Letting GPs like myself step up in ADHD care is a long-overdue reform. This change matters
This new reform will allow specialist general practitioners, after additional training, to initiate stimulant medication for ADHD in kids that known to them and manage ongoing treatment – without requiring direct handover from the diagnosing paediatrician or psychiatrist. In practical terms, it means that instead of acting as a powerless middleman, I'll finally be able to do what I know is right for my patients – and much sooner.
Currently, the system is buckling under the weight of long waitlists for paediatricians and psychiatrists. We're talking 6 to 12 months – if the referral is even accepted – to access a diagnosis, let alone treatment. In that time, people fall through the cracks.
Children continue to struggle in classrooms where they are mislabeled as defiant rather than distracted; adults silently carry the burden of emotional dysregulation, disorganisation and burnout. Families suffer. Relationships unravel. Careers stall. And for what? Because we've artificially limited access to care and underestimated the ability of GPs to manage what is, in many cases, a chronic neurodevelopmental condition with clear diagnostic criteria and well-established treatment pathways.
As a GP, I see these patients daily. I know their histories. I know their families. And more often than not, I know exactly what a psychiatrist or paediatrician will say – but I've had to tell patients, 'I know what needs to happen next, but I can't legally do it.' That changes now.
This isn't about GPs replacing specialists. It's about filling the gaping chasm in care that exists between a diagnosis and effective treatment. It's about recognising that in a stretched and fragmented system, GPs with the right training are best positioned to deliver timely and safe care, especially for conditions like ADHD.
But beyond my professional perspective, this reform touches something deeper for me. I was diagnosed with ADHD before the Covid-19 pandemic – well before the surge in public awareness and the influx of people seeking assessment in recent years. It was a long overdue recognition of a lifelong pattern.
I am also a parent of children with ADHD. I know the chaos of untreated symptoms and I know the clarity and calm that can follow the right treatment. I've seen lives transform – my own, my family's, my patients'.
This is not just a policy win; it's a personal one.
Some critics have suggested we are facing an epidemic of overdiagnosis. I disagree. What we are seeing is a long-needed correction – a better understanding of ADHD across the lifespan and among groups historically underdiagnosed. This isn't a fad. It's a reckoning with reality.
Critics may question whether GPs are 'qualified enough' to manage stimulant medications. To that I say: we already manage far more dangerous drugs in complex scenarios – opioids, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics. We monitor, we adjust, we counsel. With appropriate guidelines and training, ADHD management is well within our wheelhouse.
This reform is about trust. Trust in patients to know when they need help. Trust in GPs to rise to the challenge with care and competence. And trust in a healthcare system that must evolve to meet growing demand with practical, people-centred solutions.
For every child who has waited too long, for every adult who has been misdiagnosed, misunderstood, or turned away, this change matters. For every GP who has felt helpless watching a patient deteriorate while stuck on a waitlist – this change matters. For families like mine, this is not an abstract policy. This is hope, made real.
We must get the implementation right. Training must be robust, support must be ongoing and collaboration with specialists must be preserved where complexity demands it. But let's be clear: this is a gamechanger. And it's about time.
Dr Richard Nguyen is a GP in southern Sydney
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Healthcare firm Heartflow's IPO filing discloses wider loss
July 17 (Reuters) - Heartflow's quarterly loss widened over the year-ago period, the healthcare company disclosed in its paperwork for a U.S. initial public offering on Thursday, at a time when it looks to tap into renewed investor appetite for new listings. The U.S. IPO market is recovering from months of sluggish activity triggered by trade policy uncertainty under President Donald Trump. Both Omada (OMDA.O), opens new tab, a virtual healthcare provider, and cancer diagnostic firm Caris Life Sciences (CAI.O), opens new tab saw strong investor reception when they debuted last month. Mountain View, California-based Heartflow posted a loss of $32.3 million for the three months ended March 31, compared with a loss of $20.9 million a year earlier, the IPO filing showed. Its revenue was $37.2 million for the quarter, compared with $26.8 million a year ago. Proceeds from the IPO will be used to pay down debt, fund sales and marketing, research and product development activities and other general corporate purposes, the company said. Heartflow develops an artificial intelligence-powered heart imaging tool, which creates personalized 3D models of the organ, helping doctors detect blockages, minimize unnecessary testing and optimize treatment. The company will list on the Nasdaq under the symbol "HTFL". J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley and Piper Sandler are among the underwriters for the offering.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Idaho agrees not to prosecute doctors for out-of-state abortion referrals
July 17 (Reuters) - Idaho, which has a near-total ban on abortion, agreed not to prosecute or take away licenses of doctors who refer patients out of state to obtain the procedure, under a consent decree approved by a federal judge on Thursday. The decree prevents Idaho's Republican Attorney General Raul Labrador and county prosecutors from prosecuting healthcare providers who refer, counsel or otherwise provide information to patients seeking abortions in other states. A local Planned Parenthood affiliate sued Idaho in April 2023 to block enforcement, after Labrador said the referrals could violate state law and require license suspensions for doctors who make them. Planned Parenthood said the restriction violated the U.S. Constitution by infringing doctors' First Amendment free speech rights and regulating lawful out-of-state reproductive health services. A federal appeals court blocked enforcement last December. During oral arguments, a lawyer for Labrador said the attorney general would not prosecute people for making the referrals. Idaho makes it a crime to perform or attempt to perform abortions, or for healthcare providers to assist in abortions, with narrow exceptions. The decree covering Planned Parenthood and two doctors was approved by U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill in Boise. "Idaho's strong pro-life laws remain fully in effect, and we remain proud to defend the rights of mothers and their unborn children," Labrador said in a statement. "This settlement simply affirms what our office already made clear in court: we do not have the authority to prosecute referrals for out-of-state services." Rebecca Gibron, chief executive of Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, said in a statement that the decree "affirms something every patient deserves: open, honest care from a provider they trust." The U.S. Supreme Court eliminated the federal constitutional right to abortion in 2022, overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. Eighteen Republican-led states have total abortion bans or ban abortions at or before the 12th week of pregnancy, according to the nonprofit Guttmacher Institute, which focuses on reproductive health.
Medical News Today
3 hours ago
- Medical News Today
What to know about insurance for preventive screenings
In the United States, most health insurance plans cover preventive health screenings and services at no cost. However, the services may only be free if a healthcare professional under the plan's network provides and conditions for individual health insurance plans can vary, so people should always check with their insurance provider to see which services are covered and if any fees will article explores which preventive screenings insurance plans cover, whether there are any fees for preventive screenings, and whether Medicare covers use of binary terms such as 'male' and 'female' or 'men' and 'women' in this article reflects the language of the sources we've used. Unless otherwise noted, it's unclear whether the research we reference included participants with expansive gender screenings for all adultsMany health insurance plans will cover the following types of preventive services without charging people a copayment or coinsurance:Preventive screenings for all adults include:blood pressure screeningdepression screeningalcohol misuse screening and counselingobesity screening and counselingcertain vaccinations, depending on a person's age and other factorscholesterol screening, depending on a person's age and other factorstype 2 diabetes screening for anyone between 40 to 70 years of age with overweight or obesitydiet counseling for adults at higher risk for chronic diseasetuberculosis screening for certain people without symptoms who are at high riskaspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer for anyone between 50 to 59 years of age with a high cardiovascular riskstatin preventive medication for certain adults ages 40 to 75 yearscolorectal cancer screening for people between 45 to 75 years of agelung cancer screening for adults ages 50 to 80 at high risk for lung cancer due to current smoking or after quitting smoking in the past 15 yearstobacco use screening for everyone and quitting interventions for people who use tobaccofalls prevention for adults ages 65 years and over who live in a community settinghepatitis B screening for people at high riskhepatitis C screening for people between the ages of 18 to 79 yearssexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention counseling for individuals at higher risksyphilis screening for adults at higher riskHIV screening for anyone ages 15 to 65, and other ages at increased riskpreexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) HIV prevention medication for individuals at high risk of contracting HIV through sex or injection drug useFor menAdditionally, most health insurance plans should cover abdominal aortic aneurysm one-time screening for men of specified ages who have ever smoked without charging them a copayment or screenings for womenMany health insurance plans should also cover the following types of preventive services for women without charging them a copayment or coinsurance:Cervical cancer screening, which includes Pap tests for individuals ages 21 to cancer screening mammogram, with or without clinical breast examination, every 1 to 2 years for individuals ages 40 and cancer chemoprevention counseling for individuals at higher cancer genetic test counseling for those at higher and interpersonal violence screening and counseling. Yearly urinary incontinence screening for people with a history of gestational diabetes who are not currently pregnant and who have not been diagnosed with type 2 screening for younger individuals and those at higher screening for people at higher density screening for individuals over age 65 or 64 years and younger who have experienced healthcare professional visits to get recommended screenings for people who are pregnant or may become pregnantFor people who are pregnant or may become pregnant, many health insurance plans will also cover the following types of preventive services without charging a copayment or coinsurance:birth controlsyphilis screeningurinary tract or other infection screeningfolic acid supplements for individuals who may become pregnanthepatitis B screening for pregnant people at their first prenatal visitgestational diabetes screening for people who are 24 weeks pregnant or later and those at high risk of developing gestational diabetespreeclampsia prevention and screening for pregnant people with high blood pressureRh incompatibility screening for all pregnant people and follow-up testing for individuals at higher riskbreastfeeding support and counseling from trained providers, and access to breastfeeding supplies, for people who are pregnant or nursingpostpartum depression screening for birthing parents at baby doctor visitsexpanded tobacco intervention and counseling for pregnant people who use tobaccoPreventive screenings for childrenMost health insurance plans should also cover the following types of preventive services for children and infants without charging a copayment or coinsurance:blood screening for newbornshearing screening for all newborns, and regular screenings for children and adolescents, as a healthcare professional recommendshemoglobinopathies or sickle cell screening for newbornsbilirubin concentration screening for newbornsphenylketonuria screening for newbornsgonorrhea preventive medication for the eyes of all newbornshypothyroidism screening for newbornsautism screening for children at 18 and 24 monthsoral health risk assessment for young children from ages 6 months to 6 yearsfluoride varnish for all infants and children as soon as teeth are presentfluoride supplements for children without fluoride in their water sourcedevelopmental screening for children under age 3regular height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) measurements for all childrenregular baby and child doctor visitsbehavioral assessments for all childrenvision screening for all childrenhematocrit or hemoglobin screening for all childrendyslipidemia screening for all children once between 9 and 11 years and once between 17 and 21 years, and for children at higher risk of lipid disorderslead screening for children at risk of lead exposuretuberculin testing for children at higher risk of tuberculosisAre there any fees for preventive screenings?Preventive screenings are usually only free of charge if a healthcare professional in the plan's network provides insurance providers may charge a fee if a person receives preventive services from an out-of-network provider. They may also charge a fee for some doctor's office visit costs if preventive service is not the main purpose of the a person's insurance may not cover preventive services if a person has a 'grandfathered' health insurance should always check the terms and conditions for their individual health insurance plan or contact their insurance provider for more without health insurance may still be able to access free or reduced-cost preventive screenings through options like Medicaid, community health centers, or charity clinics. »Learn more:What medical care is available without insurance?Does Medicare cover preventive screenings?Medicare Part B covers many preventive screening tests if a person meets certain criteria. Many of these services are free of charge, but people should always check the terms and conditions of their individual Medicare plan for more information, as plan benefits can example, someone with a Medicare Advantage Plan may have access to certain preventive services that Original Medicare does not cover, and their costs and coverage rules may resourcesFor more resources to help guide you through the complex world of medical insurance, visit our Medicare to speak with a doctorPeople should aim to attend any preventive screenings that are recommended based on their age or other factors, such as pregnancy or tobacco who is unsure about which preventive services would benefit them may want to contact a healthcare professional for further information.»FIND CARE:Find a healthcare professional in your area health insurance plans cover preventive health screenings and services at no extra coverage and fees can differ between plans. For example, insurance providers may charge a fee if a person receives preventive services from an out-of-network provider. A person should always check the terms and conditions of their health insurance plan or contact their provider for more who do not have health insurance may want to explore options such as Medicaid, community health centers, or charity clinics.
