logo
Treasury minister Reynolds struggles over Lower Thames Crossing answers

Treasury minister Reynolds struggles over Lower Thames Crossing answers

Glasgow Times16-06-2025
The Lower Thames Crossing will link Essex and Kent but economic secretary Emma Reynolds was unable to give details of the precise location of the crossing or the total cost of the project.
She also mistakenly referred to the existing crossing being the 'Dartmouth tunnel', apparently confusing the Devon town with Dartford, the location of the crossings for traffic across the Thames.
The River Thames from Gravesend looking west towards London, at the location of the proposed Lower Thames Crossing (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
'I meant Dartford, excuse me, I had a very early morning,' the minister told LBC Radio.
Asked about the proposed new crossing's location, she said: 'You'll forgive me, I can't recall the landing zone.'
The crossing will involve two tunnels under the Thames to the east of Tilbury in Essex and Gravesend in Kent.
Pressed on the cost, she said 'it's going to cost quite a lot of money', suggesting it would be 'several billion pounds'.
LBC Radio presenter Nick Ferrari told Ms Reynolds: 'Is there much point continuing this conversation because you don't know where a bridge starts, where it ends and you don't know how much it costs?'
National Highways has estimated the cost will be between £9.2 billion and £10.2 billion depending on the funding model chosen.
An artist's impression of how the southern portal of the Lower Thames Crossing in Kent will look (Highways England/PA)
It would connect the A2 and M2 in Kent to the A13 and M25 in Essex via a 2.6-mile tunnel under the Thames, which would be the UK's longest road tunnel.
The funding for the Lower Thames Crossing will be part of the Government's 10-year plan for infrastructure.
A new structures fund will also invest in repairing bridges, flyovers, tunnels and other transport infrastructure such as roads.
The Lower Thames Crossing is aimed at reducing congestion at Dartford.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander (James Manning/PA)
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has said that the project is 'essential for improving the resilience of a key freight route and is critical to our long-term trade with Europe'.
'It will speed up the movement of goods from south-east England to the Midlands and the north, crucial to thousands of jobs and businesses,' she added.
Rachel Reeves has said ministers are 'going all in by going up against the painful disruption of closed bridges, crossings and flyovers'.
The Chancellor added: 'This is a turning point for our national infrastructure, and we're backing it with funding to support thousands of jobs and connect communities, delivering on our plan for change.'
The plan is intended to ease congestion at the Dartford Crossing (Gareth Fuller/PA)
It comes ahead of the Government's infrastructure strategy, expected this week, while public procurement rules are set to be overhauled so that public bodies will have to give more weight to firms which can prove they will boost British jobs when they are bidding for contracts.
The Chancellor outlined a range of infrastructure investments as part of last week's spending review.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lionesses' victory showed strong & proud England at its finest… the return of unapologetic patriotism was long overdue
Lionesses' victory showed strong & proud England at its finest… the return of unapologetic patriotism was long overdue

The Sun

time30 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Lionesses' victory showed strong & proud England at its finest… the return of unapologetic patriotism was long overdue

IF you were attempting to fly off on your family holiday this Wednesday just as all outbound flights from the UK were grounded due to a technical failure, then you would have had a vivid close-up of broken Britain. You know the place. The land where 'nothing works'. The country where taxes are at an all-time high and yet public services are at an all-time low. Where a deeply unpopular government presides over unfettered immigration, industrial unrest, porous borders, NHS queues, rising violent crime and economic paralysis. If I had been one of 577,000 Brits decked by the latest air traffic chaos, you bet your life I would have been screaming: 'Why does nothing work in this bloody country?' Most feel that a raft of crimes are on the rise, from sex offences to knife crime to street mugging. Yet police stations are closed. Coppers are rarely seen on our lawless streets. Burglars, shoplifters and phone-snatchers get away with their crimes. Our capital has become Dodge City with a mayor who frets more about the American President than he does the anarchic streets of London. But it is always worth remembering that there is another country — an unbroken Britain. And it is just as real as the land of striking doctors, online haters, small boats, e-bikes dumped in disabled bays, brazen shoplifters, phone snatchers, knife crime, and all the rest of our litany of misery. What my old mucker Ian Dury called reasons to be cheerful. That unbroken Britain — strong and proud, stoic and resilient — was rampant when England's women won the Euros. England's Lionesses return home to heroes' welcome with EURO 2025 trophy 'This team shows exactly what it means to be English,' said Lioness Chloe Kelly. 'I am so proud to be English. This team is made of magic and made of steel.' 'We've shown during this tournament that we can come back when we go a goal down,' said hero goalkeeper Hannah Hampton. 'We have that grit. We have English blood in us.' The return of unapologetic, unabashed patriotism is long overdue. Remembering who we are — and why it should make us happy — can never be wrong. Those patriotic Lionesses spoke of something real. This country has faced and fought tyrants for centuries. It has not been invaded for 1,000 years. It is home to a tough, tolerant, quietly courageous, freedom-loving people with an instinct for good manners and gentle humour. Fashionable self-loathing Doesn't that remind you of your family and your friends and everyone you grew up with? We have so many reasons to be proud of our country. Eleven years ago, Labour's Emily Thornberry took a photo of a working-class home with a St George flag on display outside — because Emily clearly thought it was hilarious, darling. But for all that ails our nation — and yes, there is plenty — I believe in my blood and bones that Emily Thornberry's brand of fashionable self-loathing has had its day. Enough. I am always proud of this country. Our history. Our people. The freedom we revere. The creativity that has poured from these shores. The grit we show when our backs are against the wall. Parts of Britain undeniably feel shattered. But there is a national soul that is made of unbreakable material. It was there in the smiling faces of all those different generations on the Mall, as they waved their Union Jacks and their flags of St George, responding to what George Orwell called, 'The spiritual need for patriotism for which, however little the boiled rabbits of the Left may like it, no substitute has yet been found.' Never forget that our unbroken, unbreakable Britain is real too, and we are right to feel an unapologetic love for it. There are no small boats trying to get into France, are there? MARIAH A TIME KILLER MARIAH Carey insists that ageing is optional. Asked how she deals with getting older, Mariah flounces: 'I don't allow it – it just doesn't happen. 'I don't know time. I don't know numbers. I do not acknowledge time.' David Bowie once told me exactly the opposite. 'The years seem to go faster,' Bowie told me just before his 50th birthday in January 1997. 'And that's because the years really are going faster.' The David Bowie theory of time was that it accelerates as we get older because one year is always becoming a smaller percentage of your life span. For Bowie, at 50, a year was just two per cent of his life – a fleeting fragment. But when David was a ten-year-old boy at Burnt Ash Junior School in Bromley, a year was ten per cent of his life. Mariah Carey, that admirably defiant diva, 56, says that we can ignore the passing of time. But David Bowie insisted that time is forever slipping through our fingers. I wonder who is right? LISTEN TO NEV, RACHEL GARY Neville is that great rarity – a Labour supporter who is also a successful businessman. We think of Gary as an acid-tongued football pundit. But – as his website proudly states – he has been a property developer since he was 21 years old, he is the co-founder of the production company Buzz 16 and his investment business, Relentless, is now ten years old. So when Gary Neville talks about this Labour Government's relationship to business, they should listen. Gary points out the intolerable burden that has been placed on British business by Chancellor Rachel Reeves hiking employers' National Insurance contributions. 'I honestly don't believe that companies and small businesses should be deterred from employing people,' he told Sky News. Neville is right – hammering employers is the dumbest move of a Government that claims to crave economic growth. Our Government is stuffed full of people who have worked as a lawyer (Keir Starmer, David Lammy), economist (Rachel Reeves) and trade union representative (Angela Rayner). Incredibly, there is not one entrepreneur among them. Can't they find a seat for Gary Neville around the Cabinet table? LIAM AND PAMELA HAVE GUN AND DONE IT 5 AGAINST all expectations, film critics are hailing the Liam Neeson-Pamela Anderson reboot of clasic cop caper The Naked Gun as a comic masterpiece. 'This is one of the funniest films I have seen in years,' said my colleague Grant Rollings in The Sun. 'So funny it made me physically crumble in my seat on multiple occasions,' gasped the Telegraph. There are two reasons this is weird. One – in recent years, comedy has gone out of fashion in Hollywood. And two – although the sequel, reboot and film franchise are all the rage in Tinsel Town, they are usually never as good as the original. Until Liam Neeson flashed his lurid underpants and got out his indecently large Glock. Until Pamela Anderson, above with Liam, brilliantly reinvented herself as a comic femme fatale. Until now. I suggest that no film this year has received rave reviews like this remake of The Naked Gun. And I hear you cry – surely you can't be serious? But I am dead serious. And don't call me Shirley! THUGS ON RISE MOHAMMED Fahir Amaaz has been convicted on three counts of assault at Manchester airport, including attacks on two female officers, PC Lydia Ward and PC Ellie Cook. The CCTV footage of Amaaz using what was described in court as 'a high level of violence' is truly sickening. PC Cook had her nose broken by this violent thug. Once upon a time – how long ago it seems! – men in this country did not think it was acceptable to hit women. And now, God help us, some of them do. PROVING that our footballers have far more money than they know what to do with, Erling Haaland's partner Isabel Haugseng Johansen poses with a £330,000 diamond-encrusted crocodile-skin Hermes handbag. Now that's what I call a sick bag. Are we meant to be impressed? Frankly, the notion that some beautiful crocodile was skinned to provide some narcissistic rich person with clicks on Instagram turns my stomach. A crocodile is a wild animal. Never a handbag. ON a golfing trip to Scotland, Donald Trump took time out to knock Net Zero for fore. While Sir Keir Starmer sat mutely by his side, the POTUS pointed out that there was a 'vast fortune to be made for the UK' if the Government reversed its self-harming policy of denying new licences for gas and oil extraction from the North Sea. Trump also railed against wind turbines and the madness of ignoring shale reserves. Starmer said nowt. Perhaps he knows that the Orange King is right. And that green goon Ed Miliband, the swivel-eyed major nutjob of Net Zero, is wrong, wrong, wrong. AS JK Rowling turns sixty, she is rightly hailed as a fearless women's campaigner. Joanne also deserves the thanks of a nation for her achievement as a writer. Nobody ever did more to give generations of children a love of reading that will stay with them for a lifetime.

State Pension age rise for some people to start next year - here's what you need to know
State Pension age rise for some people to start next year - here's what you need to know

North Wales Live

time2 hours ago

  • North Wales Live

State Pension age rise for some people to start next year - here's what you need to know

The State Pension age is due to begin its rise from 66 to 67 next year, with the increase expected to be fully implemented for all men and women across the UK by 2028. This planned alteration to the official retirement age has been in legislation since 2014, with an additional increase from 67 to 68 scheduled to take place between 2044 and 2046. The Pensions Act 2014 expedited the increase in the State Pension age from 66 to 67 by eight years. The UK Government also altered the method of phasing in the increase in State Pension age, meaning that instead of reaching State Pension age on a specific date, individuals born between March 6 1961 and April 5 1977 will be eligible to claim the State Pension once they turn 67. It's crucial to be aware of these impending changes now, particularly if you have a retirement plan in place. All those affected by alterations to their State Pension age will receive a letter from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) well in advance. Under the Pensions Act 2007, the State Pension age for both men and women will rise from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046. The Pensions Act 2014 mandates a regular review of the State Pension age, at least once every five years. This review will be centred around the concept that individuals should be able to spend a certain proportion of their adult life receiving a State Pension, reports the Daily Record. A review of the planned rise to 68 is due before the end of this decade and had originally been scheduled by the then Conservative government to take place two years after the general election - which would have been 2026. Any review of the State Pension age will take into account life expectancy along with a range of other factors relevant to setting the State Pension age. After the review has reported, the UK Government may then choose to bring forward changes to the State Pension age. However, any proposals would have to go through Parliament before becoming law. Check your State Pension age online Your State Pension age is the earliest age you can start receiving your State Pension. It may be different to the age you can get a workplace or personal pension. Anyone of any age can use the online tool at to check their State Pension age, which can be an essential part of planning your retirement. You can use the State Pension age tool to check: When you will reach State Pension age Your Pension Credit qualifying age When you will be eligible for free bus travel - this is at age 60 in Scotland Check your State Pension age online here. Boosting State Pension payments HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) recently announced more than 10,000 payments worth £12.5 million have been made by people through the new digital service to boost State Pensions since it launched last year. However, anyone keen to maximise their retirement income through the contributory benefit has just a few weeks left to fill any gaps in their National Insurance (NI) records going back as far as 2006. Usually people can only pay voluntary contributions for the past six tax years, and after the April 5 deadline this year the normal six-tax year time limit will apply. In 2023, the previous government extended the deadline to pay voluntary NI contributions to April 5, 2025 for those affected by new State Pension transitional arrangements, covering the tax years running from April 6, 2006 to April 5, 2018. The extended deadline has allowed people more time to consider what is right for them and make their contributions. Men born after April 6, 1951 and women born after April 6, 1953 are eligible to make voluntary NI contributions to boost their New State Pension. Some people may be entitled to NI credits rather than needing to pay contributions, so they will need to check and consider what is right for them. People can find out more about making voluntary contributions on here. People of working age can also check their State Pension forecast on here. Alice Haine, personal finance analyst at Bestinvest by Evelyn Partners, the online investment platform, said: 'People typically need at least 10 qualifying years of NI (national insurance) contributions to receive any state pension at all and at least 35 years to receive the full new State Pension - though they don't need to be consecutive years. 'Plugging gaps can be quite an expensive process, so it is important to assess whether you actually need to buy back any missing years. This will depend on how many more years you plan to work, and whether you are eligible for NI tax credits, which fill the gaps, such as those who have been sick, were unemployed or took time out to raise a family or care for elderly relations. 'Plugging gaps in your record is relatively straightforward since the Government rolled out its new NI payments services in April last year - a State Pension forecast tool that has been checked by 3.7m since its launch.' She continued: 'People simply need to log into their personal tax account or the HMRC app to not only view any payment gaps but also check if they can plug those gaps directly through the Government's digital channels. 'A short survey assesses the person's suitability to pay online with those eligible to pay directly given a series of options to plug any gaps depending on when someone wants to stop working. 'Calculating whether to top up can be confusing though and ultimately there is no point paying for more years than you need because you won't get that money back.' Ms Haine added: 'People who might need to top up include those that took a career break as well as low earners or expatriates living and working abroad.

Removal of dangerous cladding moving at ‘glacial pace', Lib Dems warn
Removal of dangerous cladding moving at ‘glacial pace', Lib Dems warn

STV News

time2 hours ago

  • STV News

Removal of dangerous cladding moving at ‘glacial pace', Lib Dems warn

The Scottish Government has been accused of removing dangerous cladding at a 'glacial pace', after figures showed just 0.2% of potentially affected buildings have completed remediation work. Out of an estimated 1,450 buildings that may require work to remove cladding, just three have been fully assessed under the Cladding Remediation Programme. Another 12 single building assessments (SBAs), which assess any risk to life as a result of cladding, are currently under way. Only two buildings in the country currently have active remediation work being undertaken. It comes despite the Government scheme having already received 600 expressions of interest from those responsible for potentially impacted buildings. The Scottish Liberal Democrats said there is 'no excuse' for slow progress after the Grenfell tragedy eight years ago. The party pointed to figures from England that show 48% of buildings identified with unsafe cladding have started or completed remediation work. Willie Rennie, the party's communities spokesman at Holyrood, said: 'In the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster, there can be no excuses for making such glacial progress, but this SNP Government continue to blunder their way through in slow motion. 'This is an issue where Scotland simply cannot afford to fall behind; by moving so sluggishly with the necessary building works, the SNP Government are only increasing the risks to people's lives. 'That's why I am imploring ministers to urgently step-up the pace in fixing at-risk buildings and keep homeowners, residents and local authorities informed on developments.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'A ministerial working group on fire safety was established immediately following the Grenfell Tower tragedy and continues to co-ordinate cross-government activity to improve fire and building safety. 'The Scottish Government has introduced legislation mandating the use of fire-suppression systems in new-build multi-occupancy properties over 18 metres; introduced regulations prohibiting the use of combustible cladding materials on high-medium risk buildings; and introduced regulations requiring the installation of interlinked smoke alarms in all properties. 'We committed to addressing unsafe cladding and the wider system failures that allowed these risks to go unchallenged. That commitment is now underpinned by law through the Housing (Cladding Remediation) (Scotland) Act 2024, which took effect in January 2025. 'We are moving at pace to support the identification, assessment, mitigation and remediation of buildings affected by unsafe cladding. Where risks are identified and require immediate intervention, we will take appropriate action because protecting lives is our top priority and cannot wait. 'Since the Cladding Remediation Act came into effect in January, we have launched the single open call, backed by £10 million of Scottish Government funding, to enable residential property owners to apply for a Government-funded single building assessment. 'We will shortly be announcing the second stage of the single open call, which will allow homeowners to apply for funding for measures recommended by an assessment. 'We will continue to provide updates on progress.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store