Winston Peters Apologises For Calling Te Pāti Māori MP Tākuta Ferris A 'Dickhead' In The House
The Speaker will review the incident, and report back to the House on Thursday.
Peters was answering questions from Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson on behalf of the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries, Shane Jones.
"Does he think it's hypocritical that last year Aotearoa pledged $16 million to the Global Fund for Coral Reefs, yet this year we've had the largest coral by-catch event in 15 years, dredging up to six tonnes of ancient coral from the sea floor?" Davidson asked.
"No such pledge was made by any such country as named by that questioner," Peters responded.
Peters has repeatedly bristled at other MPs referring to the country as Aotearoa. The Speaker, however, is no longer hearing points of order over the use of the word.
"Are you sure?" asked Ferris.
"Yes, I am positive. Unlike you, you dickhead," Peters responded.
The comment could be heard on the hot mic, and has been recorded in Hansard, the official record of things said in the House.
Ferris later raised a point of order.
"I've witnessed many times in this House disparaging comments being made between sides, and I'm quite sure that being called a 'dickhead' would fall in line with that tikanga of the House," he said.
The Speaker said he had not heard the allegation until Ferris brought it up, and encouraged Peters to withdraw and apologise.
Peters initially refused to apologise, arguing that Ferris had not raised the matter of offence. Ferris said he had taken personal offence, so Peters apologised.
"On the basis that when I was trying to get my thoughts together on the answer to Marama Davidson's questions, he was interrupting me. I apologise for calling him what I said he was."
ACT leader David Seymour also raised a point of order regarding Ferris' Toitū Te Tiriti t-shirt, and whether the Speaker would reflect on his earlier ruling around political motifs and branding in the House.
In 2024, Gerry Brownlee banned ACT MPs from wearing party-branded pins in the debating chamber.
Brownlee told Seymour he would reflect on the matter.
As the matter was now in the hands of the Speaker, Peters would not answer questions about the incident on his way out of the House.
The New Zealand First leader is often critical about the language used by other MPs.
But in this case, he questioned whether the word he used was offensive.
"Is it bad language?" he asked reporters.
Peters instead said it was "wrong" that another MP was interfering with him being able to hear a question.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
12 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Regulatory Standards Bill: Group of prominent Kiwis – including former Prime Minister – issue open letter against David Seymour legislation
A group of prominent New Zealanders, including well-known academics and a former Prime Minister, have written an open letter calling for the Government to drop the controversial Regulatory Standards Bill being advanced by Act's David Seymour. The authors – including Dame Anne Salmond, Sir Geoffrey Palmer and Professor Jane Kelsey
NZ Herald
14 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Listen to The Country online: Sir David Carter on politics, agriculture and forestry
Today on The Country radio show, host Jamie Mackay broadcast live from Ruralco in Ashburton, where he caught up with the cooperative's chairman, former Speaker of the House Sir David Carter, to get his thoughts on politics, agriculture and forestry. On with the show: Sir David Carter; The chairman of
The Spinoff
16 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: Youth parliament is even better than the real thing
A cohort of kids willing to challenge democracy prove they're more than ready to replace the adults. Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. A walkout in the House, claims of censorship and rogue MPs on rogue press conferences: youth parliament didn't need long to prove it can be as much of a circus as the one meant for adults. Tri-annually, pint-sized progressives and tories in the making (as well as their young peers in the fourth estate) spend three days in parliament (following a four-month training programme) to learn up close what democracy is – although if you asked this year's cohort of teens, they might be more likely to tell you what it isn't. General debates held on Tuesday and Wednesday gave all 123 youth MPs a chance to highlight the issues that matter most to them, whether that's mental health and the environment, or boy racers and 'backing the farmers' – some of these teens are already so entrenched across party lines you might expect some kind-of Scooby-Doo mask-off to reveal it was Grant McCallum all along. Youth MPs are supposedly non-partisan and aren't expected to parrot the belief of the parties they've been mentored under, but when in Rome, act like the emperor. There were claims of censorship and 'fear-based control' from some youth MPs (who are also part of the advocacy group Make It 16), but in the end, everyone got their say – even if some teens felt others should have had more vetting in the end. As was the case for Jermaine Del Mondo, youth MP for Winston Peters, whose challenge in the House to look past race – much like his mentor might say – caused a partial walkout (although no one could really leave, you see). The drama continued on Wednesday morning, with Karen Chhour's youth MP Jerry Wei having his three-minute speech last for 10 thanks to the opposition MPs raising multiple points of order in an attempt to shut him up. There was supposedly a walkout planned for him, but the progressive youth MPs felt it would just give him the satisfaction – clearly the youth parliament works, because it didn't take them long to learn the fine art of politicking. Suffice to say, some potential future leaders have already made themselves heard. Nate Wilbourne, youth MP for Labour's Damien O'Connor, had one of the strongest speeches on Wednesday morning after going off-script and directly calling out ministers Penny Simmonds, Tama Potaka and Shane Jones for putting 'profit over papatūānuku'. Later, Terangitukiwaho Edwards, youth MP for Te Pāti Māori Mariameno Kapa-Kingi and son of Ngātiwai chairman Aperahama Edwards, earned a standing ovation for his impassioned speech on prioritising mokopuna-led solutions in state care. The mock question time kicked off just before midday, with National MP Barbara Kuriger as the speaker, and only a handful of ministers – James Meager, Penny Simmonds, Louise Upston, Casey Costello and Chris Bishop – taking oral questions. This activity seemed to provide two learning points: for the government youth MPs, how to pass off patsies to your colleagues to ensure good PR, and for the opposition youth MPs, how to argue back. When Vashika Singh, youth MP for Helen White, asked RMA minister Bishop how he planned to incorporate the Treaty into the Planning Act and Natural Environment Act, she was told straight up by the minister that he had no commitment to doing that. Bishop wasn't a popular man that session – his answer to a question on housing targets from Esha Ram (youth MP for the Greens' Steve Abel) caused a few youths to rustle in their seats and attempt supplementaries, which the speaker denied. Sam Allen (youth MP for National's Hamish Campbell) then offered to 'guide' Kuriger through the speaker's rulings, which she ignored for time purposes. 'We are not having supplementary questions, and that's the last point of order I'm going to take on that issue,' Kuriger declared, before the voice of Thomas Brocherie, youth MP for the Greens Lan Pham, popped up for the hundredth time: 'Point of order, Miss Speaker …' Bishop was next questioned by Louis McSporran, youth MP for NZ First's Jenny Marcroft, on how he would 'incentivise and support' the revitalisation of rural areas through infrastructure, and a rebel youth MP in the Labour benches held up a note to the House in protest. 'DISSAPOINTED IN NAT' it read, causing Wei to raise a point of order: would the speaker consider removing the member from the House? Later, outside the chamber, a group of NZ First Youth MPs – and friends from other branches of the coalition – held a last-minute press conference on the parliament steps. They weren't happy with the narrative playing out in the media about censorship – we're not being censored, nor would we like the right to vote, they told reporters. It was 'dangerous' to let a minority group (as in, the youth MPs from Make It 16) purport to speak for the nation, an Act Party youth MP claimed. Their attempt at winning back the narrative was immediately stifled, as the press conference spurred an off-the-cuff argument from the Labour and Greens-aligned youth MPs walking past. It was probably the debate the teens would have liked to have had in the House – with each other, in verbal fisticuffs, and no expectation to be non-partisan. Parliament is a place that often feels like a high school simulator – and for three days this week, it was the real thing. Even if half of these teens still think they shouldn't have the right to vote until they're a bit older, they're already perfect for the role of politician.
