logo
Two SANDF officials arrested for murder of a police officer

Two SANDF officials arrested for murder of a police officer

Two suspects who are South African National Defence Force (SANDF) officials are expected to appear at the Randburg Magistrate's Court in connection with the murder of a police officer.
The two suspects aged 36 and 51, were arrested on Sunday, 22 June, at OR Tambo International Airport and in Centurion, Pretoria.
The arrests were effected by members of the Johannesburg-based Hawks' Serious Organised Crime Investigation, Headquarters Serious Organised Crime Investigation, and Tactical Operations Management Section (TOMS).
Hawks spokesperson in Gauteng, Lieutenant Colonel Christopher Singo, said the arrests are linked to the murder of Lieutenant Colonel Frans Mathipa, who was fatally shot while driving on the N1 highway near Hammanskraal on 6 August 2023. Following the shooting, his vehicle lost control and veered into a ditch.
Singo said Lieutenant Colonel Mathipa, who was attached to the Hawks' Crimes Against the State section within the Serious Organised Crime Investigation in Gauteng, was on duty conducting an investigation at the time of his death.
Singo said during the operation, police also seized a vehicle belonging to the 36-year-old suspect.
The vehicle is alleged to have been used in the kidnapping of two male foreign nationals at a mall in Midrand on 29 December 2022.
'It has since been impounded for further forensic investigation. The suspects are expected to appear before the Randburg Magistrate's Court on Monday, 23 June, where they will face charges of murder and kidnapping,' he added.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Malalane attorney's fraud case: Failure to secure legal counsel results in another delay
Malalane attorney's fraud case: Failure to secure legal counsel results in another delay

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Malalane attorney's fraud case: Failure to secure legal counsel results in another delay

The fraud trial of suspended attorney Zietta Janse van Rensburg was postponed again today (July 23) after she appeared in court without legal representation. The case has faced numerous delays since July last year, several of them due to her failure to secure legal counsel. ALSO READ: Trial postponed again: Zietta Janse van Rensburg returns to court in June Magistrate postpones attorney's fraud case to September Magistrate Jacob Mamabolo asked about her legal representation and who Janse van Rensburg had indicated as her attorney during her previous appearance. She replied that Johannesburg-based attorney Marco Lamberti had been appointed and that his contact details had been shared with the state. 'He has another matter in Randburg but was due to be here today,' Janse van Rensburg explained. Mamabolo's response was to postpone the matter to September 1 – and he instructed Janse van Rensburg to appear with a legal representative. 'Are you aware that at the present moment, you are by yourself?' he asked. Prosecutor says Onderberg attorney sent him WhatsApp messages, emails Before she could respond, state prosecutor Tobie Steyn intervened, questioning the accuracy of her claims. 'Ms Janse van Rensburg is placing certain information on record as if it is the truth,' said Steyn. He went on to say that he had been contacted by Adv Hennie van Rensburg, who had read in a newspaper article that he had supposedly been reinstated as her legal representative. Steyn said the accused then started sending him WhatsApp messages and emails on the matter. He told the court that he had never spoken to Lamberti but confirmed that he was copied on an email. 'But it is not my responsibility to confirm with her lawyer,' he added. He requested that the court reiterate the need for the attorney to appear personally to be placed on record. Complainants will be unhappy about accused talking to state, warns magistrate Mamabolo further instructed Janse van Rensburg not to have direct contact with the prosecutor. 'Only a witness may contact a prosecutor. You are absolutely not allowed to, and it is uncalled for. Should the complainants hear of this, they will not be happy,' he said. In response, Janse van Rensburg told the court she had taken it upon herself to make arrangements to save costs, since Lamberti would otherwise have to appoint a corresponding attorney to attend in his absence. ALSO READ: The Onderberg's Zietta van Rensburg implicated in 'serious misconduct' Mamabolo reminded her that she had the right to apply for Legal Aid, appoint her own lawyer, or represent herself. 'If you want to continue on your own, it's also fine,' he said. Janse van Rensburg confirms Joburg attorney for September court date He then asked her to suggest a date when her attorney would be able to appear in court. Janse van Rensburg said she was in a difficult position and requested permission to step outside and call Lamberti. The magistrate declined to adjourn the matter for this reason, but the prosecutor suggested that the case stand down briefly to give her the opportunity. Janse van Rensburg returned with confirmation that Lamberti would be available on September 1 and said she had already instructed him to represent her. Lamberti is the same attorney who previously withdrew from representing murder accused Sonell Joubert after not receiving payment for his services. Lowvelder attempted to reach Lamberti for comment, but he was unavailable at the time of publication. Read original story on

Zietta Janse van Rensburg fraud trial delayed yet again
Zietta Janse van Rensburg fraud trial delayed yet again

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Zietta Janse van Rensburg fraud trial delayed yet again

The fraud trial of suspended attorney Zietta Janse van Rensburg was postponed again today (July 23) after she appeared in court without legal representation. The case has faced numerous delays since July last year, several of them due to her failure to secure legal counsel. ALSO READ: Trial postponed again: Zietta Janse van Rensburg returns to court in June The first question raised by Magistrate Jacob Mamabolo was about her legal representation and who Janse van Rensburg had indicated as her attorney during her previous appearance. She replied that Johannesburg-based attorney Marco Lamberti had been appointed and that his contact details had been shared with the state. 'He has another matter in Randburg but was due to be here today,' Janse van Rensburg explained. Mamabolo's response was to postpone the matter to September 1 – and he instructed Janse van Rensburg to appear with a legal representative. 'Are you aware that at the present moment, you are by yourself?' he asked. Before she could respond, state prosecutor Tobie Steyn intervened, questioning the accuracy of her claims. 'Ms Janse van Rensburg is placing certain information on record as if it is the truth,' said Steyn. He went on to say that he had been contacted by Adv Hennie van Rensburg, who had read in a newspaper article that he had supposedly been reinstated as her legal representative. ALSO READ: Another urgent application by suspended Malalane attorney Steyn said the accused then started sending him WhatsApp messages and emails on the matter. He told the court that he had never spoken to Lamberti, but confirmed that he was copied on an email. 'But it is not my responsibility to confirm with her lawyer,' he added. He requested that the court reiterate the need for the attorney to appear personally to be placed on record. Mamabolo further instructed Janse van Rensburg not to have direct contact with the prosecutor. 'Only a witness may contact a prosecutor. You are absolutely not allowed to, and it is uncalled for. Should the complainants hear of this, they will not be happy,' he said. In response, Janse van Rensburg told the court she had taken it upon herself to make arrangements to save costs, since Lamberti would otherwise have to appoint a corresponding attorney to attend in his absence. ALSO READ: The Onderberg's Zietta van Rensburg implicated in 'serious misconduct' Mamabolo reminded her that she had the right to apply for Legal Aid, appoint her own lawyer, or represent herself. 'If you want to continue on your own, it's also fine,' he said. He then asked her to suggest a date when her attorney would be able to appear in court. Janse van Rensburg said she was in a difficult position and requested permission to step outside and call Lamberti. The magistrate declined to adjourn the matter for this reason, but the prosecutor suggested that the case stand down briefly to give her the opportunity. Janse van Rensburg returned with confirmation that Lamberti would be available on September 1 and said she had already instructed him to represent her. Lamberti is the same attorney who previously withdrew from representing murder-accused Sonell Joubert after not receiving payment for his services. Lowvelder attempted to reach Lamberti for comment, but he was unavailable at the time of publication.

‘Only a sperm donor' claim fails for dad trying to dodge maintenance
‘Only a sperm donor' claim fails for dad trying to dodge maintenance

The Herald

time6 hours ago

  • The Herald

‘Only a sperm donor' claim fails for dad trying to dodge maintenance

A Johannesburg man's attempt to avoid a claim for maintenance to support his twin children by asserting he had merely agreed to be a sperm donor for a lover has been rebuffed by the high court. The lawyer, who is a senior counsel, had an on-off extramarital affair from 2002 with a woman with whom he had twins, a boy and a girl, in October 2021. He is their biological father, though they were conceived by her undergoing artificial fertilisation. The married man also has one child with his wife and two older children. Last year the mother of the twins went to maintenance court and asked for an increase in the allowance he paid towards the children's care because her work contract was not renewed. He responded by filing a case in the high court, saying he had a 'gamete donor agreement' with her for use of his sperm to become pregnant during fertility treatment. A maintenance claim, he said, was 'contrary to their agreement' and he must 'protect his rights'. He asked the court for a declaratory order that he not be considered as the children's father or a person holding parental responsibilities and rights for them as envisaged by the Children's Act. He said he had agreed to assist her because of his care and affection for her 'to allow her to fulfil her dearest wish'. He did not want and could not afford another child and his condition was clearly expressed to her, which she accepted and on which basis he donated his sperm, he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store