Athletes frustrated as France mulls Muslim headscarf ban in sport
But now the Muslim convert fears she will no longer be able to compete as the French government is pushing for a new law to ban the headscarf in domestic sports competitions.
"It feels like they're trying to limit our freedoms each time a little more," said Eberena, a passionate athlete who trains five days a week.
"It's frustrating because all we want is to do sport."
Advertisement
Under France's secular system, civil servants, teachers, pupils and athletes representing France abroad cannot wear obvious religious symbols, such as a Christian cross, a Jewish kippah, a Sikh turban or a Muslim headscarf, also known as a hijab.
Until now, individual national sports federations could decide whether to allow the hijab in domestic competitions.
But the new legislation aims to forbid the head covering in all professional and amateur competitions countrywide.
Backers say that would unify confusing regulation, boost secularism and fight extremism.
Critics argue it would be just the latest rule discriminating against visibly Muslim women.
The bill passed in the Senate in February and is soon to go to a vote in the lower house of the French parliament.
Some proponents want to stop what they call "Islamist encroachment" in a country that has been rocked by deadly jihadist attacks in recent years.
But critics point to a 2022 interior ministry report finding that data "failed to show a structural or even significant phenomenon of radicalisation" in sport.
French Olympic judo champion Teddy Riner, a star of the 2024 Paris Games, last month said France was "wasting its time" with such debates and should think about "equality instead of attacking a single and same religion".
Right-wing Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau responded that he "radically disagreed", describing the headscarf as "a symbol of submission".
Advertisement
Eberena, who converted aged 19, said her head attire - allowed by the weightlifting federation - had never been an issue among fellow weightlifters.
She said the sport has allowed her to make friends from completely different backgrounds.
"Sport brings us together: it forces us to get to know each other, to move beyond our prejudices," she said.
France's football and basketball federations are among those that have banned religious symbols, including the headscarf.
The country's highest administrative court in 2023 upheld the rule in football, arguing the federation was allowed to impose a "neutrality requirement".
United Nations experts last year called the rules in both sports "disproportionate and discriminatory".
Advertisement
It is difficult to estimate how many women might be prevented from competing if such legislation passes.
But AFP spoke to several women whose lives had already been affected by similar rules.
Samia Bouljedri, a French 21-year-old of Algerian origin, said she had been playing football for her club in the village of Moutiers for four years when she decided to cover her hair at the end of high school.
She continued playing with her team, but after her club was fined several weekends in a row for allowing her on the field, they asked her to take off her hijab or quit.
"That they ended my happiness, just like that, over a scarf made me really sad," she said.
France's brand of secularism stems from a 1905 law protecting "freedom of conscience", separating church and state, and ensuring the state's neutrality.
The country's constitution states that France is a secular republic.
Rim-Sarah Alouane, a researcher at University Toulouse Capitole, said the 1905 law, intended "to protect the state against potential abuses from religion", had been "weaponised" against Muslims in recent years.
French secularism "has been transformed into a tool in its modern interpretation to control the visibility of religion within public space, especially, and mostly, targeting Muslims," she said.
Sports Minister Marie Barsacq last month warned against "conflating" the wearing of a headscarf with radicalisation in sport.
But Justice Minister Gérald Darmanin said that if the government did not "defend secularism", it would empower the far right.
In the Oise region north of Paris, Audrey Devaux, 24, said she stopped competing in basketball games after she converted to Islam a few years ago.
Instead, she continued training with her former teammates and began coaching one of the club's adult teams, she said.
But when she goes to weekend games, she is not allowed onto the courtside bench with a headscarf - so she is forced to yell out instructions from the bleachers.
"At school I learnt that secularism was living together, accepting everyone and letting everybody practice their religion," Devaux said.
"It seems to me they're slightly changing the definition."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AFP
an hour ago
- AFP
Philippine senator's plea to colleagues misrepresented as 'vow to defy constitution'
"We will be defying the constitution, we, the senators," Hontiveros is heard saying in Tagalog in a Facebook reel posted on June 26, 2025. It was shared after the Senate voted to send back to the House of Representatives the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte (archived link). The vice president was impeached by the lower house in February on charges of graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against one-time ally and former running mate President Ferdinand Marcos. A conviction in the Senate would require the support of two-thirds of its 24 members, and would see Duterte removed as vice president and permanently banned from public office. Before the case can return to the Senate, the House must certify that it did not violate the constitution in its handling of impeachment proceedings and that it remained willing to prosecute the case after its new members take their seats. Hontiveros opposed the motion to send the case to the lower body, calling the decision a "functional dismissal'. Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post captured on July 1, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The clip also spread in similar Facebook and TikTok posts. "Wow, defy the constitution? You think you're more powerful than the country's laws?" read a comment on one of the posts. Another wrote: "She really wants to remove the vice president!" But the clip has been misleadingly edited to omit Hontiveros's full remarks. It was also earlier fact-checked by Philippine media organisation Vera Files (archived link). A reverse image search on Google using a keyframe from the falsely shared clip found it was taken from a news conference held by Hontiveros on June 9 (archived link). At the 9:15 mark, Hontiveros was asked if she thinks convening as an impeachment court is optional for the Senate. "Oh, definitely not. Definitely not," she says before responding further in Tagalog. "If we look at it and act as if convening as an impeachment court is optional, we will be defying the constitution, we, the senators. "And that's why I've been saying that will not allow this. As a senator, I will not agree to that." Her answer is also shown in the transcript of the press conference published on the Senate's website (archived link). Duterte's impeachment has spawned a wave of misinformation debunked by AFP here.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
US House sets make-or-break final vote on Trump tax bill
Trump is seeking a green light in the House of Representatives for his Senate-passed "One Big Beautiful Bill" -- but faces opposition on all sides of his fractious party over provisions set to balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson spent much of Wednesday struggling to corral his rank-and-file members as the package scraped through a series of "test" votes that laid bare deep divisions in the party. It was set for a final vote to advance it from Congress to Trump's desk around 8:30 am (1230 GMT) after passing its last procedural hurdle in the early hours. "We feel very good about where we are and we're moving forward," an upbeat Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. "So we're going to deliver the Big, Beautiful Bill -- the president's 'America First' agenda -- and we're going to do right by the American people." Originally approved by the House in May, Trump's sprawling legislation squeezed through the Senate on Tuesday by a solitary vote but had to return to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp of the senators' revisions. #photo1 The package honors many of Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing $4.5 trillion to extend his first-term tax relief. But it is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while shrinking the federal food stamps program and forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. While moderates in the House are anxious that the cuts will damage their prospects of reelection, fiscal hawks are chafing over savings that they say fall far short of what was promised. Johnson has to negotiate incredibly tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers in the final vote, among more than two dozen who have declared themselves open to rejecting Trump's bill. 'Abomination' #photo2 Republican leaders had been hoping to spend just a few hours on Wednesday afternoon approving the package, although they had some breathing room ahead of Trump's self-imposed Independence Day deadline on Friday. The 887-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed version further to the right. Republicans lost one conservative who was angry about adding to the country's $37 trillion debt burden and two moderates worried about plans for around $1 trillion in health care cuts. Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance under the bill at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Legislation in the House has to go through multiple preliminary votes before it can come up for final approval, and a majority of lawmakers must wave it through at each of these stages. But there were warning signs early on as the package stumbled at one of its first procedural steps, with a vote that ought to have been straightforward remaining open for seven hours and 31 minutes -- making it the longest in House history. Johnson had been clear that he was banking on Trump leaning on waverers, as the president has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure. The Republican leader has spent weeks hitting the phones and hosting White House meetings to cajole lawmakers torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" Trump thundered in one of multiple posts to his Truth Social platform that sounded increasingly frustrated as Wednesday's marathon voting session spilled into Thursday. The minority House Democrats have signaled that they plan to campaign on the bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to analyses showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump's tax bill struggles to gain GOP support in late-night session
House Republicans were straining past midnight to advance President Donald Trump's tax and spending cuts package, after GOP leaders spent the afternoon and evening working furiously to persuade sceptical holdouts to send it to his desk by the Fourth of July deadline. The roll call vote that started late on Wednesday was held open for hours as several Republicans refused to give their votes. With few to spare from their slim majority, the outcome was in jeopardy. House Speaker Mike Johnson had recalled lawmakers to Washington, eager to seize on the momentum of the bill's passage the day before in the Senate, and he vowed to press ahead. 'Everybody wants to get to yes,' Johnson said during an interview on Fox News as the voting was underway. But as voting stalled Trump lashed out in a midnight post: 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???' He also warned of political fallout from the delay: 'Costing you votes!!!' The idea of quickly convening for a vote on the more than 800-page bill was a risky gambit, one designed to meet Trump's demand for a holiday finish. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, often succeeding by the narrowest of margins — just one vote. Their slim 220-212 majority leaves little room for defections. Several Republicans are balking at being asked to rubber-stamp the Senate version less than 24 hours after passage. A number of moderate Republicans from competitive districts have objected to the Senate bill's cuts to Medicaid, while conservatives have lambasted the legislation as straying from their fiscal goals. It falls to Johnson and his team to convince them that the time for negotiations is over. They will need assistance from Trump to close the deal, and lawmakers headed to the White House for a two-hour session on Wednesday to talk to the president about their concerns. Republicans are relying on their majority hold of Congress to push the package over a wall of unified Democratic opposition. No Democrats voted for the bill in the Senate and none were expected to do so in the House. 'Hell no!' said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, flanked by fellow Democrats outside the Capitol. In an early warning sign of Republican resistance, a resolution setting up terms for debating Trump's bill barely cleared the House Rules Committee on Wednesday morning. As soon as it came to the full House, it stalled out as GOP leadership waited for lawmakers who were delayed coming back to Washington and conducted closed-door negotiations with holdouts. By nightfall, as pizzas and other dinners were arriving at the Capitol, the next steps were uncertain. Trump pushes Republicans to do 'the right thing' The bill would extend and make permanent various individual and business tax breaks from Trump's first term, plus temporarily add new ones he promised during the 2024 campaign. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 (€5,000) deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 (€64,000) a year. In all, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion (€3.8tn) in tax cuts over 10 years. The bill also provides about $350 billion (€297bn) for defence and Trump's immigration crackdown. Republicans partially pay for it all by less spending on Medicaid and food assistance. The Congressional Budget Office projects the bill will add about $3.3 trillion (€1.8tn) to the federal debt over the coming decade. The House passed its version of the bill in May by a single vote, despite worries about spending cuts and the overall price tag. Now it's being asked to give final passage to a version that, in many respects, exacerbates those concerns. The Senate bill's projected impact on the nation's debt, for example, is significantly higher. 'Let's go Republicans and everyone else,' Trump said in a late evening post. Speaker Johnson is intent on meeting Trump's timeline and betting that hesitant Republicans won't cross the president because of the heavy political price they would have to pay. They need only look to Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina, who announced his intention to vote against the legislation over the weekend. Soon, the president was calling for a primary challenger to the senator and criticising him on social media. Tillis quickly announced he would not seek a third term. Democrats target vulnerable Republicans to join them in opposition Flanked by nearly every member of his caucus, Democratic Leader Jeffries of New York delivered a pointed message: With all Democrats voting 'no', they only need to flip four Republicans to prevent the bill from passing. Jeffries invoked the 'courage' of the late Senator John McCain giving a thumbs-down to the GOP effort to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, and singled out Republicans from districts expected to be highly competitive in 2026, including two from Pennsylvania. 'Why would Rob Bresnahan vote for this bill? Why would Scott Perry vote for this bill?' Jeffries asked. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that Medicaid cuts would result in lives lost and food stamp cuts would be 'literally ripping the food out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors,' Jeffries said Monday. Republicans say they are trying to right-size the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and applies existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to more beneficiaries. States will also pick up more of the cost for food benefits. The driving force behind the bill, however, is the tax cuts. Many expire at the end of this year if Congress doesn't act. The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 (€127) tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 (€1,480) tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 (€9,290) tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired.
