It's Game Over for Everyone Else if Toyota Finally Sells a Compact Pickup in the US
The Ford Maverick, Hyundai Santa Cruz, and Honda Ridgeline have had the small pickup truck market to themselves for a while now, but it sounds like Toyota is looking into getting a slice of that pie. In an interview with The Japan Times , Toyota's North American chief operating officer Mark Templin said 'We're looking at it,' in response to U.S. dealer requests for a compact pickup slotting under the midsize Tacoma.
Considering the fact that even Slate, a whole unproven startup, is putting all its eggs in the compact truck basket, it's kind of surprising Toyota hasn't brought out a vehicle like this already. The Japanese automaker pretty much has all the ingredients in place to make it happen, including stateside manufacturing facilities. Take the unibody TNGA-K bones and proven hybrid powertrains from, say, that snazzy new RAV4 and give it mini-Taco styling and a bed in the back. Toyota big boss Koji Sato was recently quoted saying, 'A car is not a car if it's not fun'—a pickup RAV4 would be hella fun.
And I don't think I'm alone in thinking this. In 2024, the two best-selling cars in the U.S. were the Ford F-Series and Chevy Silverado. Nipping at their heels at number three? The Toyota RAV4, of which 475,000 were sold. Combine the compact crossover's wild popularity with this country's insatiable appetite for the truck form, and it's hard to see how a small Toyota pickup would be a losing proposition. The 2025 Ford Maverick's popularity has proved that people will buy small trucks. Ford
Unibody truck naysayers may rebut by pointing to relatively weak Hyundai Santa Cruz and Honda Ridgeline sales—Hyundai sold just 32,000 pickups in 2024 (down 13% from '23) while Honda moved 45,000 Ridgelines (also a 13% drop year-over-year). But I have a pet theory that those two vehicles aren't that popular not because they are small or aren't body-on-frame but more because Hyundai and Honda aren't really known as truck brands. Classic truck brand Ford, meanwhile, sold 131,000 Mavericks last year (a 39% growth) despite that vehicle sharing bones with the Escape.
In other words, the badge on the nose matters to truck people, arguably more than it does with any other segment of vehicle. Perhaps not the best thing to hear if you're Slate, but Toyota has been building trucks now with success for decades now, and it's time to cash in on that brand equity with something even those shopping on the Corolla end of the price spectrum can afford.
Got a tip or question for the author about a new, small Toyota pickup? You can reach him here: chris.tsui@thedrive.com
Chris Tsui is The Drive's Reviews Editor. He oversees the site's car reviews operation in addition to pitching in on industry news and writing his own evaluations of the latest rides. He lives in Toronto.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Gets Dismal Sales News After Disastrous Robotaxi Launch
Tesla has posted its second quarter delivery numbers — and they're not looking good. As the New York Times reports, the company reported it had delivered just 384,000 vehicles between April and June, a massive drop from 444,000 vehicles over the same period last year. Meanwhile, CEO Elon Musk has focused his carmaker's resources on developing a robotaxi network of fully autonomous vehicles. However, given a disastrous launch filled with near-collisions, bizarre driving behavior, and human "safety monitors" being forced to jump into the driver's seat, dropping sales are only the tip of the iceberg of Tesla's troubles. The company's brand has been dragged through the mud by its mercurial CEO's embrace of far-right talking points, leading to plummeting demand and furious protesters denouncing Musk in front of dealerships. Worse yet, international competition is really starting to ramp up. While Tesla's sales numbers have been dropping for months now, interest in EVs, particularly in the offerings of Chinese carmakers like BYD, is still steadily increasing. Investors and analysts alike were expecting bad news for Tesla's second quarter. "We expect Tesla's 2Q25 deliveries to miss... but this shouldn't come as a surprise," Deutsche Bank analysts wrote in a note earlier this week, citing cratering European sales. However, considering the company's shares have risen more than this morning, chances are investors were prepared for far worse — or simply looking for a good deal after the stock slid more than five percent on Tuesday. In April, the company reported an astonishing 71 percent drop in net income since the first quarter of last year, indicating the company was seriously struggling. Even the billionaire's purported departure from the world of politics and return to his EV business hasn't helped the situation. The company's shares are still down roughly 22 percent year to date. Musk, for his part, is still locked in an ugly spat with president Donald Trump, who threatened this week to cut him off from all subsidies and look into deporting him. The South Africa-born entrepreneur has been desperately trying to paint his carmaker's chaotic robotaxi launch as a success, gloating about the company completing the first fully autonomous car delivery. "There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point," he tweeted over the weekend. "FULLY autonomous!" But the stunt ended in an embarrassing flub, with the modified Model Y stopping at a brightly red-colored curb that read "NO PARKING FIRE LANE." More on Tesla: Tesla Bros Who Bet on Polymarket That Tesla Would Successfully Launch Full Self-Driving by July Are Now Screwed Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's Self-Driving Mode Causes It to Get Hit by Train
Tesla's so-called "self-driving" features have some serious issues with train tracks — and in a recent instance, it led to a small collision with a moving freight train. As Pennsylvania-based broadcaster WFMZ reports, a family of three was forced to exit their Tesla in the wee hours of the morning after it decided, when in an assisted driving mode, to turn left onto some train tracks. Jared Renshaw, the fire commissioner for Southeastern PA's Western Berks County, told WFMZ that the car was in "self-driving" mode when it decided to take a jaunt down the train tracks. Though we can't be sure, Renshaw probably meant the Tesla was using "Full Self-Driving" (FSD) mode, the erroneously-named software that helped the company become the most accident-prone carmaker in the US for two consecutive years. A few minutes after the unnamed travelers ditched the car, a train came barreling down the opposite tracks to the Tesla's crappy parking spot. As indicated by social media photos from the local company that towed the car, it was apparently just inches from the train that hit it, though it came away mostly unscathed save for a clipped mirror. Because the family had already vacated the Tesla, they were uninjured. (That close call, while mighty undesirable, is far preferable to last year's big Tesla versus train story, when one of Elon Musk's self-driving electric vehicles was caught on video careening straight towards a moving train while the driver tried and failed to steer it away.) Though little damage to the car's body occurred, getting it off the tracks was apparently another story. As WFMZ notes, the Tesla had to be lifted via crane due to concerns that trying to roll it onto a flatbed would damage its highly flammable lithium-ion battery. Though the commissioner didn't explicitly say so, such damage could result in a massive, outrageously hot blaze that would require tens of thousands of gallons of water to put out. Despite its polarizing CEO ruining its sales and brand image, Tesla's ubiquity has led to more law enforcement interaction with the EVs. According to Renshaw, however, this was the first time he'd had to deal with the faulty autonomous driving software. "We've had accidents involving Teslas," he explained to WFMZ, "but nobody has expressed to us [in the past] that the vehicle was in self-drive mode when it happened." Unfortunately, the faulty FSD software also undergirds the Robotaxis that Tesla just unleashed onto the streets of Austin — which is, in part, why the rollout has already been such a disaster. More on FSD: Watch in Horror as Cybertruck Driver Plays "Grand Theft Auto" While Screaming Down Highway on Self-Driving Mode
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Bros Are Begging Polymarket to Change the Rules So Elon Musk's Disastrous Robotaxi Launch Doesn't Lose Them a Ton of Money
Tesla bros, it turns out, can be pretty sore losers. On the crypto-based prediction hub Polymarket, some of the automaker's diehards can't accept that they're about to lose a boatload of money after betting that their hero Elon Musk would launch a public robotaxi service in June. Which he didn't, by the way; the trial is limited to a few people with an invite, and beyond that, the most notable thing it's accomplished was earn the attention of federal regulators for flubs like violating traffic laws. Now, with July in full effect, the Tesla bettors are begging the site admins to let them win anyway, with some already crying foul if they don't get what they want. "This is a public launch," insisted one user who bought nearly 22,000 "Yes" shares on the bet titled, "Will Tesla launch a driverless Robotaxi service before July?" Dismissing the "haterz," the user added: "If they resolve this any other besides a YES, it's called a scam." In a hilarious testament to their zeal, the total bet volume has shot up by nearly $1,000,000 from just a day or two earlier, when the Polymarket event should've already closed. All the while, the odds of the yes-camp winning haven't budged from less than one percent. Many of them were inspired by Musk calling out the bet weeks ago, guaranteeing easy riches for his followers. "Money-making opportunity," he wrote in a tweet pointing to the Polymarket event. Musk's tweet briefly caused the "yes" odds to surge, but the reality of the situation has since set in. Tesla is operating an extremely limited form of a Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, with only ten to 20 vehicles on the road. And with its myriad of caveats, it doesn't appear to meet the bet's definition. In the rules section, it clearly states that a program restricted to "invite-only testers" will not qualify as a robotaxi service. Tesla's program is currently invite-only, with most of the participants being Tesla "influencers." In the past few days, it has reportedly begun inviting people outside this small pool of personalities, but it remains invite-only nonetheless. Tesla's service may fail on another count on top of that: it must not have a human in the vehicle who's "positioned to take control," the rules state. All of the robotaxis are currently supervised by a human "safety monitor" in the front passenger seat who can intervene to stop the vehicle (as we've already seen) and drive them if necessary (as we've also already seen.) Try explaining any of this to the Polymarket bettors, though, and your words will fall on deaf ears. (And to be fair, if we had thousands of dollars riding on this decision, we probably wouldn't take the loss well, either.) Take one user who bought a staggering 825,000 shares in favor of yes, who insists that the tiny pool of people allowed to use the robotaxi service don't count as "testers," but "users." "The exclusion only affects invite-only testers, a subset of all invite-only users," they explained. "Excluding a subset does not mean excluding the whole set." "If you reject that," they added, "you're rejecting basic set theory and by extension, the logic of this universe." The cosmos shudders at the plight of the wounded Tesla warrior. Won't someone do something? "Elon needs to step in and clarify the situation. His reputation is at stake," commented another. Epitomizing the outlook of Musk-worshipping tech bros and the specious nature of their pleas, another in the yes-camp sincerely cited a "conversation with Grok," Musk's X-integrated AI chatbot, as evidence in their favor. So far, the Tesla bros have disputed the "no" decision twice. A final decision is slated to come down on Thursday. More on Tesla: Tesla's Self-Driving Mode Causes It to Get Hit by Train Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
