logo
BREAKING NEWS Shock as Britain turns its back on Afghans who loyally helped UK forces during two decades in Afghanistan with sudden closure of lifeline ARAP scheme

BREAKING NEWS Shock as Britain turns its back on Afghans who loyally helped UK forces during two decades in Afghanistan with sudden closure of lifeline ARAP scheme

Daily Mail​a day ago
Hundreds of Afghans in line for sanctuary in Britain in return for their loyalty to the UK were 'betrayed' today when ministers suddenly cut a lifeline to help them.
The Afghans, owed a debt a gratitude for working alongside British troops and officials during the UK's two decades in Afghanistan, face retribution from the vengeful Taliban warlords now running the country.
The Daily Mail's award-winning 'Betrayal of the Brave' campaign led to a scheme being set up to resettle thousands of Afghans in Britain.
But today, without warning, the Government suddenly closed the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) to new applicants.
The decision, slipped out without any announcement, spread panic among those who had been hoping to make a new life in safety in the UK.
The scheme's shock closure – from 3pm today - was confirmed in an 'explanatory memorandum' in a Home Office policy document.
The decision – and lack of announcement – flies in the face of the public pledges made by former Defence Secretary Ben Wallace when he set up the scheme.
Mr Wallace said in 2020: 'We want to send a message to the world that if you work with the British wherever we are deployed, we'll look after you.'
Today former frontline interpreter Rafi Hottak, who was blown up on patrol with UK forces in Helmand, said he felt betrayed by the sudden announcement. 'I am deeply shocked and saddened by the news that the UK Government is scrapping the ARAP scheme – a programme that was meant to honour Britain's moral obligation to the brave Afghan men and women who stood shoulder to shoulder with British forces in Afghanistan,' he said.
'Many of these individuals put their lives on the line for the UK mission. Today, they live in hiding, facing persecution, torture, and death at the hands of the Taliban. Thousands have been waiting for years without a decision on their applications, clinging to hope that the country they served would not abandon them. That hope is now being extinguished.'
Former Sergeant Major Colin Dawson, who served two tours in Afghanistan and battled to help those he worked with escape the Taliban, said : 'If we have abandoned people out there – and it seems we have – it is very wrong. We have a duty of care to these people who served with us.
'After all these years there are still people left behind who we should be helping. Many people have been rescued and we should be grateful for that but my experience of ARAP has been negative, I have tried to help one interpreter whose family is still in country – they have been beaten and abused – but ARAP has failed to reply. The last occasion was only last week. It is immensely frustration, these people are in desperate need and yet hope, it seems, is being taken from them.'
Professor Sara de Jong, a founding member of the Sulha Alliance which campaigns for interpreters and those who worked for Britain, said: 'The sudden announcement that ARAP closes comes as a shock to the Sulha Alliance and our community of Afghan interpreters and other locally employed civilians. Perversely, the Government's own ARAP website has not even been updated yet and states that the scheme "remains open". Perversely, the Government's own ARAP website has not even been updated yet and states that the scheme "remains open".
'The closure is implemented in a very odd way, by adding as a criteria for eligibility that applicants must have "submitted their application before 15:00 BST on 1 July 2025".' Afghan applicants deserved advance notice of this new rule, especially as the UK Government prided itself in teaching Afghans about good governance and transparency.
'There is no information on what will happen with applicants who have submitted a request for a review of a negative decision, many of whom have been waiting for months if not years.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dunn family raise concerns Foreign Office will try to ‘hide' final review report
Dunn family raise concerns Foreign Office will try to ‘hide' final review report

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Dunn family raise concerns Foreign Office will try to ‘hide' final review report

The family of Harry Dunn have expressed concerns the Foreign Office will attempt to 'hide' the final report from a parliamentary review into the case following an eleventh hour invite to meet the Foreign Secretary. Harry's mother, Charlotte Charles, as well as other family members, are due to meet David Lammy on Wednesday following an invitation for him to 'hear the family's views and concerns'. The review is not set to scrutinise the role or actions of the US government, but will examine the support the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) offered the Dunn family after the teenager was killed by a former US state department employee in a road crash in 2019. The Dunn family spokesman Radd Seiger told FCDO officials they were concerned there was 'no explicit provision for the publication of the final report' in the review's proposed terms of reference. His words prompted an invitation to meet with Mr Lammy on Wednesday afternoon ahead of the review's official announcement, which is expected on Thursday. Mrs Charles said she was 'apprehensive' ahead of the meeting, adding: 'I won't accept anything less than a full, open and transparent process.' Mr Seiger told the PA news agency the family will 'have no part in any process that lacks transparency'. Anne Sacoolas, the American driver who killed Harry, had diplomatic immunity asserted on her behalf following the incident outside RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire before a senior Foreign Office official said the US government should 'feel able' to put her on the next flight home. Ahead of the meeting, Mr Seiger told PA: 'We are grateful to the Foreign Secretary for making time to meet us today. 'That said, it is not lost on us that the only reason we appear to have been called in is because we asked for only one basic and reasonable assurance – that Anne Owers' report will be published. 'That request appears to have put the cat amongst the pigeons ahead of the government formally announcing the inquiry tomorrow. 'The fact that it has prompted such an urgent response gives us real concern that publication of the report may not have been the Government's intention.' Mr Seiger continued: 'Although we will not get ahead of ourselves, if that proves to be the case, I can say categorically on behalf of the family that we will have no part in any process that lacks transparency. 'It would defeat the entire purpose of the inquiry and would represent a betrayal of everything Harry stood for and the brave fight the family put up on his behalf. 'We have always been grateful for David Lammy's support over the years. 'It must follow that Anne Owers' report, the first and only detailed look into those failures must be published. Without that, we cannot move forward. 'We owe it to Harry, to our public institutions, and to every future family who might find themselves in a similar nightmare.' Mrs Charles said any attempt by the Government to 'hide' the final report 'fills me with dread'. She told PA: 'I feel incredibly apprehensive going into this meeting. 'After everything we've been through, the idea that the Government might try to hide Anne Owers' report fills me with dread. 'We have never wanted anything more than the full truth and for lessons to be learned, not just for Harry, but to stop any other family from suffering like we have. 'I won't accept anything less than a full, open and transparent process.' In a statement, the FCDO said: 'The Foreign Secretary has always made clear his commitment to support Harry Dunn's family and learn lessons from this tragedy. 'It is right we brief the family first on any developments and will announce further details in due course.'

‘Premature' to decide whether MI5 should face contempt probe, judges rule
‘Premature' to decide whether MI5 should face contempt probe, judges rule

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘Premature' to decide whether MI5 should face contempt probe, judges rule

MI5 could still face contempt of court proceedings over incorrect evidence provided in a bid for an injunction against the BBC pending the outcome of an investigation, judges at the High Court have said. In 2022, then-attorney general Suella Braverman went to the High Court to stop the broadcaster airing a programme that would name a man who has allegedly abused two women and is a covert human intelligence source. An injunction was made in April 2022 to prevent the corporation disclosing information likely to identify the man, referred to only as 'X', though Mr Justice Chamberlain said the BBC could still air the programme and the key issues, without identifying him. But at a hearing earlier this year, the London court was told that part of the written evidence provided by MI5 was false. Lawyers for the BBC told the court the 'low threshold' for launching contempt proceedings against MI5 and a number of individuals, for not being fully transparent with the court, had been met. In a decision on Wednesday, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr said that a further investigation should be carried out and that it would be 'premature to reach any conclusions on whether to initiate contempt proceedings against any individual'. The senior judge said that the new investigation should be carried out on behalf of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner. Baroness Carr, sitting with Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Chamberlain, also said: 'The investigations carried out by MI5 to date suffer from serious procedural deficiencies. 'Their conclusions cannot presently be relied on.' The written witness evidence, now accepted to have been false, said the Security Service had maintained its policy of neither confirming nor denying (NCND) the identities of intelligence sources. However, MI5 disclosed X's status to a BBC reporter, but then said it had kept to the NCND policy. Lawyers on behalf of MI5 apologised earlier this year and carried out two investigations, which concluded the false evidence was given due to a series of mistakes with no deliberate attempt by any staff member to mislead. In Wednesday's 26-page ruling, the three judges said they were not 'satisfied' with the investigations or their conclusions. They added: 'It is regrettable that MI5's explanations to this court were given in a piecemeal and unsatisfactory way — and only following the repeated intervention of the court.' In the programme about X, the BBC alleged the intelligence source was a misogynistic neo-Nazi who attacked his girlfriend, referred to by the pseudonym Beth, with a machete. Beth is bringing related legal action in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), with the judges finding on Wednesday that the specialist tribunal – which investigates allegations against the UK intelligence services – was also misled. Baroness Carr later said: 'Whilst we accept the genuineness of the apologies proffered on behalf of MI5, the fact remains that this case has raised serious issues. 'MI5 gave false evidence to three courts. This was compounded by inadequate attempts to explain the circumstances.' Following the ruling, MI5 director-general Sir Ken McCallum said: 'I wish to repeat my full and unreserved apology for the errors made in these proceedings. 'We take our duty to provide truthful, accurate and complete information with the utmost seriousness. 'Resolving this matter to the court's satisfaction is of the highest priority for MI5 and we are committed to co-operating fully with the Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office and the court. 'MI5 is now embarked on a programme of work to learn all lessons and implement changes to ensure this does not happen again. This programme will build in external challenge and expertise – with independent assurance to the Home Secretary on our progress. 'MI5's job is to keep the country safe. Maintaining the trust of the courts is essential to that mission.' A BBC spokesperson said: 'We are pleased this decision has been reached and that the key role of our journalist Daniel De Simone in bringing this to light has been acknowledged by the judges. 'We believe our journalism on this story has always been in the highest public interest.'

Praise and criticism over Dorset Council tip booking plan rethink
Praise and criticism over Dorset Council tip booking plan rethink

BBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Praise and criticism over Dorset Council tip booking plan rethink

A revised plan to roll out a booking system at Dorset's household tips has been met with both praise and a backlash, Dorset Council said it would halt plans for the booking system at six of its household recycling centres while it assessed its impact at four Dorset's Labour MP Lloyd Hatton hailed the rethink as a "victory for common sense" but Conservative North Dorset MP Simon Hoare said a single solution was needed for council administration was praised by fellow Lib Dem Edward Morello, MP for West Dorset, who said he was "grateful" it had adopted "a flexible approach". Dorset Council initially said residents would have to pre-book to use any of its 10 household recycling centres from the autumn, to reduce congestion and prevent misuse by commercial users and people from outside the widespread objections, the scheme will now be rolled out at Dorchester, Wimborne, Shaftesbury and Sherborne, while "alternative measures" are explored for Bridport, Swanage, Weymouth, Portland, Wareham and Blandford. Dorset's place councillor, Jon Andrews, said: "We've listened to residents and understand their concerns."But Mr Hoare, in a Facebook post, said: "This is simply not good enough."These councillors appear to have forgotten they are 'running' an unitary council and not a series of district councils. "Policies regarding waste and recycling need to be uniform across the council area."Mr Hatton said: "After weeks of campaigning and public pressure... working together, we've got Dorset Council to finally listen to us."Mr Morello said: "Ultimately the council is trying to ensure access remains easy, save money, and cut down on abuse. "I'm grateful that the council has therefore decided to adopt a flexible approach that balances the needs of the sites where there are problems and those where there aren't." You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store