‘The real tragedy': Shadow health minister Anne Ruston says youth pushed to crime networks for vapes under Labor
The opposition has accused the Albanese government of driving young people into the arms of organised crime after new data revealed less than one per cent of vapes are purchased legally.
Documents obtained by The Daily Telegraph revealed on Monday that one in every 1,686 vape sales occur legally through a pharmacy—about 0.06 per cent.
Organised crime syndicates have been importing vapes, of which more than 10 million are sold nationally every month on the black market.
Shadow health minister Anne Ruston told Sky News that the government's restrictive model of only allowing vape sales in pharmacies created the booming black market.
'We told the government when they put this policy forward that it wasn't going to work,' Ms Ruston said on Monday.
'The government knew right from the get-go that the prescription-only model wasn't working.
'The real tragedy of all this is the fact that young Australians particularly (are being) forced into the hands of organised crime to access vapes.
'Organised crime is benefiting from the failure of this government's policy.'
Figures obtained via Freedom of Information showed an average of 5,932 vapes were sold legally, compared to more than 10 million sold illegally every month.
Asked what the opposition's approach to vape regulation would be, Ms Ruston admitted it did not yet have one.
'We've made it very clear that all policies that we took to the election that we are intending to look at and make sure that they are fit for purpose,' she said.
Nationals leader David Littleproud, who conceded that he had previously supported a prescription-only model, called for a 'regulated' model of vape sales.
'I admit that I got it wrong … on a prohibition model around prescriptions for vaping,' Mr Littleproud told Sky News on Monday.
'We've got to get to a regulated model. Look what's worked—what worked with tobacco back in the 90s was a regulated model."
Mr Littleproud said by regulating and taxing vape products, the government could reinvest some of that money into treating health issues caused by smoking.
The government's vaping reforms—championed by Health Minister Mark Butler—were intended to reduce youth uptake and ensure access for adults trying to quit smoking.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
17 minutes ago
- The Age
Trump demand on Australian defence spending would leave $200b crater in budget
Washington: Meeting the Trump administration's demand for Australia to boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP would cost the federal budget a whopping $210 billion extra over a decade, according to analysis of Parliamentary Budget Office figures by this masthead. The Trump administration ratcheted up pressure on Australia and other Indo-Pacific allies on Friday, again calling for an increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP after being emboldened by an agreement from its NATO partners. The mounting pressure from Washington on Canberra to spend more on defence comes as the Albanese government grapples with the ballooning cost of the National Disability Insurance Scheme, and calls from the states for more money to be spent on health. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told this masthead: 'If our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do it, I think our allies and our friends in the Indo-Pacific region can do it as well.' She said she would leave discussions of specific countries to the president. The administration has already asked Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent from a projected 2.33 per cent by 2033, something the government says it is assessing. But the NATO decision to move to 5 per cent makes it more difficult for Australia and other partners, such as Japan, to refuse. Modelling prepared by the independent Parliamentary Budget Office for the opposition on its policy to move to 3 per cent of GDP suggested the overall cost would be approximately $156 billion, and add $24 billion in interest costs. Moving to 3.5 per cent by 2035-36 would cost an estimated $182.5 billion, with an extra $27 billion in interest payments – a total of $207.5 billion. At present, Australia spends just over 2 per cent, or about $56 billion per year, on defence but the acquisition of nuclear submarines and frigates, for example, $56 billion per year and is expected to rise to $100 billion over the next eight years. 'The developments at NATO suggest that the president and his team will be very keen that allies in the Indo-Pacific region follow a similar pattern in a commitment to increase defence expenditure,' said Arthur Sinodinos, a former Australian ambassador to the US, who is now at The Asia Group and co-chair of the AUKUS Forum, a group for AUKUS-related businesses.
West Australian
29 minutes ago
- West Australian
Australia defence budget increase: Military capability not just dollars, government says
Lifting the federal defence budget will be based on what Australia's military can achieve, rather an arbitrary dollar figure, a senior minister says. Pressure has mounted on the Albanese government to lift defence spending, after NATO allies agreed to boost theirs to five per cent of GDP. While Australia has pledged to increase its spend to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34, the US has called for a rise to 3.5 per cent. But Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia was already lifting its spending on the military, which would also centre on the ability of the armed forces to protect the country. 'We start with the capability, we don't start with the dollars, and that's how we work with every financial decision that the government makes,' Mr Burke told Sky News on Sunday. 'With those capability decisions, we are already spending more than was spent before we came to office.' Despite the push from the US, Mr Burke said Australia's relationship with America was not at risk. 'The relationship with the United States is really important,' he said. 'We have mature, decent, respectful conversations with the United States, but as I say, the conversation doesn't start with the dollars at our end.' Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said the instability seen around the world reinforced the need for countries like Australia to spend more on defence. 'We are seeing authoritarian regimes across the globe flexing their muscles, and open, democratic societies like ours need to stand up for what we believe in, and need to make sure we achieve peace through deterrence,' he told Sky News. 'There's a range of things that are very clear that we need to spend on ... and there's a whole series of areas which we're seeing are underfunded right now.' Before the federal election, the opposition had pledged to increase the defence budget to three per cent of GDP. However, there was uncertainty about where the extra money would come from. Mr Taylor said the budget for the military should be increased, regardless if there was pressure from the US. 'If a government is not in a position to keep its people safe, then it has failed as a government,' he said. 'This is a disaster for Australians and for Australia, we need to get serious about it, and I'm going to continue to hold the government to account on this, because this is a failure from our government.'
Perth Now
32 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Defence hike tied to military capability, not just cash
Lifting the federal defence budget will be based on what Australia's military can achieve, rather an arbitrary dollar figure, a senior minister says. Pressure has mounted on the Albanese government to lift defence spending, after NATO allies agreed to boost theirs to five per cent of GDP. While Australia has pledged to increase its spend to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34, the US has called for a rise to 3.5 per cent. But Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia was already lifting its spending on the military, which would also centre on the ability of the armed forces to protect the country. 'We start with the capability, we don't start with the dollars, and that's how we work with every financial decision that the government makes,' Mr Burke told Sky News on Sunday. 'With those capability decisions, we are already spending more than was spent before we came to office.' Despite the push from the US, Mr Burke said Australia's relationship with America was not at risk. 'The relationship with the United States is really important,' he said. 'We have mature, decent, respectful conversations with the United States, but as I say, the conversation doesn't start with the dollars at our end.' Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said the instability seen around the world reinforced the need for countries like Australia to spend more on defence. 'We are seeing authoritarian regimes across the globe flexing their muscles, and open, democratic societies like ours need to stand up for what we believe in, and need to make sure we achieve peace through deterrence,' he told Sky News. 'There's a range of things that are very clear that we need to spend on ... and there's a whole series of areas which we're seeing are underfunded right now.' Before the federal election, the opposition had pledged to increase the defence budget to three per cent of GDP. However, there was uncertainty about where the extra money would come from. Mr Taylor said the budget for the military should be increased, regardless if there was pressure from the US. 'If a government is not in a position to keep its people safe, then it has failed as a government,' he said. 'This is a disaster for Australians and for Australia, we need to get serious about it, and I'm going to continue to hold the government to account on this, because this is a failure from our government.'
