3 ways to invest in a company before it IPOs
While it might seem like pre-IPO investing opportunities are reserved for insiders and institutional investors, there are actually a few ways everyday investors can get in early.
It's an exciting time for the IPO market: after years of sluggish activity, things are picking up, and Wall Street is anticipating more public issuances in the pipeline.
In addition to Circle, notable IPOs this year include the cloud-computing company CoreWeave and financial technology company Chime. This week, the design platform company Figma filed to go public.
There's been a big push for financial institutions to democratize their offerings. Traditionally, only institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals had access to IPO shares at the offering price.
Han Qin, CEO of the blockchain-based IPO investing platform Jarsy, sees increasing IPO appetite, especially among Gen Z and millennials.
"They follow the news about SpaceX and xAI," Qin said. "But because these companies stay private, retail investors can't access them easily and feel like they can't participate in the growth state."
Below are three ways for everyday investors to gain access to the pre-IPO market.
Online brokerages
In recent years, brokerage firms such as SoFi, Robinhood, and Charles Schwab have been offering their clients opportunities to buy into pre-IPO opportunities.
These platforms partner with underwriters to allow eligible users to request shares in upcoming IPOs at the offering price, which is the same price institutional investors pay before the stock goes live on public exchanges.
Craig Stephens, a 50-year-old investor, has been investing in companies before their IPOs for over a decade. Stephens got his start before more mainstream brokerages offered pre-IPO investing with Loyal3, an online broker that shut down in 2017.
Some of his notable investments include Instacart, Arm Holdings, and Circle.
Stephens noted that this method's success rate depends on the overall demand for the IPO and individual account size. In his experience, he's found that legacy brokers have higher capital requirements. And while Robinhood and SoFi are more accessible for everyday investors, higher demand on these platforms often leads to investors only receiving a fraction of the shares they requested.
Qin himself requested Circle shares on Robinhood but didn't end up receiving any because demand was so high, he told Business Insider.
Direct share programs
It's common for companies to offer IPO access to employees, and sometimes even loyal customers or users.
One notable example is Reddit, which went public in March 2024. The social media company allowed top users and moderators to participate directly in its IPO.
Reddit also set aside shares of its IPO for individual investors to purchase on Robinhood, with priority determined by individual investors' Reddit "karma."
For Stephens, his first IPO investment was in LendingClub back in 2014. Because he had been an investor in the company's peer-to-peer marketplace, Stephens gained access to LendingClub shares before they hit the public market.
Qin points out that direct share programs are a good opportunity to invest in customer-facing companies, but aren't a good fit for others such as the B2B SaaS company Databricks that many anticipate to IPO soon.
Secondary markets
There are also funds that invest in private markets on behalf of a pool of investors.
For example, pre-IPO venture funds such as ARK Venture Fund and Fundrise Innovation Fund invest in a curated portfolio of private, high-growth companies that may eventually go public.
Their holdings include big names like SpaceX, Anduril, and Epic Games. These specific funds are open to non-accredited investors, meaning that everyday individuals can participate without needing a high net worth or income threshold.
However, investors don't get to pick and choose the companies they have exposure to, as the fund managers make those decisions and pool all contributions into a single diversified portfolio.
Accredited investors can also buy in through secondary marketplaces or special purpose vehicles that pool capital to invest in individual private companies. These options offer more control over which companies investors gain exposure to, but often come with higher minimums — typically starting at $10,000 to $100,000 — and less liquidity.
It's important to do your homework before buying into IPOs, Qin emphasized. It's an investment more suited to those with a higher risk tolerance, as early valuations can be unpredictable, and the share price can be prone to fluctuation after the company goes public.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SoFi Stock Is Betting on Crypto Again. How Should You Play SOFI Stock Here?
SoFi Technologies (SOFI) is back in the crypto universe with an expansion of its blockchain abilities. The fintech company announced the move as shares have hit a fresh 52-week high of $18.92, powered by its impressive financial performance and business expansion. Investors are now hopeful that its return to cryptocurrency will be a catalyst for further gains. As Amazon Doubles Down on Robotaxis, Is AMZN Stock a Buy? Why Citi Thinks Micron Stock Is Headed to $150 After Earnings Beat OpenAI's Partnership With Microsoft is Good, Says CEO Sam Altman; There's 'Tension,' But Already Planning 'Next Decade Together' Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Fellow fintech companise Robinhood (HOOD) and PayPal (PYPL) have benefitted recently from their own crypto forays, boosting the bull case for SoFi here. SoFi Technologies (SOFI) is a San Francisco-based digital financial services provider that offers a suite of banking, lending, investing, and insurance products. With more than 10.9 million members, the company operates in the U.S., Latin America, Hong Kong, and Canada. SoFi is one of the most prominent fintech companies disrupting consumer finance, and it currently has a market capitalization that exceeds $20 billion. SOFI stock has surged more 200% from the 52-week low at $6.01 to trade in the $18.50 range. With shares up nearly 21% in the year to date, it is vastly outperforming the S&P 500 Index ($SPX), which is up about 6.6% YTD as of this writing. Exponential member growth and service expansion has helped SoFi achieve this run. SoFi trades at a forward price-earnings ratio of about 64.2x and a price-sales ratio of 7.3x. While these multiples are rich relative to traditional banks, they are a function of investor hopes for high growth and high fee-based revenues. SoFi posted record results for Q1 2025 with net revenue at $772 million, a growth of 33% year-over-year, and net income at $71 million. Adjusted EBITDA grew by 46% to a record high of $210 million due to a surge in fee-based revenue, which grew 67% to an all-time high of $315 million. Following these results, management raised full-year 2025 guidance. Plus, the crypto relaunch is expected to boost SoFi's reach and further enable its goal to become a legitimate one-stop-shop for digital banking. In addition to crypto trading against Bitcoin (BTCUSD) and Ethereum (ETHUSD), SoFi will provide stablecoins, lending against crypto collateral, and staking products. SoFi Money members will also be able to access self-serve international transfers through the app in the near future, the company said, an important step toward cross-border growth. SoFi earns a 'Hold' consensus rating rating with the current average price target standing at $14.30, implying downside potential of roughly 22%. The high estimate at $20 implies a somewhat tame potential return of only 8% from here. On the date of publication, Yiannis Zourmpanos had a position in: SOFI. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio


Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
RDDT SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Suffer Losses on Reddit, Inc.? Contact BFA Law by August 18 Securities Fraud Class Action Deadline (NYSE:RDDT)
NEW YORK, July 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Reddit, Inc. (NYSE: RDDT) and certain of the Company's senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Reddit, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until August 18, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors who purchased Reddit securities. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and is captioned Tamraz, Jr. v. Reddit, Inc., at al., No. 25-cv-05144. Why was Reddit Sued for Securities Fraud? Reddit owns and operates the eponymous social news aggregation, forum, and social media platform. Reddit receives a significant portion of its user traffic from individuals seeking answers to questions using Google Search. The complaint alleges that Reddit misrepresented and downplayed the impact that Google's use of Artificial Intelligence ('AI') technology in Google's search results had on Reddit's user growth. In truth, Google's use of AI dented Reddit's user growth by eliminating the need for individuals to visit and click through to Reddit to get answers to their questions. Rather, the answers appeared through Google's AI search results. The Stock Declines as the Truth is Revealed On May 1, 2025, Reddit reported a significant slowdown in daily active user growth. On this news, the price of Reddit stock declined $4.96 per share, or more than 4%, from $118.79 per share on May 1, 2025, to $113.83 per share on May 2, 2025. Then, on May 21, 2025, Wall Street analyst Baird cut its Reddit stock price target over concerns that Google's AI capabilities are stifling Reddit's user growth. On this news, the price of Reddit stock fell $9.79 per share, or over 9%, from $105.64 per share on May 20, 2025, to $95.85 per share on May 21, 2025. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in Reddit you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact: Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212-789-3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It was named among the Top 5 plaintiff law firms by ISS SCAS in 2023 and its attorneys have been named Titans of the Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 and SuperLawyers by Thompson Reuters. Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.'s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman's Husband Expects Her to Pay for Sister-in-Law's Wedding After She Gets 'Pretty Decent' Bonus
A 27-year-old mom earned a bonus from work and decided to save it for her son However, her husband's family expected her to spend it on her sister-in-law's wedding and got mad at her when she didn't She turned to Reddit to ask if she was in the wrongA 27-year-old woman is at odds with her in-laws after choosing to spend her work bonus on her son rather than her sister-in-law's wedding. In a since-deleted Reddit post, the woman shared that she recently got "a pretty decent performance bonus" from her full-time job. While the bonus was "nothing wild," she noted that it was "enough to give [her] some breathing room." "My plan? Use it for our kid's savings. Not even for myself. Not for a vacation. Not even a new phone," she added. "Just stash it away for my son. Because let's be real life's expensive, and I don't want him to struggle the way I did growing up." Her husband initially "agreed" and said she was "being smart" — until his sister's wedding came up. "Suddenly, it's like my money isn't mine anymore," she wrote. Her in-laws began making "little suggestions," telling her that she should spend the bonus on her sister-in-law's upcoming wedding. First, they suggested that the poster could "help with the flowers" and then asked if she would be willing to cover the venue's deposit. "Before I could even blink, his mom was calling me, talking like it was already decided. 'You'll cover the catering, right? You just got that bonus,'' she recalled. "Excuse me? I said no. I said it nicely at first. I explained our plan, reminded them that we wanted to build something for our kid." 'My husband? He just sat there. Didn't back me up. Just sat quiet while his mom guilt tripped me over 'family' and 'celebrating once in a lifetime moments,'" she continued. "When I didn't budge, they turned on me. His mom said I was selfish. His sister texted me some passive-aggressive crap about how 'some people only care about their own.' " Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The woman's husband seemingly took his family's side, telling her she was "overreacting' and that it was just 'one bonus' and that they could 'always save later.' "Like .... are you serious? I work full time, manage our bills, handle everything in the house, and you think I owe your sister my bonus?" she questioned. Still, the woman didn't budge and has since been uninvited to her sister-in-law's wedding. Now, her husband and in-laws are acting "cold" towards her. The poster feels like she is being "punished" for protecting her child, but turned to Reddit to ask if she made the right decision. A vast majority of people in the comments defended her, insisting that her husband should have had her back. 'The fact that your husband sat there and said nothing while his family ganged up on you is the biggest problem here," one commenter wrote. "He's supposed to be your partner, not a silent spectator. You have a major husband problem, not a sister-in-law problem." Others noted that if the sister-in-law can't afford such a big wedding, then she shouldn't be having one. Read the original article on People