Convention authority to pay for Gary Air Show with commissioner's help
Lake County Commissioner Kyle Allen Jr., D-1, is chipping in $25,000 toward the show, SSCVA Events and Facilities Chief Kristin Taylor told the CVA Board at its July 18 meeting. The board approved an interlocal agreement with commissioners with a 9-0 vote.
'We've now raised $200,000 more than last year and $150,000 more than in 2023,' Taylor said.
'We keep having bad weather, but you keep raising more money each year,' Board President Andy Qunell said.
Allen had the money to give via a lawsuit settlement with Monsanto, he told the Post-Tribune Tuesday. He and Commissioners Mike Repay, D-2, and Jerry Tippy, R-3, divided the settlement three ways to spend in the community as they see fit.
'I've spent mine on various charitable causes, anywhere from $500 to bigger donations like the air show,' Allen said.
The Gary Air Show came back to Northwest Indiana in 2023 — with the SSCVA as its sponsor — after a seven-year hiatus for various reasons, including the COVID-19 pandemic and financial challenges, the Post-Tribune previously reported. Launched in 2000 by former Gary Mayor Scott King, the city of Gary took over the airshow operations from SSCVA in 2015 after SSCVA started sponsoring it in 2006 because of the city's financial woes.
Back then, officials estimated the two-day show cost about $350,000 and drew thousands to the lakefront. The city offset some of that cost in 2015 when it started charging $30, $20 and $10 for parking, the Post-Tribune reported.
Last year, the air show cost $580,000, including a $50,000 monetary contribution and an in-kind security donation from the city of Gary, the Post-Tribune previously reported, while it cost $630,000 in 2023. The city will provide in-kind security again this year, Taylor said.
In other business, the CVA is 'working really hard' to reconcile a -$266,198.48 balance in its legal fund, Chief Financial Officer Nicole Wolverton and President and CEO Phil Taillon told the Post-Tribune. Between scaling back event sponsorships and other costs, and Taylor's fundraising efforts, Wolverton expects they'll be able to transfer funds to cover the shortfall before the end of the fiscal year, she said.
According to the organization's June Appropriations Report, the CVA has spent $406,198.48 in legal fees this year after allocating $150,000 for legal funds in 2025.
'I'm not concerned that we won't be able to cover it,' Taillon said of the deficit, adding that he plans to go before the Lake County Council before it's time for the CVA to work on its 2026 budget to explain where they are in the lawsuit with former CVA President and CEO Speros Batistatos.
Batistatos sued the SSCVA in August 2022, one month after being fired, alleging the agency violated the law and mishandled contract renegotiations because of his age and misspent federal Payroll Protection Plan funds in violation of the CARES Act.
The county council on Nov. 12, with Lake County Councilman Randy Niemeyer, R-Cedar Lake, voting against it, approved the SSCVA's proposed 2025 budget of $6,614,000, a $15,000 increase from the agency's 2024 numbers, according to Post-Tribune archives.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
European wine and spirits makers urge 0% tariffs as EU-U.S. deal leaves sector in the dark
European wine and spirit makers are viewing their exclusion from the newly-etched U.S.-EU trade deal with caution as industry bodies call for a sector specific carve-out. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Sunday that a framework deal imposing 15% tariffs on EU goods imported to the U.S. did not contain any decision regarding the wine and spirits industry, adding that an agreement for the sector would be examined in the coming weeks. An industry-wide reprieve would provide much-needed relief for the spirits sector, which has been under pressure amid waning consumer spending and shifting consumption habits. Spirits stocks Pernod Ricard, Remy Cointreau, Diageo and Davide Campari ticked moderately higher early Monday on hopes of a carve-out, before uncertainty seeped in, paring gains. Brewers — which are typically less impacted by tariffs given their localized production — traded lower, after Heineken posted better-than-expected first half results but pointed to softening consumer sentiment in the U.S. and Europe. The Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins (CEEV), which represents the European wine industry, called for the sector to be included in the final list of products covered in a proposed zero-for-zero tariff arrangement. "[We] are watching with great anticipation the outcome of the upcoming negotiations regarding the list of products that will be included under the 0-for-0 tariff arrangement, among them some agricultural products" said Marzia Varvaglione, president of CEEV, in a Sunday statement. "We truly believe the trade of wine is of great benefit for both EU and U.S. companies," she added. Under the new U.S.-EU trade deal, a mutual zero tariff rate has been agreed for certain strategic products, including "all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generics [drugs], semiconductor equipment." Discussions around other exclusions, meanwhile, remain underway. Chris Swonger, CEO and president of the U.S.'s Distilled Spirits Council, similarly said that he was hopeful for an industry-wide reprieve. "We are optimistic that in the days ahead this positive meeting and agreement will lead to a return to zero-for-zero tariffs for U.S. and EU spirits products," Swonger said in a statement. Alcohol is one of the EU's leading exports to the U.S., accounting for around 9 billion euros ($10.5 billion) in 2024, according to Eurostat data. The U.S., meanwhile, exported 1.2 billion worth of spirits alone to the 27-country bloc in 2024, Distilled Spirits Council data shows. European spirit makers have posted several consecutive quarters of weak sales as the sector has been caught in the crosshairs of trade tensions, while a post-Covid slowdown has suppressed spending. Verushka Shetty, equity analyst at Morningstar, said uncertainty around tariffs would weigh on drinks makers in the near-term, even as firms plan mitigating measures such as price hikes. "We expect a negative impact on margins across our spirits coverage, however we expect the impact to be limited with pricing actions," he wrote in a note. CEEV, meanwhile, forecast that any move to impose tariffs would force European wine makers to increase prices and could "eject" some EU companies from the U.S. market entirely. According to CEEV, the U.S.' previous 10% broad-based tariffs on EU imports, imposed during President Donald Trump's 90-day tariff pause, led to an approximate 12% decline in turnover for wine producers. "While producers may absorb part of the increase to lessen the impact on consumers, this approach is not always feasible or effective," CEEV Secretary General Dr Ignacio Sanchez Recarte told CNBC via email.
Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
‘Pretty Neutral' on Stocks to Year's End: Calvasina
00:00 I've got to say, just looking through your note, you do seem a lot more measured than some of your Southside peers who start to dust off their bull case Upside scenario playbook. What has you remaining a little bit more conservative right now? So, look, I mean, markets have run up tremendously and we actually have done this work where we looked back at the market rebound nine months down the road off of things like the 2010 2011 growth scares, 2018, kind of all the big 10% plus drops except for the COVID recession of 2020 that we've seen since the GFC. And we are recovering faster than any of them and we're about where we deserve to be. If you look at the average of those in nine months time in December. So we think markets have already pulled forward a tremendous amount of good news. And that's not to say, you know, that we're feel super bearish from here. We feel pretty neutral, you know, looking at stocks through the end of the year. What do you make of the fact we have recovered so quickly? Is it a change in investor behavior? Is something different this time around from previous rebounds? So I think that what is really unusual is that perhaps far earlier than any point in time that I can remember in my career, people are already looking to next year. And if you go back to June, all I was hearing was 20, 26, 20, 26, 2026. We're done with 2025, you know, and as we're getting all these headlines, you know, on the trade deals, I'm sort of, you know, kind of laughing to myself in my head, like who was worried about the is certainly not any of the people I was talking to in June where there was an assumption that, you know, we didn't really know quite what all the details were, but that things, you know, we were going to get deals done right. There were just not a lot of concerns about tariffs in the meetings, frankly, that I had at the end of the second quarter. What about what you've heard from companies and how much concern they're expressing in this earnings season? I don't think that the corporate sentiment level matches what we've seen from investors and what we've seen priced into markets. And, you know, if you want to just sort of take my opinion out of it, look back at the Duke CFO survey, which came out right before reporting season, and we didn't see the same kind of inflection in sentiment that we had seen in things like the NFIB survey, things like the Eye Survey or even the consumer sentiment surveys. If you look at what we've sort of qualitatively been gathering the last couple of weeks, you know, we kind of just finished week to week one was all about financials and they sounded pretty good. You know, our tagline at the end of that was fine, but not fabulous. Maybe even they were a little bit more guarded than what we've been hearing from investors. Last week, though, we finally got both volume and breadth in terms of, you know, different industries and sectors participating. And it frankly did sound a bit more mixed. You know, we have had, you know, even as of last week, obviously not the news of the weekend, but we did have more clarity. And I was still seeing one company after another talking about fluidity was kind of the big word uncertainty. And certainly, you know, companies were saying things were better than the initial assumptions, but there was still some guarded ness.
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Russia's economy is now so militarized, it may keep expanding its army even after the Ukraine war
Russia's war machine has become such an integral part of its economic engine that its military industry is likely to keep expanding even after the fighting in Ukraine ends, according to a report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "The end of hostilities will not lead to a radical cut-off of military investment," wrote CSIS analysts in a report published on Thursday. Now in its fourth year, Russia's war with Ukraine continues even as Russian President Vladimir Putin's administration weathers sweeping Western sanctions. And while cracks are starting to show, the Russian economy may still be able to sustain the war effort for several more years, the report said. Defense spending is set to hit a post-Soviet record of 6.3% of GDP in 2025 and could climb even higher despite mounting signs of economic slowdown or recession. "Russia's economy appears sustainable for the next few years," the CSIS analysts wrote. They forecast that the Kremlin could maintain its war of attrition through at least 2027. 'Russia could be preparing for some kind of future confrontation with NATO' The CSIS report comes amid renewed scrutiny of Russia's economy. Manufacturing activity contracted last month, and employment has suffered. GDP growth slowed to 1.4% in the first quarter, down sharply from 4.5% in the previous quarter. Still, Russia has defied expectations thanks to its growing military-industrial complex. "Having become the most sanctioned country in the world, it has managed to maneuver around many economic constraints, keeping revenues from energy sales high and its budget balanced, investing in the military and defense industry, ramping up domestic production of weapons and equipment, and boosting economic growth," wrote the think tank analysts. Crucially, the militarized economy has built a broad base of political and economic stakeholders — from elites to ordinary workers — who benefit from continued conflict. That makes any significant drawdown in military activity politically and economically unlikely. Even if a ceasefire is reached, Russia may still be able to rebuild and expand its armed forces over the next decade. "Russia's war-induced socioeconomic changes have been so significant that the process of societal militarization is unlikely to stop even if the war in Ukraine were to end," wrote the CSIS analysts. The Kremlin's strategic posture hasn't softened either. CSIS suggests Russia is preparing for a long-term confrontation with NATO, using the war to modernize its forces and test Western resolve. Beyond conventional arms, Russia has ramped up hybrid warfare, including cyberattacks, disinformation, sabotage, political meddling, and strikes on critical infrastructure. These tools allow Moscow to operate aggressively across multiple fronts. "Despite being inferior to NATO in terms of its conventional capabilities, today's Russia represents a bigger challenge to European security than it did at the start of 2022," the CSIS analysts wrote. The Kremlin is learning from past failures, adapting quickly, and growing more confident in what it sees as a West unwilling to stop it. "Moscow's ongoing large-scale military reforms signal that Russia could be preparing for some kind of future confrontation with NATO within roughly the next decade—including even a large-scale conventional war," they wrote.
