logo
AC Milan ‘exploring Rasmus Hojlund transfer' after Man Utd agreed £65million Bryan Mbeumo deal

AC Milan ‘exploring Rasmus Hojlund transfer' after Man Utd agreed £65million Bryan Mbeumo deal

The Sun3 hours ago
AC MILAN could swoop for Rasmus Hojlund after Manchester United finally agreed a deal for Bryan Mbeumo.
The Italians are desperate for a new striker and hope United will take a hit on their misfiring Danish striker.
5
5
United signed Hojlund, 24, two years ago for a huge £72million.
But he suffered another tough season, scoring just four times in the the Premier League.
And United now value him as low as £29.5m.
Now, Sky Sports say Milan are ready to find out what United's terms would be as they work out whether a deal could be possible financially.
Hojlund has expressed his intent to remain at Old Trafford and prove his worth, and is contracted until 2028.
But he could find regular football harder to come by in the upcoming season after United agreed a transfer worth £71million for Mbuemo.
United had been dragging their feet in their pursuit of the Cameroon international but were finally successful with a belated third bid.
Mbeumo, 25, scored a total of 20 goals in the Premier League last season for the Bees.
5
Amorim's 3-4-3 formation is expected to have Mbeumo on the right, alongside other new United recruit Matheus Cunha on the left.
Cunha cost the team £62.5m and is joining from Wolves.
5
TRANSFER NEWS LIVE - KEEP UP WITH ALL THE LATEST FROM A BUSY SUMMER WINDOW
The 26-year-old Brazilian scored 15 times as well as contributing six assists in the Premier League last season.
And the would leave Hojlund competing with the likes of Joshua Zirkzee for the remaining spot in the side.
5
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Identical twins Rasmus and Nicolai Hojgaard shine on day two at Royal Portrush
Identical twins Rasmus and Nicolai Hojgaard shine on day two at Royal Portrush

The Independent

time5 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Identical twins Rasmus and Nicolai Hojgaard shine on day two at Royal Portrush

Danish identical twins Rasmus and Nicolai Hojgaard made it a family affair on day two of The Open after both shooting under par to sit inside the top 10. Rasmus, younger by a couple of minutes, carded a 68 which was one better than his sibling and lifted him to the group on five under. Nicolai is one back in a tie for 10th. 'It's cool to see Ras playing well this week. I saw him quite early on the leaderboard, and I kind of wanted to follow it up,' said Nicolai. 'A little frustrated I didn't manage to get to minus five where he is. I felt like the round had potential. 'I cheer him on and am happy to see him play well, but I also want to beat him. But it's a good relationship and hopefully we'll have a good weekend and maybe battle it out on Sunday. 'We couldn't handle each other's success when we were younger, but we can do that now and support each other and get motivated by each other. When you get older, you get slightly more mature.' They were the first twins to appear at the Masters in April, the 24-year-olds arriving at their pre-tournament news conference dressed identically – although they insisted that was a random coincidence. World number 70 Rasmus has five DP World Tour wins, Nicolai, ranked 93, has three – but is a Ryder Cup winner after success in Rome two years ago and now plays on the PGA Tour. Rasmus also wants his brother to do well – until the closing stages of the final round. He added: 'I'm going to root for him until we are on Sunday back nine.'

England's defensive problems go deeper than Carter – and must be fixed fast
England's defensive problems go deeper than Carter – and must be fixed fast

The Guardian

time6 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

England's defensive problems go deeper than Carter – and must be fixed fast

Jess Carter glumly accepted her warm-down top, the pallid commiserations of Arjan Veurink and a seat on the England bench. In truth she had been fortunate to see 70 minutes of this quarter-final, and for all the nightmarish apparitions of the first half perhaps the last few minutes were the loneliest of all. Marooned at the back, 30 yards behind the rest of the team while England forced set pieces and pushed for a route back into the game: a last line of defence that had proved to be very little defence at all. Esme Morgan would replace her to add some extra heft and the entire system would need to be rejigged to a back three. Carter would watch the excruciating last hour from a seated position, reflecting bleakly on the sort of performance that scars international careers, perhaps even defines them. 'You're feeling nothing and everything at the same time,' she said afterwards. 'It's a turbulent experience. I feel like it's the first time I've smiled since the game.' The first thing to be said is that it wasn't entirely Carter's fault. England's anomie in the first hour was above all a collective failing, a mass panic that seemed to infect the entire team like a bad illness. Keira Walsh also gave the ball away for Sweden's first goal, Alex Greenwood was bypassed too easily for the second, and Hannah Hampton was having an exceptionally fraught game before spectacularly redeeming herself later. Acute problems at the back are often the symptom of more chronic issues further up the pitch. And England's sketchy press, their utter inability to gain a foothold in midfield and their unfortunate habit of colliding with the referee presented Sweden with a sitting target on their favoured right flank. Even so, right from the opening minute England's defence gave the impression that they might be in for a long night. Carter's first act on the ball was to receive a rushed pass from Leah Williamson and punt it straight out of play while trying to funnel it on to Greenwood. Her second act was to give the ball away on the edge of her area. Her third was to pluck the ball defiantly out of the net and punt it back towards the centre circle while her shellshocked teammates surveyed the wreckage around her. In a way, this encapsulated the confusion that seemed to overcome England after their early setback: the complete absence of a unifying strategy for getting back into the game, 11 players in 11 entirely separate headspaces. Do you try and weather the storm, string a few passes together for confidence, sit a little deeper to squeeze the spaces in behind? Or do you get stuck in, recommit to the original gameplan, try to pile the pressure back on Sweden. Everyone seemed to have a different answer to this question. While Georgia Stanway and Lauren James went hunting for the ball, and Lucy Bronze went roaming up the right to try and stretch the play, Greenwood dropped a few yards for security and Walsh retreated to the comfort of the back line. The result was space opening up all over the pitch, severed connections and massive underloads that again left Carter isolated against the marauding Stina Blackstenius for the second goal. And whether in the centre or at left-back, Carter is always a defender who has thrived on those connections, who needs clarity and support, and whose game – based on poise and superior reading rather than pace, height or brute strength – seems to suffer disproportionately when those elements are missing. When she arrived at Gotham FC last summer she started working with their coach Juan Carlos Amorós, who told her that she would need to rewire her defensive mindset completely. 'You've shown what you can do on the ball, but you don't do it consistently enough,' he said. What he wanted, in essence, was for Carter to start concentrating on the process instead of worrying about outcomes. 'My weakness has always been my technical ability, my consistency in that,' Carter told Sam Mewis on the Women's Game Podcast in May. 'And now I've never been so out of my comfort zone, playing for a team where you always have to play forward, be brave. He [Amorós] would rather me lose the ball 10 times trying to play forward, trying to create something, than just going back to the keeper or going long.' For Carter, reared on the tough love of Emma Hayes at Chelsea, this was the polar opposite of what she had always been taught. 'At Chelsea we were a very direct team – successful with it, but we weren't a possession team at all,' she told Mewis. 'Coaches have told me they want me to be better on the ball. But when we played direct it kind of went out the window a little bit, so … I didn't need to be that good.' But the mindset of playing centre-half for England in a tournament knockout is of an entirely different order to an evening runout at Utah Royals in 35C heat. Here it really does matter if you lose the ball 10 times in a row trying to play forward. Here the outcome matters infinitely more than the process. And perhaps Carter's skittish inconsistency suggests a player trapped between two contradictory instincts, while also being switched between two very different positions. Sign up to Moving the Goalposts No topic is too small or too big for us to cover as we deliver a twice-weekly roundup of the wonderful world of women's football after newsletter promotion Few would be surprised if Sarina Wiegman now gave Carter the opportunity to work through these issues away from the starting XI. Given the way Blackstenius and Delphine Cascarino got the better of Carter, Cristiana Girelli and Sofia Cantore would certainly relish a chance to run at her in Tuesday's semi-final. Morgan and Niamh Charles impressed when they were introduced from the bench, and the smart money is on at least one of them coming in for the Italy game. The potential ankle injury to Williamson complicates matters, particularly while Wiegman bafflingly continues to see Maya Le Tissier as little more than a training mannequin. If Williamson cannot start, then Wiegman may opt for the safety of a back three with Charles on the left, Morgan and Greenwood in the centre and a reprieved Carter given one more chance alongside them in her preferred system. Recently Rachel Daly was reminiscing about the Euro 2022 quarter-final win over Spain, a game she described as 'the worst of her life'. Given a torrid evening at left-back, put on her backside by Athenea del Castillo, at breakfast the next morning Daly was still reeling from the experience, questioning everything, wondering whether she was really cut out for the job. Millie Bright's response was curt. 'Let it go,' she said. Daly kept her place, and two games later was a European champion. Point being: these experiences do not have to define you. Social media, where Carter was being gleefully scapegoated on Friday morning, will always be a place of absolutes and extremes, of gods and demons. But for all her current difficulties, she is a multiple league winner, a continental champion for club and country, a World Cup finalist and above all a far better player than she showed on Thursday night. Whether she gets another chance to prove it, of course, is another matter.

Madueke sale 'an own goal' or 'good business'?
Madueke sale 'an own goal' or 'good business'?

BBC News

time6 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Madueke sale 'an own goal' or 'good business'?

Noni Madueke has become the latest player to make the switch from Chelsea to Arsenal, so we asked for your views on the winger's £50m move to the do you feel about the number of Chelsea players making the move to the north of the capital? Do you think this transfer could come back to bite the Blues?Here are some of your thoughts:James: It very much depends on the situation. For example Petr Cech left with much admiration, but when it comes to Madueke I feel that he still had so much to offer Chelsea. I'm sorry to see him go and this move could potentially be an own goal for I'm not happy at all with this transfer. I absolutely love Noni and I'm very gutted that he is I think it might be one Chelsea regret. Looking at all the players we have sold to Arsenal, from Cech onwards, all of their careers have been winding down (with the possible exception of Kai Havertz). Madueke is a real talent though. Good luck to him, just not when he plays Why do we keep helping Arsenal? I understand selling him, but why to them? Why would you help your rival? They obviously need more wide Chelsea have benefitted more than Arsenal here. Nice It's good business from Chelsea. He is a rotational squad player with low goals and assists and we have sold him for £ It's all about money. Madueke was falling down the pecking order at Chelsea, so who can blame him? He will get more chances at Arsenal but I still don't think that he will do any good there.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store