logo
Is the bubble about to burst on Dubai's booming restaurant scene?

Is the bubble about to burst on Dubai's booming restaurant scene?

Independent19 hours ago
Dubai's culinary landscape is a testament to its unbridled ambition, boasting an astonishing 13,000 food and drink establishments that range from the opulent to the everyday. Yet, as the emirate continues to push the boundaries of gastronomic extravagance, questions are emerging about the sustainability of its "growth-at-all-costs" model.
From diners suspended high above the city to underwater lounges and dishes adorned with edible gold, the city-state's eateries employ every conceivable gimmick to lure customers in one of the world's most saturated dining markets. This diverse offering, catering to every taste and budget – from inexpensive biryani to lavish fine dining – is a key weapon in Dubai's fierce competition with neighbours like Saudi Arabia and Qatar for lucrative tourist dollars.
So far, Dubai is winning handily, with more restaurants per capita than any major global city save for Paris. However, this relentless expansion of its culinary empire is beginning to strain the very model that fuels it, prompting observers to ponder how long the emirate can continue to feed its insatiable appetite for growth.
The competition is cutthroat, so presentation is key.
'Gone are the days when it just tastes good,' said Kym Barter, the general manager of Atlantis The Palm, a resort perched on a manmade archipelago that boasts more Michelin stars than any other venue in the Middle East.
But dazzling Dubai's food bloggers — the most popular of whom have millions of social media followers — isn't enough. Staying afloat means battling high rents and winning over a diverse and demanding group of consumers.
Dubai has roughly nine expatriate residents for every Emirati citizen. Most of its private sector workers are migrants on temporary contracts, and only Vatican City has a higher share of foreign-born residents.
Tourists, in turn, outnumber locals about five to one by some estimates, and they spend lavishly. Visitors to Dubai drop an average of over five times more than those traveling to nearby Saudi Arabia or even the U.S., according to global restaurant consultant Aaron Allen.
Dubai is 'on the right path' to becoming the world's food capital, said Torsten Vildgaard, executive chef at FZN by Björn Frantzén. The restaurant, which runs at more than $540 a head, was one of two in Dubai to nab three Michelin stars in May.
'We're only seeing the tip of the iceberg of what's to come in terms of gastronomy here,' Vildgaard added.
With each new set of illuminated high-rises and hotels, another crop of eateries emerge, vying for patrons. The legions of construction workers powering Dubai's progress also need affordable options.
That growth, propped up in part by investor pressure on some of the world's biggest chains to expand in Dubai, has created what some analysts warn is a bubble.
'If you're a publicly traded company like Americana, what are you supposed to do — just stop opening restaurants?' restaurant consultant Allen said, referring to the Gulf-based operator of KFC, Pizza Hut and other big franchises.
The frenetic expansion of Dubai's restaurant industry is part of a regional shift that has seen Gulf Arab states pour hundreds of billions of dollars into building out tourist destinations as they move away from hydrocarbons to diversify their economies. Saudi Arabia has a high-stakes, $500 billion project: a straight-line futuristic city called Neom.
But, in a Muslim-majority region, the United Arab Emirates has gone to lengths that some consider too much of a compromise, including relaxing restrictions on alcohol that fuel its pubs and nightlife and other social reforms.
The rapid development comes at a price. Dubai's restaurants have a high failure rate, industry veterans say, though local authorities don't say what the rate of closures is. In the downtown district and other prime areas, annual rents for restaurants can top $100 per square foot. That's on a par with some of the world's most expensive cities.
Still, the emirate issued almost 1,200 new restaurant licenses last year, according to Dubai's Department of Economy and Tourism. The department declined to respond to questions.
Empty tables during peak hours are common, even in top locations. Part of the problem, managers say, is that traffic congestion is so severe that convincing diners to drive out can be a tall task.
'I sometimes go, 'Do I go into the restaurant right now, because I'm going to get into traffic?''' said Waseem Abdul Hameed, operations manager at Ravi, a Pakistani family-owned eatery famous for its official Adidas shoe line and a 2010 TV feature from Anthony Bourdain.
He knows restaurateurs who have had to shut up shop and others who are squeezed by slim margins and increasingly reliant on delivery apps, Hameed said.
The demand sends fleets of migrant workers racing through gridlock on motorbikes, with few protections and tight delivery windows. Emirati newspaper Khaleej Times reported the accidental deaths of 17 Dubai food couriers last year.
The math of Dubai's restaurant scene doesn't add up, delivery apps and wealthy tourists notwithstanding, restaurant consultant Allen said. He cited operating expenses that have more than doubled relative to sales since 2009, when a financial crisis almost hobbled the emirate.
Too many Dubai entrepreneurs, he put it simply, have 'too much money, and they don't know what to do besides open restaurants.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UN expert calls for companies to stop doing business with Israel
UN expert calls for companies to stop doing business with Israel

BBC News

time10 hours ago

  • BBC News

UN expert calls for companies to stop doing business with Israel

A United Nations expert has called on dozens of multinational companies to stop doing business with Israel, warning them they risk being complicit in war crimes in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. Francesca Albanese, presenting her report to the UN human rights council, described what she called "an economy of genocide" in which the conflict with Hamas provided a testing ground - with no accountability or oversight - for new weapons and has rejected her report as "groundless", saying it would "join the dustbin of history".UN experts, or special rapporteurs, are independent of the UN, but appointed by it to advise on human rights matters. Ms Albanese is an international lawyer from Italy, and she is known for her bluntness; in previous reports she has suggested that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. On Thursday she repeated that, accusing Israel of "committing one of the cruellest genocides in modern history".In this report she names companies she says are profiting from, and therefore complicit in, war crimes in Gaza. Her list includes arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin for selling weapons, and tech firms Alphabet, IBM, Microsoft and Amazon, for providing technology which allows Israel to track and target Palestinians. She also lists Caterpillar, Hyundai, and Volvo, which her report claims have supplied vehicles used for demolishing homes and flattening bombed institutions are included too: banks BNP Paribas and Barclays, claims Ms Albanese, have been underwriting Israeli treasury bonds throughout the BBC has approached the companies named above for comment. Lockheed Martin said foreign military sales were government-to-government transactions, and discussions were best addressed by the US government. Volvo said it did not share Ms Albanese's criticism which it believes was based on "insufficient and partly incorrect information". It added it is committed to respecting human rights and constantly works to strengthen its due diligence. But it said since its products have a long life and change hands often "there is unfortunately a limit to how much control or influence we can have on how and where our products are used during their lifetime". For the companies named the business is lucrative, the report says, and helps Israel to continue the war. Ms Albanese says all the companies should stop dealing with Israel immediately. But how likely is that? UN reports like this one have no legal power, but they do attract attention. Ms Albanese is, in targeting economic ties, trying to remind multinationals, and governments, of what happened with apartheid South Africa. For a while many businesses made good money trading with South Africa, but the injustice of apartheid attracted global condemnation and UN sanctions which forced disinvestment and, eventually, helped to end the apartheid listing companies which are household names, Ms Albanese is probably also hoping to provide millions of consumers worldwide with information they can use when choosing whether or not to buy something, as they did with South the suggestion they are complicit in possible genocide is the one the multinationals themselves may take most seriously. The law on genocide is strict, it needs to be determined by a court of law, and in fact the International Court of Justice is currently considering a case against Israel on this very question, brought by South is defined as a person or entity having engaged in actions whose foreseeable results may have contributed to genocide, but without having personally intended to commit genocide. This is an accusation that Ms Albanese suggests could be levelled against businesses selling anything that might contribute to Israel's war effort. It is known that international lawyers have privately advised European governments that continued arms sales to Israel may lead to charges of which has long accused Ms Albanese of being extremely hostile to it, and even antisemitic, has rejected her latest report as "groundless, defamatory and a flagrant abuse of office". It also denies genocide, claiming the right of self-defence against when Ms Albanese presented her report to UN member states, she received primarily praise and support. African, Asian, and Arab states backed her call for disinvestment, many agreed that genocide was taking place, and some also warned Israel against vilifying international lawyers like Ms Albanese for doing their states, traditionally more supportive of Israel, also condemned the denial of aid to Gaza, and said Israel had a legal responsibility, as the occupying power, to ensure Palestinians had the means to Israel's biggest ally, the United States, left the UN Human Rights Council when President Donald Trump took office in January. Washington's response to the report has simply accused Ms Albanese, whose team contacted US companies for information about their dealings with Israel, of an "unacceptable campaign of political and economic warfare against the American and worldwide economy".It's unlikely the US administration will pay much more attention to the words of one international lawyer. But the big US companies named in her report, listening to the condemnation from so many countries where they have financial interests, may start to question their ties with Israel.

The popular holiday destination where you could be fined £100,000 for taking a selfie
The popular holiday destination where you could be fined £100,000 for taking a selfie

Daily Mail​

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

The popular holiday destination where you could be fined £100,000 for taking a selfie

Taking photos on holiday captures the most memorable highlights of a trip, but a picture-perfect snap in the wrong place could land holidaymakers in serious trouble. Luxury travel specialists at eShores are warning tourists of the seemingly innocent photographs that can break local privacy laws and breach copyright restrictions in destinations around the world. Some locations have specific selfie bans, and taking photos of others without consent or posting about your travels online could result in fines of up to £110,000 - and even prison time. With the average Brit snapping around 14 selfies a day during their travels, Gavin Lapidus, founder of eShores, stressed the importance of understanding local laws and cultural sensitivities while holidaying abroad. He advised: 'We always recommend travellers research photography restrictions before they travel, or better yet, speak to experienced travel consultants who understand each destination's cultural nuances and legal requirements.' Seasoned travel consultants warned tourists to be especially vigilant taking photographs in or near; religious sites, government buildings, cultural institutions, military zones, copyright-protected landmarks and public spaces with privacy laws. Here's a closer look at five of the most expensive photo opportunities across the globe, and why you should think twice before you click. Dubai (UAE) - Potential fine: £110,000 Taking photos on holiday captures the most memorable highlights of a trip, but a picture-perfect snap in the wrong place could land holidaymakers in serious trouble In Dubai, taking photographs is generally fine for personal use, especially at popular tourist spots. However, it's crucial to be mindful of privacy and avoid taking photos of people without their consent, as this is a violation of UAE privacy laws. Tourists can face eye-watering fines of up to 500,000 AED (£110,000) or even imprisonment. Cameras are also strictly banned in government buildings, military sites, specific palaces, and designated areas throughout the emirate, so that Instagram selfie could literally cost you your holiday - or your freedom. Spain – Potential fine: £26,400 In Spain, taking a selfie with, of, or including police officers in public can trigger brutal fines ranging from €600 to €30,000 (£530–£26,400). The controversial 2015 'Gag Law', which was initially introduced to restrict photographing or filming police, has since been relaxed, and now prohibits unauthorised use of images that could jeopardise officers' safety or hinder their work The law, however, is actively enforced, especially during protests and in sensitive locations like airports, turning tourists into unwitting lawbreakers. Japan – Potential fine: £55 In Japan, photo restrictions go far beyond the obvious temple no-nos, with strict no-camera policies also enforced at train stations and traditional ryokan inns. In historic geisha districts, such as Kyoto's world-famous Gion quarter, there are bans on photography in some areas due to issues of tourists harassing geisha. Taking an unsolicited selfie with a geisha, or even just taking photos of them in certain areas, can lead to fines of ¥10,000 (around £70) - not to mention serious cultural offence. Portofino, Italy – Potential fine: £242 In Portofino, Italy, lingering for too long while snapping a selfie in 'no-waiting zones' could lead to a fine of up to €275 (£242). The picture-postcard town has implemented these restrictions to manage overcrowding and pedestrian traffic jams, especially during busy periods of the tourist season. South Korea – Potential jail time In South Korea, privacy is taken seriously with its 'Right to Face' law, which grants members of the public comprehensive image protection. This means taking photos of individuals without their consent, whether in private spaces or even in the street, can lead to legal issues such as potential jail time if subjects are identifiable. While not widely enforced, unregistered selfie sticks can also technically lead to fines.

ADNOC restores most Murban oil supply to equity holders in July, sources say
ADNOC restores most Murban oil supply to equity holders in July, sources say

Reuters

time15 hours ago

  • Reuters

ADNOC restores most Murban oil supply to equity holders in July, sources say

SINGAPORE, July 3 (Reuters) - Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) has restored most of the Murban crude oil supply going to equity holders in July after making a sharp cut earlier, multiple trade sources said on Thursday. Partners in Murban crude producer ADNOC Onshore, which include BP (BP.L), opens new tab, TotalEnergies ( opens new tab, China National Petroleum Corp, Inpex (1605.T), opens new tab, Zhenhua Oil and South Korea's GS Energy, are entitled to about 40% of production of the grade that stands at around 2.1 million barrels per day, traders said. During the Israel-Iran conflict last month, ADNOC notified equity holders that it would cut their Murban crude supply by 3 million to 4 million barrels in July, the sources said. It was not immediately clear what led to the changes. Most of these volumes have since been restored, they said. A spokesperson for ADNOC said there had been no cuts to supplies to long-term customers such as refiners. "ADNOC has maintained uninterrupted supply to our customers, with no cessation of Murban sales contracts or nominations in June and July," he added in an email. Japan, Thailand and India are the biggest importers of Murban crude, Kpler data showed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store