Ingenuity helps Zimbabwe weather drought and US aid cuts
Last year, Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park fed villagers who were starved by drought with elephants they had culled to reduce overpopulation.
This year, the nearby community of Mabale is banking on rain-harvesting to help locals grow enough food, using chicken wire, canvas and cement to get through the extreme weather that has become Zimbabwe's new norm.
President Emmerson Mnangagwa declared a state of disaster last April because of the drought and climate experts say this kind of extreme weather is only going to get worse.
'Zimbabwe is a country highly affected by climate change, and looking ahead, science tells us that the situation is likely to become worse,' said Mattias Soderberg, global climate lead at DanChurchAid, a Danish humanitarian organisation.
In 2024, Zimbabwe was hit by Southern Africa's worst drought in 40 years. Harvests failed and water reserves dried up in a country where 70% of people rely on subsistence agriculture.
The unprecedented drought was fuelled by El Nino, a climate phenomenon that can worsen drought or storms — weather that is made more likely by climate change.
Last year, the United Nations said Zimbabwe was among 18 locations that risked a 'firestorm of hunger' in the absence of aid.
But now aid has been heavily cut worldwide after President Donald Trump gutted the US Agency for International Development (USAID) on taking office this year.
US funding supported a range of projects in Zimbabwe in agriculture, health and food security.
The United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization has received termination notices for more than 100 programmes, with Africa the worst hit, a Rome-based spokesperson said via email.
It couldn't come at a worse time for Zimbabwe, as it counts the cost of its latest drought — and readies for the next one.
'Without funding, important efforts to increase resilience, and to adapt to the effects of climate change, may never become reality,' Soderberg said.
Layiza Mudima, a 49-year-old mother from Mapholisa village in Mabale, about 2km northeast of the park, said her community was facing 'a severe water challenge'.
Around Hwange, last year's drought dried up the boreholes and waterholes, threatening wildlife in the park and depriving people in Mabale of drinking water.
And though rainfall from December to February this year was normal or above, fallout from the last drought persists.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
20 hours ago
- IOL News
President Xi Jinping says China, Senegal inject fresh impetus into Global South cooperation
President Xi Jinping meet with Prime Minister of Senegal Ousmane Sonko, who is in China to attend the 2025 Summer Davos Forum, in Beijing. Image: Ding Lin/ Xinhua / Xinhua via AFP China is willing to work with Senegal to strengthen solidarity and cooperation, deepen their comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership, bring more benefits to the two peoples, and inject fresh impetus into China-Africa friendship and Global South cooperation, Chinese President Xi Jinping said on Friday. Xi made the remarks when meeting with Prime Minister of Senegal Ousmane Sonko, who is in China to attend the 2025 Summer Davos Forum, in Beijing. The Chinese president noted that he co-chaired the 2024 Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in Beijing with President Bassirou Diomaye Faye last September, leading China-Africa relations into a new phase of jointly building an all-weather China-Africa community with a shared future for the new era. Xi also said that China and Senegal should firmly support each other's independent and self-reliant development paths, strengthen party-to-party and governance exchanges, and continuously consolidate the foundation of political mutual trust. China and Senegal are partners and good brothers on the road to development and revitalization, Xi said, adding that China is willing to work closely with Senegal to implement the 10 partnership actions between China and Africa, carry out more people's livelihood projects, and encourage Chinese enterprises to invest in Senegal's renewable energy, digital infrastructure and other sectors, becoming partners for win-win cooperation. Noting China and Senegal each have their own unique culture, Xi said both countries should take the opportunity of the 2026 China-Africa Year of People-to-People Exchanges to strengthen exchanges in fields such as culture, education, tourism, sports and youth, and bring their peoples closer together, becoming friends of mutual civilizational learning. Both China and Senegal must firmly defend the international system with the United Nations at its core, practice true multilateralism, uphold global governance featuring extensive consultation, joint contributions and shared benefits, and jointly promote world peace, prosperity, and progress, Xi said. Sonko said China is a reliable partner for Senegal, and that the two countries have always respected each other, united in mutual assistance, with stable and resilient bilateral relations and good progress in cooperation in various fields. Senegal firmly adheres to the one-China principle and looks forward to deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership with China, advancing the joint construction of the Belt and Road Initiative, enhancing cooperation in trade, investment, energy and other fields, and contributing to Senegal's economic and social development, Sonko said. Both China and Senegal are members of the Global South with shared values, and Senegal is willing to closely cooperate with China on international and regional issues, firmly becoming China's strategic partner, promoting international fairness and justice, and safeguarding the common interests of the Global South, Sonko added. IOL
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
MTN faces legal reckoning: Turkcell's $4.2 billion claim exposes alleged corruption and bribery
A $4.2-billion corruption claim, including allegations of bribery and geopolitical interference: MTN's long-running Irancell saga is finally knocking at the doors of South Africa's highest court. More than two decades since Iran issued its first private mobile network licence, a tangled web of geopolitics, bribery allegations and courtroom battles has landed squarely at the feet of South Africa's Constitutional Court. First, some background. The stakes? A $4.2-billion claim. The claimant? Turkish mobile giant Turkcell. The accused? The MTN Group, South Africa's telecommunications crown jewel. At the heart of the matter lies the 2005 award of Iran's mobile licence to MTN – after Turkcell had already been named the winner. Now, after years of legal ping-pong, Turkcell's claim of corruption and foul play is finally inching towards a South African trial. MTN is trying to stop that from happening. The smoking gun Turkcell's legal counsel, New York-based King & Spalding's Cedric Soule, doesn't mince his words. 'MTN sought to obtain illegally what it could not win through honest competition,' he told Daily Maverick. The allegations, which are laid out in filings and interviews, read like an international spy thriller: Bribing foreign officials, including Javid Ghorbanoghli, then Iranian deputy foreign minister for the Africa Bureau, and South Africa's then ambassador to Tehran, Yusuf Saloojee; Trading influence at the United Nations nuclear watchdog, promising to help Iran avoid sanctions; Promising prohibited defence equipment, including Rooivalk attack helicopters and frequency-hopping radios, to sweeten the deal (Turkcell claims it has evidence, as yet undisclosed, that MTN communicated with Denel and Iranian officials). According to Turkcell, all this happened so that MTN could elbow its way into a $31-billion mobile market and walk away with the licence that should have gone to Turkcell. The deal was sealed days after South Africa abstained from a crucial vote related to Iran's nuclear programme at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in late 2005. The vote concerned whether to report Iran to the UN Security Council for failing to comply with its IAEA Safeguards Agreement. But the abstention was seen as a deliberate act, motivated by concerns about the procedural fairness of the resolution and a desire to maintain the IAEA's authority. Specifically, South Africa's representative to the IAEA, Abdul Samad Minty, argued that the resolution was flawed and premature, as it bypassed the IAEA board of governors' role in the verification process. Minty said at the time that 'South Africa's commitment is to the IAEA's integrity and impartiality and is reluctant to undermine the agency's authority'. South Africa has also enjoyed good relations with Iran. Crucially, this abstention was not an isolated incident. South Africa also abstained on similar resolutions in 2006, highlighting a consistent stance on the matter. Soule says Turkcell 'won the licence fair and square' and that MTN's conduct undermined the integrity of international business. 'This case is about accountability,' he says. 'And it belongs in a South African courtroom.' A strong rebuttal MTN, for its part, has always dismissed Turkcell's claims as 'a fabric of lies' and a 'frivolous shakedown'. Its legal team, speaking about background exclusively to Daily Maverick, continues to lean heavily on the Hoffmann Report – a 2013 internal investigation led by British judge Lord Leonard Hoffmann. This report found 'no conspiracy,' labelled Turkcell's key witness a 'fantasist' and said MTN executives were in the clear. It even found that although a $400,000 payment had been made to an Iranian intermediary, the money's purpose couldn't be determined – and was irrelevant to Turkcell's central claims. MTN also argues that Turkcell failed to comply with Iranian laws after a shift in government policy. 'They failed to adjust their shareholding in time,' MTN argues, 'and were lawfully excluded from the process.' As for the most salacious allegations – military gear and political favours – MTN says it would be impossible for its actions to have altered Iranian legislation or international diplomacy. The Hoffmann Report indicates that a general election took place in Iran on 20 February 2004, which resulted in a new parliament taking office in May 2004. This new Iranian parliament was overwhelmingly dominated by conservatives who opposed the government's policy of privatisation and foreign inward investment, particularly in relation to the cellphone service. The Single Article Act, designed to strengthen financial discipline, stemmed from this shift in parliamentary power. Snookered in ownership Following the Single Article Act, the parliament passed another significant piece of legislation in February 2005, known as the Irancell Act. This act imposed further conditions, requiring that 51% of the shares in the operating company be held by Iranian entities and that all board decisions require the approval of at least 50% of the shareholders. This was understood to be due to concerns about foreign entities becoming heavily involved in what was considered critical infrastructure in Iran. These legislative changes created significant obstacles for Turkcell, which had initially won the tender with a plan to control 70% of the shares. 'Turkcell was given multiple opportunities to negotiate with its existing partners to reach a compliant deal, but they didn't do that or they were not able to do that,' MTN's legal team argues. The team points to a specific deadline – 4 September 2004 – when the Ministry of Telecommunications demanded a compliant deal from Turkcell, which the Turkish company failed to deliver. 'Turkcell has never explained how MTN's [alleged] corrupt practices would have led to a change in national legislation,' MTN's lawyers emphasise, arguing that their client was simply better positioned to navigate Iran's evolving regulatory landscape. After Turkcell's 2012 US complaint, MTN commissioned the independent investigation led by Lord Hoffmann, a retired British Supreme Court judge. But Turkcell has 'strongly rejected MTN's repeated reliance on the Hoffmann Report', with Soule calling it 'unreliable and irrelevant' to current proceedings. The Turkish company has criticised the investigation, claiming: Conflicts of interest: Lord Hoffmann's daughter, Jennifer, worked for MTN Mobile Money during the relevant 2004-2006 period and also in the MTN Banking joint venture with Standard Bank, which was involved in the financial transfers. 'Lord Hoffmann had a huge conflict of interest,' Soule argues. Lack of independence: The committee was composed of MTN non-executive directors and used MTN's own external lawyers (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) instead of independent counsel. The committee even thanked the Islamic Republic of Iran for support – problematic given Iran's alleged involvement in the wrongdoing. Insufficient rigour: The committee didn't actually interview key witnesses like former MTN director in Iran Chris Kilowan, then commercial director Irene Charnley (to whom Jenny Hoffmann reported) or former MTN CEO Phuthuma Nhleko to determine credibility, relying only on written statements prepared with lawyers' help. The committee did not independently seek documents, relying instead on what MTN's lawyers provided. Turkcell characterises the report as essentially 'a PR exercise' to review curated evidence and reach predetermined conclusions. The company declined to participate owing to concerns about the committee's structure and independence. Where we are now In April this year, the Supreme Court of Appeal handed Turkcell what it called a 'procedural win' – confirming that South African courts do have jurisdiction to hear the matter. It dismissed MTN's argument that South Africa cannot police corporate misconduct committed abroad. 'Not on our watch' was how the court framed its message to South African firms doing business in murky waters. MTN is now seeking leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court in a last-ditch effort to stop the case from going to trial. Turkcell has filed its opposition. 'The report never seriously asked: what if we did do some of these things?' says Soule. 'It only asked: is Turkcell's story perfect?' MTN has argued that Iranian courts would offer a fair alternative venue for the dispute, but Turkcell has strongly rejected that suggestion. The Turkish company cites 'well-documented concerns regarding judicial independence and due process' in what it describes as a 'religious dictatorship where dissent is not tolerated'. More practically, Turkcell argues that Iranian courts wouldn't be able to compel MTN executives, who reside in South Africa, to appear and testify – a crucial limitation given the nature of the allegations. But the fact remains that Turkcell also refused to participate in the Hoffmann inquiry, claiming its witnesses would not be safe and due process could not be guaranteed in Iran. Although the Supreme Court of Appeal agreed that Iranian law would apply to aspects of the case, Turkcell sees this as its 'only and probably final opportunity' to get a substantive ruling on MTN's alleged misconduct. If it proceeds, this would become one of South Africa's most explosive corporate trials. MTN also faces what amounts to a 'reputational trial in the court of public opinion', regardless of the legal outcome. The company holds a 49% minority stake in Irancell, which it says is not under MTN Group's operational control. The case also highlights claims of a complex interplay between corporate interests and state foreign policy. President Cyril Ramaphosa served as MTN Group chairperson (a non-executive role) more than 12 years ago, resigning from the position in May 2013. But MTN asserts that any suggestion of improper benefit from his time at the company is 'false and misleading', and emphasises that it does not conduct business in alignment with government foreign policy. The Constitutional Court is expected to announce its decision on MTN's leave to appeal within the next three months. MTN's other Iran headache MTN just can't catch a break in the Middle East, with new scrutiny coming from the US. Congresswoman Elise Stefanik has written a letter urging Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon) to investigate its ties with MTN. Her letter highlights concerns about MTN's links to Iran, Hamas and President Cyril Ramaphosa's finances. She calls for BNY Mellon to halt its role as the bank handling MTN's shares in the US, cooperate with US authorities, and disclose its involvement with MTN and its Iranian affiliates. A pending lawsuit, Zobay v MTN, accuses MTN of financing terrorism, as defined by the US Anti-Terrorism Act. Stefanik claims significant legal precedent exists, which MTN denies. Senior MTN executive Nompilo Morafo rejected Stefanik's claims in an interview with Daily Maverick, stating that the allegations have not been tested in court. Morafo also dismissed accusations against Ramaphosa, who chaired MTN 12 years ago, and insisted MTN has no operational control in Iran, holding only a minority share in Irancell. MTN says it 'remains committed to human rights', and its directors have pushed for a pivot to the company's pan-African strategy, despite litigation and pressure from US legislators. DM
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
World War III: A Continental Response
General view of a Security Council Meeting on the Israel-Iran conflict at United Nations headquarters on June 24, 2025 in New York. The Israeli government said it had agreed to the US-proposed ceasefire after achieving all of its objectives in the war with Iran, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailing a "historic victory". Armed forces chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir said Israel's strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme "by years" while Netanyahu vowed to thwart "any attempt" by Iran to rebuild it. The world is experiencing escalating conflicts rippling across the Middle East, Eurasia, Asia, and Africa. In a dramatic escalation, the US (United States) launched missile strikes at Iran targeting suspected nuclear facilities–triggered by Israel's confrontation with Iran. Weeks of crossfire between the two countries saw the US involved noting its longstanding nuclear policy towards Iran, North Korea, and Iraq. The flames of war are fanned by hostilities and changing global alliances, threatening to ignite multiple conflicts globally. In the Middle-East, Iran has responded to the US by launching an attack on its US base in Al Udeid, Qatar. Preceding this attack, Gulf countries–Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and Bahrain have been engaging in coordinated response drills. Due to rising regional security tensions, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) has taken the precaution of partially activating its emergency response centre. Meanwhile, Palestinians in Gaza continue to suffer under Israeli military actions, with Iran backing Hamas in a manner comparable to Israel's support for the Iranian dissident group, the People's Mujahedin of Iran. In Asia, the conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir has intensified, with Iran's ties to Shia militias and Israel's cooperation with India subtly shaping the broader regional dynamics. In the days following the exchanges between Iran and Israel, oil prices surged between 7-11 percent following initial strikes. One third of the world's seaborne oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz. Prolonged disruption would add $500 Billion to the Asian continent's annual import bill. China has emphasised diplomacy calling for international efforts to ease tensions between Israel and Iran. Africa is facing a multitude of challenges as the Iran-Israel-US war progresses. Brent crude prices are set to skyrocket due to disruptions faced in the Strait of Hormuz. Refined import to countries such as Kenya, Ghana, and Senegal are also impacted. The continent remains divided over the Iran-Israel-US conflict, with some countries like Algeria, Sudan (pre-normalisation), and South Africa–contemplating the closure of its Israeli Embassy–historically leaning toward Iran often citing solidarity with Palestine. In contrast, others such as Morocco, Egypt, and Kenya maintain strong security and economic ties with the US and, in some cases, formal or informal relations with Israel. The war between Russia and Ukraine has been a major source of instability in Eurasia. Iran has supported Russia with its war against Ukraine–diplomatically and militarily–mirroring the US and Europe's support for Ukraine. As Netenyahu warns the US of an Iranian threat, Zelensky has warned that Russia may soon expand its military operations across Europe, prompting the continent to prepare for possible escalation. In the Americas, the US has ramped up preparations for a potential military confrontation with China and Russia and its recent attack on Iran serves as a clear warning to its geopolitical rivals. Sanctioned Cuba, a long-time ally of both Iran and Russia, condemned the US for escalating tensions in the Middle East. Further south, Brazil is set to host the upcoming BRICS summit, where peacebuilding and diplomatic solutions are expected to top the agenda. The Iran-Israel conflict has rapidly evolved into a global crisis with far-reaching consequences. In the Middle East, military engagements and regional defence coordination have intensified. Asia faces possible economic shocks due to energy disruptions, while African allegiance is divided grappling with fuel shortages and diplomatic fractures. Eurasia remains on edge from the enduring war in Ukraine. The Americas are divided—between US militarism and Latin American ambivalence. This moment underscores the collapse of isolated conflicts in favour of a deeply interconnected world, heightening the risk of global insecurity. Cole Jackson Lead Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group Chinese & Latin American Specialist ** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates
