
‘I was a newborn addicted to crystal meth and heroin – no one should have such a tough start to life'
He spent his first four months in intensive care after suffering a stroke and a cardiac arrest as hospital staff attempted to wean him off crystal meth and heroin – after he was born to a mother addicted to Class A drugs.
Adopted at the age of four after 24 temporary placements in foster care, Mr Hesketh was raised by a loving family in St Helen's, and only discovered the true extent of his birth mother's condition as he became older.
He had been born via emergency C-section over two months prematurely, and faced developmental delays during his early years, which included a diagnosis of Asperger's Syndrome. As a result of suffering a stroke, he has also had to undergo two squint correction surgeries, including one as recently as in 2020.
'My adoptive parents rewrote my story,' the 28-year-old told The Independent. 'They literally saved me. Children who are in foster care are sadly more likely to turn to those kinds of behaviours and turn to drugs because it's what they've been used to.'
Latest figures reveal that over 1,000 newborns are born in England's hospitals every year suffering from neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), as they experience acute withdrawal symptoms from substances.
Freedom of information data shows that nearly 12,600 cases have been recorded since 2014, placing enormous pressure on NHS staff as calls grow for increased spending on treatment and rehabilitation for pregnant women who present at hospital with addiction.
Calling for better provisions to be in place for mothers who are struggling with addiction, Mr Hesketh said: 'This puts such a huge strain on the NHS, and they're not getting enough funding to help them and to provide recovery services.
'It needs to be enforced and there should be an action plan in place. It's currently not safeguarded, and in some cases you see a mother go on to have five children, all of them born with the same issues.'
Statistics show that there has been a slight decrease in the number of babies being born with NAS over the last 10 years, down from 1,287 in 2014 to 1,001 between January and November 2024.
Recent figures released by the Scottish Liberal Democrats revealed that over 1,500 babies had been born drug dependent in Scotland since 2017, as they called for further investment in local drug services.
Symptoms can start within a few days of birth and can include uncontrollable trembling, sickness, poor weight gain and a continuous high-pitched cry. Consuming drugs and alcohol during the pregnancy can also lead to development issues for the foetus, and increases the risk of infections.
The introduction of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 has seen drastic cuts to addiction services, as it removed their funding from the central government to being commissioned at the discretion of local authorities.
With council budgets slashed over the last decade, services have been cut with less support available despite hospital admissions in England and Wales rising by 13.2 per cent between 2012 and 2021.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics in October showed that the number of people dying as a result of drug poisoning had reached the highest level on record.
'Drug abuse is becoming a lot worse than it was when I was born in 1996,' Mr Hesketh told The Independent. 'I've got friends who work in a women's hospital, who say they just don't get the support and they're having to comfort babies who can't sleep or eat as they're dealing with addiction.'
Now advocating for change, Mr Hesketh is calling for the government to introduce stronger measures to encourage pregnant women to break from the cycle of addiction.
'I was born into withdrawal and had to fight for my life before I even had a chance to live it,' he said. 'This law isn't about punishment — it's about prevention. We need to break the cycle of addiction, protect innocent babies, and give mothers the support they need to make better choices.'
This includes mandatory addiction treatment which would involve free or low-cost programmes, financial aid, and housing support for pregnant women, with potential legal consequences for repeat offenders.
Graeme Callander, policy and public affairs at addiction service WithYou, said: "It's vital that women who are using drugs during pregnancy receive the right support, for themselves and their child.
'Not enough research has been done on the impact of drug use in pregnancy on the child, and we also know that tragically stigma and shame mean many women are scared to reach out and ask for help.
"Our services are free and non-judgemental. You can contact us by visiting our website at wearewithyou.org.uk, and by using our anonymous webchat service 9am-9pm on weekdays and 10am-4pm at the weekend."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Weight-loss jabs on NHS may be rolled out ‘in high streets and shopping centres'
The 10-year plan for the health service says there is a need to expand access to weight-loss services and treatments and bring them closer to where people live and work. It says the Government will work with industry 'to test innovative models of delivering weight loss services and treatments to patients effectively and safely' in convenient locations, which may include 'on the high street, or at any out-of-town shopping centre'. Digital-only models, where everything is done and managed online, may also be put in place, the plan says. Furthermore, companies will not just paid if people lose weight, 'but if that also translates into outcomes that really matter for patients, such as fewer heart attacks, strokes or cancer diagnoses'. Earlier, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said weight-loss jabs should be available according to need, not the ability to pay. At the moment, people with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 or more, or 30 but with a linked health condition, can be prescribed jabs on the NHS through specialist weight-management services. Health Secretary Wes Streeting outside BBC Broadcasting House in London (Lucy North/PA) Other people are paying hundreds of pounds a month to get the jabs privately. Mr Streeting told LBC radio: 'Weight-loss jabs are the talk of the House of Commons tea rooms, half my colleagues are on them and are judging the rest of us saying 'you lot should be on them'. 'And the thing is, if you can afford these weight loss jabs, which can be over 200 quid a month, well that's all right for you. 'But most people in this country haven't got a spare two and a half grand a year and often the people who have the worst and most challenging obesity also have the lowest income. 'So I'm bringing to weight loss jabs the principle of fairness which has underpinned the NHS. 'It should be available based on need and not the ability to pay. 'And that's what we're going to do on weight-loss jabs, as well as a number of other things, including people getting more fit, more active, supporting people on diet and nutrition….that's the bit of the weight-loss jab debate that sometimes gets lost. 'It's not that you can have some weight-loss jabs and stuff your face with Jaffa cakes…' He said obesity cost the NHS billions a year, adding that taxes have been going 'up and up' to pay for the health service.


The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves says she is ‘cracking on with the job' after Commons tears
Rachel Reeves says she is 'cracking on with the job' of chancellor after being visibly distressed in the Commons the day before, speaking after a public show of unity with Keir Starmer. Reeves unexpectedly joined the prime minister and Wes Streeting, the health secretary, at the launch of the NHS 10-year plan at a health centre in east London, receiving hugs from both colleagues. Her brief speech at the event gave no mention of Wednesday's prime minister's questions, at which she was visibly tearful, with the chancellor talking only about the fiscal foundations of the NHS plan. But, speaking to reporters afterwards, Reeves said the reason for her upset was a personal issue unconnected to politics, insisting she was now fine. 'Clearly, I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that,' she said. 'My job as chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the prime minister, supporting the government and that's what I tried to do. 'I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that.' She rejected suggestions that her upset was connected to an interaction with Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons speaker, or with a government colleague. 'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job,' she added. During a Q&A session with Starmer after his speech at the NHS event, a number of reporters directed questions to Reeves – but without reply. Starmer also refused to discuss what prompted Reeves's upset: 'She has made clear on a number of occasions that yesterday was a personal issue, and I am certainly not going to say anything more about that. I think it's fantastic that she is here, and none of this would be happening if she hadn't taken the decisions that she's taken.' Asked if he should have noticed what was happening during PMQs and consoled the chancellor, Starmer said that was unrealistic given the format of the Commons exchanges. 'I didn't appreciate what was happening because, as you'll probably appreciate, PMQs is pretty wired,' he said. 'It goes from question to question and I am literally up, down, question, looking at who is asking me a question, thinking about my response and getting up and answering it.' He added: 'It wasn't just yesterday. No prime minister ever has had side conversations in PMQs. It does happen in other debates when there is a bit more time, but in PMQs it is bang, bang, bang, bang. 'That is what it was yesterday and therefore I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber.' Reeves has been under intense pressure, with her task of balancing already tight public finances made even harder after the government's concessions to Labour MPs over plans to reform welfare, which has obliterated the planned-for £5bn savings a year. Downing Street has insisted that Reeves's position is not under any threat. Speculation that she might resign or be forced out had pushed up borrowing costs and led the pound to fall against the dollar and euro, with markets rallying after Starmer publicly backed her.


The Herald Scotland
14 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Rachel Reeves insists she is ‘cracking on with the job' after Commons upset
Ms Reeves would not, however, be drawn into answering questions about the 'personal matter' which had upset her ahead of Wednesday's Prime Minister's Questions. She told broadcasters: 'Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that. 'My job as Chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the Prime Minister, supporting the Government and that's what I tried to do. 'I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves (right) crying as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaks during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA) The Chancellor rejected suggestions that her tears were related to a conversation with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle or another member of Government. 'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job,' she added. Sir Keir gave a full-throated defence of his Chancellor, and said he had not appreciated how upset she was while he was focused on the cut and thrust of Parliament's most-viewed weekly event. On Thursday, the Chancellor appeared alongside the Prime Minister and Health Secretary Wes Streeting as the Government launched it's 10-year plan for the NHS in London. Ms Reeves made no mention of Wednesday's incident in the Commons as she made her first public appearance since crying in the chamber. Smiling as she spoke at a health centre in London, the Chancellor insisted the NHS plan was 'good for the health of our nation and good for the health of our nation's finances'. She also stopped to take selfies with nurses and other healthcare staff who were gathered for the launch. Sir Keir and Ms Reeves embraced as he made his way to the podium to give a speech after the Chancellor had finished. The Prime Minister poured praise upon her in an open show of unity, hailing the decisions made by the Chancellor as playing a part in the Government investing 'record amounts in the NHS'. Sir Keir said he did not 'appreciate' that Ms Reeves was crying behind him at PMQs as the event is 'pretty wired'. 'It goes from question to question and I am literally up, down, question, looking at who is asking me a question, thinking about my response and getting up and answering it,' he said. Sir Keir added: 'It wasn't just yesterday. No prime minister ever has had side conversations in PMQs. It does happen in other debates when there is a bit more time, but in PMQs it is bang, bang, bang, bang. 'That is what it was yesterday and therefore I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber.' As the Prime Minister took questions from the media, several journalists invited Ms Reeves to comment on her tears, but only Sir Keir answered. Earlier, the Prime Minister said all people could be caught 'off guard' by their emotions, but the Chancellor had to deal with it while on camera in Parliament. He said she was doing an 'excellent' job, would remain in place beyond the next general election, and that they were both absolutely committed to the Chancellor's 'fiscal rules' to maintain discipline over the public finances. Chancellor Rachel Reeves (left), Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (right) and Health Secretary Wes Streeting (second left) at the launch of the Government's 10-year health plan (Jack Hill/The Times) UK Government bonds rallied and the pound steadied on Thursday, after reassurances from the Prime Minister about the Chancellor's future. The sight of her in tears on Wednesday, and the £5 billion black hole in her public spending plans as a result of the welfare U-turn had spooked the markets, triggering a sharp sell-off of bonds, with the yield seeing the sharpest increase since US President Donald Trump's tariff plans shook up financial markets in April. Back in the Commons chamber, Commons Leader Lucy Powell defended her 'friend' Ms Reeves, and said 'she's got more class than most of the rest of the members opposite on the frontbench'. Leadership is hard. There are good days, some very good, and bad days, some very bad. The resilience you need for top jobs is superhuman. But if a Chief Exec cried in public, if a military chief said they hadn't read the operational plan properly because they had a bad day,… — Claire Coutinho (@ClaireCoutinho) July 3, 2025 The Conservatives meanwhile suggested Ms Reeves' public show of emotion was not acceptable. In a post on X shared by Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, shadow energy secretary Claire Coutinho said: 'Leadership is hard. There are good days, some very good, and bad days, some very bad. The resilience you need for top jobs is superhuman. 'But if a chief exec cried in public, if a military chief said they hadn't read the operational plan properly because they had a bad day, they would not be forgiven for it.'