Smithsonian says it's committed to being free from ‘partisan influence' after Trump tries to remove gallery director
The institution said in a statement on Monday that 'all personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the Secretary, with oversight by the Board.' It comes amid tension in recent months between several art institutions and the president who has tried to reshape leadership and put in place his own personnel choices.
Trump claimed in late May that he was removing Kim Sajet as director of the National Portrait Gallery. Sajet, who has led the Smithsonian-affiliated institution since 2013, is the first woman to serve in that role.
The president cited concerns over her political leanings and support for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, though his statement did not cite specific incidents or provide evidence of partisanship.
'She is a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position. Her replacement will be named shortly. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post at the time.
The Smithsonian's statement also noted that the institution has set out to be nonpartisan and that its Board of Regents 'is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence.'
The board directed the secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch III, 'to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums,' give directors time to make changes to 'ensure unbiased content' and report back on progress and any needed personnel changes.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who sits on the Smithsonian board and is the Chancellor, previously declined to comment on the matter. CNN has reached out to Roberts on the latest statement by the board of regents.
CNN has also reached out to the Smithsonian Institution, National Portrait Gallery and White House for comment.
Trump has removed several members of independent agencies and entities since the start of his second term, including the board of trustees and chairman at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, senior officials at federal labor agencies, Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission and inspectors general from more than a dozen federal agencies.
The Smithsonian Institution — the world's largest museum complex, including 21 museums and the National Zoo — has also been a target for the Trump administration as he has looked to influence American cultural and artistic institutions.
The president signed an executive order in March that put Vice President JD Vance, who also serves on the Smithsonian's board of regents, in charge of stopping government spending on 'exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy.'
In his order, Trump specifically targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture and the Smithsonian American Art Museum as carrying exhibits and promoting language he deemed inappropriate.
He also signed an order in March directing the Institution of Museum and Library Services, who supports museums and libraries in all 50 states, among several other government entities, to be 'eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AICPA submits recommendations for transition to EFDS
The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has submitted recommendations to the Department of the Treasury concerning the transition to an electronic federal disbursements system (EFDS), as mandated by Executive Order 14247, Modernizing Payments To and From America's Bank Accounts. The order stipulates that all federal payments should be processed electronically by ceasing issuance of paper checks by 30 September 2025 and aims to enhance efficiency and security while reducing costs. The AICPA supports the move towards electronic payments but highlights the challenges it poses, particularly for taxpayers without a US bank account. This includes seniors and the unbanked population, who may be excluded from the system due to international banking regulations that restrict automated clearing house transfers with non-US financial institutions. The AICPA's letter references a Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration report indicating that nearly seven million taxpayers received refunds through non-electronic means in the latest tax year. The AICPA's recommendations include exceptions for individuals and entities not based in the US or without a US bank account, and exemptions for temporary non-US individuals. It also suggests expanding the capabilities of the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System to allow business accounts to process payments on behalf of individuals, and delaying the implementation for trusts and estates until the IRS can address specific administrative issues. Furthermore, the AICPA proposes guidance for applying exceptions for qualified taxpayers, extending the timeframe for implementing the order, seeking statutory authority for the mandates, and involving stakeholders in establishing the rules for the transition. AICPA senior manager for Tax Policy & Advocacy Daniel Hauffe said: 'For many years, the AICPA has advocated for and supported the modernisation of the IRS and its payment systems; although this executive order is a step in the right direction, there are many considerations before implementing changes, which means updated processes and carefully tailored rules will need to be developed.' 'The AICPA's recommendations allow for the modernisation of the IRS' tax payment systems while mitigating the impact of the administrative burden on taxpayers, tax practitioners and the IRS, that could be caused by this executive order.' In June 2025, the AICPA also expressed concerns regarding the pass-through entity tax state and local tax (SALT) deductions in recent reconciliation bills. "AICPA submits recommendations for transition to EFDS" was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Are Texans Most Likely To Lose the Most Due to Tariffs?
The Trump administration's campaign of taxing foreign governments in an effort to 'Make America Great Again' may have unforeseen domestic ramifications. This is particularly true in the state of Texas, as its economy is intimately tied to its southern neighbor Mexico. In fact, some analysts foresee nothing short of a calamity for the Texas economy if the tariffs go forth as planned. But that's also a big 'if.' Read Next: Check Out: Here's a look at the potential effect on the Texas economy due to the Trump administration's tariffs as currently planned. One of the problems with economic indicators is that some are lagging, meaning they only give a picture of what has already happened. On that level, Texas looks A-OK, as job growth was good in the first quarter of 2025. But according to the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank, which has more up-to-date information on economic trends and sentiment, business activity is weakening. And this is before the full effect of the tariffs are even being felt. Be Aware: Every month, the Dallas Fed conducts a manufacturing outlook survey to gauge the real-time, on-the-ground response of businesses to various economic stimuli. In the first quarter of 2025, manufacturing activity actually picked up a bit in Texas, but some of that was likely due to orders being pulled forward ahead of the implementation of tariffs. The fact that manufacturing activity is now rapidly declining, with the index actually turning negative in April, helps validate that theory. Perhaps not surprisingly, businesses are uncertain about the future due primarily to the tariff policy. According to the Dallas Fed, the uncertainty level among Texas businesses has reached multiyear highs, and this in and of itself can hurt economic prospects. Businesses that are unsure what to expect may opt to hunker down and reduce capital expenditures or even hiring until the path ahead becomes more clear. This self-imposed slowdown can exacerbate the economic damage created by the actual tariffs themselves. Texas is the leading trade state in the country, so tariffs on foreign countries are likely to affect it disproportionately. Mexico is the state's No. 1 trading partner, according to the Office of the Governor of Texas, to the tune of $272.3 billion worth of goods exchanged in 2023 alone. And it's not just one-way trade either. Mexico is both the leading source of imports and the top export market for Texas. The bottom line here is that when Mexico is subject to tariffs, it also has a large effect on the state of Texas. According to Trade Partnership Worldwide, Texas businesses could see a $47 billion economic loss. And a Perryman Group analysis found that a sustained 25% tariff on Mexican goods could cost the state over 287,000 jobs. Although no one can tell with 100% accuracy what the final tariff policy will be — and how it will affect Texans — there are some steps you can take to prepare. Just as businesses are hunkering down in the wake of the tariff uncertainty, it makes sense as an individual to boost your cash reserves as well. Since any type of economic contraction could lead to job loss, it's best to sock away at least three to six months' worth of income in a savings account. From a longer-term perspective, it can make sense to upskill yourself so that your value as an employee can outlast any economic turndowns. This will help ensure job security even beyond the potentially temporary tariff issues. If you have the luxury of flexibility, consider exploring other industries that might be less affected by tariff concerns than, for example, construction and auto manufacturing. Service-oriented industries are a good option, as are businesses that don't source materials or trade with tariff-impacted countries like Mexico. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck This article originally appeared on Are Texans Most Likely To Lose the Most Due to Tariffs? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Once it was mostly a taco website. Now it's covering L.A. ICE raids.
It all happened so quickly. On June 6, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents descended upon Los Angeles, raiding businesses and arresting more than 40 people. Once word got out on social media, protests began and L.A. Taco's six-person news team headed out to the streets. Investigative reporter Lexis-Olivier Ray captured video of police firing pepper balls at protesters and media at the downtown Los Angeles Federal Building. The next day, law enforcement shot pepper balls at him and other journalists, he said. In five years of covering protests and civil unrest in the city, he had never seen anything like that.
