Second Air India 787 Incident in 4 Days Sparks Fresh Safety Concerns
CBS News reported that Flight AI315 departed as scheduled from Hong Kong but turned around midair after pilots reported a mechanical concern. The aircraft landed safely at approximately 1 p.m. local time and was undergoing checks "as a matter of abundant precaution," Air India said in a statement.
The incident follows Thursday's catastrophic crash of Flight AI171, also a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, which slammed into a residential area in Ahmedabad, India, just minutes after takeoff. That crash claimed the lives of 241 passengers and crew, along with at least 29 people on the ground. One British passenger survived.The timing and aircraft model overlap has raised eyebrows. Both flights were 787 Dreamliners, and both events occurred within days of each other. While no injuries were reported in Monday's turnback, the proximity to Thursday's tragedy has heightened public scrutiny.
In response to the crash, Indian aviation authorities ordered Air India to conduct enhanced safety checks on all 787 aircraft in its fleet. Despite that, no orders have been issued to ground the aircraft.
Boeing has not released a statement regarding the Hong Kong incident but is reportedly assisting with the ongoing investigation into the Ahmedabad crash.
Air India has arranged alternative travel for the affected Hong Kong passengers.
More than 360 Boeing 787-8 aircraft are currently in service worldwide. American Airlines operates the largest number of them. The model is prized for its fuel efficiency but has had a complicated safety history.
While Monday's incident ended without injury, two serious events involving the same aircraft type in under a week have reignited questions about reliability and whether more stringent oversight is now overdue.Second Air India 787 Incident in 4 Days Sparks Fresh Safety Concerns first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 16, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former CBS anchor slams Paramount settlement with Trump: ‘It was a sellout'
A former CBS News anchor and 60 minutes correspondent, Dan Rather, has blasted the $16m settlement between Paramount, the parent company of CBS News, and Donald Trump, calling it a 'sad day for journalism'. 'It's a sad day for 60 Minutes and CBS News,' Rather, a veteran journalist who was a CBS News anchor for over 20 years, told Variety in an interview published on Wednesday. 'I hope people will read the details of this and understand what it was. It was distortion by the president and a kneeling down and saying, 'yes, sir,' by billionaire corporate owners.' Last November, Trump sued CBS News, claiming that the network's interview with the Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, had been doctored to portray her in a favorable light – which he alleged amounted to 'election interference'. Related: Paramount settles with Trump for $16m over '60 Minutes' Kamala Harris interview Many legal experts had widely dismissed the lawsuit as 'meritless' and unlikely to hold up under the first amendment, but on Wednesday Paramount announced that it had agreed to pay Trump $16m to settle the case over the interview that was broadcast on the CBS News program 60 Minutes. The settlement comes as Paramount is preparing for a $8bn merger with Skydance Media, which requires approval from the US Federal Communications Commission. Paramount has said that the lawsuit is separate from the company's merger. A spokesperson for Trump's legal team said in a statement to the Guardian that 'With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit. 'CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle,' the spokesperson added. According to Wednesday's announcement, the settlement funds will not be paid to Trump directly, but instead would be allocated to Trump's future presidential library. The settlement did not include an apology. Rather told Variety on Wednesday that in his opinion 'you settle a lawsuit when you've done something wrong' and '60 minutes did nothing wrong, it followed accepted journalistic practices'. 'Lawyers almost unanimously said the case wouldn't stand up in court,' he said. Ultimately though, Rather said he was disappointed but not surprised by the settlement. 'Big billionaire businesspeople make decisions about money,' he said. 'We could always hope that they will make an exception when it comes to freedom of the press, but it wasn't to be. 'Trump knew if he put the pressure on and threatened and just held that they would fold, because there's too much money on the table,' Rather said. 'Trump is now forcing a whole news organization to pay millions of dollars for doing something protected by the constitution – which is, of course, free and independent reporting. Now, you take today's sellout. And that's what it was: It was a sellout to extortion by the president. Who can now say where all this ends?' He continued: 'It has to do with not just journalism, but more importantly, with the country as a whole. What kind of country we're going to have, what kind of country we're going to be. If major news organizations continue to kneel before power and stop trying to hold the powerful accountable, then we all lose.' In his more than 60 years in journalism, Rather told Variety he had never seen the profession face the kind of challenges as those it faces today. 'Journalism has had its trials and tribulations before, and it takes courage to just soldier on,' Rather said. 'Keep trying, keep fighting. It takes guts to do that. And I know the people at CBS News, and particularly those at 60 Minutes, they'll do their dead level best under these circumstances. But the question is what [is] this development and the message it sends to us. And that's what I'm trying to concentrate on.'
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer Says He's 'Not Going to Fight' Joby Aviation
Joby Aviation, Inc. (NYSE:JOBY) is one of the 22 stocks Jim Cramer recently talked about. During the lightning round, a caller inquired about the company, and Cramer commented: 'I'm going to do a twofer because I'm in the mood for the $9, $10 stocks. Archer and Joby, what can I say? I'm not going to fight them. Boeing has a flying car. Why can't they?' A futuristic electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft soaring through the sky. Joby Aviation (NYSE:JOBY) designs electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft for use in air mobility services. The company plans to introduce an app-based platform to provide aerial ridesharing for passenger transportation. Over the past year, JOBY stock gained more than 104%. Additionally, in early June, when Cramer was asked about the company, he said: 'You know what, remember a couple of weeks ago I said I was done with the knocking on the ones that don't make money. Joby is real. I think Archer is real… But Joby is good and I'm going with it and I am with you… Joby is okay. I'm even playing some Joby music.' While we acknowledge the potential of JOBY as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Social Security Tax U-Turn — What Retirees Need To Know Now
On the campaign trail, President Donald Trump promised over and over that he wanted to end taxes on Social Security — a vow that retirees backed. However, in his 'Big Beautiful Bill,' there is no mention of his pledge. Instead, there is a proposal to give seniors over 65 a $4,000 deduction that could help lower taxes, CBS News reported. Learn More: Read Next: With the House having officially passed the bill on July 3, seniors will not get the tax break Trump guaranteed. Here's why the elimination of Social Security taxes is not in the bill, and what retirees should know. While plenty of retirees loved the idea of not paying taxes on Social Security, critics voiced concern over the unrealistic and unaffordable proposal. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities stated it would be 'unwise' because of the cost factor, and money expert and founder of Be Fluent in Finance Andrew Lokenauth agreed. 'Removing Social Security taxes would've cost the program about $45 billion annually,' he said. 'The program's already facing serious funding issues, and taking away this revenue stream would've been like throwing gasoline on a fire.' He added, 'From what I've seen working with retirement planning, the Social Security trust fund's gonna run dry by 2033, and removing the tax would've made that happen even faster. The math just didn't work — and I think Trump's team knew it.' Be Aware: It's clear Trump broke his promise and is trying to rectify it with a $4,000 deduction called the 'enhanced deduction for seniors,' per CBS. According to Lokenauth, it can help some retirees. 'The temporary standard deduction increase is actually pretty significant for lower-income seniors,' he said. ' I worked with a client last month who'd benefit about $880 annually from this change — she's single, 68 and makes about $40K.' He went on to explain that, 'It's not as generous as eliminating Social Security taxes completely — that could've saved some retirees $2-3K annually — but it's targeted at folks who need it most.' But the concession wouldn't help everyone on Social Security. The maximum Social Security benefit in 2025 is $5,108/month, or $61,296 a year. 'If a retiree has even modest supplemental income — from a pension, IRA withdrawals or rental income — they're likely hitting the 85% taxable range, so no tax relief on Social Security means many retirees are handing Uncle Sam more of their fixed income than they expected,' Peter Diamond, a Federally Licensed Tax, Accounting, Real Estate, and Structure and Certified Bankability Expert® explained. With that in mind, Diamond said most retirees don't have other revenue sources. 'They're not flipping properties or trading options on their phones,' he said. 'They're living off what they saved, and Social Security is often the biggest piece. So when a campaign says you won't be taxed, then quietly drops it later? That's not just a political pivot — it's a punch to the wallet.' A major thing to note is that if Social Security is your only income, it's likely you won't pay federal tax. 'But once you hit certain income thresholds, the IRS starts dipping its hand in,' Diamond said. As of 2025, according to T. Rowe Price: If you're single and your combined income (that's adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + 50% of your Social Security) is: Over $25,000, up to 50% of your benefits may be taxable. Over $34,000, up to 85% may be taxable. For married couples filing jointly: Over $32,000, up to 50% is taxable. Over $44,000, up to 85% is taxable. According to Lokenauth the income thresholds haven't changed since the 80s, which is 'nuts.' 'Due to inflation, about 50% of seniors now pay these taxes versus just 10% when implemented, and I see this impact every day — middle-class retirees getting pushed into higher tax brackets because these thresholds are never adjusted for inflation,' he explained. He added, 'From my experience working with retirees, most would rather see those thresholds updated than eliminate the tax entirely. That'd be a more targeted fix that wouldn't threaten Social Security's stability.' Another important key element to keep in mind regarding Social Security is knowing your strategy, meaning when you plan on collecting your benefits. The longer you wait, the higher monthly payment you'll receive. 'While you become eligible to claim your own Social Security benefits at age 62, that might not be the best filing strategy for you,' said Eric Mangold, CWS Founder of Argosy Wealth Management. This is especially true for married couples who could gain potential spousal benefits. According to Mangold, 'you should know what filing strategy makes the most sense for you and puts the most money in your pocket.' He explained, 'How you choose to file can mean the difference of tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of dollars over the course of your retirement.' There's no denying that Trump walked back his pledge to end Social Security taxes. He continued to make promises knowing the program is financially struggling, but not including the proposal in the bill was the right choice, according to Lokenauth because it would have worsened the situation. 'The program needs every revenue stream it can get,' he said. 'While Trump's original promise sounded great, it would've accelerated the program's financial problems.' Lokenauth explained, 'The standard deduction boost is actually smart policy. It helps lower-income seniors who really need it — I've seen firsthand how an extra $500 to $1000 annually can make a real difference for many of my retired clients living on fixed incomes.' Trump flipped his stance, and retirees will not receive the tax break on Social Security he vowed. While it would have been a win for middle-class retirees, it would have bankrupted the program, according to experts. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement The 5 Car Brands Named the Least Reliable of 2025 This article originally appeared on Trump's Social Security Tax U-Turn — What Retirees Need To Know Now
