Judge in Trump Murdoch libel case handled lawsuit president dropped against Michael Cohen
Trump voluntarily dropped that $500 million lawsuit against Cohen, which was filed in U.S. District Court in Miami in 2023, shortly after Judge Darrin Gayles scheduled a deposition where Trump would have had to answer questions about his allegations under oath by Cohen's attorney.
The president's filing of the suit against Murdoch sets the stage for Gayles to schedule another deposition for Trump — and for Trump to weigh whether he wants to answer questions under oath from Murdoch's legal team.
Those questions could focus on Trump's past friendship with Epstein and his convicted procurer, Ghislaine Maxwell, and comments such as one Trump made in 2002 to New York magazine about Epstein.
"He's a lot of fun to be with," Trump is quoted saying. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
Gayles was randomly assigned as the judge for Trump's new lawsuit on Monday.
A former federal prosecutor whom then-President Barack Obama nominated to the bench in 2014, Gayles became the first openly gay Black man to serve as a federal judge after the Senate confirmed him in a 98-0 vote.
Cohen told CNBC on Monday that even if Gayles orders Trump to sit for a deposition for his suit against Murdoch, he does not expect history to repeat itself.
In addition to Murdoch, Trump is suing his company News Corp, its CEO Robert Thomson, the Journal's publisher, Dow Jones & Co., and the two reporters who wrote the article that said the president sent Epstein a "bawdy" birthday letter in 2003.
Cohen, who fell out with Trump years ago, said he thinks the president will pursue the case — and that Murdoch will cave.
"I predict Murdoch, et al will settle this matter in the same manner that ABC and CBS did," Cohen said in a text message, referring to recent multi-million-dollar settlements Trump obtained from ABC and the parent company of CBS News after suing those two news organizations.
"Unlike the lawsuit against me, this action has real consequences: such as advertisers pulling away from the newspaper or journalists being denied access to the White House," Cohen said.
But Cohen's own former personal lawyer, Lanny Davis, told CNBC that he thinks Trump will voluntarily withdraw his case against Murdoch and the others after Gayles schedules a deposition for the president.
"If he's smart, even if he has nothing to hide," Trump will not submit to a deposition, Davis predicted. "He doesn't want this story to alienate his base for the next two years."
Trump sued Murdoch and the other defendants on Friday, a day after the Journal reported that a letter sent by Trump for Epstein's 50th birthday was among material reviewed by federal investigators as part of a criminal probe of the notorious sex offender.
Trump has angrily denied writing the letter.
The Journal's story was published as Trump faced growing pressure to have the Justice Department release investigatory files about Epstein, a convicted sex offender who killed himself in 2019 after being arrested on child sex trafficking charges.
Trump had been friends with Epstein for years before the two men had a falling out, long before Epstein's 2019 arrest.
Davis compared filing a defamation case to submitting oneself to an invasive physical examination.
"As a matter of crisis management, what Trump has done is make matters worse with both his base and his critics, which is hard to do," Davis said.
"He's extended the story," Davis said. "If you file a lawsuit, it's the opposite of good crisis management, because you're asking for more drip by drip stories, questioning you under oath."
CNBC has requested comment from Dow Jones, which on Friday showed no sign of backing down from Trump after he filed his lawsuit.
"We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit," the publisher said at that time.
Trump, for his part, has suggested it is Murdoch who would have the most to fear from being deposed.
A spokesman for Trump, when asked about comments by Cohen and Davis on Monday, directed CNBC to the president's social media post last Friday.
"I hope Rupert and his 'friends' are looking forward to the many hours of depositions and testimonies they will have to provide in this case," Trump wrote in that Truth Social post.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Doesn't Rule Out Pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell
On his way out the door to a weekend golf trip that's set to cost American taxpayers at least $10 million, Trump stopped to answer a couple questions from reporters ― and he was awfully cagey when asked about Ghislaine Maxwell. Asked if he would pardon or commute the sentence of Maxwell, sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's onetime girlfriend, Trump sure didn't say 'no.' 'I'm allowed to do it,' he told reporters. He then claimed that 'it's something I've not thought about.' Presumably, Trump wouldn't pardon Maxwell, who was convicted for helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls, unless it benefited him personally — perhaps by buying her silence or otherwise somehow distracting the country from his own past relationship with Epstein. Trump deflected further when pushed on the subject. 'I don't want to talk about that,' he said. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence at a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with her on Thursday in an attempt to quell a firestorm over the Trump administration's backtracking on promises to release additional records from the Epstein investigation. 'What I do want to say is that Blanche is a great attorney,' Trump told reporters. Then he launched into one of his classic redirects and encouraged the press not to investigate his own connection to Epstein, but everyone else's. He proceeded to list names that may or may not be in the Epstein files and speculated about 'hedge fund guys' and former President Bill Clinton going to Epstein's island. (Clinton has denied knowing anything about the 'terrible crimes' allegedly committed by the billionaire financier.) In the same back and forth, Trump also denied that he'd written a lewd birthday message for Epstein that featured a drawing of a naked woman and remarked how 'enigmas never age' while wishing that 'may every day be another wonderful secret.' The Wall Street Journal published a copy of the note last week. Related... Justice Department Officials Meet With Ghislaine Maxwell Trump Told By Bondi His Name Is In The 'Epstein Files': Report Fox News Apparently 'Largely Obeyed' This Trump Order On Epstein, New Report Finds Trump Once Gave Epstein A Racy Birthday Card With A Strange Note: Report
CNN
14 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump's Epstein claims keep falling apart
We don't yet know the full story of the Trump administration's sudden reluctance to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. Its reversal appears to have coincided with the president being told his name appeared in the files, but there are gobs of unanswered questions. What we do know is that Trump keeps making some very curious claims about the situation and about his ties to Epstein. Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein. But in an effort to downplay the whole thing, he's added fuel to the fire with the kind of dodgy claims that he himself once suggested could raise suspicions about one's ties to the convicted sex offender. The most recent is his denial last week that Attorney General Pam Bondi had told him his name was in the Epstein files. 'No, no,' Trump said July 15. 'She's given us just a very quick briefing.' It turns out Bondi had, in fact, told Trump precisely that back in May, CNN confirmed Wednesday. And not only that, but sources familiar with the Justice Department's review of the files told CNN they appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims about Trump and others. DOJ found those claims not to be credible, according to the sources, but whatever those claims were, they could have posed problems for Trump if aired publicly. Trump has also denied writing a letter bearing his name that the Wall Street Journal reported was given to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003 — a period in which plenty of evidence suggests he and Epstein had a relationship. The letter included an outline of a naked woman and a strange, imagined conversation between Trump and Epstein in which Trump concludes by saying, 'May every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the Journal. The president is suing the newspaper and its owner, his oft-ally Rupert Murdoch, saying the letter is a 'fake.' Part of Trump's public denials have rested on the idea that it simply wasn't in his character to draw things. 'I never wrote a picture in my life,' Trump said at one point. 'I don't draw pictures,' he added at another. It didn't take long to find plenty of evidence that contradicted that. Trump drawings have been auctioned off. He wrote in a 2008 letter that he donated an autographed doodle every year to a charity. A charity director told CNN that Trump sent her two signed drawings in 2004, the year after the Epstein birthday letter. After that report, a White House spokesman watered down Trump's denial, saying Trump didn't draw things but adding the qualifier 'like the outlet described.' And now more evidence is calling these claims into question. The New York Times reported late Thursday that Trump's name also appeared on a contributor list for the album of letters for Epstein's 50th birthday. The Journal also reported the contributors included Bill Clinton and a Wall Street billionaire, suggesting powerful people besides Trump also participated. (A source close to the former president told CNN that his last contact with Epstein was 20 years ago and that he hasn't been accused of wrongdoing.) Perhaps tellingly, Trump on Friday appeared to concede that the letter could be real, but again denied he had written it. 'Now, somebody could have written a letter and used my name, and that's happened a lot,' he said. But these are hardly the only Trump claims about his ties to Epstein that have fallen victim to basic scrutiny. Trump claimed in 2019, after Epstein was charged with sex trafficking of minors, that he was 'wasn't of fan' of Epstein's. He suggested their relationship was more incidental than anything else, because of where they lived: 'I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him.' But mounting evidence keeps suggesting a closer and more friendly relationship than that, at least before the two of them had a falling out in the 2000s. Trump not only called Epstein a 'terrific guy' in 2002, but the Times reported Thursday that Trump gave Epstein a signed copy of his book in 1997, writing, 'To Jeff — You are the greatest!' And there's plenty more where that came from suggesting a once-close relationship, as CNN's Andrew Kaczynski and Em Steck reported this week. Also in 2019, Trump downplayed his ties to Britain's Prince Andrew, who has been the subject of Epstein-related allegations that Buckingham Palace denies. 'I don't know Prince Andrew,' Trump said, adding: 'I don't know him, no.' In fact, Trump had been photographed meeting with the Duke of York just months earlier, during a state visit to the UK. Prince Andrew's official Twitter account posted about a breakfast meeting with Trump. And there was also a photo of them together at Mar-a-Lago in 2000. Trump told People magazine at the time that Andrew was 'a lot of fun to be with.' And last year, Trump claimed on social media, 'I was never on Epstein's Plane …' In fact, Trump flew on it seven times in the 1990s, according to flight logs released as a part of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's legal proceedings. What was most striking about that denial is that those flight logs had already been released years prior. The question becomes: Why go to such easily disprovable places and make claims that are so suspect? If the truth is so benign, why the need to stretch it or disregard it? Why suggest you weren't a fan of a guy you were obviously chummy with? Why deny you drew pictures when your drawings are public record? Trump has a demonstrated history of lying and misleading about many subjects, but this would seem to be one you'd want to get right so you don't seed suspicion. And, as it turns out, that's a point that was once made by none other than Trump – at least when talking about Clinton's ties to Epstein. 'I know he was on his plane 27 times, and he said he was on the plane four times,' Trump said in 2019, while answering a question about why he retweeted a post that made baseless suggestions about Clinton being involved in Epstein's death. 'But when they checked the plane logs, Bill Clinton, who was a very good friend of Epstein – he was on the plane about 27 or 28 times. So why did he say four times?' The difference that Trump alluded to appeared to owe in large part to Clinton having taken multi-leg trips on the plane, in which each leg counts as an individual flight on the logs. But the question Trump raised is a good one. Indeed, why would someone misrepresent Epstein-related things? And why would a president do so repeatedly like this?
USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Can 'South Park' take on Trump 2.0? They're walking a tightrope
This week's "South Park" premiere pulled no punches. The sharply sardonic series skewered President Donald Trump and a hefty settlement Paramount paid to him following a lawsuit over CBS' "60 Minutes." Paramount is the parent company of both CBS and Comedy Central, which airs "Park." Known for a no-holds-barred approach to comedy, "Park" (Wednesdays 10 ET/PT) has beckoned controversy for decades, to the delight of its viewers and the ire of its subjects. Created by Trey Parker and Matt Stone, it's part of a class of raunchy adult animation programs that burst onto the scene in the late '90s. It stands out among its peers, always deeply reflective and cynical about current events. 'South Park' creators 'apologize' for latest Trump episode: 'We're terribly sorry' Incorporating pointed criticism of Trump's second term as president into the show might offer a challenge for the writers, however, after a major merger between Paramount and Skydance Media received the green light from Trump's FCC. The merger puts "Park" under the stewardship of a company many assume will be aligned with the Trump administration. Skydance executives have made public statements suggesting they have similar opinions on DEI initiatives as Trump, for example. Skydance CEO David Ellison is the son of Larry Ellison, the billionaire chairman of Oracle, who has hosted a fundraiser for Trump on his property and donated to Republican-friendly super-PACs. Paramount too paid a $16 million settlement to Trump earlier this month, after the president sued the company for defamation over an interview "60 Minutes" ran with former political rival Vice President Kamala Harris. The company also recently announced the cancellation of CBS' "The Late Show," hosted by Stephen Colbert, a prominent Trump critic. Against that backdrop, "Park" seems to be sending a message to viewers that it has no plans to fall in line. The July 23rd episode, the first of the show's 27th season, depicted Trump literally getting into bed with Satan, his lover, using actual photos of the president crudely placed on an animated body. It's the same depiction that Saddam Hussein received in 1999's "Park" movie. The Satan character in the new episode even comments that Trump and Hussein are "exactly alike." White House: 'South Park' hasn't 'been relevant for over 20 years' after Trump parody Paramount itself also wasn't safe from the ire of Parker and Stone. The episode also features a pair of animated "60 Minutes" anchors covering protests as they nervously praise Trump and insist they don't agree with the protesters, intimating that they might be worried he will sue again. The administration responded in anger. "This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention," White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement provided to USA TODAY July 24. "President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history − and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak." The day after the episode aired, the show's creators, onstage at a San Diego Comic-Con panel, seemed unfazed. "We're terribly sorry," Parker said with a sly grin, sitting next to next to Stone. Whether the pair will be able to maintain that "sorry not sorry" sentiment as the new season airs remains to be seen, though. Parker and Stone spoke at the Comic-Con panel about how they are making the episodes on the fly in response to the news of the day, and will likely poke at Trump again in the future. Under an administration increasingly intolerant of criticism (comedic or otherwise), "Park" finds itself in a difficult bind. The popularity of the show hinges on the very style of comedy that may enrage the Trump White House. To maintain a robust and loyal audience, Parker and Stone will likely need to continue making the politics of the day into punchlines. But to do that, thet may also need to defy the the sensibilities of their newly merged parent company. Wednesday's episode may provide an important clue, however: It hit the air the same day Paramount inked a five-year agreement for 50 new episodes of "Park." Contributing: Brendan Morrow, Brian Truitt, Kelly Lawler
