
Tejashwi Yadav projected as CM face of INDIA bloc in Bihar by Congress leaders
'Who else other than RJD's Tejashwi Yadav will be the CM face of the Opposition bloc?' Mr. Singh told media persons on Thursday (June 26) night, following a meeting with RJD supremo Lalu Prasad and his son Tejashwi Yadav at the residence of former Chief Minister Rabri Devi in Patna's Circular Road. Mr. Singh, known to be close to the RJD patriarch, was recently replaced as BPCC chief by Dalit leader Rajesh Kumar.
Also Read | Will pad up and bat if captain tells me to: Kanhaiya on contesting Bihar polls
'The wind of change is blowing across the state and is visible on every face here. People want to get rid of the present dispensation,' he added.
When asked about the purpose of his visit, Mr. Singh said, 'We're in social and public life, so meeting senior politicians at short intervals is part of our daily routine. I had come to inquire about Laluji's health.'
His remarks come amid the Congress's official stance, reiterated by Bihar incharge Krishna Allavaru and other senior leaders, that Tejashwi Yadav currently heads only the coordination committee of the Bihar alliance, and that announcing a CM face is beyond the scope of the panel.
Also Read | Opposition in Bihar raises questions over special revision of voters' list
A day later, on June 27, Congress national spokesperson and former Jawaharlal Nehru University Students' Union president Kanhaiya Kumar also endorsed Mr. Yadav as the prospective Chief Minister. 'If the mahagathbandhan gets a majority in the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections, the Chief Minister will be from the RJD. There is no confusion or dispute over Tejashwi Yadav being the main face for the CM's post,' Mr. Kumar said in New Delhi.
He also alleged that political opponents were trying to 'divert attention by raking up the matter of the coalition's CM face'. 'It is true that RJD is a bigger party, has more MLAs, provides leadership to the mahagathbandhan, and holds the post of Leader of the Opposition in the State Assembly. Naturally, it is their responsibility,' he said.
Mr. Kumar also noted that all constituent parties, including the Vikassheel Insaan Party led by Mukesh Sahani, had their respective roles in the coalition.
Both Mr. Singh and Mr. Kumar belong to the Bhumihar community, an upper caste grouping in Bihar.
Meanwhile, Left party leaders have begun arriving in Patna for discussions with the RJD to finalise seat-sharing arrangements and election strategy. On June 26, the RJD released a campaign video over five minutes in length, prominently projecting Tejashwi Yadav as the next Chief Minister. The video, however, makes no reference to the 15-year rule of his parents, Lalu Prasad and Rabri Devi - a period once dubbed 'jungle raj' by the Patna High Court - apparently to distance the campaign from that legacy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bihar Assembly adjourned till 2 p.m. amid ruckus, Tejashwi-Nitish spat over Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
The Bihar Assembly was on Wednesday (July 23, 2025) adjourned till 2 p.m. after Chief Minister Nitish Kumar angrily intervened during a statement by the Leader of the Opposition Tejashwi Yadav, over Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in the State, plunging the House into turmoil. "Only three days of this session are left. You should say whatever you wish during elections," said the Chief Minister. Also Read | Opposition protests in Parliament against Bihar's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls Most of the Opposition party leaders are wearing black dresses even on Wednesday in protest over the ongoing SIR of electoral roll exercise in the State. Earlier, the Speaker Nand Kishore Yadav had agreed to give a chance to both the opposing camps, NDA and Mahagathbandhan ( grand alliance) leaders, over SIR. Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav was speaking on the issue when the House was adjourned till lunchtime. Mr. Yadav was making the statement on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in the State, to which the Leader of the House took exception. (With PTI inputs)


Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
‘25 times in 73 days': Congress on Trump's repeated India-Pak ceasefire claim; Rahul Gandhi asks ‘Why is he saying it'
Congress MP and Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday raised eyebrows over former US President Donald Trump's recurring claims of brokering peace between India and Pakistan. Speaking on Trump's repeated remarks, Gandhi asked, 'Why is he saying it so many times?' The comment came after US President Donald Trump once again claimed credit for stopping a potential nuclear conflict between the two South Asian neighbours, India and Pakistan, allegedly using trade threats as leverage. Echoing Rahul Gandhi's concerns, senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh strongly criticised the Narendra Modi-led government for its silence on Trump's statements and its failure to provide clarity on key national security matters, including the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. Ramesh noted that Trump's claim has now reached a symbolic milestone. 'The claims of a 'ceasefire' made by Trump have reached their silver jubilee with the US President reiterating them 25 times in the last 73 days,' he said. In a post on X, Jairam Ramesh accused the Prime Minister of avoiding critical debate: 'As the Modi government continues in its refusal to give firm dates for a debate on Pahalgam-Sindoor in Parliament and as the Modi government persists in its refusal to commit to a reply by the PM in the debate, President Trump reaches the silver jubilee, the quarter-century mark on his claims. He has trumpeted 25 times in the last 73 days, but the Prime Minister of India is totally quiet – finding time only to travel abroad and to destabilise democratic institutions at home.' Donald Trump's latest claim restated his supposed role in preventing a major war: 'We have stopped wars between India and Pakistan. They were probably going to end up in a nuclear war. They shot down five planes in the last attack. It was back and forth, back and forth. I called them and I said no more trade if you do this. They are both powerful nuclear nations. Who knows where that would have ended up, and I stopped it,' he said. The Opposition has also demanded that PM Modi address Parliament and the nation regarding Operation Sindoor and the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise currently underway in Bihar.


New Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Dhankhar made 'unscheduled visit' to Rashtrapati Bhavan before announcing resignation
Before his surprise resignation, former vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar made an "unscheduled visit" to the Rashtrapati Bhavan late on Monday evening, official sources said. Dhankhar met President Murmu around 9 pm on Monday and handed over his resignation to her. Half an hour later, he made his resignation letter public on X, they said. "To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution," Dhankhar said in his letter. Dhankhar, 74, assumed office in August 2022 and his term would have ended in August 2027. The resignation of Dhankhar, who was also the ex officio chairman of the Rajya Sabha, came on the first day of the Monsoon session of Parliament. Prime Minister Narendra Modi posted on X, saying, "Jagdeep Dhankhar has got many opportunities to serve our country in various capacities, including as the Vice President of India. Wishing him good health." Meanwhile, the Congress sought an explanation from the government after Dhankhar resigned unexpectedly, citing health reasons. Congress general secretary in-charge of communications Jairam Ramesh said there were 'far deeper reasons' behind the move, while the party's deputy leader in the Lok Sabha, Gaurav Gogoi, asked the Centre to clarify if it had prior knowledge of the resignation. Several other Opposition leaders also expressed surprise and scepticism over the abrupt move, with some suggesting there may be more to the decision than meets the eye.