Boy, 3, died in 'ferocious' dog attack 'after wandering into pen unsupervised'
Daniel Twigg was fatally mauled at Carr Farm in Milnrow, near Rochdale, while being 'alone and unsupervised', the prosecution allege.
His parents Mark Twigg, 43, and Joanne Bedford, 37, are on trial at Manchester Crown Court accused of the toddler's manslaughter.
Daniel allegedly entered a pen where two large, 'dangerous' 50kg dogs, a Cane Corso called Sid and a Boerboel or Boerboel cross named Tiny, were kept.
The animals, which belonged to the farm owner, were used as guard dogs and for breeding and were not family pets, prosecutor John Elvidge KC told the court.
Mr Elvidge said the pair were 'deliberately kept outside' in enclosed pens and the jury heard how the RSPCA had warned they were a danger.
He told the court that while steps had been taken to prevent them escaping, 'no effective precautions were taken to keep Daniel out'.
Daniel is seen in a neighbour's CCTV entering the pen at 12.50pm before moving around inside briefly and then disappearing from view, the court was told.
A dog in an adjacent pen became 'excited, bouncing up and down in animated fashion' at the same time as the attack on May 15, 2022.
The prosecution say this 'coincides with the beginning of a ferocious and prolonged attack' on Daniel, who suffered catastrophic injuries, principally to his head and neck, which were consistent with the 'predatory behaviour of dogs', Mr Elvidge told the court.
Daniel's mother made a 999 call almost 20 minutes after her son had been in the pen, the jury heard.
Sid was the most 'likely' culprit, the court was told.
Mr Elvidge said: 'No-one suggests that these catastrophic events were intended or desired by his parents, but this attack and Daniel's death were utterly foreseeable consequences of negligently allowing Daniel to enter Sid and Tiny's pen alone and unsupervised.
'It is the prosecution case that his parents were aware that Daniel could enter the pen if he was left unsupervised.'
The pen was accessed through gates secured by a Karabiner clip – rather than a secure lock – that could 'easily' be slipped open, the jury was told.
The parents, who have two other children, had a 'long association' with the farm, with Twigg working as an odd-job man, including looking after the dogs, and Bedford keeping horses there.
They continued to have responsibility for the dogs on weekends when the owner was away, and that was when Daniel was attacked, the prosecution allege.
Mr Elvidge told the court that the animals had been kept in 'filthy and disgusting conditions' and the couple, who had eight or nine dogs of their own, were aware of concerns raised by the RSPCA and a warning that Daniel 'might be bitten'.
The RSPCA inspectors had expressed concerns about Daniel being around the dogs and they mentioned a recent fatal attack involving a small child, but they were 'disregarded' by the couple, the court heard.
Incidents involving dogs at the farm were said to include the animals escaping, biting people and fighting each other.
Police were also aware that 'dangerous' dogs at the farm were being injured and neglected, the jury was told.
Signs of 'neglect' of Daniel and that he was 'in danger' from the dogs were raised by Rochdale Children's Services when they visited the farm just three days before the attack, the jury was told. More Trending
Twigg and Bedford, of Radcliffe, Bury, both deny charges of gross negligence manslaughter and being in charge of a dog that was dangerously out of control.
The trial continues.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Mum's heartbreaking plea after nine-day-old baby snatched by 'fake support worker'
MORE: British man reported missing in Cambodia found in jail accused of drug smuggling
MORE: Bryan Kohberger 'to plead guilty to murders of four Idaho students' in major twist
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Ex-GP found guilty of sex offences after carrying out ‘unnecessary' genital exams
A former GP is facing jail after conducting 'unnecessary' genital examinations on patients, including two teenage boys. Gregory Manson, 56, has been found guilty of conducting groin exams even when his patients came in with coughs, headaches, back pain and knee sprains. Some of his accusers said he pulled down their underwear without asking their permission. Manson told jurors at Canterbury Crown Court that his medical examinations were 'not sexually motivated at all' and were instead based on ruling out rare diseases which he had misdiagnosed in the past. After originally working in South Africa, Manson qualified as a GP in the UK in 1998 and also worked as a GP trainer, programme director of GP training and GP appraiser for the General Medical Council before his dismissal in 2017. Manson, of Tower Way, Canterbury, denied 18 offences of sexual assault and six of indecent assault in respect of nine victims. On Thursday, he stared at the floor as jurors at Canterbury Crown Court returned their verdicts after 10 hours and 29 minutes of deliberation. Manson was convicted by majority verdict of 12 sexual assaults and four indecent assaults against nine men which took place over almost two decades. He was found not guilty of six offences, and two others were alternative charges which did not require verdicts. Judge Simon Taylor KC warned Manson: 'It will be a prison sentence, so you need to prepare for that.' During the trial, the prosecution noted that 'many examinations he performed were not medically justified' and that other GPs would not have carried them out. 'In truth Dr Manson took frequent opportunities to examine patients' genitals, not because he needed to but because he wanted to,' said Jennifer Knight KC, prosecuting. The earliest two victims of the former GP were brothers, and he was their doctor before and after they were 16, the court heard. They both remember being taken to an examination room next to the consultant room before being told to sit on the bed and pull down their trousers and boxer shorts. The older brother's medical notes suggests that he was seen 11 times by Manson between the ages of 14 and 19, and he remembered his genitals being examined on 'over half' of those visits. Ms Knight said: 'The examinations seemed to him (the victim) to be done professionally and as a young teenager, he assumed they were required. 'As he got older however, he became uncomfortable about these examinations and wondered whether they should be so frequent.' Their mother told investigators she never met the former GP when they were young teenagers as she would stay in the waiting room. Many of the examinations relate to what the former GP called 'well person checks' which were offered to new patients at the surgery he worked for, the court heard. Giving evidence last week, Manson said: 'Part of your work as a GP is disease prevention and health promotion, we do that all the time. 'You're looking for any pathology or disease that may be asymptomatic that somebody is not necessarily aware of.' A professor of forensic medicine and GP, Ian Wall, was 'surprised' that Manson considered testicular examination part of a new patient check during his review of Manson's medical notes, jurors heard during the trial. Manson added: 'When I worked in South Africa, particularly in many hospitals that didn't have facilities to further investigate things, your training was very much in examination and being thorough with examinations. An MRI was not available in Soweto.' He told the court about his early work as a GP and why losing patients had made him conduct more 'thorough' investigations. The former GP said that every doctor remembered their 'first death', and his was a man who had arrived with what was initially thought to be a stomach ulcer but was in fact an abdominal aortic aneurysm. 'When you have experiences like this and you examine an abdomen you are haunted,' said Manson. Opening the case, Ms Knight told jurors: 'Dr Manson performed unnecessary examinations of male patients' genitals without offering a chaperone or providing any proper explanation to the patients involved of the reason for the examination, and without wearing gloves. 'Dr Manson also failed to document in patients' notes the fact that such examinations had taken place or what his findings if any were.' Following his conviction, Will Bodiam from the Crown Prosecution Service said: 'These patients trusted Manson as he was their GP and he abused that trust in an appalling way, carrying out intimate examinations which were not all medically justified. 'They described their discomfort at what happened to them and some of them actively tried to avoid seeing Manson because of their previous experiences with him. 'On several occasions, the victims were not even given the option to consent to the examinations and had their underwear removed with no warning.' He added: 'This is not what patients should expect from their GPs.' Manson will be sentenced on July 4, and remains on bail until then, with new conditions of residence and that he does not enter an international airport, train station or port.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Cannabis-addict father, 25, who violently shook baby daughter and then played games on his phone as medics tried to resuscitate her is found guilty of murder
A father who killed his baby daughter by shaking her so hard he caused 'catastrophic' brain injuries has been found guilty of murder. Cannabis addict Thomas Holford, 25, played games on his phone as medics desperately tried to resuscitate one-year-old Everleigh Stroud, jurors were told. The little girl died in May 27, 2022 after 'excessive and severe' shaking when she was just five weeks old led to severe brain and put her in a vegetative state. Everleigh was initially rushed to Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital in Margate, Kent, on April 21, 2021, when her grandmother reported she was 'only just' breathing. While his baby was being resuscitated Holford showed 'little emotion' and continued to download and play games on his phone, a court was told. He later lied to police about his cannabis use to disguise the fact that he had been smoking the night before when he was looking after Everleigh alone. On Thursday, Holford, of Ramsgate, was found unanimously guilty of murder and actual bodily harm of his daughter by a Canterbury Crown Court jury. Everleigh, who was born on March 13, 2021, spent more than a year in a vegetative state before she died at 14 months on May 27, 2022. She also had bone fractures, bruising to her face and injuries to her anus having spent the night before she was rushed to hospital in her father's care, the court heard. Prosecuting, Eloise Marshall KC said: 'On the night of April 20 into the early morning of April 21 2021, when Everleigh was just over five weeks old, she suffered catastrophic injuries which caused substantial brain damage, and that resulted in her death just over a year later. 'There is no dispute as to how Everleigh came to suffer those injuries, they were inflicted by her father, Thomas Holford.' She added: 'It is the Crown's case that all those injuries were deliberately caused by Thomas Holford, they were what we call non-accidental, members of the jury.' While giving evidence, Holford told jurors he had at least five joints on April 20, 2021, before being left in charge of Everleigh that evening. On that day, he was smoking more than usual because it was '420' which he agreed was a 'big day for cannabis smokers', the court heard. When police arrived at his address in Wallwood Road, Ramsgate, where Holford, then 20, lived with his then 16-year-old girlfriend and her parents, they discovered a cannabis grinder and joint butts next to a milk bottle in his bedroom. Police attending the scene remarked that Holford appeared to be in a 'good mood' as he played games on his phone while his baby was rushed to hospital. 'While speaking with PC Smith, Thomas Holford continued to show little emotion,' said Ms Marshall. He told police that he had not smoked cannabis since 10am the previous morning, which he has now accepted was a lie. Ms Marshall KC asked: 'When the police asked you what you'd smoked, you lied?' 'Yes,' Holford replied. Asked why, he added: 'I'm trying to project an image of something that is better than reality.' Text messages shown to jurors also suggest that he tried to buy weed from a contact known as 'Milo' because he knew he was looking after his daughter. He sent a text which read: 'Could you strap me anything, as I've got the little one on my own tonight. Going to be f****** stressful.' Holford also admitted he had 'manipulated' his girlfriend's family into taking care of his cannabis for him and allowing him to smoke it. While in the witness box, he often answered questions to the effect of being unsure or not remembering what had happened. 'When it suits you, you have a memory - and when it doesn't suit you, you pretend you don't have a memory,' said Ms Marshall. Holford, who admitted manslaughter of Everleigh last year, will be sentenced for murder and actual bodily harm on July 4.
Wales Online
7 hours ago
- Wales Online
He crept into women's bedrooms at night as they slept and carried out a sex act
He crept into women's bedrooms at night as they slept and carried out a sex act One woman woke to find Evan Powell performing a sex act on himself Evan Powell (Image: South Wales Police ) A man crept into women's houses in the dead of night and entered their bedrooms to watch them sleeping, a court has heard. On one occasion Evan Powell pleasured himself while staring at one of his dozing victims. When arrested the defendant claimed he had been going into houses looking for someone who might have the mobile phone he had lost during a student night out on Swansea's Wind Street. He denied there was any sexual element to what he had done. A jury rejected that version of events and found him guilty of trespassing with intent to commit a sexual offence. Making the defendant the subject of an extended sentence the judge at Swansea Crown Court said on the night in question Powell had been "prowling the streets" looking for "opportunities for non-consensual activity" and he described Powell's behaviour as "extremely sinister". The court has previously heard that on the night of October 30 last year Swansea University computer science student Powell attended a fancy dress Cocktail Society house party on Brynmill Crescent in the Brynmill area of Swansea before going on to the bars of Wind street in the city centre. He was dressed in a black suit and tie in the style of the lead characters in the film "Men in Black". In the early hours of the following morning the defendant left the city centre and returned to the Brynmill area where he entered three houses, and tried to enter a fourth For the latest court reports sign up to our crime newsletter In one property the student first went into a child's bedroom and rummaged through a chest of drawers - the child woke to see the stranger in his room - before entering the mother's bedroom. The court heard the women woke suddenly to see the 21-year-old standing near her bed watching her. Powell fled down the stairs and left the house. Article continues below At a property nearby Powell again entered a woman's bedroom - this time he exposed his penis and masturbated while watching his sleeping victim. The woman woke and challenged the defendant who fled into the kitchen where an altercation took place during which the woman punched him and he pushed her. The defendant then left. The court heard Powell also entered a third property, though on that occasion the sleeping occupant was woken by the sound of the bedroom door opening. The defendant ran off and went home to his shared student house.. The incidents were reported to police and Powell was identified and subsequently arrested. Enquiries conducted by the police established that the defendant had tried to enter a fourth Brynmill property on the night in question but had been unsuccessful. Powell subsequently pleaded not guilty and the matter went to trial in April this year. Following his conviction, sentencing was adjourned for the preparation of a report to consider the issue of dangerousness. At the trial prosecution barrister Dyfed Thomas had put it to Powell that he had been "looking for sexual satisfaction from watching women sleeping in bed" but the defendant rejected that. Powell accepted it was a "very odd, unusual situation" but insisted he had been trying to find the property where the earlier house party had been held in the hopes someone there might know where his lost phone was. He added: "I'm very, very bad with directions". Evan Powell, now of Lobelia Close, Rogerstone, Newport, had previously been convicted at trial of three offence of trespassing with intent to commit a sexual offence and one count of attempting to trespass with intent to commit a sexual offence when he returned to the dock for sentencing. He has no previous convictions but the court heard that in October 2023 the defendant sexually assaulted a young woman in the Brynmill area in the early hours of the morning when he followed her along Bryn Road before grabbing her and putting his hands between her legs. The assault was reported to police but the defendant was not prosecuted and was dealt with by way of a "community resolution" which saw him admit the offence and write a letter of apology. Judge Paul Thomas KC had previously expressed his concern at the 2023 offending being dealt with by a community resolution, and the prosecution barrister told the court he had made enquiries into the matter and it seemed the officer who investigated the incident had not referred it to an officer of detective inspector rank or above as he should have done before making the decision. The prosecutor said the officer had been spoken to. Avirup Chaudhuri, for Powell, said the defendant came from loving and caring background. He said his client understands the gravity of the situation he was facing and asked the court to consider that it may be the "shame and embarrassment" Powell feels which prevents him from "confronting his offending in full". The barrister also asked the court to take into account the defendant's age and immaturity, and he said his client but been putting his "privileged education" to good use while on remand in prison by helping fellow inmates to improve their literacy skills. Judge Paul Thomas KC said on the night in question Powell had been "prowling the streets of the student area looking for opportunities for non-consensual activity". He said the defendant's motivation in entering or trying to enter four properties in the space of around two hours had been sexual, and he described Powell's behaviour as "extremely sinister". The judge said Powell had no insight into his problem and did not even acknowledge he had a problem, and he said until the defendant did come to terms with the reality of the situation he would continue to pose a high risk of sexual offending in the future. Powell was given a nine-year extended sentence comprising five years in custody followed by a four-year licence period. He will become eligible for parole after serving two-thirds of the custodial element of the sentence. The defendant will be a registered sex offender for the rest of his life. Article continues below Judge Thomas added that it was a matter of "great regret" that the 2023 sexual offending had not been dealt with "properly" at the time as it should have been. Speaking after the sentencing Carolina Mayorga-Williams, senior crown prosecutor with the Crown Prosecution service's rape and serious sexual offence team, said: "Waking up to find a stranger in your or your child's bedroom must be a terrifying experience and violates a person's right to feel safe in their own home. We take all allegations of sexual offending very seriously. The evidence presented by the Crown Prosecution Service resulted in the jury reaching their guilty verdicts and has brought Powell to justice."
