logo
Detroit Tigers Announce Big Alex Lange News Tuesday

Detroit Tigers Announce Big Alex Lange News Tuesday

Yahoo18-06-2025
Detroit Tigers Announce Big Alex Lange News Tuesday originally appeared on Athlon Sports.
The Detroit Tigers lost starting pitcher Jackson Jobe to a season-ending injury on his right elbow recently, prompting concerns about the team's pitching staff headed toward the second half of the 2025 season.
Advertisement
The Tigers' starting rotation and bullpen suddenly seems significantly thinner now that the power arm Jobe has been sidelined.
On Tuesday, word broke that a well known Tigers reliever is headed to High-A West Michigan to began a rehab assignment with the White Caps, the precursor to a possible return to the big league level this season.
Alex Lange (L) poses with Tarik Skubal (to his right) and others during 2025 Spring Training. © Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
"Alex Lange (right lat repair) is beginning a rehab assignment with High-A West Michigan," reporter Evan Petzold wrote on X Tuesday afternoon.
Lange had a solid first four seasons of his MLB career with the Tigers, compiling ERAs of 4.04, 3.69, 3.68 and 4.34.
He has yet to pitch a game this season after appearing in 21 games with Detroit in 2024.
Advertisement
The Tigers currently have the tenth best ERA in the Major Leagues and have witnessed a strong season from the bullpen so far as Detroit is second in MLB in saves.
Detroit is near the middle of the pack among all MLB teams with 18 home runs given up. Its staff ranks 10th in MLB with 619 on the season, fifth among American League teams.
Detroit's recent blowout loss to the Cincinnati Reds showed there may be more than a few chinks in the armor of manager AJ Hinch's team.
If the Tigers get Lange back from injury this season, it may soften the blow they sustained when Jobe went to the IL for Tommy John surgery.
Related: 17-Year-Old Detroit Tigers Prodigy Turns Heads With Big Performance Monday
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 17, 2025, where it first appeared.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who Really Runs the Big Ten: Ohio State or Michigan?
Who Really Runs the Big Ten: Ohio State or Michigan?

Fox Sports

timea few seconds ago

  • Fox Sports

Who Really Runs the Big Ten: Ohio State or Michigan?

Ohio State runs the Big Ten — or does it? The Buckeyes want to be heard on this point: They're defending nothing. They're chasing everything. And everything better mean Michigan. It's a sentiment that most competitors would embrace. Enter the silo. Silence the outside. Secure and protect focus on what's to come, not what has come to pass. However, that's not what we do with defending national champions, especially when they've not beaten their arch nemesis since 2019 and haven't won the league championship in a conference they claim to rule since 2020. Not only has Michigan — Ohio State's enemy now and forever — won three of the last four Big Ten titles and claimed the 2023 national title, but the Wolverines have watched an entire class of Buckeyes go winless against a program they refer to as "That Team Up North." The best tact, the best take, in any conversation where points must be made, is sharpening the truth into an iron point, especially when sliced at a rival. And that is what Michigan defensive end Derrick Moore did on Thursday when asked what he thought about Ohio State winning its most recent national title. "First, I'd like to congratulate them on the win," Moore said. "But you know it's not a real win if y'all [Ohio State] ain't beat us. Moore went on to elaborate on his statement, noting the first-year 12-team College Football Playoff and where the Buckeyes would have ended up had it not been for the expanded field. "If the playoff expansion wasn't around, they wouldn't have won the national championship. So we pretty much look at it like, y'all had a nice little, easy run. But we helped y'all along the way. We pretty much helped y'all build back up. But after that, they dominated everybody that came in front of them, so, I've got to give all the credit to them." Ahem: Where's the lie? Ohio State, being the No. 8 seed, would likely have been left out of a four-team playoff. And that loss to an unranked seven-win Michigan team would've slammed the door on a conversation to get the Buckeyes in among most rational fans and, more importantly, a rational selection committee. Remember this: Michigan ran the table in 2023. The Wolverines ran through Ohio State without their head coach on the sideline, right through their competition in the Big Ten title game and over Nick Saban's Alabama team and Kalen DeBoer's Washington team to win the title. If not all national champions are alike, 2023 Michigan looks a lot like 2018 Clemson and 2024 Ohio State looks a lot like 2007 LSU. It's one thing to win the national title. It's another for Ohio State or Michigan to beat the other, and that is by design. For so long, we've lived for rivalry games because it wasn't that long ago that we counted votes to decide who the national champion was. No one was really playing for one as much as they were playing for the right to point at someone else in a game that mattered more than it should and say, "I beat you." That's what Ohio State-Michigan is all about. It's about eight consecutive losses from 2012 to 2021. It's about Urban Meyer never knowing what it's like to lose to Michigan, and it's about Ryan Day knowing those four losses to the Wolverines might mean more to OSU fans than his one national title. It's about red X's on all words that begin with the letter "M" during the week of The Game. It's about 62-39 (2018), 56-27 (2019) for Ohio State, followed by 42-27 (2021) and 45-23 (2022) for Michigan. It's about Michigan closing the gap from laughable in 2020 to "We Own You" in 2024. It is reasonable that comparing how you win is as important as winning, especially given the Midwest penchant for fair play and taking the rough road, because it's the right way. And that brings us to the obvious rebuttal, where Ohio State might look at Michigan and ask, sincerely, "didn't they cheat?" Here's what we know: The NCAA launched an investigation early in the 2023 season amid allegations that Michigan used a robust in-person scouting and sign-stealing operation. The Wolverines served a penalty for this in the same season for which they won the national title, as the Big Ten suspended Jim Harbaugh for the final three regular-season games of the year after its investigation concluded Michigan had violated conference sportsmanship rules via an impermissible in‑person scouting operation. Just two months ago, according to reports, Michigan proposed suspending current coach Sherrone Moore for the third and fourth games of the 2025 season for deleting a thread of text messages as the scandal broke. Then, this past week, Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti reportedly sent a letter to the NCAA Committee on Infractions suggesting that Michigan's football program should not face more sanctions stemming from the sign-stealing scheme. I think what galls most folks isn't that Michigan wasn't punished, but that the program was not punished harshly enough for its transgression. After all, Ohio State likely lost a chance to play for the 2012 national title because, after a 12-0 season, it was forced to serve a bowl ban because players sold memorabilia. Today, that feels quaint. Had some of these events not occurred, the question would remain: Who runs the Big Ten? In a season where the conference could win a third national title in as many years for the first time in the CFP era and in a league that Michigan helped found in 1896, which now features four programs in their second year as members, the consistent excellence of Penn State and the awakening of Indiana, now is the moment for the conference's two best programs over the last five decades to throw down a gauntlet. Come Nov. 29 at the Big House in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the last two national champs will meet, and we'll look at the scoreboard to see who really runs this league, and, perhaps, the sport. RJ Young is a national college football writer and analyst for FOX Sports and the host of the podcast "The Number One College Football Show." Follow him at @RJ_Young . Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account , and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience College Football recommended Item 1 of 3 Get more from the College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

What I'm hearing about the Cardinals' trade deadline: John Mozeliak listening on relievers
What I'm hearing about the Cardinals' trade deadline: John Mozeliak listening on relievers

New York Times

timea minute ago

  • New York Times

What I'm hearing about the Cardinals' trade deadline: John Mozeliak listening on relievers

ST. LOUIS — As the St. Louis Cardinals teeter above .500, president of baseball operations John Mozeliak has started to field calls regarding many of his players, not just pending free agents. Though the Cardinals have not publicly declared their intent to sell, Mozeliak has reached out to teams to inform them relievers Ryan Helsley, Phil Maton and Steven Matz are available, according to multiple league sources. All three pitchers will be free agents at the end of the season. Reliever JoJo Romero is also drawing interest from rival clubs, though he will not be a free agent until 2027. Advertisement Helsley, who wishes to remain in St. Louis, recently described his chances of being traded as '90 percent.' The two-time All-Star closer is the longest-tenured Cardinal, and expressed his hope for an extension in spring training. But the Cardinals' decline in July, combined with Chaim Bloom and a new front office taking over after the season, squashed all potential extension conversations. 'The likelihood is probably as great as it's ever been for me to get traded,' Helsley said recently to The Athletic. St. Louis will entertain offers on Nolan Arenado and Sonny Gray. Both players have full no-trade clauses, but could be motivated to waive them for the right fit. Mozeliak has started to gauge the interest of a handful of contending teams, though the talks are described as preliminary. The odds of either player being traded before the deadline remain slim, but the Cardinals are financially motivated to move their contracts. Gray is owed $35 million in 2026, his final guaranteed year of his three-year contract, while Arenado has $31 million (not including deferrals) remaining over the next two seasons. The Cardinals' attempts to trade Arenado date back to the offseason. Arenado provided Mozeliak with a list of five teams he would consider waiving his no-trade clause for: the Los Angeles Dodgers, New York Yankees, San Diego Padres, Boston Red Sox and Houston Astros. St. Louis believed it had a trade in place to send Arenado to Houston, but he vetoed the deal at the time. The Cardinals were unable to find a suitable trade partner for the remainder of the winter, leading to Arenado remaining in St. Louis. Arenado has posted a stellar year defensively, but his offensive decline is worrisome. Arenado entered play Friday hitting .241 with an OPS of just .677. His last homer came over a month ago, on June 21, against the Cincinnati Reds. Arenado, 34, has never demanded a trade from St. Louis, but he has been vocal about his preference to play for a contending team. Eugenio Suárez represents the best available third baseman on the market, but a team looking to upgrade the hot corner could target Arenado as a potential change-of-scenery candidate. Similar to the offseason, however, a team interested in acquiring Arenado must also be willing to take on a significant portion of his contract. Arenado must also be willing to expand his list of approved teams, and the third baseman has not yet indicated he'd be willing to do so. Advertisement Multiple teams have inquired about All-Star infielder Brendan Donovan, with the New York Yankees and Los Angeles Dodgers known to have interest. Both the Dodgers and the Yankees were major pursuers for Tommy Edman last year, with Los Angeles edging out New York in a three-team trade that sent Erick Fedde and Tommy Pham from the Chicago White Sox to St. Louis. Donovan, a super-utility player who is hitting just under .300 this year, is a similar player to Edman and was part of the reason why St. Louis felt comfortable trading Edman. The Yankees made their first splash of the deadline Friday afternoon, acquiring third baseman Ryan McMahon from the Colorado Rockies for pitching prospects Griffin Herring and Josh Grosz. It's unclear if netting McMahon changed the Yankees' interest in Donovan. The Dodgers expect to be one of the more active buyers this deadline and are looking to add a left-handed bat that can play the outfield. Donovan's natural positions are second and third base, but he's serviceable in both corner outfield spots. Donovan is not considered untouchable, and the Cardinals will listen, team sources said. But the asking price is sky-high, and St. Louis is in no rush to part with him, as he still has two years of arbitration remaining. Other position players gathering varying levels of interest are Iván Herrera, Alec Burleson and Lars Nootbaar. The Cardinals will not part with one of their position players unless they are blown away by the offer, and their conversations have not progressed past initial check-ins. The Athletic's Fabian Ardaya contributed to this report. (Top photo of Ryan Helsley: Joe Puetz / Getty Images)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store