Man Hung Upside Down, Thrashed In Rajasthan, "Mafia Rule", Says Congress
A man was hung upside down with a rope from an earthmover in Beawar district and beaten over the suspicion of cement theft, police on Saturday said.
The incident, which was captured in a video and attracted a strong condemnation from Congress, led to the arrest of a man under section 170 of BNSS (arrest to prevent commission of cognizable offences).
Sub-Inspector Naval Kishore, posted at the Raipur Police Station (Beawar), said the video showed accused Tejpal Singh striking the man whose legs were tied to the bucket loader of the earthmover with a rope.
"Primary investigation reveals that Tejpal tortured his driver Yakub on suspicion of diesel and cement theft. Tejpal runs a factory and had sent the driver to Jaipur with a dumper loaded with cement nearly two and a half months ago," he said.
The SHO said the driver has not given any complaint yet.
"Further action will be taken on FIR registration by the victim," another officer said.
The state Congress denounced the BJP government over the incident, crying poor law and order.
Former chief minister Ashok Gehlot asked the government how long the "mafia rule" would continue in Rajasthan? "The public is asking when will this scary game being played with the connivance of the police and administration stop?" he said in a post on X.
PCC chief Govind Singh Dotasra said, "The hooliganism of mafias is at its peak in Rajasthan. In the weak BJP government, there is no fear of law on the mafias." He added, "This inhuman and cruel incident has raised serious questions on law and order, police inaction and political protection being given to criminals in the BJP rule in the state." Dotasra said that the incident was a blot on the entire system.
"I demand from the state government strict action in this case and the layers of political protection should be exposed. Also, there should be an impartial investigation of the role of careless local police in the incident," he said.
Leader of Opposition Tikaram Jully alleged that the criminals had patronage of the state.
"This has crossed all limits of brutality. This is not only the failure of the administration, but is the real mirror of the government," he said.
"How long will the mafia rule continue? At whose instigation this open hooliganism is happening? Why is the police administration a mute spectator? Whose protection do the mafias have in power? Does the government have the courage to take strict action against the accused?" he asked.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
5 key reasons why Congress prefers Siddaramaiah over DK Shivakumar as Karnataka CM
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on July 2 asserted that he will be in office for a full five-year term, putting to rest speculation of leadership change in the Congress-ruled state. "Yes, I will be the CM of Karnataka. Why do you have doubts?" the veteran leader said in response to reporters' questions about whether he would be the CM for five years. Siddaramaiah's deputy, DK Shivakumar, responded, saying he doesn't have an option but to support CM Siddaramaiah. "What option do I have? I have to stand by him and support him. I don't have any objection to it. Whatever the party high command tells and whatever they decide, it will be fulfilled...I don't want to discuss anything now. Lakhs of workers are supporting this party," Shivakumar told the news agency ANI. The comments from top Karnataka leaders come after speculations in political circles, particularly within Congress, regarding a change in the chief minister later this year. As Mint reported earlier, this speculation is based on a power-sharing agreement involving Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar. "I have to go by my party. My party is important. My leadership's decision is important. We have an aim to bring 2028 (state assembly elections), we will work for that," Shivakumar said. It seems that the Congress party has sorted out the Karnataka leadership crisis for now. The party has decided to nominate Siddaramaiah as chief minister. Here are five reasons why Congress decided to go ahead with Siddaramaiah for now: Bihar is the only state going to the polls in 2025. Sources said the Congress party thinks that removing a leader from a marginalised community (OBC) ahead of elections in Bihar would not send a good message in a state with substantial numbers of backwards and extremely backwards class voters. Some leaders in the Congress party think that removing Siddaramaiah would give the BJP in Bihar political ammunition to attack the INDIA bloc comprising Congress and its ally RJD. If Shivakumar wanted to be the CM, he would have to give up his Karnataka Pradesh Congress President post. Sources said Shivakumar is not keen on leaving the post. He fears Siddaramaiah loyalists would be appointed for it. After the Assembly election results were declared in May 2023, Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar faced stiff competition for the chief minister's post, but the Congress convinced the latter and made him the deputy CM. One of the reasons that Congress picked Siddaramaiah instead of Shivakumar then was that the latter was under investigation by central agencies. This time also, that consideration has prompted the Congress party to continue with Siddaramaiah as the chief minister. Shivakumar even went to jail for more than a month in 2019 over money laundering charges against him. According to reports, the Congress party fears that the BJP ruling at the Centre could attack Shivakumar with these cases if he becomes the CM and perhaps put a sitting CM in jail again. Another factor that is not going with Shivakumar is the June 4 stampede in Bengaluru that killed 11 people during the IPL victory parade of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB). While the cricket team has been held 'prima facie responsible', Shivakumar has also come under fire for reportedly allowing the gathering despite crowd control warnings. The Congress doesn't want to repeat the mistakes of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh in Karnataka, one of its three states in power. The other two Congress-ruled states are Telangana and Himachal Pradesh. Yes, I will be the CM of Karnataka. Why do you have doubts? In Rajasthan, for example, the Ashok Gehlot vs. Sachin Pilot controversy may have cost the party the Rajasthan assembly elections in 2023. The Congress may also be wary of the Kamal Nath vs. Jyotiraditya Scindia controversy of 2020 in Madhya Pradesh. Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan will vote for assembly elections in 2028. What option do I have? I have to stand by him and support him.
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
The RSS Obsession: What's Fueling Congress's Endless Attacks On Sangh
RSS functionaries often say, sometimes in jest, that Rahul Gandhi has made them 'famous'. And, he has done more to publicise the RSS than the organisation has ever done for itself. There has been a curious pattern in Indian politics in recent times. Irrespective of the forums, occasion, or issue, the Congress, particularly Rahul Gandhi, inevitably brings up the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Whether it is a campaign rally, a Parliament speech, or an international press interaction, the Sangh Parivar is the invisible opponent in almost every Congress narrative. With elections around the corner in several states, the Congress turned up the heat on its old enemy – RSS. This time it began in Karnataka as senior leaders made repeated references to the RSS — accusing it of running the Modi government, subverting the Constitution, and controlling institutions. These are not just ideological volleys. Instead, they are also calculated political moves aimed at rallying a fractured voter base that the Congress desperately wants to consolidate votes of Muslims, OBCs, and Dalits. The RSS functionaries often say, sometimes in jest, that Rahul Gandhi has made them 'famous'. And, he has done more to publicise the RSS than the organisation has ever done for itself. They add that Rahul Gandhi's relentless references about the RSS made people curious around the world and they have now started to take an interest in the Sangh and what it stands for. 'Nehruvian' Anxiety, The Founding Feud The Congress and the RSS were born of two contrasting visions for India pre-independence. While the Congress, particularly under Nehru, sought to build a 'secular', 'socialist' republic rooted in Western liberalism, the RSS emerged in 1925 as a cultural movement aimed at rejuvenating Hindu identity and nationalism. The RSS never accepted the Nehruvian idea of secularism and saw it as appeasement for Muslims. Congress, in turn, viewed the RSS as sectarian, regressive, and a threat to India's plural fabric. This was the reason when Nehru first banned the RSS in 1947 for four days. Several RSS functionaries said that the ban was a result of 'Nehruvian anxiety' as he felt that the Sangh might spread its roots faster than anybody could think of. This foundational clash made the RSS a permanent ideological adversary in the Congress's worldview. The situation, however, escalated after Mahatma Gandhi's assassination in 1948, with the RSS temporarily banned and its alleged links, though unproven, with Nathuram Godse cited in public discourse. That shadow never fully lifted in Congress rhetoric. Advertisement Speaking with News18, Ratan Sharda, author and political analyst said, 'Post-1947, Congress developed a peculiar complex about the RSS. The Sangh's growing popularity made them anxious — not because it contested elections, but because it connected with the people in a way Congress couldn't. Nehru responded with bans, setting a legacy of state-sanctioned suppression that his ideological heirs proudly continued. At the core of Congress's worldview was a warped idea of secularism — where appeasing Muslims was considered liberal, but speaking of Hindus was communal. This distorted lens defined their politics for decades. India was governed for years by this confused sense of nationhood." 'Indira and Rajiv didn't hold visceral hatred for the RSS; their opposition was mostly tactical. But today's leadership, led by Rahul Gandhi, has outsourced its thinking to woke JNU types that have a toxic alliance of radical Islamists, Church lobbies, and leftist ideologues. Their hope is that attacking the RSS will rattle the BJP. What they do not realise is — it is not the Sangh's name but its unmatched ground presence, its disciplined ecosystem, and its connect with the grassroots that make it so formidable," he further said, adding, 'Congress's politics of Muslim appeasement and RSS-bashing has earned it no dividends — only political decline. Despite the failure of this idea they have not thought of some new tactics." advetisement Attacking the Sangh: A Flawed Shortcut? Despite being largely a social-cultural organisation with no direct or overt electoral role, the RSS remains the ideological backbone of the BJP. The Congress is aware that for defeating the BJP at the ballot box, targeting the party is just not enough. They also need to take on the RSS's deep grassroots machinery, committed cadre, and long-term ideological vision. A senior RSS functionary called it 'ideological bigotry'. 'Jairam Ramesh and his coterie, cloaked in self-righteous liberalism, are quick to label an ordinary swayamsevak as a fascist or neo-Nazi — terms that reveal more about their ideological insecurity than about their target. They speak often of the Constitution, invoking its sanctity at every turn. But their idea of constitutionalism collapses at the first sign of ideological dissent," said the senior RSS functionary. advetisement Senior Congress leaders including Rahul Gandhi, often frame the BJP as a 'mask" and the RSS as the real power behind the throne. The anxiety is not misplaced. The Sangh's ecosystem, ranging from education to health to civil society and other welfare networks, provides the BJP with cultural depth and staying power. This is something the Congress, once a pan-India organisation with a nationalist monopoly, can no longer claim. Badri Narayan, director of GB Pant Social Science Institute and a senior political observer said, 'The BJP has built its politics around visible developmental work and performance, and that's where the political discourse should be focused. But their opponents haven't been able to offer a real contrast on that front. Instead, they keep targeting the RSS, thinking it's a shortcut to discrediting the BJP. What they do not realise is that the more they attack the Sangh, the more it gains strength – not just politically, but socially through its grassroots work." top videos View All 'When they speak against the RSS, they are essentially speaking against the people who are part of its vast social outreach. The RSS has never been bothered by political noise; it stays rooted in its long-term vision. So this strategy of attacking the Sangh, without engaging the BJP on governance or delivery, is fundamentally flawed. It shows a lack of understanding of the deeper political implications. It is just an escape route for the Congress," he added. From shaping policies to grooming leadership, the RSS now holds moral and intellectual influence over a large section of people through its 'nationalistic' ideas. This probably unnerves the Congress. For a party long used to holding the narrative, the RSS represents an alternative nationalism it neither understands fully nor knows how to counter. About the Author Madhuparna Das Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : congress Rahul Gandhi Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh rss Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 03, 2025, 07:41 IST News politics The RSS Obsession: What's Fueling Congress's Endless Attacks On Sangh
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Vote-bandi will destroy democracy: Cong opposes EC's roll revision in Bihar
Leaders of several INDIA bloc parties met the Election Commission over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar and raised concerns over its timing, alleging that over two crore voters of the state may be disenfranchised by this mammoth exercise being done just ahead of assembly elections. The Congress claimed that after the prime minister's 'notebandi' (demonetisation) that "destroyed" the country's economy, EC's 'Vote-bandi' in Bihar will demolish India's democracy. Leaders from 11 parties, including the Congress, RJD, CPI(M), CPI, CPI(ML) Liberation, NCP-SP and the Samajwadi Party, put forth their objections before Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and other election commissioners to the special scrutiny of the voters' list. The INDIA bloc parties have been vocal in their opposition to the Special Intensive Revision exercise that has already started in Bihar and is to be carried out in Assam, Kerala, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, which are going to the polls next year. Briefing the media after the meeting, Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi said a minimum of 20 million people may be disenfranchised in this exercise as many, especially, the SCs, STs, migratory and impoverished, among the nearly eight crore voters in Bihar may not be in a position to present their and their parents' birth certificates to the poll authorities in such a short period. He also claimed that they would not be able to challenge the removal of their names from the electoral rolls as polls would begin by then, and courts do not hear challenges when elections are underway. In a post on X, Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said, "After the PM's 'notebandi' of November 2016 destroyed our economy, ECI's 'VOTE-Bandi' in Bihar and other states, as reflected in the SIR, will destroy our democracy." Singhvi said, "We asked the EC that the last revision was in 2003, and for 22 years after 4-5 elections have happened, were all those elections faulty or imperfect or unreliable. The SIR was held one year before the general elections and two years before the assembly elections." He said that in a maximum period of one or two months, the EC is holding an electoral revision exercise of India's second most populous state, Bihar, which has roughly under eight crore voters. "This disenfranchisement and disempowerment is the worst attack on the basic structure of the Constitution. We gave universal adult suffrage in 1950, when so-called advanced countries like the USA and the UK got it only in 1924 and 1928. "Today, every vote counts, even if you wrongfully delete or wrongfully add a single voter, it is creating a non-level playing field and that affects elections, that affects democracy," the Congress leader said. Elections and democracy are part of the basic structure, and it is said that even a constitutional amendment is unconstitutional if it affects the basic structure, he asserted. Singhvi asked, "How do you expect the very diverse voting population of Bihar, the backwards, the flood-affected, the poor and impoverished, the SC/ST, the unempowered or even the migrant to spend the next two months running from pillar to post to get the birth certificate of his own and his father/mother." It is easy to say that the volunteers will help him, but if a person does not get the certificate within the time limit, that individual loses a place in the electoral roll, he noted. "We have said that upwards of 2.5 crore to 3 crore persons, let us assume the minimum figure of two crore may be disenfranchised in this exercise. "We are not against it (SIR), but this can be done with great care after this election. Why choose this time, just ahead of the assembly elections," Singhvi said. He alleged that this exercise was announced suddenly. "We believe that migratory persons, who have to travel for work, cannot be at the beck and call of the person who knocks on the door asking for filling up the enumeration form," he said, noting that voters have been there on rolls since 2003 and have voted in 4-5 elections. "The EC, though it heard us, seems to be disinclined to accept our submissions," he said. Singhvi said they also protested against the new directive of the poll panel on entry to the Election Commission premises that asks only party presidents to appear before it. "For the first time, we were given rules to enter the EC. For the first time, we were told that only party chiefs can go. Such a restriction means necessary dialogue between political parties and the EC can't happen," Singhvi said. Ramesh in his X post said, "The Election Commission was literally compelled to meet the delegation after having refused to do so. A few of us could not meet the ECI, which unilaterally imposed a limit of two representatives per party. I myself had to hang around in the waiting room for almost two hours." "Over the last six months, the ECI has conducted itself in a manner that undermines the very basis of our democratic system. The ECI is a constitutional body. It cannot routinely refuse requests for a hearing from the Opposition. It must abide by the principles and provisions of the Constitution." He said the EC "cannot dictate arbitrary rules for interacting with political parties such as deciding the designation of those attending or the number who can attend or who is or isn't an authorised person". "When the delegation rejected these new rules as arbitrary and confused, the Election Commission informed us that this is a 'New' Commission. We shudder to think what this 'New' Commission's game plan is. How many more Master(s)strokes can we expect?" RJD leader Manoj Jha said the meeting was "not cordial". "We expressed our concern about the poor, backward classes in Bihar. We saw a lack of concern from the Election Commission," he said. "Is this an effort to disenfranchise people? The 20 per cent Biharis who migrate outside the state are the target. If the purpose of an exercise becomes exclusion instead of inclusion, what should we do? "Are you trying to find doubtful voters in Bihar?" he said. CPI(ML) General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said their doubts and worries about the SIR have increased after the meeting because they did not get any satisfactory reply. "We said the poor will not have these documents. They said those who are in the 2003 voters' list will be presumed to be citizens of India, the rest will have to prove their citizenship to the EC," he said. "We said this reminds people of Bihar of 'notebandi', and it is being called 'votebandi' (disenfranchisement) in Bihar," he said. "If you interfere with 'one person-one vote', we will take action." EC sources said some of the participants were given an appointment and others were allowed to join in without any prior appointment, as the Commission decided to meet two representatives from every party. The EC told them that SIR is being conducted in accordance with the provisions of Article 326, RP Act 1950 and instructions issued on 24.06.2025. They also said each concern raised by the parties was "fully addressed" by the Commission. The Election Commission has issued instructions to carry out a Special Intensive Revision in Bihar to weed out ineligible names and ensure all eligible citizens are included in the electoral roll, allowing them to exercise their franchise in the polls slated later this year. The poll panel has said it has taken additional steps in the intensive revision to ensure illegal migrants do not get enrolled in the voters' list. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
