Centre notifies draft rules to clear obstacles near airports
The central government issued draft rules on Wednesday to regulate and remove physical obstructions around airports, six days after the devastating Air India crash in Ahmedabad, the deadliest in three decades, as authorities separately spoke of plans to survey structures near the city's airport for potential safety violations.
The Aircraft (Demolition of Obstructions Caused by Buildings and Trees etc.) Rules, 2025, were notified on June 18 under the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024, and are open for public feedback for 21 days. The rules aim to replace the three-decade-old Aircraft (Demolition of Obstructions) Rules, 1994.
Under the proposed framework, the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) will have expanded authority to take action against any structure violating height restrictions around airports. 'Any building or tree that violates notified height restrictions around airports may face demolition or height reduction orders from the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA),' the draft rules state.
The regulations establish a detailed enforcement mechanism where airport authorities must notify owners of potential violations and conduct physical verification. Property owners will be required to submit structural details within 60 days, with a possible 60-day extension if granted.
'If the DGCA determines, after providing an opportunity for a hearing, that a building or tree violates safety norms, an order can be issued for its demolition, trimming, or reduction in height,' the draft states.
In cases of non-compliance, district collectors will be authorised to enforce demolition procedures, treating violations as unauthorised construction under local law. 'On receiving the report from the officer-in-charge of the aerodrome, the district collector shall carry out forthwith the demolition of the building or the cutting of the tree or reduction in height of the building... in the same manner and by the same procedure as is followed in case of demolition of any unauthorized construction in his district,' the rules specify.
The draft rules come as authorities prepare to conduct a comprehensive survey around Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport following last week's crash. According to PTI, Ahmedabad district collector Sujeet Kumar told reporters that 'a survey of areas surrounding the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport here will be conducted by the officials of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and the Civil Aviation department.'
'Once the survey gets over, subsequent necessary work will be initiated,' Kumar said. The collector cited the new draft rules as providing the framework for potential action against structures posing threats to aircraft safety.
Some analysts cautioned that while many airports around the country have buildings nearby that violate height norms, following through with an actual demolition will be hard. 'While it's easy to make rules, it will be next to impossible to implement them,' given the scale of non-conforming structures, said Mark Martin, founder and CEO at Martin Consulting, an aviation advisory firm, Bloomberg reported.
An official at the Delhi airport said a survey will be initiated to identify obstructions in the Capital by both the Airports Authority of India (AAI) and the directorate general of civil aviation. 'The Air Traffic Control (ATC) directly reports to the AAI and so it will share information on possible obstructions. Both AAI and DGCA will also do their own surveys,' said the official, pointing to a similar exercise done in 2018 when 369 obstructions were identified, including trees, poles and buildings. 'Subsequently, AAI also took action against these obstructions,' the airport official added.
Compensation provisions are limited under the proposed new framework. 'Compensation may be available but only for compliant or pre-existing structures. New constructions violating notified height restrictions will not be eligible,' the rules specify.
The London-bound Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed into a medical hostel complex in Meghaninagar area moments after take-off on June 12, killing all but one of the 242 people aboard and 29 others on the ground.
The aircraft departed Ahmedabad airport at 1:39 PM on June 12, with the pilot issuing a Mayday distress call shortly after take-off before the plane crashed into the medical complex located outside the airport compound.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
IAF lost aircraft due to ‘constraint by political leadership', says defence attache in Jakarta; ‘quoted out of context,' says embassy
A senior Indian military officer acknowledged last month that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost 'some aircraft' during Operation Sindoor because of the 'constraint' laid down by the Indian political leadership not to attack the Pakistani military establishment or their air defences. This was detailed by Captain Shiv Kumar, India's Defence Attache to Indonesia, during a presentation at a seminar in Jakarta on June 10. In the presentation, he also stated that after the initial setback, Indian forces adjusted their strategy, while clarifying that although the skirmish continued till May 10, India incurred losses only on May 7. Captain Kumar said the Indian forces had been directed not to target Pakistan's military infrastructure or air defences. 'Only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defences,' he said, explaining why the IAF suffered the loss of fighter jets. 'After the loss, we changed our tactics and we went for the military installations… We first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then… all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles,' he said. Captain Kumar's statement marks the first instance of an Indian military officer attributing a reason as to why India lost aircraft in Operation Sindoor. It is also the first time that an Indian military officer has thrown light on the modified tactics adopted by India after suffering initial losses during the operation. After his remarks came to light, Congress communications chief Jairam Ramesh sought clarification from the government. 'Why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence? Why has the demand for a special session of Parliament been rejected?' he said in a post on X on June 29. Later, the Indian Embassy in Jakarta issued a clarification, saying that he was quoted out of context and was simply reiterating that Operation Sindoor aimed to target terrorist infrastructure. 'His remarks have been quoted out of context, and the media reports are a mis-representation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker, the embassy said. 'The presentation conveyed that the Indian Armed Forces serve under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in our neighbourhood,' it added, in a veiled jab at Pakistan. What the armed forces had said earlier Before this, top Indian military officers had publicly acknowledged that India had suffered some aircraft losses, but had cautiously held back the reasons and the tactical changes adopted thereafter. For instance, last month, Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan had acknowledged losses during the early phases of Operation Sindoor, but did not offer specific numbers. He had told news agencies in Singapore why the jets were downed, and the way forward warranted greater importance than the number of IAF fighters downed. He also said that after suffering losses in the air initially, India had rectified its tactics and went back in large numbers deep inside Pakistan to hit their airbases. His comments marked India's first official admission to a global audience of having lost an unspecified number of jets in the operation, although India had never denied such losses. The only other official comment on this matter was made by Air Marshal A K Bharti, Director General Air Operations, IAF, in an official briefing in May, where he had said that losses are part of any combat, the Indian military had achieved all its selected objectives and all IAF pilots were back home. He had said that he would not like to comment on whether India lost any aircraft in Operation Sindoor due to the prevailing combat situation. Takeaway from Operation Sindoor: 'Air defence is very important' Captain Kumar's 20-minute detailed presentation was part of a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan–India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies' organised by Suryadarma University, also attended by senior military officials from Indonesia. While India conducted 'punitive strikes' during Operation Sindoor as an act of 'political signalling', with 'air power' as the medium of choice, the lessons learnt by the military establishment from this operation are that 'air defence is very important', he said. On the takeaways from the operation, he said that 'air defence is very important and has to be integrated — long-range, medium range, short range, legacy systems, from different OEMs – can be Russian, Indian, Israeli. (We have also learnt) that the era of manned fighter aircraft is not over.' Out of the 21 terror camps shortlisted by India, 'depending on the intelligence, we decided to target nine of them (four in Pakistan and five in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir),' Captain Kumar added. 'The only constraint that the government gave to the armed forces was not to target anything but the terrorist camps — no military installations, no civil installations and nothing which is not connected to terrorists,' he said about the operation. Born in Chennai, Captain Kumar, 46, holds a Bachelor's degree from the Naval College of Engineering in New Delhi, and three Master's degrees in Computer Science Engineering, Defence and Strategic Studies, and Management Studies, as per his bio presented at the beginning of the seminar. He was commissioned into the Navy in January 2002. Before being appointed as the defence attache at the Embassy of India, Jakarta, with concurrent accreditation to Timor-Leste, he was serving as faculty at the College of Defence Management in Secunderabad. The officer also threw more light on the evidence India has about Pakistan's involvement in the attacks, mentioning that besides The Resistance Front claims and eyewitness accounts, technical intelligence confirmed secured communication hubs of terrorists; there were also forensic investigations of recovered digital artefacts. He said that despite India giving enough time — more than two weeks — after a response across diplomatic, economic and political domains, no concrete measures were taken by Pakistan against terror outfits and infrastructure. 'That is when India initiated Operation Sindoor,' he said. After this, the Indian director general of military operations and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson conveyed (to Pakistan) that India has only targeted the terrorist camps and did not wish to escalate further, Kumar said. 'This can be the conclusion of the skirmish,' the Indian side conveyed, as per Kumar, also adding that 'any more attacks will be taken as a second escalation'. However, even as Pakistan escalated further after Operation Sindoor, India's counter-response, he said, was 'swift, precise and non-escalatory'. On the nuclear situation, he clarified that even as India has a clear no first-use policy, and also has credible deterrence in place, in case of such an attack, 'the retaliation will be massive, and Pakistan will cease to exist'.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
In charts: How Indo-Pak conflict hit flights, visits to Azerbaijan, Türkiye
The four-day conflict between India and Pakistan left the entire country on edge. Its impact was felt on the airline industry as flight cancellations soared and air passenger traffic growth slowed in May. At the same time, calls to boycott Azerbaijan and Türkiye were made after the West Asian nations seemingly supported Pakistan over India, which resulted in fewer visits by Indians during the month. Following the Pahalgam attack on 22 April, India launched precision strikes—Operation Sindoor—on terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir early on 7 May. Pakistan then struck India in the border regions, which led to drone strikes between the two countries for four days until an understanding of ceasefire was achieved. Impact on airlines As India's border regions came under heavy attack from Pakistan, as many as 32 airports in northern and western states were shut down. On day one of the conflict, over 50 flights were cancelled. The latest data released by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) for May shows the extent of disruptions, from increased airline cancellations to a sharp decline in domestic passenger traffic growth. Despite lasting only a few days, the conflict seemingly left a sizeable—though temporary—impact on the airline industry. Also Read: Gold's 'core' problem: How it may be distorting inflation Airline-wise data shows Air India was particularly hit in May, with a 3.4% cancellation rate, the highest among four major airlines by market share, and a sharp rise from just 0.27% the previous month. IndiGo and SpiceJet also saw an increased cancellation rate at 2.03% and 2.62%, respectively. The cancellation rate was lowest for Akasa Air, 0.34% as against none reported in the previous month. As airports were shut and flights were cancelled, domestic air passenger traffic growth plummeted to the lowest since March 2022. Passenger air traffic grew only 1.9% in May, much lower than the 8.4% growth recorded in the previous month. The northern region was the main catalyst for this, as shown by additional airport footfall data (domestic and international) from the Airports Authority of India. The western region was also hit, but the impact was less pronounced. Airport footfalls declined 8.7% year-on-year in the northern region in May, while they grew only 1.5% in the western region. In April, the northern region had recorded 7.3% growth and the western region 8.3%. Boycott impact During the conflict, both Azerbaijan and Türkiye supported Pakistan. The latter reportedly supplied drones to Pakistan, which raised security concerns in India and soured relations between the two countries. Also Read: The investment story in charts: How Southeast Asia is defying FDI trends The issue spiralled into calls for a boycott, especially after travel website Ixigo suspended flight and hotel bookings. Several anecdotal evidence pointed to Indians cancelling their plans to these countries. Tourism data from both countries for May now confirms the development to some extent. The number of Indian visitors to Azerbaijan fell to 23,326 in May from 29,691 in the same month a year ago. Similarly, 31,659 Indians visited Türkiye in May as opposed to 41,544 a year ago. While Azerbaijan recorded its first decline (21.4%) in Indian visitors at least since 2018 (excluding the pandemic years), Türkiye recorded its third straight month of decline. However, the decline was quite sharp compared to the previous two months. In the past few years, Azerbaijan and Türkiye saw increased tourism from India. In Azerbaijan, Indian tourists make up around 10% of total tourists. While the share is minuscule in the case of Türkiye, at around 0.7%, it saw increased year-on-year growth in visits by Indians. Despite the decline, Azerbaijan still witnessed the third-largest visitors from India in May. In this context, Azerbaijan may be more vulnerable to boycotts from Indian tourists than Türkiye. It is, however, not clear how important both nations have become in the past year. Detailed tourism data, which is available only until 2023, shows that neither Azerbaijan nor Türkiye were among the top destinations for Indian departures. Also Read: Indian companies' profit puzzle: When global turmoil meets economic theory Although the Indo-Pak conflict caused only temporary disruption to the airline industry, it is unclear whether its effect on tourism from India to Azerbaijan and Türkiye will extend beyond May.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
CEC allays oppn fears of Bihar 'disenfranchisement'
NEW DELHI: Chief election commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar on Monday stepped forward to allay the opposition's fears regarding "disenfranchisement" on account of the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of the Bihar electoral roll, saying the objective of the exercise is to simply ensure that no eligible voter is left out, while also keeping the roll free of any ineligible voter. This is in line with the duty cast upon the Election Commission by Article 326 of the Constitution, which requires only an Indian citizen above 18 years of age and ordinary resident in that constituency, unless disqualified, to be enrolled. Kumar told TOI EC is deploying over 1 lakh volunteers to assist the elderly, sick, persons with disabilities (PwDs) and other marginalised groups in filling up their enumeration forms. In a statement on Monday, EC reiterated that over 4.9 crore electors included in Bihar's electoral roll from 2003 - when the last such intensive revision was conducted - need not submit any document other than their filled-up enumeration form. The 2003 roll will be treated as probative evidence of eligibility, including presumption of Indian citizenship unless any input is received otherwise. They only need to verify details from the 2003 roll - now uploaded on the EC website and hard copies of which are being provided to booth level officers (BLOs) - and return the filled-up enumeration form to the BLO. Even children of these 4.9 crore electors will only have to submit their own citizenship proof from a list of 11 specified documents, and not any documents related to the birth of their parents. "This is because any children born to parents included as electors in the 2003 Bihar roll are Indian citizens by birth," said an EC official. "Thus, nearly 60% of Bihar's (current) 7.9 crore electorate, would not have to submit any documents. " Stating that revision of electoral roll is mandatory prior to parliamentary/assembly election or bypoll, EC said it has been conducting annual summary revisions for 75 years. Nine intensive revisions were undertaken between 1952 and 2004, involving an average six-year gap, but the latest was pending for 22 years. "SIR is required as the electoral roll is dynamic and changes due to deaths, shifting of people due to reasons such as migration due to occupation/ education/ marriage, and addition of new voters who have turned 18 years old," said the officer. As per Census 2011, there were 454 million migrants in India, up from 315 million in 2001. Even as per the Migration in India Report, 2021, the percentage of migrants in the population was estimated at around 29%, which is more than the winning margin in many of the constituencies. "SIR will introduce complete transparency in the additions/deletions in the electoral rolls through active participation of booth level agents (BLAs) appointed by political parties," the officer said, and added that around 1.5 lakh BLAs, including over 47,000 deployed by RJD alone, will monitor each stage of SIR. Interestingly, even as RJD is opposing SIR, its MLA from Hathua Rajesh Kushwaha has released posters educating electors on how to ensure they are enrolled.
