IMF official visits amid budget talks
The International Monetary Fund (IMF)'s regional director, Jihad Azour, is visiting Pakistan this week in the middle of negotiations for approval of the new budget, as both sides are taking time to converge on key issues of increasing taxes and rationalising expenses.
Government sources told The Express Tribune that Jihad Azour, the IMF's Director for the Middle East and Central Asia, would also meet Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif during his visit this week. Azour will also hold discussions with Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb.
The regional director is visiting Pakistan 10 days after the approval of the second loan tranche of the $7 billion programme, despite opposition from India. Azour's visit is a testimony to smooth relations between the lender and the borrower, despite New Delhi's negative campaign.
Both the Ministry of Finance and the IMF resident representative remained tight-lipped about the purpose of the visit at a time when the IMF staff is already in Pakistan to reach an agreement on the new budget for fiscal year 2025-26.
One senior government functionary said the government would take up some outstanding budget-related issues with the IMF director, particularly regarding major spending items. The IMF has imposed a new condition on Pakistan that the government must secure parliamentary approval of the new budget in line with the IMF staff agreement to meet programme targets. This leaves little space for the government to implement its own agenda, although PM Sharif wants to provide relief to the salaried class.
The sources said the tax target, defence spending, and some grant-related issues were being discussed. The federal government has decided to allocate nearly Rs2.504 trillion for defence spending in the next fiscal year, which is 18% higher than this year's allocation. However, the IMF's staff-level report released on Saturday showed defence spending at Rs2.414 trillion, an increase of 12%. Some grants and subsidy allocations have also not yet been finalised.
The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on Monday presented the taxation proposals for the next fiscal year to the prime minister. The PM was also briefed that the FBR's tax target may be around Rs14.07 trillion, which is roughly Rs240 billion less than the earlier mutually agreed target between the IMF and the government for fiscal year 2025-26, they added.
However, there is a possibility that the government may substantially increase petroleum levy rates in the Finance Bill 2025. The IMF has projected petroleum levy collection at over Rs1.3 trillion for the next fiscal year, which could become the single largest non-tax revenue source if the government starts charging Rs100 per litre levy on petrol and diesel. The current rate is Rs78 per litre.
The finance ministry will have to find space to adjust the Rs240 billion reduction in the earlier agreed target if the petroleum levy is not immediately increased to Rs100 per litre in the budget. For the outgoing fiscal year, the FBR's tax target has further dropped to Rs12.16 trillion after economic growth remained below the government's conservative estimates.
The sources said the PM termed the proposed relief in income tax for the salaried class and the cut in super tax rates as insufficient. He directed tax authorities to provide significant respite to salaried individuals in consultation with the IMF.
The sources said the PM stated in the meeting that providing relief to the salaried class was his top priority. Salaried individuals paid a whopping Rs437 billion in taxes in just 10 months of this fiscal year, which was Rs150 billion higher than the previous record. The FBR's claims before the prime minister and the IMF that it would compensate for the shortfall in taxes through enforcement measures and by settling litigation cases have proven incorrect. This has created a trust issue between the IMF and the FBR, said the sources.
In addition to the standard 29% income tax from the corporate sector, the government also charges a 10% super tax, which might be reduced in phases.
The FBR's single biggest failure was its inability to collect the IMF-set target of Rs36.7 billion from traders in nine months under the Tajir Dost Scheme. The IMF report revealed that collections were less than Rs4 million during the first half. For the next fiscal year, the IMF has dropped the Tajir Dost Scheme and proposed a new target, which may shift the focus away from retailers. The IMF and the government have agreed to collect a cumulative Rs531 billion in taxes from retailers in the next fiscal year, including other applicable taxes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
‘Agri development, farmer prosperity are top priorities of CM'
LAHORE: Minister for Agriculture Punjab, Syed Ashiq Hussain Kirmani, has stated that agricultural development and farmer prosperity are among the foremost priorities of the Chief Minister Punjab. The present government is implementing revolutionary programs aimed at uplifting the agriculture sector and ensuring farmer welfare, which have already begun yielding positive outcomes across the province. However, some elements are attempting to distort the facts and spread misconceptions regarding these historic initiatives of the Punjab government. Minister Syed Ashiq Hussain Kirmani highlighted that within just one month of taking office, the Chief Minister Punjab initiated multiple agricultural development programs worth Rs. 400 billion — f or the first time in the history of Province. These programs included interest-free loans worth of billions of rupees through Kisan Card, provision of thousands of tractors on subsidy under the Green Tractors Program, and provision of modern agricultural machinery with up to 60% subsidy and many other initiatives. He added that this is the only Government in Pakistan's history during which no fertilizer shortage has been witnessed. Fertilizer is available in abundance in the market at prices even lower than those fixed by the manufacturers. Artificial shortages, profiteering, and hoarding of fertilizers have been completely eradicated from the province. He clarified that, during the current season, all provincial governments ceased official wheat procurement under the IMF agreement; however, Punjab remains the only province that extended direct financial support of Rs. 14 billion to small wheat farmers. During just a short period of two months, more than Rs. 85 billion in interest-free loans have been disbursed to farmers across Punjab for the purchase of fertilizers, seeds, and pesticides for Kharif crops. Of this amount, farmers have already utilized over Rs. 45 billion for the purchase of fertilizers, pesticides, and diesel. Syed Ashiq Hussain Kirmani further elaborated on the landmark programs launched during the current fiscal year for the welfare of farmers and agricultural advancement. These include Rs. 200 billion in interest-free loans through the Kisan Card, subsidized provision of 20,000 tractors, solarization of over 10,000 agricultural tube wells, establishment of 10 model agriculture malls, recruitment of 2,000 young agriculture graduates to provide technical support in the field, improvement and lining of watercourses, and a Rs. 30 billion program for the distribution of modern agricultural machinery. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Discount rate as a policy tool
Economic stability has been achieved, and the country will not be deterred from implementing the reform agenda agreed with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) – a claim that has repeatedly been pledged by the country's cabinet members. The pros and cons of economic stability are stark in Pakistan: pros include strengthening foreign exchange reserves, rising remittances, plummeting inflation and halving of the discount rate in one year (21 percent in June 2024 to 11 percent in June 2025). The cons negate these gains with (i) reserves entirely debt based as roll-overs are estimated at 16 billion dollars while reserves on 11 July 2025 reached a high of 14.525 billion dollars – a high achieved by the State Bank of Pakistan reportedly picking up 8 billion dollars from the open market that led to a severe dollar supply shortage in the open market leading to a fall in the rupee value in spite of the current account surplus; (ii) the rise in remittance inflows leading to the current account surplus is are not expected to end the boom bust trade cycle — 'economic volatility has only increased over time, with a tight correlation between Pakistan's boom-bust economic outcomes and its economic policies' was noted by the IMF in its September 2024 documents; (iii) declining inflation which has been unable to arrest the rise in poverty levels (44.2 percent at present as per the World Bank), and (iv) reduction in the discount rate that has been unable to lift the large scale manufacturing sector out of its negativity (with the latest data placing it at negative 1.52 percent). This leads one to carefully review IMF's first review documents dated May 2025 where it argues that external and domestic risks may 'quickly eviscerate Pakistan's hard won economic stability.' The key question raised in nearly all twenty-three previous IMF programmes is: did the Pakistan team propose in-house out of the box suggestions to the IMF team and which, if any of their suggestions, were entertained? A quick glance at the Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies (MEFP) dated 2024 shows no deviation from past conditions, except that they are harsher and more upfront for the reason specified in Fund documents notably that Pakistan's implementation of agreed reforms has been poor – an opinion supported by the fact that the country either left the previous programmes mid-way or if any was completed (2016 three year loan) the government of the day quickly reversed all reforms necessitating another loan within the year of its completion. Notwithstanding the foot-dragging by Pakistan authorities to implement politically challenging reforms, there is flawed policy advice given by the Fund staff premised on economic linkages that maybe relevant in several countries but not in Pakistan. A long time Fund condition for Pakistan has been to link the discount rate to inflation – a linkage that is tenuous in Pakistan as the government remains the major borrower in the domestic market and any decline in the discount rate is seen as a means to reduce mark-up on loans secured to finance budgeted expenditure. The government budgeted bank borrowing (treasury bills, Pakistan investment Binds, sukuk) at 5.142 trillion rupees in 2024-25 while total credit to the private sector was only 676.6 billion rupees – a mere 13 percent of government borrowing. So much for claims that private sector led growth is the policy thrust. A State Bank of Pakistan Working Paper Series dated December 2022 titled 'Time Frequency Analysis Determinants of Inflation rate' in Pakistan identified short, medium, and long term determinants of inflation as follows: (i) short term (4 to 8 months) policy rate, exchange rate, government borrowing and import growth; (ii) medium term (9 to 64 months) global commodity prices (specially petroleum whose impact on the public is exacerbated by the hefty petroleum levy as well as the carbon levy that was a condition to procure 1.4 billion dollar resilience loan from the IMF) and broad money supply; and (iii) Long term (above 64 months) government borrowing which continues to rise with the focus on extending the amortisation period rather than reducing the amount), global commodity prices and money supply. The short term one may assume began soon after the 8 February 2024 elections and ended in November 2024 with three major observations that challenge the linkage between the discount rate and inflation: (i) the discount rate declined by a mere 150 basis points on 10 June 2024 (from 22 percent to 20.5 percent) even though it was claimed inflation declined by 8.1 percent (from 20.7 percent in March 2024 to 12.6 percent in June); reports suggest that the Fund may have opposed a further cut in the discount rate as it is clearly stipulated in the Fund's loan documents dated September 2024 that 'there are important shortcomings' in the source data available for sectors accounting for a whopping one-third of GDP and a Technical assistance will be provided that would address these weaknesses in Government Finance Statistics and Producer Price Index; (ii) IMF condition that the interbank open market rupee-dollar parity must not be in excess of plus/minus 1.25 percent during five consecutive business period. However, the dollar scarcity has been addressed by the stakeholders through implementing law enforcement measures; and (iii) imports were restrained during this period via administrative measures while domestic government borrowing continued – up to 53.46 trillion rupees by March 2025 (no further update is available). Medium term is underway and is more dependent on global commodity prices as well as the rupee-dollar parity. Long term has not yet arrived, but one may assume that government borrowing will continue to rise, though the economic team leaders have budgeted a decline in debt servicing due to the expectation that the discount rate will decline — an expectation that would entail convincing the Fund team that the real rate has declined – an assessment that may not be forthcoming till the end of the Fund TA on addressing data shortcomings (scheduled end in June 2026). There is a need for existing researchers employed in the SBP as well as those in the federal government to not only provide accurate data to the leadership on a regular basis but also to ensure that they provide an updated analytical treatise on the outcome of reforms proposed by the Fund and those out of the box in-house measures that would achieve better results because they are premised on unique conditions prevalent in this country. To date the government has focused on reducing subsidies, passing the onus of utilities reforms onto the end users through higher tariffs, raising revenue through indirect taxes and ceasing procurement and price setting of staple food items – measures likely to exacerbate the poverty levels, which together with unemployment at a high of 22 percent bodes ill for the general public and strengthens the risk associated with 'political economy considerations and pressures from vested interests that could delay or weaken the reform momentum and put at risk the still brittle stability.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Foreign debt inflows
EDITORIAL: Economic Affairs Division (EAD) released data that showed Pakistan's foreign debt inflows (fresh loans and grants) surged to 12.4 billion US dollars in fiscal year 2025 attributed to an inflow of 3.4 billion US dollars in June 2025 secured by the government from commercial banks in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and China. The provisional disbursement July-June 2025 was cited as 4.297 billion US dollars, which was 518.83 million US dollars in excess of what was budgeted for the year at 3.779 billion US dollars. The amortisation period and the interest rate applicable on these foreign commercial loans were not shared with the public, rates that are set in line with the ratings given to Pakistan by the three international rating agencies. In this context, it is relevant to note that in spite of a recent upgrade by one of the three international rating agencies, a rating guided by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which noted in the first review documents of the ongoing Extended Fund Facility dated May 2025 that external and internal risks would 'quickly eviscerate Pakistan's hard won economic stability' one may safely assume that the interest rate agreed would be higher than the market rate and, additionally, given that commercial banks typically lend for short periods the principal due may have to be factored in as repayment in the current year's reserves. In other words, the actual debt servicing for 2025-26 may already be lower than what was budgeted for the year. The budgeted amount under Naya Pakistan Certificate was 464.9 million US dollars, and it reached a high of 1,918 million US dollars July-June 2025 which accounted for market borrowing inflows, including commercial borrowings, of 5439.34 million US dollars, higher than the budgeted 5049.26 million US dollars — a rise in spite of one billion US dollars budgeted bonds not issued, due perhaps to lack of market interest. Time deposits cited in the statistics were 9 billion US dollars — budgeted though the corresponding disbursed column (provisional) has not been filled but the total bilateral and multilateral inflows of 5,439.34 million US dollars plus 4,297.83 million US dollars foreign commercial bank borrowings plus 1,918.06 million US dollars from Naya Pakistan Certificate gives a grand total of 11,655.23 million US dollars, which requires a clarification from EAD as to how it reached a total of 12,138.24 million US dollars as adding on the time deposit would give a grand total of 20,655 million US dollars — higher than the budgeted 19,393 million US dollars. The EAD does not factor in the IMF disbursements; however, two observations are critical. First and foremost, the capacity of the administration to secure commercial loans from abroad has no doubt been strengthened due to the country being on an IMF programme; however, budgetary support amounted to 8,602.96 million US dollars (provisional) last year and yet this was only 54 percent of the budgeted amount of 15,965.94 million US dollars. One would hope that the government had instead opted to slash its major current expenditure components, some of which required reforms like the pension budget while others required sacrifice (salary budget of the 7 percent employed by the government). And secondly, the shortfall was filled by a rise in domestic borrowing that was accommodated by the 10 percent decline in the discount rate that led to a decline in mark-up on domestic debt by about 830 billion rupees. To conclude, there is little evidence of the country moving towards ending the toxic tendency to borrow from abroad to meet the budgeted outlay as repeatedly stated by the Prime Minister and one can only hope that in the current year the budgeted current expenditure is slashed, which is not attributable to a lower discount rate but to actual savings by improving governance. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
