GM slow-rolls its all-EV aspirations
The automaker announced Tuesday that it would spend $4 billion on mostly gasoline-powered vehicles. While GM is not retreating from EVs, the investment means the company is 'giving up any hope of achieving that [2035] goal,' said Sam Abuelsamid, an auto analyst at Telemetry, a Detroit-area research firm.
Asked Wednesday whether the goal still exists, GM said in a statement, 'We still believe in an all-EV future.'
GM's move away from the 2035 goal is less a singular failure and more a symptom of flagging support among many actors, including government, other automakers, charging companies and car buyers, analysts said.
Much has changed since GM set the EV target, just after President Joe Biden took office and amid a surge of confidence in the auto industry about widespread EV adoption. Four years later, the Trump administration is dismantling Biden-era federal support for EVs and implementing high tariffs, upsetting automakers' production plans.
Those federal moves, combined with a cooling desire for EVs among car buyers, has moved the sunset date for the internal combustion engine to a vague someday.
GM is still ramping up EV production. Earlier this week, it trumpeted the fact that it sold 37,000 EVs in the first quarter of the year, making it the number two EV maker in the U.S. behind Tesla.
The company's 2035 goal 'was aspirational. It was more an idea than a strategy,' said Alan Baum, an independent Detroit auto analyst. 'GM's doing a better job than many of their competitors, but there's obviously a relatively low ceiling because of the lack of supportive policy.'
GM's all-EV goal back in 2021 was one of the earliest and most prominent of a wave of automaker commitments to electric vehicles. At the time, GM CEO Mary Barra encouraged others to 'follow suit and make a significant impact on our industry and on the economy as a whole.'
Others did follow — and all of those promises have been tempered by new realities.
Last year, European automakers Volvo, Porsche, Volkswagen and Mercedes all dropped earlier goals that would have seen them producing all or mostly EVs by the early 2030s.
Back in 2021, GM also put an asterisk on its 2035 target.
'We say it as an aspirational goal, because to actually make that timing, we need some external things to come together also,' spokesperson Jessica James said at the time.
Barra reiterated last month that the company still wants an 'all-EV future.'
'EVs are fundamentally better,' she said at a Wall Street Journal event late last month. 'We have work to do to continue to get battery technology to give us greater density, so we have farther range. We need to have a robust charging infrastructure.'
Automakers, including GM, have been mostly mum in public as the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress seek to kill tax incentives that make it cheaper for manufacturers to produce batteries and consumers to buy EVs.
But through the main U.S. automotive lobby, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, automakers have vociferously opposed California's plans to require all-electric auto sales by 2035.
The Republican-controlled Congress voted to kill that California 2035 all-EV sales goal — the same one that GM first set for itself — through the Congressional Review Act. The move came after the Senate parliamentarian told lawmakers they couldn't repeal the goal through the CRA.
The bill awaits a signature by Trump, after which the California attorney general has pledged to sue.
GM's announcement that it would invest $4 billion in domestic manufacturing essentially shuffles production among factories in ways that will help the company dodge Trump's tariffs.
It is moving production of about a half-million gasoline-powered vehicles from Mexico to factories in the U.S., according to an analysis by Abuelsamid of Telemetry. Doing so will enable GM to avoid 25 percent tariffs that the Trump administration has placed on vehicles imported from Mexico.
For example, the production of several full-size SUVs and pickup trucks will transfer to GM's Orion plant, north of Detroit. The gas-powered Equinox, a strong U.S. seller, will move to the Fairfax plant in Kansas City. The gas-running Blazer will go to the company's Spring Hill plant in Tennessee.
Meanwhile, more EV production will move to GM's Factory Zero, a dedicated EV plant in metro Detroit that is running far below capacity. Electric versions of the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickup trucks will now get made in the plant, alongside other large EVs made in low volumes, including the Cadillac Escalade IQ and the Hummer.
Other EVs will be made elsewhere. Other electric Cadillacs, for example, will be made at the Spring Hill plant, while a rebooted version of the Chevy Bolt will be produced at the Fairfax plant, which the company described as the site for the 'next generation of affordable EVs.'
Those changes, combined with other recent moves, make it clear that GM is laying the groundwork to produce gas-powered vehicles well into the 2030s.
In May, the Detroit automaker said it would ditch plans to make electric motors at its Towanda Production plant in Buffalo, New York, and instead spend $888 million to make V-8 engines.
In 2023, GM put $579 million toward refurbishing an engine plant in Flint, Michigan. Electric vehicles don't have engines — they rely instead on batteries for propulsion.
Engine factories are large, fixed investments that are meant to operate for 15 years or more, according to Neal Ganguli, a managing director and auto-manufacturing expert at the business advisory firm AlixPartners.
Meanwhile, the manufacturing lines that make finished cars — like the ones GM unveiled this week — have shorter but still lengthy lives.
'When you put these [manufacturing lines] in, you are planning on a five- to seven-year time horizon,' Ganguli said. 'Maybe 10 years.'
Analysts said General Motors' swerve back into the gasoline lane — and away from the path to all EVs by 2035 — is not a surprise, given the market and policy realities.
'It was always a long shot at best,' said Abuelsamid.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
20 minutes ago
- Forbes
5 Key Ways Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Transforms Corporate Taxation
Tax The House has passed the Senate's version of Trump's Big Beautiful Bill by a narrow margin (216-214), and it will now head to President Trump's desk for his signature. The bill includes significant tax cuts that dwarf the spending cuts to the tune of a $3.1 trillion increase in the deficit over the next 10 years, according to Forbes. This article highlights 5 key ways the One Big Beautiful Bill Act transforms corporate taxation. For a look at how the bill will affect individual taxation, see my companion article on Forbes. (1) Corporate Tax Rates Will Not Increase A key provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 lowered the corporate tax rate by a staggering 40% (from 35% to 21%). The previous rate of 35% has been held constant since 1986. However, relative to other OECD countries, the 35% tax rate was among the highest levied on corporations in the OECD. Many companies and policymakers felt this put US corporations at a competitive disadvantage, especially given the increasingly global economy, according to the Tax Policy Center. Absent a provision allowing the corporate rates to hold steady, they would have reverted to their 35% tax rate. In a statement released by the White House, holding the corporate tax rate at 21% signals a pro-business environment for starting and growing businesses. (2) Full Expensing Of Domestic Research And Experimentation Since 2022, corporations have been required to amortize and expense their research and development (R&D) expenses over time. As highlighted by The Tax Foundation, not being able to immediately expense R&D stifles corporate innovation in the US. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act addresses this issue by allowing R&D performed in the US to be immediately expensed. Meanwhile, R&D performed by US corporations outside the US will continue to be subject to the amortization rules. While separating domestic from international R&D expenses will create other nuances that need to be addressed over time, this provision benefits corporations by allowing the immediate expensing of these costs, yielding significant tax benefits due to the time value of money. This provision enables corporations to recognize expenses earlier, rather than later, thereby benefiting from the time value of money. This provision will also benefit the US by providing financial incentives for corporations to locate their R&D activities within the US. Lastly, an important portion of this provision is that it will be retroactively implemented as of December 31, 2021. This change means that corporations that have been amortizing their R&D over the last three and a half years can now recognize these expenses. For companies with annual gross receipts of less than $31 million, the expensing can occur immediately. All other companies can recognize these expenses over the next two years. (3) Bonus Depreciation Is Back The bonus depreciation benefits, which provide an immediate expense deduction for specified types of property purchased, were introduced by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. These benefits have been slowly phased out in recent years and were scheduled to expire completely in 2027. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act brings back the 100% immediate expensing through 2029. The property that qualifies for bonus depreciation typically includes tangible personal property, such as furniture and fixtures, computer equipment, appliances, and certain types of vehicles. The immediate expensing allows corporations to realize significant tax benefits by accelerating their tax deductions for qualifying expenditures over many years. Being able to deduct these expenses immediately not only puts the cash flows back in the corporation's hands, but it also gives them a time value of money benefit for their tax deductions. (4) Reenactment And Amplified Opportunity Zone Tax Benefits The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 introduced the concept of opportunity zones, designed to utilize tax incentives to stimulate investment in underserved communities. According to the Tax Policy Center, opportunity zones had three key tax benefits: (1) temporary deferral of taxes on previously earned capital gains, (2) basis step-up of previously earned capital gains invested, and (3) exclusion of taxable income on new gains. While the benefits of opportunity zones primarily accrue to high-wealth individuals, many of these opportunity zones have flowed into real estate and operating businesses, representing a potential catalyst for companies that might ultimately become or be acquired by corporations. Importantly, these entities can only be developed and allocated in specific areas, which means that investments are flowing into areas that are most in need of economic stimulus. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act brings back opportunity zones through 2033. The key changes include that 33% of the zones must be in rural areas (an area with fewer than 50,000 inhabitants), and an increased tax incentive of a 30% exclusion of a deferred gain (previously 10%). Thus, this provision will increase the incentives for wealthy taxpayers to invest in rural areas that may be in need of an economic stimulus. (5) Less Extreme Changes To Multinational Taxation Rules Perhaps no bill in history has altered the taxation of US multinationals as significantly as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. In that bill, US multinationals transitioned from a worldwide tax system, where profits generated anywhere in the world were taxed in the US, to a quasi-territorial tax system, where, as long as certain conditions were met, profits were only taxed in the jurisdiction where they were generated. This lowered the complexity for multinational corporation tax laws. However, other provisions have also now become a mainstay in US multinational tax law, such as the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) tax, which introduces an additional layer of US tax when companies have unusually high income relative to their assets overseas. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 also introduced the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII) provision, which provides a lower tax rate for products made in the US and exported overseas. Lastly, the act introduced the Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT), which adds tax liabilities to large corporations that make significant payments to foreign subsidiaries, such as royalties and interest. Each of these provisions were set to become less beneficial to US corporations starting in 2026. Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the quasi-territorial tax system will remain in place. The additional layer of GILTI tax will increase from 10.5% to 10.7%. While this increase is higher than 13.1%, it is better than what it would have been absent this bill. Similarly, the lower FDII tax rate was 13.125%, and it would have increased to 16.4%. Instead, it will be 13.3% starting in 2026. Lastly, the BEAT tax rate will increase from 10% to 10.1% under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, rather than 12.5% under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. While some of these changes and modifications may appear small, it is essential to consider the magnitude of the global economy and recognize that even tenths of a percent can have multi-million-dollar ripple effects. Above all else, these changes help ensure our corporations remain competitive in the global economy. These key changes are not all that is packed into the nearly 1,000-page One Big Beautiful Bill Act. However, they do represent some of the most impactful to US Corporations should President Trump sign it into office on the 4th of July.
Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
July 4th cookout costs sizzle with tariff pressures
Tariffs and trade tensions are pushing up the cost of summer cookouts, including Independence Day barbecues, Democratic lawmakers warn. Why it matters: Cookout costs increased 12.7% since President Trump announced the "Liberation Day" tariffs, analysis by the Joint Economic Committee's minority arm found. By the numbers: Ground beef and ice cream hit their highest prices on record since the 1980s, the analysis found citing Consumer Price Index data. Miller Lite and Coors Light six-packs are up more than 13% at Walmart since Liberation Day and through June 26, per the report. Imported beer prices also rose with Peroni increasing 10.5% and Modelo Especial 9.5%. Cookout essentials like aluminum foil, grill tools, and sunscreen saw hikes between 6% and 18%. Yes, but: Different analysis yield different results, while also looking at varying items. The Rabobank Barbecue Index found the 10-person barbecue cost 4.21% more than last year. The America Farm Bureau's annual survey found cookout staples for a 10-person meal declined less than 1% from last year's record high but are 19% higher than five years ago. Wells Fargo Fourth of July report estimates a 2.2% increase over last year for the holiday cookout. The intrigue: 32% of Americans are swapping barbecue for pizza this Fourth of July, according to Empower's survey of 2,200 people. 68% of those surveyed said barbecues are noticeably more expensive to host this year with 55% noting tariffs are making holiday celebrations more expensive.
Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
Washington state schools left waiting for $137M in federal funds
States are missing billions in federal education funding that was expected to be accessible on July 1 but has yet to be released by the Trump administration. Why it matters: In Washington state, an estimated $137 million is being withheld, which amounts to 15.6% of the state's federal K–12 education funding, according to the state Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. The big picture: The Department of Education's funding delay has exacerbated the uncertainty for after-school, summer and other programs, leaving schools in limbo, advocates and policy experts say. The Education Department said in a last-minute notice that the funds would not be released while the programs were under review, according to the School Superintendents Association. What they're saying: U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a prepared statement that education funding uncertainty has prompted districts to delay hiring and other initiatives. "Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on after-school programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed," Murray said. Districts have "made programming and employment commitments with the assumption that they'd be receiving this funding," Washington state superintendent Chris Reykdal said in a written statement. Zoom out: Nationwide, an estimated $6.2 billion in K–12 funds across five programs remains unavailable, according to the Learning Policy Institute, which conducts research to improve education policies. That includes funding for after-school and summer learning through the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program, money to support migratory children, educator development funds and more. The other side: The Department of Education referred Axios' questions for this story to the Office of Management and Budget. An OMB spokesperson said no decisions have been made amid "an ongoing programmatic review of education funding." What we're watching: If unreleased 21st Century Community Learning Center funds — the chief stream for academic enrichment outside school hours — remain blocked, up to 926 Boys and Girls Clubs could be forced to shut their doors, the organization's president and CEO, Jim Clark, said in a statement.
