
Healthcare: 24 per cent
Social Protection: 28 per cent
The Social Protection Fund currently supports over 2 million beneficiaries monthly, with PIT revenue expected to further strengthen the program.
Also read: Oman Expands Plastic Bag Ban To Retail And Food Sectors In Third Phase Of National Plan
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Insider
4 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Bahrain: Court Restores Marital Home To Husband After Sham Sale To Ex-Wife
A man has won back ownership of his home after the High Civil Court ruled that a BD270,000 property transfer to his ex-wife was a sham intended only to protect the asset. The court found that the sale contract between the couple was not genuine and ordered the house to be returned to the husband's name. The decision followed the submission of a signed statement from the ex-wife, confirming that the sale was only on paper and that her husband had remained the rightful owner throughout. The statement, dated 21 February 2010, was presented by the man's lawyer, Zuhair Abdullatif. The court deemed it legally binding, noting that the ex-wife neither denied her signature nor challenged the content. Under Bahraini law, a private document stands as valid unless its signature is explicitly denied. The man had purchased the home in early 2010 but soon faced financial difficulties. To protect the property, he transferred it to his wife's name in a fictitious sale, trusting she would safeguard it. Just one day after the transfer, the property was registered in her name. Less than a year later, she divorced him through khula, a form of wife-initiated divorce. Despite efforts to resolve the matter privately over the years, the ex-wife refused to return the property and even threatened to sell it. The man eventually took legal action, presenting the court with his ex-wife's written admission that the deal had been for formality only. In its ruling, the court referred to precedents set by the Court of Cassation, affirming that in sham transactions, the true intent of the parties takes precedence over the registered deed. If it can be proven that a transfer was only symbolic, actual ownership must be honoured. The court concluded that the sale was not real and ordered the Survey and Land Registration Bureau to remove the ex-wife's name and reissue the property deed in the husband's name.


Gulf Insider
5 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Bahrain: Woman Wins 25-Year Legal Battle To Register Home
After a 25-year legal struggle, a woman has finally secured ownership of her home, following a ruling by the High Civil Appeals Court that upheld the validity of a property sale contract once deemed invalid. The dispute dates back to the year 2000, when the woman purchased the house for BD80,000. She paid the amount in three instalments— BD40,000 followed by two payments of BD20,000—to an agent representing the heirs of the deceased property owner. Although she received the property documents, she was unable to register the home in her name due to a 17-year restriction imposed by the Ministry of Housing, which barred property transfers during that period. The situation worsened when the property was seized by the Execution Court to settle a debt owed by one of the heirs, who had never formally transferred the property title. The court ordered the house be sold. In response, the woman filed a lawsuit to enforce her ownership rights. However, the First Instance Court declared the contract void, citing the restriction that was in effect at the time of sale. Her lawyer, Nabeel Al Qassab, appealed the ruling and submitted new evidence, including powers of attorney from the heirs authorising her to complete the title transfer. He argued that this constituted their approval of the original sale. Despite this, the Appeals Court initially upheld the lower court's decision. The case then went to the Court of Cassation, which overturned the verdict and sent it back to the Appeals Court for review. Upon reconsideration, the Appeals Court ruled that the powers of attorney clearly demonstrated the heirs' ratification of the transaction—even if the agent lacked authority at the time of sale. Under Article 436 of Bahrain's Civil Code, such ratification validates a contract if it meets key conditions: mutual consent, a defined property, a lawful purpose, and an agreed price. With those elements confirmed, the court ruled in the woman's favour and ordered the property to be officially registered in her name—bringing an end to a dispute that had lasted a quarter of a century.


Daily Tribune
14 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Woman wins 25- year legal battle to register home
After a 25-year legal struggle, a woman has finally secured ownership of her home, following a ruling by the High Civil Appeals Court that upheld the validity of a property sale contract once deemed invalid. The dispute dates back to the year 2000, when the woman purchased the house for BD80,000. She paid the amount in three instalments— BD40,000 followed by two payments of BD20,000—to an agent representing the heirs of the deceased property owner. Although she received the property documents, she was unable to register the home in her name due to a 17-year restriction imposed by the Ministry of Housing, which barred property transfers during that period. The situation worsened when the property was seized by the Execution Court to settle a debt owed by one of the heirs, who had never formally transferred the property title. The court ordered the house be sold. In response, the woman filed a lawsuit to enforce her ownership rights. However, the First Instance Court declared the contract void, citing the restriction that was in effect at the time of sale. Her lawyer, Nabeel Al Qassab, appealed the ruling and submitted new evidence, including powers of attorney from the heirs authorising her to complete the title transfer. He argued that this constituted their approval of the original sale. Despite this, the Appeals Court initially upheld the lower court's decision. The case then went to the Court of Cassation, which overturned the verdict and sent it back to the Appeals Court for review. Upon reconsideration, the Appeals Court ruled that the powers of attorney clearly demonstrated the heirs' ratification of the transaction—even if the agent lacked authority at the time of sale. Under Article 436 of Bahrain's Civil Code, such ratification validates a contract if it meets key conditions: mutual consent, a defined property, a lawful purpose, and an agreed price. With those elements confirmed, the court ruled in the woman's favour and ordered the property to be officially registered in her name—bringing an end to a dispute that had lasted a quarter of a century.