Xiaomi 16 Ultra flagship may launch ahead of schedule: Here's what leaks suggest
The speculation gained momentum after Lu Weibing, a partner at Xiaomi Group and President of Xiaomi, took to Chinese social media platform Weibo to hint at the forthcoming device. Referring to the Xiaomi 16 Ultra as marking a 'new height of mobile imaging,' his statement effectively confirmed the handset's existence and ongoing partnership with German optics company Leica.
Adding to the buzz, known industry insider Digital Chat Station, citing translated information from Chinese sources, suggested that the flagship device might launch earlier than initially anticipated. The Xiaomi 16 Ultra is now expected to launch in China alongside the Xiaomi 16 and Xiaomi 16 Pro models, possibly within this calendar year.
For context, Xiaomi launched the 15 Ultra in China in February 2025, with the global unveiling taking place a month later at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. It was subsequently introduced in India at a price of ₹ 1,09,999 for the 16GB RAM and 512GB storage variant.
Early leaks point to significant hardware upgrades for the Xiaomi 16 Ultra. The device is said to house a 50MP primary camera sensor. Additionally, a 200MP periscope telephoto lens (1/1.28-inch sensor) and a 50MP Sony LYT600 sensor (1/2-inch) are expected to form part of its rear camera setup, continuing Xiaomi's focus on high-end mobile photography.
The smartphone is also tipped to feature a 6.8-inch LTPO display with 2K resolution and up to 120Hz refresh rate. Under the hood, it may run on Qualcomm's upcoming Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 chipset.
Powering the device could be a large battery, reportedly in the range of 7,000mAh to 7,500mAh, with support for 100W wired and 50W wireless charging.
More details are likely to emerge in the coming weeks, especially if Xiaomi is indeed planning to bring forward its launch timeline.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
Apple isn't leaving China. Its footprint is getting harder to see.
Apple's plans to make iPhones in India, components in Vietnam, and build new hubs across Southeast Asia reflect a meaningful effort to diversify away from China. But they tell only part of the story. In March, Apple CEO Tim Cook announced a new $99 million clean energy fund during a visit to Beijing. He didn't disclose project locations or recipients—only that Apple's commitment to China was 'expanding." The announcement came just two months before Chinese regulators delayed Apple's rollout of generative artificial intelligence features, the Financial Times reported. Those developments show how even one of China's most entrenched U.S. companies may face political and commercial friction as it tries to do business in both countries. As geopolitical pressure intensifies and investors look for clarity on decoupling, Apple's recent maneuvers offer a lesson for global businesses: A company need not leave China entirely so long as it can more effectively hide itself within it. Apple's behavior over the past several years shows it recalibrating its exposure to the actors and regions in China that carry reputational or regulatory risk. But it isn't ceasing to do business in China. Rather, Apple has stepped back from some of its direct affiliations and reduced its visibility without severing its ties to the business ecosystem in China, which remains dominated by the Chinese Communist Party. This model is instructive for other multinationals operating in China and other complex authoritarian environments. Confrontation and divestment are costly. Structural opacity, by contrast, offers flexibility—and protection. Apple needs to remain in good standing with regulators on both sides of the Pacific. That has led to unusual arrangements in China's western Xinjiang region. The Chinese Communist Party's policies of mass surveillance and forced labor there have deservedly drawn international condemnation. Congress passed the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act in 2021, banning imports tied to forced labor in Xinjiang. Many Western businesses have withdrawn entirely from doing business in Xinjiang. In 2016, Apple announced that it had taken minority stakes in four wind power projects in China as part of a strategy to decarbonize its supply chain. The projects were developed in collaboration with Goldwind, one of China's largest wind turbine makers. Goldwind has strong ties to state-led infrastructure planning and to Xinjiang. The company was formerly called Xinjiang Goldwind but dropped the word from its name in 2023. Though not sanctioned by the U.S., Goldwind has faced criticism for its ties to Xinjiang from European and U.S. politicians for its suspected ties to forced labor. An investigation by the Tech Transparency Project, a nonprofit organization, and The Information, a tech and business publication, linked Goldwind to state-run labor transfer programs and construction projects involving the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a U.S.-sanctioned paramilitary entity. U.S. pressure over forced labor in Xinjiang intensified in 2020. Companies such as H&M and Nike, which issued statements addressing forced labor allegations, faced backlash on social media in China. By 2021, Apple's affiliated entities no longer appeared as shareholders in the Goldwind wind projects in Xinjiang. Corporate filings, reviewed in a Chinese business registration database, indicate that the equity stakes were transferred to subsidiaries controlled by Goldwind. Apple didn't publicly disclose the move, and no mention appeared in its environmental or investor reporting: Apple's investment shift is being revealed here for the first time. Apple didn't respond to requests for comment. The company has addressed allegations of forced labor involving Xinjiang in at least one other case, saying it regularly audits its supply chain to avoid the practice. It cut ties with a Chinese supplier that had been accused of forced labor in 2021, Bloomberg reported. Apple may have found other investing strategies that allow it to maintain relationships with Chinese entities in less visible ways. In 2018, Apple had announced it and 10 Chinese suppliers would invest $300 million in China Clean Energy Fund. That fund allows Apple's capital to reach state-linked firms and potentially sensitive regions without appearing in public filings. Among the beneficiaries of the fund, disclosed in a Chinese business registration database, is China General Nuclear Power Group, a state-owned firm added to the U.S. Entity List in 2019 for military ties. U.S. companies face sharp restrictions on doing business with companies on the list. The initial clean energy fund, designed to last just four years, ended in 2022. This year, Apple announced a successor fund worth approximately $99 million during Cook's visit to Beijing—but this time disclosed neither project locations nor recipient companies, continuing its reliance on indirect investment vehicles. This isn't a retreat from China but a careful reconfiguration—one that allows Apple to meet its clean-energy goals while addressing government sensitivities in both the U.S. and China. In 2024, Apple ranked third for China exposure of large U.S. companies in Strategy Risks SR 250 rankings; it has since dropped to 27th. Apple continues to operate at scale within China's commercial and political systems, while relying on structures that make its presence less legible to outside observers. The company meets regulatory expectations in both Washington and Beijing, while it avoids direct exposure that could invite retaliation from either. U.S. sanctions law covers physical imports from Xinjiang, but it doesn't restrict capital flows. Financial contributions routed through investment vehicles, such as the CCEF, are legally safe—even if reputational risk persists. Apple isn't exiting China. It has re-engineered its presence there to be less visible and harder for outsiders to trace. Its energy partnerships, once direct and disclosed, are now filtered through funds. In Xi Jinping's China, the companies that endure aren't the ones that speak out. The ones that endure are the ones that adapt—and recede from transparency. Guest commentaries like this one are written by authors outside the Barron's newsroom. They reflect the perspective and opinions of the authors. Submit feedback and commentary pitches to ideas@
Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
Why is the India-US trade deal delayed? What does it mean for the Indian stock market? Explained
A trade deal between India and the US remains elusive, despite repeated claims from both sides in recent months that an agreement was within reach. The US, over the last few days, has signed trade deals with several major economies, including Japan and the European Union (EU). With China, the US had a tariff and export control agreement in May with August 12 deadline, which, according to experts, may be extended. According to Reuters, US and Chinese economic officials resumed talks in Stockholm, Sweden, on Monday. On the other hand, there has been no major breakthrough on the trade deal front between the US and India — at least none that has been made public. Last Thursday, July 24, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said India and the US are working towards finalising the 'first tranche of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA).' Hopes were high that a trade deal between India and the US could be finalised before July 9, an earlier deadline set by US President Donald Trump for the tariffs to take effect. However, despite several rounds of talks and reports suggesting that President Trump was expected to make a final decision on the potential deal, no agreement materialised. A key point of contention has been the US's insistence on greater access to Indian markets for its agricultural, dairy, and genetically modified (GM) products. However, India has argued that such access could negatively impact the livelihoods of its farmers. "The US wants more access to India's agriculture market, particularly dairy products. India cannot and is unwilling to negotiate on this. Animal farming in India is a source of livelihood for millions, not a large-scale industry like in the Western world," VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Investments, noted. Moreover, reports suggest that India is seeking lower tariff rates to gain a competitive edge over its Asian peers. Another possible reason for the delay in finalising the trade deal is the US's stance against countries importing oil from Russia. Last week, US Senator Lindsey Graham issued a stark warning that President Trump intends to impose steep tariffs on countries continuing to import oil from Russia. Experts still remain optimistic that India and the US will reach an agreement, even though it may take time and may even go beyond the August 1 deadline. After August 1, tariffs on Indian imports to the US will increase to 26 per cent. Both countries may first finalise a basic trade deal, while talks for a more comprehensive agreement could continue until October or November. According to media reports, a team of US negotiators is expected to visit New Delhi in the second half of August for the next round of discussions. Experts believe that a deal is important not only for India but also for the US because of geopolitical compulsions. "We believe that signing a trade deal amicably with India is equally important for the US for geopolitical compulsions. Therefore, we still hope that India would avoid any major risk on this front," G Chokkalingam, the founder and head of research at Equinomics Research Private Limited, observed. A further delay may keep the market under pressure due to elevated concerns about the country's widening trade deficit, potentially triggering ripple effects on the economy and the Indian rupee. On the other hand, a trade deal could serve as a short-term catalyst for the domestic market and may help it break out of the range it has been trading in for nearly two months. "If India signs a deal with the US and averts the 26 per cent reciprocal duties, then the market is likely to recover significantly. In case reciprocal duty is imposed, then the market is likely to remain weak in the short-term," said Chokkalingam. A trade deal between the two countries may also attract FPIs who have been on a selling spree of Indian equities this month. "Over the medium term, this could encourage increased FPI inflows into sectors like manufacturing, technology, and healthcare, particularly if supported by supply chain diversification and the ongoing 'China+1' strategy. Such a deal would also signal long-term economic stability and global integration, key factors for long-duration foreign investors," Aditya Sood, a fund manager at InCred Asset Management, told Mint. However, in the long term, the market will look for durable economic growth and a sustainable recovery in earnings to justify the elevated valuations. Read all market-related news here Read more stories by Nishant Kumar Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations expressed are those of individual analysts or broking firms, not Mint. We advise investors to consult with certified experts before making any investment decisions, as market conditions can change rapidly and circumstances may vary.
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Euro under pressure as US-EU trade deal fails to impress
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel The euro struggled to recoup its steep losses on Tuesday as investors sobered up to the fact that terms of the trade deal between the U.S. and the European Union favoured the former and hardly lifted the economic outlook of the on Monday, called the framework trade agreement a "dark day" for Europe, saying the bloc had caved in to U.S. President Donald Trump with an unbalanced deal that slapped a headline 15% tariff on EU goods German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his economy would suffer "significant" damage due to the agreed euro slid 1.3% in the previous session, its sharpest one-day percentage fall in over two months, on worries about growth and as euro-area government bond yields common currency last traded 0.07% higher at $1.1594."It hasn't taken long for markets to conclude that this relatively good news is still, in absolute terms, bad news as far as the near term implications for euro zone growth are concerned," said Ray Attrill, head of FX research at National Australia Bank."The deal has been roundly condemned by France while others - including German Chancellor Merz, are playing up the negative consequences for exporters, and with that, economic growth."The slide in the euro in turn boosted the dollar, which jumped 1% against a basket of currencies dollar held on to gains on Tuesday and knocked sterling to a two-month low of $1.3349. The yen edged marginally higher to 148.49 per dollar index steadied at 98.67."While the U.S. dollar's strength... may reflect the perception that the new U.S.-EU deal is lopsided in favour of the U.S., the U.S. dollar's strength may also reflect a feeling that the U.S. is re-engaging with the EU and with its major allies," said Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Trump said on Monday most trading partners that do not negotiate separate trade deals would soon face tariffs of 15% to 20% on their exports to the United States, well above the broad 10% tariff he set in the Australian dollar eased 0.05% to $0.6518, while the New Zealand dollar was little changed at $ offshore yuan was little changed at 7.1813 per U.S. and Chinese economic officials met in Stockholm on Monday for more than five hours of talks aimed at resolving long-standing economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, seeking to extend a truce by three from trade negotiations, focus this week is also on rate decisions from the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan (BOJ).Both central banks are expected to stand pat on rates, but traders will watch subsequent comments to gauge the timing of their next moves.
