This 21-year-old founder cut open his leg to show off his biotech. Then he raised $4.3 million from Peter Thiel and others.
Adler, the founder of Pilgrim, a biotech and defense startup building medical devices for the battlefield, tested his flagship product — a hemostatic dressing he calls Kingsfoil — by cutting open both of his thighs.
Business Insider will spare you the details (and the video), but we watched it. (Adler, who is 21, assured us that he told his mom before filming: "I was very cautious," he said to BI in an interview. He does not encourage other founders to pursue similarly daring — and potentially dangerous — testing on themselves.)
In a video sent to investors and viewed by BI, Adler numbed his legs with lidocaine and used a punch biopsy tool to create two scientifically precise wounds. One was slathered with Kingsfoil, which seemed to stall the bleeding, and the other was a control.
When Kingsfoil touches the skin, Adler said, the gauze morphs into a gel-like consistency. He added that this can help seal wounds, clot blood flow, and aid in healing. Adler claims there are no known side effects to Kingsfoil, a clay-based hemostatic, other than possibly some minor skin irritation.
Adler named Kingsfoil after the healing herb in J.R.R. Tolkien's book "The Lord of the Rings." (LotR names are popular among defense tech founders; Palmer Luckey's Anduril and Erebor and Alex Karp's Palantir all come from the book.)
No investors held Adler's feet to the fire for the video: It was totally his idea, and he hopes to build on the demonstration by testing Kingsfoil in more controlled settings. "It is intended to undergo proper and rigorous clinical investigations," Adler said of Kingsfoil before sterilizing his thigh in the video. "This is just a precursor to that."
"When I looked through the laws, there was nothing that inherently said I couldn't do a test on myself," he added in an interview. "In the same way you can get a tattoo, I'm allowed to do anything to my own body."
Following the video, the Redwood, Calif.-based startup raised $4.3 million in seed funding. Frontier tech-focused firm Cantos VC led the round. Thiel Capital, Day One Ventures, and Refactor Capital participated alongside angel investors including Joshua Browder, Cory Levy, and Adrian Fenty.
There are some established incumbents and newer startups in the wound care space. QuikClot also makes hemostatic dressings; its original formula used a mineral called zeolite, which triggered a heat-releasing reaction upon contact with blood, potentially causing burns. The company now uses a clay-based formula, and its website claims that the US Defense Department uses QuikClot products.
HemCon makes hemostatic dressings using chitosan, a shellfish derivative. There's also Sealonix, a startup that makes hemostatic sealants for surgical use, which raised a $20 million Series A in 2023.
While many defense startups are more focused on autonomous tech that can operate with humans off the physical battlefield, Pilgrim hopes to address critical medical needs of the soldiers who will remain on the battlefield despite advancements in drone tech.
Adler sees the Defense Department as an "initial and first market" for his tech because "their operational needs are roughly five to 10 years ahead of the general operating or emergency room," he said.
"My goal is to translate technologies to the everyday civilian," Adler continued, adding that the company also hopes to one day sell the product commercially. This would make Pilgrim a dual-use startup, an increasingly common business model for companies hoping to diversify their customer base by selling to both the government and consumers.
"We look for people who stand out and are a little weird," Ian Rountree, general partner at Cantos, told BI about Adler. "Jake is exceptional," He added," It's one of those problems hiding in plain sight."
Kingsfoil hasn't yet hit shelves. Since hemostatic agents already exist, Adler said the company can pursue an "expedited pathway" toward FDA approval, which he thinks could take six months. If the FDA deems Kingsfoil as novel, though, the company could face a timeline of one to one and a half years for approval. Adler said Pilgrim has already done a few "pre-submissions" to the FDA.
The company is also working on two other products: Voyager, an inhaled mist that Pilgrim hopes will help the body neutralize chemical threats, like nerve agents, before they reach the bloodstream, and ARGUS, a surveillance platform that Adler says will be able to detect chemicals and other biological threats in high-risk areas like ports, hospitals, and farms.
Both are still in the prototyping and testing phases. The five-person Pilgrim team develops these products and Kingsfoil from a hybrid office-lab in California.
In 2023, a year after graduating from high school, Adler became a Thiel Fellow to work on a wearable device startup that aimed to induce and improve sleep.
"I was really compelled by this belief that we can move beyond that paradigm toward being able to leverage data in real time to augment the body," Adler said.
This idea still underpins his work at Pilgrim, Adler added: "I'm interested in creating an enduring institution that can become a biotech prime and go beyond that and actually translate technologies back to the civilian."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
12 hours ago
- Business Insider
Tesla must pay over $242M in damages after being found partly at fault for deadly Autopilot crash
In a major blow to Tesla, a Florida federal jury on Friday found Elon Musk's electric car company partly to blame for a 2019 crash that left a 22-year-old woman dead and her boyfriend seriously injured. The jury sided with the plaintiffs, awarding the family of Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, a combined $329 million in total damages — $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million punitive damages. Jurors awarded $59 million in compensatory damages to Benavides Leon's family and $70 million to Angulo, who suffered a traumatic brain injury and broken bones among other injuries. The verdict marks a substantial setback for Tesla and its Autopilot driver-assistance feature that the attorneys for the plaintiffs said was engaged at the time of the deadly collision and had design flaws. Tesla, in a statement, called the verdict "wrong" and said it plans to appeal "given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial." "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," said Tesla. The company added, "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver — from day one — admitted and accepted responsibility." Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . The plaintiff's attorney, Brett Schreiber, said the verdict "represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives." The verdict follows a three-week civil trial that included testimony from Angulo, Benavides Leon's family members, and the driver of the Tesla that plowed into a parked SUV and struck the couple as they were stargazing outside the vehicle alongside a Key Largo road. The jury found Tesla 33% responsible for the crash, with the driver responsible for the rest. Tesla will have to pay the full punitive damages amount, and a third of the compensatory damages, which equals $42.5 million. The case stems from a wrongful-death lawsuit that the plaintiffs brought against Tesla. The lawsuit argued that the carmaker's vehicles were "defective and unsafe for their intended use." Tesla, the lawsuit said, programmed Autopilot"to allow it to be used on roadways that Tesla knew were not suitable for its use and knew this would result in collisions causing injuries and deaths of innocent people who did not choose to be a part of Tesla's experiments, such as Plaintiffs." "Despite knowing of Autopilot's deficiencies, Tesla advertised Autopilot in a way that greatly exaggerated its capabilities and hid its deficiencies," said the lawsuit, which pointed to multiple comments from Musk touting the safety and reliability of the software. Tesla driver George McGee had Autopilot on when his 2019 Model S blew past a stop sign and a flashing red light at a three-way intersection and plowed into Angulo's mother's Chevrolet Tahoe at more than 60-miles-per-hour, the lawsuit said. McGee — who previously settled a separate lawsuit with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed amount — said he had dropped his cellphone during a call and bent down to pick it up moments before his Tesla, without warning, T-boned the Tahoe. He testified during the trial that he thought of Autopilot, which allows the vehicle to steer itself, switch lanes, brake, and accelerate on its own, as a "copilot." "My concept was it would assist me should I have a failure" or "should I make a mistake," McGee said in testimony, adding, "I do feel like it failed me." "I believe it didn't warn me of the car and the individuals and nor did it apply brakes," McGee testified. Attorneys for Tesla have argued that McGee was solely responsible for the April 25, 2019, crash. In the trial's opening statements, Tesla attorney Joel Smith said the case was about a driver, not a "defective vehicle," and had "nothing to do with Autopilot." "It's about an aggressive driver, not a complacent driver, a distracted driver who was fumbling around for his cellphone," Smith said. "It's about a driver pressing an accelerator pedal and driving straight through an intersection." Tesla's attorneys said that just before the crash, McGee hit the accelerator, overriding the vehicle's set cruising speed of 45 miles per hour and its ability to brake on its own. Autopilot mode, Tesla says on its website, is "intended for use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment."

Business Insider
15 hours ago
- Business Insider
This 21-year-old founder cut open his leg to show off his biotech. Then he raised $4.3 million from Peter Thiel and others.
If you think you're moving fast and breaking things, you haven't met Jake Adler, who poured his actual blood into his startup. Adler, the founder of Pilgrim, a biotech and defense startup building medical devices for the battlefield, tested his flagship product — a hemostatic dressing he calls Kingsfoil — by cutting open both of his thighs. Business Insider will spare you the details (and the video), but we watched it. (Adler, who is 21, assured us that he told his mom before filming: "I was very cautious," he said to BI in an interview. He does not encourage other founders to pursue similarly daring — and potentially dangerous — testing on themselves.) In a video sent to investors and viewed by BI, Adler numbed his legs with lidocaine and used a punch biopsy tool to create two scientifically precise wounds. One was slathered with Kingsfoil, which seemed to stall the bleeding, and the other was a control. When Kingsfoil touches the skin, Adler said, the gauze morphs into a gel-like consistency. He added that this can help seal wounds, clot blood flow, and aid in healing. Adler claims there are no known side effects to Kingsfoil, a clay-based hemostatic, other than possibly some minor skin irritation. Adler named Kingsfoil after the healing herb in J.R.R. Tolkien's book "The Lord of the Rings." (LotR names are popular among defense tech founders; Palmer Luckey's Anduril and Erebor and Alex Karp's Palantir all come from the book.) No investors held Adler's feet to the fire for the video: It was totally his idea, and he hopes to build on the demonstration by testing Kingsfoil in more controlled settings. "It is intended to undergo proper and rigorous clinical investigations," Adler said of Kingsfoil before sterilizing his thigh in the video. "This is just a precursor to that." "When I looked through the laws, there was nothing that inherently said I couldn't do a test on myself," he added in an interview. "In the same way you can get a tattoo, I'm allowed to do anything to my own body." Following the video, the Redwood, Calif.-based startup raised $4.3 million in seed funding. Frontier tech-focused firm Cantos VC led the round. Thiel Capital, Day One Ventures, and Refactor Capital participated alongside angel investors including Joshua Browder, Cory Levy, and Adrian Fenty. There are some established incumbents and newer startups in the wound care space. QuikClot also makes hemostatic dressings; its original formula used a mineral called zeolite, which triggered a heat-releasing reaction upon contact with blood, potentially causing burns. The company now uses a clay-based formula, and its website claims that the US Defense Department uses QuikClot products. HemCon makes hemostatic dressings using chitosan, a shellfish derivative. There's also Sealonix, a startup that makes hemostatic sealants for surgical use, which raised a $20 million Series A in 2023. While many defense startups are more focused on autonomous tech that can operate with humans off the physical battlefield, Pilgrim hopes to address critical medical needs of the soldiers who will remain on the battlefield despite advancements in drone tech. Adler sees the Defense Department as an "initial and first market" for his tech because "their operational needs are roughly five to 10 years ahead of the general operating or emergency room," he said. "My goal is to translate technologies to the everyday civilian," Adler continued, adding that the company also hopes to one day sell the product commercially. This would make Pilgrim a dual-use startup, an increasingly common business model for companies hoping to diversify their customer base by selling to both the government and consumers. "We look for people who stand out and are a little weird," Ian Rountree, general partner at Cantos, told BI about Adler. "Jake is exceptional," He added," It's one of those problems hiding in plain sight." Kingsfoil hasn't yet hit shelves. Since hemostatic agents already exist, Adler said the company can pursue an "expedited pathway" toward FDA approval, which he thinks could take six months. If the FDA deems Kingsfoil as novel, though, the company could face a timeline of one to one and a half years for approval. Adler said Pilgrim has already done a few "pre-submissions" to the FDA. The company is also working on two other products: Voyager, an inhaled mist that Pilgrim hopes will help the body neutralize chemical threats, like nerve agents, before they reach the bloodstream, and ARGUS, a surveillance platform that Adler says will be able to detect chemicals and other biological threats in high-risk areas like ports, hospitals, and farms. Both are still in the prototyping and testing phases. The five-person Pilgrim team develops these products and Kingsfoil from a hybrid office-lab in California. In 2023, a year after graduating from high school, Adler became a Thiel Fellow to work on a wearable device startup that aimed to induce and improve sleep. "I was really compelled by this belief that we can move beyond that paradigm toward being able to leverage data in real time to augment the body," Adler said. This idea still underpins his work at Pilgrim, Adler added: "I'm interested in creating an enduring institution that can become a biotech prime and go beyond that and actually translate technologies back to the civilian."

Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
China's military tried to buy Nvidia chips for AI servers and a robot dog, documents show
The Chinese military wants to use Nvidia AI chips in a wide range of projects, from servers running Chinese startup DeepSeek's most powerful model to a 33-pound "robot dog" with a high-definition camera, according to documents reviewed by Business Insider. BI reviewed records on the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA)'s official procurement portal, where military units post thousands of requests for equipment that local contractors can bid on. Multiple requests over the past year reference both banned and permitted Nvidia hardware, including the H20 chip, on which the US is set to loosen export controls—a move that has sent Nvidia's stock soaring. An Nvidia spokesperson told BI that China has "more than enough" domestic chips for all its military applications. "Buying a handful of older products to test the US competition is not a national security concern," the spokesperson said. "Using restricted products for military applications would be a nonstarter, without support, software, or maintenance." While the Chinese military tries to buy Nvidia's hardware, the chipmaker faces pressure from other parts of the Chinese government, which has long supported efforts to build a domestic alternative. On Thursday, China's internet regulator said it had summoned the company to explain alleged backdoor security risks in its H20 chips, claims that Nvidia has denied, Reuters reported. How the Chinese army wants to use Nvidia chips The military projects reviewed by BI are typically for servers to run AI models, like those built by DeepSeek, for unspecified purposes. Three requests published this April call for banned Nvidia chips to power such servers. One requests at least eight H20 cards for a system capable of running one of DeepSeek's largest and most powerful models, DeepSeek-R1 671B, at full capacity. Another, tied to an "intelligent decision-making" support system that can also run DeepSeek, calls for four RTX 6000 graphics cards—also banned. Although the contract hasn't been finalized, a supplier was provisionally selected in June. DeepSeek didn't respond to requests for comment. Another server request from the same month asks for an H100 graphics card— banned from export to China since 2022—which can cost tens of thousands of dollars apiece. The listing specifies that the cards must be delivered in their original packaging and installed on-site. Another AI server request published in July 2024 also calls for H100 GPUs. The Chinese military isn't only calling for AI servers. One project from April, for example, shows a military unit requesting a 33-pound "robot dog" with an Nvidia Jetson computing module as part of an unspecified training project. This particular request was later canceled, and Jetson modules are not barred from being exported to China for most use cases. It's unclear whether the Chinese military actually obtained these chips. Ryan Fedasiuk, a former State Department advisor on China tech policy, says the Chinese military has many ways to acquire them. "There are ample cutouts, subsidiaries, and shell companies that the PLA can and does use to source chips illicitly from American companies, including Nvidia," he told BI. Nvidia plans to sell H20 chips to China again Some national security policymakers and professionals have expressed concerns about making it easier for China to get some Nvidia chips. Twenty of them sent a letter to the Commerce Department on Monday asking the US to reimpose the H20 ban, saying the chips would "support China's military." "This reversal will certainly open the floodgates," said Craig Singleton, a senior director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies who co-signed the letter. The Commerce Department told BI that the current administration has tightened controls compared to its predecessor. "The Trump Administration will consider any H20 license applications carefully, accounting for both the benefits and the costs of potential exports from America and taking into account the views of experts across the US Government," a Commerce spokesperson said. 'Nobody can beat Nvidia' Fedasiuk reviewed some of the records found by BI and said they show that the Chinese military, like Chinese AI companies, wants to use the best hardware possible, and domestic chips like Huawei's don't cut it. "In terms of sheer processing power that a given chip is capable of bringing to bear, nobody can beat Nvidia. Huawei is not close," Fedasiuk said. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has downplayed such concerns, saying China's military doesn't want to rely on US technology. "They simply can't rely on it," Huang said in July on CNN. "It could, of course, be limited at any time."