
Trump takes on the Fed – but he has little power over central bank, economists say
'You have cost the USA a fortune and continue to do so. You should lower the rate – by a lot!' Trump wrote to Powell, whom he calls 'Too Late' in one of his less compelling nicknames.
That Trump has targeted the Fed isn't surprising. In the midst of Trump's trade war, consumers and business owners alike have expressed anxiety about the economy. The stock market tanked in April, when the president announced the highest of his tariffs, and only went on the upswing when he pulled back the bulk of his levies.
The Fed has the ability to sway the US economy through its ability to adjust interest rates. When rates are high, as they have been for the last few years, borrowing money becomes more expensive. This means higher rates for mortgages, business loans, credit card debt and more. People are less likely to invest when interest rates are high, which can slow activity in the economy. The Fed lowering interest rates would excite investors and spur economic activity, but the price could be steep in the long run.
But how much sway does Trump really have over the Fed?
While Trump's aggression toward the Fed, particularly his personal attacks against Powell, are a remarkable departure from the relationship a US president typically has with the Fed, economists say the structure of the central bank limits the amount of power Trump actually has – at least in the short term.
Historically, the Fed has been a nonpartisan, independent central bank within the federal government. Economists have found that countries without central banks are prone to high inflation and unemployment.
'A central bank's independence is pretty much the only thing macroeconomists know of that's a free lunch,' said Jason Furman, a former economic adviser to Barack Obama. 'When you look at authoritarian leaders that have effectively taken over the central banks, like in Turkey, you can end up with 70% inflation rates and really, really big economic problems.'
In late June, Trump told reporters that he has zeroed in on 'three or four people who I'm going to pick' to replace Powell. When the treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, whose name has been floated, was asked if he would take the job, Bessent said: 'I will do what the president wants'.
That the White House is already talking about replacing Powell almost a year out from the end of his term has raised concerns that a new appointee would act as Trump's 'shadow chair', or someone who has power over Powell before he leaves office.
But those familiar with the Fed's structure say that a powerful 'shadow chair' is unlikely, especially since the Fed's structure encourages consensus among its leaders.
When setting interest rates, the Fed chair doesn't act alone. The chair is one of 12 members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which meets eight times a year to vote on any adjustments to the interest rate.
The amount of control Trump has over who gets on to the FOMC is limited. The committee has seven Fed governors who serve 14-year terms. Those governors are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The other five members are presidents of regional Federal Reserve banks, who are selected within the Federal Reserve system.
During the next four years, because of upcoming term limits, Trump will have the ability to appoint two of the 12 members of the FOMC – what would be a small fraction of the committee.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
'They're going to have a hard time persuading other people on the committee to go along with anything like what Trump wants,' Furman said.
Ryan Sweet, chief US economist for Oxford Economics, said that Fed governors on the FOMC already voice dissenting views on the economy in public, but come together to form a consensus during their meetings.
'It's built [into the Fed] that they go into a meeting and they've got to come to a consensus on what the outcome is,' Sweet said.
And even though Trump may want to replace Powell before his term is up, the supreme court signaled that the president can't constitutionally fire him. Sweet pointed out that the court's preemptive protection of the Fed chair has likely soothed stock markets, which had gone into a panic when Trump first threatened to oust Powell.
Powell, whom Trump first appointed in 2018, has publicly resisted the president's efforts to sway the Fed. He has said he would not step down if Trump asks and has said the Fed will not lower interest rates prematurely, at risk of raising inflation.
In his most pointed statement against Trump's economic policies, Powell said that the Fed paused interest rate increases 'when we saw the size of the tariffs'.
'Essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence of tariffs,' Powell said. 'We didn't overreact, in fact we didn't react at all.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern confirm merger talks to create coast to coast railroad
Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern acknowledged Thursday that they were in merger talks that would create a single U.S railroad with rails stretching service from East to West Coasts. The Associated Press reported last week that the companies were discussing a tie-up but neither company confirmed until Thursday morning. The potential merger would combine the largest and smallest of the country's six major freight railroads. There's widespread debate over whether such a merger would be approved by U.S. regulators, which have established a high bar for consolidation in the crucial industry. THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. AP's earlier story follows below. Union Pacific reported Thursday that its adjusted profit grew to $1.8 billion in the second quarter as merger rumors to swirl around the nation's largest railroad. The Omaha, Nebraska, per-share earnings rose rose to $3.03, beating Wall Street expectations and easily topping the $2.71 per-share profit it reported in the same period last year. Analysts were expecting profit of $2.91 per share for the recent quarter. Operating revenue grew 2% over last year, to $6.2 billion, the company said. Union Pacific shares rose about 1% before the bell Thursday, to $233.30 each. They had slumped to around $208 in early April, their lowest level of 2025, as President Donald Trump rolled out sweeping tariffs that threatened to upend global trade. Shares of all U.S. railroads moved higher as well. Sources told The Associated Press last week that Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern are in merger talks that would create the a railroad in North America that essentially connects the East and West Coasts. Neither company has commented on the negotiations, which began during the first quarter of this year, according to a person familiar with the talks who wasn't authorized to speak publicly about them. It would combine the largest and smallest of the country's six major freight railroads. There is widespread debate over whether such a merger would be approved by U.S. regulators, which have established a high bar for consolidation in the crucial industry. That is largely because of a disastrous deal that involved Union Pacific. Union Pacific merged with Southern Pacific in 1996 and the tie-up led to an extended period of snarled rail traffic on U.S. rails. Three years later, Conrail was divvied up by Norfolk Southern and CSX, which led to more backups on rails in the East. However, just two years ago the U.S. Surface Transportation Board did approve a deal that created the CPKC railroad, allowing Canadian Pacific to acquire Kansas City Southern for $31 billion. That merger combined the two smallest major railroads in North America, however, but left only six major freight railroads. It was the first major rail merger approved in more than two decades. To be approved, any major rail merger must show it will enhance competition and serve the public interest under the 2001 rules. The CPKC merger was not judged under those rules because Kansas City Southern had an exemption from them as the smallest major freight railroad at the time.


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
UnitedHealth says it is under a federal investigation and cooperating
Shares of UnitedHealth Group slipped Thursday after the health care giant said it was under a Department of Justice investigation. The company said it has started complying with both criminal and civil requests from federal investigators and it was cooperating with them. '(UnitedHealth) has a long record of responsible conduct and effective compliance,' the company said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Earlier this year, The Wall Street Journal said federal officials had launched a civil fraud investigation into how the company records diagnoses that lead to extra payments for its Medicare Advantage, or MA, plans. Those are privately run versions of the government's Medicare coverage program mostly for people ages 65 and over. The company's UnitedHealthcare business covers more than 8 million people as the nation's largest provider of Medicare Advantage plans. The business has been under pressure in recent quarters due to rising care use and rate cuts. UnitedHealth Group Inc. said in February that it wasn't aware of the start of any new activity as the paper reported. The company said Thursday that it reached out to the Justice Department 'after reviewing media reports about investigations into certain aspects of the company's participation in the Medicare program.' UnitedHealth runs one of the nation's largest health insurance and pharmacy benefits management businesses. It also operates a growing Optum business that provides care and technology support. Company shares have mostly shed value since December, when UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot in midtown Manhattan on his way to the company's annual investor meeting. The stock price dropped 2%, or $6.13, to $286.50 Thursday morning.


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Major UK-India trade deal expected to create 2,200 British jobs
Britain and India have formally signed a free trade agreement at Chequers, the prime minister's country residence, following three years of negotiations. The deal is projected to inject £6bn into the British economy and create 2,200 jobs across the country. It will significantly reduce tariffs on British goods, including halving duties on whisky and lowering them for cars and cosmetics. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the agreement as a 'historic day' and a 'new chapter' in their nations' shared history. This marks Britain's largest trade deal since leaving the European Union and India's biggest strategic partnership with an advanced economy.