D-St Dodges Bullet, Ends Day in Green
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
How will Trump's tariffs impact India?
The story so far: On July 30, U.S. President Donald Trump announced 25% tariffs on imports from India 'plus a penalty'. While this puts to rest months of speculation over what the tariffs would be on Indian imports into the U.S., it opens up fresh uncertainties with respect to a potential bilateral trade agreement between India and the U.S. What did Mr. Trump announce? Taking to social media, Mr. Trump cited India's tariff and non-tariff measures on trade, and its dealing with Russia on energy and military equipment, as the main reasons behind imposing the 25% tariffs and the penalty. There is no clarity yet on what the penalty will look like, but Mr. Trump has in the past threatened a 10% additional tariff on BRICS countries. If this comes to pass, then effective tariffs on Indian imports would be 35%. There is also a legislation in the U.S. in the process of being passed that could see an additional 500% tariff on India, China, and Brazil for their dealings with Russia. What does it mean for India? Tariffs are paid by importers. Therefore, tariffs on Indian imports would be paid by those in the U.S. that are importing Indian goods. That is, Indian goods will become more expensive for them. Therein lies the true problem for India. On a macro level, the tariffs and the impact they will have on Indian exports are expected to only lower India's GDP by 0.2%, according to research by the Bank of Baroda. So, if India's growth forecast had been 6.6%, then these tariffs — if they are imposed — could lower growth to 6.4%. However, the issue arises in individual sectors. According to the Bank of Baroda, sectors such as garments, precious stones, auto parts, leather products, and electronics (although their inclusion is uncertain) could face the pinch and would have to rework their strategies. 'The issue really is that some of the competing nations like Vietnam (20%), Korea (15%) and Indonesia (19%) have lower tariffs compared with India,' the Bank of Baroda added in its research note. How did things come to such a pass? While most trade deals are negotiated over years, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mr. Trump in February 2025 announced that they would conclude the first tranche of a trade deal by fall. To put this in perspective, the recently-signed Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between India and the U.K. took about three years to negotiate. What made the announcement by Mr. Modi and Mr. Trump notable was that it came before the latter's big moves on reciprocal tariffs, which is what pushed other countries to start negotiating with the U.S. The announcement was thus a strong and positive commitment towards strengthening ties between the two countries. But then, on April 2, Mr. Trump announced his Liberation Day reciprocal tariffs. These included a 10% baseline tariff for all countries, and additional tariffs on a country-by-country case. For India, this total was 26%. However, just a week later, Mr. Trump announced a 90-day pause on these tariffs so that bilateral deals could be struck so as to reduce the U.S.'s trade deficit with most of its trading partners. The 90-day pause was to end in July, but Mr. Trump extended it to August 1. What are the points of friction? It's hard to pinpoint any single recent development that has soured relations, but there have been several points of friction between the two countries in the past few months. The matter of India's tariffs and non-tariff barriers has been something Mr. Trump has been highlighting since his first term as President. It was no surprise that he would take up the issue in his second term. Soured relations: The Hindu editorial on Trump's 25% tariff, 'penalty' Mr. Trump has brought up India's engagement with Russia, too, saying countries like India are partly financing Russia's war with Ukraine. India, however, has reiterated that it will secure its national and energy security, and if that means buying cheap Russian oil, then that is what it would do. Russia currently accounts for about 35-40% of India's oil imports, making it a significant partner. In addition, India has remained adamant about keeping core parts of its agriculture and dairy sectors out of trade deals, including with the U.S. This has upset negotiators on the U.S. side, but it is a 'red line' India will not cross. Opening up these sectors would expose India's relatively low-productivity farmers to global competition, which will likely have devastating impacts on their livelihoods. Then, there is the fact that Mr. Trump has repeatedly stated that it was him, and his trade talks, that encouraged India and Pakistan to agree to a ceasefire following the launch of Operation Sindoor by India. The fact that the Indian government has refuted it has only further angered Mr. Trump. Mr. Trump's claims have irked the Indian establishment as well, since it has provided the Opposition a means to attack the government. India has informed the World Trade Organization that it reserves the right to impose additional tariffs on imports from the U.S. to retaliate against its higher tariffs on items like steel, aluminium, and automobiles. Taking these things together, Mr. Trump's tariff announcement comes as a confirmation that at least one, if not all of these factors, worked toward souring relations. Will India continue paying these tariffs? Although there has been a lot of talk about a 'mini-deal' between India and the U.S. to walk back the reciprocal tariffs, Indian officials have been cagey about the date for such a deal. The tariff announcement by Mr. Trump confirms that such a deal is not coming. However, the two sides have been remarkably consistent about their commitment of having some sort of trade deal finalised by the fall 2025 deadline. So far, negotiators from the two sides have met in New Delhi and Washington five times, including the first meeting in March where the Terms of Reference for the negotiations were finalised. The team from the U.S. will visit India in late August to take forward the talks. Things have, however, become trickier for Indian negotiators because Mr. Trump has now directly linked India's dealings with Russia to India's trade relationship with the U.S. The tariffs will come into effect soon. According to an Executive Order dated July 31, Mr. Trump said that his duties on India and other countries would come into effect '7 days after the date of this order'. What about deals with other countries? Over the last month, Mr. Trump has concluded deals with the U.K., Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan, the EU, and South Korea. The deal with the U.K. does not specify a general tariff level, but it will see British car exports to the U.S. attract a 10% tariff, down from the earlier 27.5% and a removal of tariffs on aerospace exports to the U.S. Japan negotiated lower tariffs of 15% for its exports to the U.S., the same as the EU.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Discom rules flouted in inflated bill cases
1 2 Jaipur: Consumers are grappling with erroneous, inflated power bills that require payment of the full amount, facing the threat of supply disconnection if unable to do so. Discom rules are often overlooked by authorities, officials said. According to officials, supply disconnection is a lengthy process, providing consumers the right to present their position and offering several opportunities to do so. However, a lack of awareness of the rules among consumers and the indifferent, authoritarian attitude of authorities at the lower level of the administration ultimately lead to harassment. They said as per the existing rules, customers are required to pay average monthly charges in cases of inflated bills and follow the process to settle disputes. "We have an internal grievance redressal (IGR) cell set up for resolving bill payment disputes arising out of faulty meter reading or overshooting contracted demand (for large consumers). Customers should not be asked to pay the full amount pending the process," a discom official said. Payment disputes involving up to Rs 20,000 are resolved at the AEN. Disputes up to Rs 50,000 are addressed by the XEN. Cases between Rs 50,000 to Rs 5 lakh are taken up at the circle level and above that at the discom's corporate level. By the time the disputes reach the corporate level, the number is reduced to about five to seven. The highest level of grievance redressal cell is represented by the managing director of discoms, an independent official from the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission, and a senior accounts person. In fact, the IGR asks for deposits of money in the disputed cases, but they mostly involve high-value cases. Often, it is 25% or 50% of the disputed amount, depending on the nature of the case. But the rates are not uniform, said a discom official. "In most cases, the genuineness of the bill raised is known because the consumer has a record. If a meter malfunctions and the consumption of units goes up, it's easier to solve it. But in cases involving large customers when their consumption overshoots their contracted demand, we demand a deposit of 25% or 50% of the disputed amount," said the official. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Fake guarantee': ED arrests BTPL's Partha Biswal; will confront him with Anil
Anil Ambani (File photo) NEW DELHI: In a significant development ahead of questioning Anil Ambani of Reliance ADAG, Enforcement Directorate late on Friday night arrested Partha Biswal, the MD of Biswal Tradelink Pvt Ltd (BTPL) that was searched by the agency in connection with a Rs 68-crore fake bank guarantee provided by the Ambani group to Solar Energy Corporation of India Ltd (SECI) to secure a tender. The central agency has claimed that Anil Ambani ADAG group's Reliance Power Ltd paid Rs 5.4 crore to Biswal's BTPL for "providing this bank guarantee" by forging documents. A special court here on Saturday granted the custody of Biswal, whose company was searched on Friday, to ED till Aug 6, during which he is likely to be confronted with Anil Ambani and questioned about the fake bank guarantee he allegedly generated by spoofing email of govt lender SBI. ED proof confirms use of fake docus in name of banks The agency on Friday issued a look out circular (LOC) to put curbs on foreign travel by Anil Ambani who has been summoned for questioning on Aug 5 at the agency's headquarters in Delhi. Biswal's BTPL was incorporated in 2019 and has been found to have at least seven "undisclosed bank accounts" involving transactions of alleged proceeds of crime, disproportionate to its declared turnover, has been found during the money trail conducted by ED. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Santo Domingo Este: Unsold Sofas Prices May Surprise You (Prices May Surprise You) Sofas | Search Ads Search Now Undo On Friday, ED conducted searches at three premises in Bhubaneswar and one at Kolkata after its investigators found alleged evidence of the fake bank guarantee provided to SECI on behalf of Reliance NU BESS Ltd/Maharashtra Energy Generation Ltd. "BTPL fraudulently arranged and submitted fake bank guarantees of Rs 68.2 crore along with forged SBI endorsements and fabricated confirmations for a SECI tender. For providing this bank guarantee, Rs 5.4 crore have been received by BTPL from Reliance Power Ltd," a senior official aware of the probe said. The Reliance Group reiterated its statement issued on Friday saying: "The company and its subsidiaries acted bonafidely and have been a victim of fraud. .. The company has made a due disclosure on this to the stock exchanges and a criminal complaint has already been lodged with Delhi Police." Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
