Trump announces second round of US trade talks with China next week
The president said on social media that the meeting would take place in London on Monday, his announcement coming one day after a rare leader-to-leader phone call with Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping appeared to calm rising tensions.
'The meeting should go very well,' said Trump in a post on his Truth Social platform, adding that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would meet the Chinese team.
The talks will mark the second round of negotiations between the two countries since Trump launched his trade war this year, targeting China with levies of up to 145 percent. Beijing struck back with countermeasures of 125 percent.
Following talks in Geneva last month, both sides agreed to temporarily bring down the triple-digit tariffs, with US tariffs cooling to 30 percent and China's to 10 percent.
But the temporary halt is expected to expire in early August and Trump last week accused China of violating the pact, underscoring deeper differences on both sides.
US officials have accused China of slow-walking export approvals of rare earth minerals, which the country had limited after the tariff war broke out, triggering alarm among US companies.
Other US concerns include alleged fentanyl trafficking, the status of democratically governed Taiwan, and China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model.
On Wednesday, Trump said on Truth Social that Xi was 'VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH'.
However, he reported a 'positive conclusion', following his long-awaited phone call with Xi on Thursday, which likely paved the way for further high-level trade talks – though a swift resolution to the tariffs impasse remains uncertain.
The Chinese foreign ministry said Xi asked Trump to 'remove the negative measures' that the US has taken against China, alluding to his administration's decision to revoke the visas of Chinese students studying in the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
37 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
US federal judge refuses Trump's bid to unseal Epstein grand jury records
A federal judge in the United States has rejected a request from the Department of Justice to release transcripts from a grand jury investigation into the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. On Wednesday, US District Judge Robin Rosenberg of Florida indicated her hands were 'tied' in the matter. The unsealing of grand jury testimony is relatively rare, given the need for secrecy in such sensitive criminal investigations. There are only narrow exceptions to federal criminal procedure that would allow for the transcripts to be released, and Judge Rosenberg indicated that those were not met by the Justice Department's requests. The request Judge Rosenberg received was one of three issued by the Justice Department, as it seeks to tamp down outrage from President Donald Trump's base about the lack of recent revelations in the Epstein scandal. Epstein scandal fuels conspiracy theories In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi played up the impending release of a trove of documents related to Epstein, a disgraced financier and convicted sex offender whose entourage included high-profile figures. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial in New York, fuelling conspiracy theories that his death might have been a cover-up orchestrated by powerful, shadowy figures. But the nearly 200 pages Bondi and the Justice Department ultimately published failed to produce any major new revelations. It also notably lacked the 'client list' that Bondi told Fox News was 'sitting on my desk right now to review'. Some of President Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) supporters had pushed the idea that paedophiles had infiltrated the highest levels of government and popular media, and that Epstein kept a client list in order to blackmail those power brokers. Even Trump's appointee to lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Kash Patel, and his second-in-command Dan Bongino had promoted the conspiracy theories, claiming there was a 'black book' or 'list' in the government's possession that would prove the Epstein rumours. But the FBI and the Justice Department have since attempted to quash that speculation. In July, the agencies released a joint memorandum denying the existence of such a list. 'This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list.' There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions,' it read. Scrutiny on Trump That, however, did little to abate the outrage, and scrutiny has since turned to President Trump's own relationship with Epstein. The Wall Street Journal this month published a report alleging that Trump had signed a birthday note to Epstein featuring a suggestive message, alongside a doodle of a naked woman. Trump denied ever writing or drawing such a birthday message, and he has since sued the newspaper and its parent company. But on Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal continued its coverage of the Epstein scandal with an article that alleged the Justice Department knew Trump's name appeared multiple times in files related to the sex offender. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, called the latest report 'another fake news story'. Trump has called for all the Epstein transcripts to be released, calling the ongoing scandal a 'scam' and a 'hoax'. He also repudiated any of his supporters who believed the rumours. 'My PAST supporters have bought into this 'bull****,' hook, line, and sinker,' Trump wrote on social media on July 16. 'Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work.' While the Justice Department has argued there is 'extensive public interest' in releasing the grand jury transcripts, experts say those testimonies are unlikely to contain the full extent of the evidence in the Epstein case. Federal grand jury testimonies are usually brief, supplying only enough information to secure an indictment. One former federal prosecutor, Sarah Krissoff, told The Associated Press the transcripts are likely to be a 'distraction'. 'The president is trying to present himself as if he's doing something here, and it really is nothing,' Krissoff said in an interview published earlier this week. Democrats seek advantage Democrats, meanwhile, have sought to highlight the lingering questions about Epstein in a bid to damage Trump's reputation with his supporters. In the House of Representatives, for instance, Democrats on the Committee for Oversight launched a bid to subpoena the Justice Department for all its Epstein files. Rather than risk a vote to push for further Epstein records, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson adjourned the chamber early for its six-week August recess. Democrats like Representative Summer Lee seized upon that manouevre as evidence of complicity. 'They're fleeing our work, our job and sending us back home because they don't want to vote to release these files,' Lee said. But Johnson defended the move this week, saying Trump officials were 'already doing everything within their power to release them'.
Al Jazeera
39 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump administration unveils wide ranging AI action plan
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has unveiled its new artificial intelligence action plan, which includes a strategy it says will boost the US standing in AI as it competes with China for dominance in the rapidly growing sector. The White House released the 25-page 'America's AI Action Plan' on Wednesday. It includes 90 different policy proposals that the administration says will increase AI tools for allies around the globe. It will also promote production of new data centres around the US. It will scrap federal regulations that 'hinder AI development', although it is not clear which regulations are in question. In a statement, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the plan will 'ensure America sets the technological gold standard worldwide, and that the world continues to run on American technology'. The president is expected to announce a series of executive orders which will outline key parts of the plan around 5pm in New York (21:00 GMT). 'We believe we're in an AI race … and we want the United States to win that race,' White House AI czar David Sacks told reporters on Wednesday. The White House says the plan will 'counter Chinese influence in international governance bodies' and also will give the US more control over exports of AI technology. However, the administration did not offer any details on how it plans to do that. The plan outlined by the Trump administration will also include a framework to analyse models built by China to assess 'alignment with Chinese Communist Party talking points and censorship'. Free speech in the spotlight The plan says that it will also uphold free speech in models that will allow systems to be 'objective and free from top-down ideological bias' for organisations wanting to do business with the federal government. A senior White House official said the main target was AI models that consider diversity and inclusion, according to The Wall Street Journal, which, experts say, signals the concern is the government's perceived liberal bias as opposed to an overall bias. 'The government should not be acting as a Ministry of AI Truth or insisting that AI models hew to its preferred interpretation of reality,' Samir Jain, vice president of policy at the Center for Democracy & Technology, said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera. 'The plan is highly unbalanced, focusing too much on promoting the technology while largely failing to address the ways in which it could potentially harm people.' Conservatives have long accused AI chatbots of having a liberal bias, comparable to their comments on legacy media for providing critical coverage of the administration. However, it comes as users of GrokAI, former Trump ally and right-wing tycoon Elon Musk's AI platform, have accused it of having a right-wing lean. Musk's X AI is part of a $200m package with the Pentagon that has other AI companies, including OpenAI. Building out data centres A key focus of the new plan will be to build out new data centers for AI technology as the industry rapidly expands. The administration said that will include streamlining permits for new centre development and the energy production facilities used to power these data centres. The plan sidesteps environmental concerns that have been a major criticism of the AI industry. AI 'challenges America to build vastly greater energy generation than we have today', the plan said. AI data centres have been tied to increased power consumption and, in turn, greenhouse gas emissions. According Google's 2024 sustainability report, there was a 48 percent increase in power greenhouse gas emissions since 2019 which, it says, will only become more prevalent. 'This result was primarily due to increases in data center energy consumption and supply chain emissions. As we further integrate AI into our products, reducing emissions may be challenging due to increasing energy demands from the greater intensity of AI compute, and the emissions associated with the expected increases in our technical infrastructure investment,' the report said. The streamlining of permits also comes as the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to reverse its scientific determination that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health. That change would remove the legal framework that climate regulations are based on, the Reuters news agency has reported, citing two unnamed sources. The reversal would remove the 'endangerment finding', making it easier for the EPA to undo legislation limiting greenhouse gas emissions on energy-producing facilities, including those used to power AI data centres. The administration has created environmental review exceptions for data centre construction and will allow expanding access to federal lands for AI development. 'AI will improve the lives of Americans by complementing their work — not replacing it,' the plan says. It, however, comes as employers across the country scrap jobs because of AI. Earlier this month, Recruit Holdings, the parent company of Indeed and Glassdoor, cut 1300 jobs which it directly attributed to AI. In June, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said that AI is doing 30 to 50 percent of the company's workload. In February, the tech giant laid off 1,000 employees. Analysts say the plan looks promising for investors in the AI sector. 'This is a watershed moment in the AI revolution, and Trump recognises this AI arms race between the US and China. A big step forward,' Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush Securities, told Al Jazeera. As of 4pm in New York (20:00 GMT), stocks of AI-focused companies had mixed results. NVIDIA was up 2.1 percent; Palantir up 3.6 percent, Oracle up 1.5 percent and Microsoft was up 0.3 percent. On the other hand, Google's parent company Alphabet was down 0.5 percent.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump White House probes Harvard University's scholar exchange programme
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has launched a new investigation against Harvard University, this time targeted at an exchange programme that allows foreign scholars to visit the elite school. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement on Wednesday saying the probe was necessary to ensure US security — but the investigation is likely to be seen by critics as the latest attempt to bully the school into compliance with President Donald Trump's policies. 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students,' Rubio wrote in the statement. 'The investigation will ensure that State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation's interests.' At stake is Harvard's exchange visitor programme, which allows professors, students and researchers to come to the US on a temporary basis. Participating scholars receive a J-1 visa, which allows them to participate in cultural and academic exchange programmes on the basis that they are coming to the US not as immigrants but as visitors. But Harvard's ability to host such a programme is contingent on the State Department's approval. Rubio suggested that the school's 'continued eligibility as a sponsor' would hang in the balance of Wednesday's investigation. 'To maintain their privilege to sponsor exchange visitors, sponsors must comply with all regulations, including conducting their programs in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States,' Rubio wrote. Questions of national security Under President Trump's second term, the US has repeatedly cited questions of national security and foreign policy in its attempts to expel foreign students, particularly those involved in pro-Palestinian and antiwar movements. Rubio himself has drawn on the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 — a relatively obscure Cold War-era law — in his efforts to deport student protest leaders like Mahmoud Khalil. The law allows the secretary of state to expel foreign nationals 'whose presence or activities' could pose 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States'. The government's use of such laws, however, is currently being challenged in court. Critics argue they violate the constitutional right to free speech and protest. It was President Trump's opposition to the pro-Palestinian protests that led him to engage in a high-profile confrontation with Harvard, the country's oldest university and a member of the much-vaunted Ivy League. Schools like Harvard in Massachusetts and Columbia University in New York were considered the epicentre of the protest movement. At Columbia, for instance, students erected a tent encampment that inspired similar demonstrations across the world. The schools' crackdowns on those protests, however, were also emulated at other campuses. Columbia, for instance, called in police to clear pro-Palestinian demonstrators, and other schools took similar action, leading to more than 3,000 campus arrests across the country last year. Critics of the protests, including President Trump, have called the demonstrations anti-Semitic and warned they create an unsafe learning environment for Jewish students. Protest leaders, however, point out that most of the demonstrations were peaceful and have forcefully rejected anti-Jewish hate. Rather, they argue their protests are about shining a light on the abuses Israel has perpetrated in Gaza — and the crackdowns are aimed at stamping out views that run contrary to the US's close relationship with Israel. Pressure on schools Upon taking office in January, however, Trump pledged to take 'forceful and unprecedented steps' to root out alleged anti-Semitism on campus. In early March, he began his broadside on Ivy League campuses like Columbia and Harvard. He began by stripping Columbia of $400m in federal contracts and grants and then by requesting compliance with a list of demands, including disciplinary reform and external oversight for certain academic departments. By March 22, Columbia had agreed to make concessions. But Trump encountered greater resistance at Harvard University. On April 11, the Trump administration likewise issued a list of demands that would have required Harvard to commit to 'structural and personnel changes' to foster 'viewpoint diversity', eliminate its diversity programmes and agree to external audits. It refused. Instead, Harvard President Alan Garber said such requests would violate Harvard's rights as a private institution committed to academic freedom. Since then, the Trump administration has stripped Harvard of billions of dollars in federal contracts, research funding and grants. A federal court in Boston began hearing a legal challenge against that decision this week. A multipronged attack But the Trump administration has also explored other avenues to pressure Harvard into compliance. Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status — though critics warn it would be illegal to do so — and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem blocked Harvard from accessing the Student and Exchange Visitor Programme (SEVP), a system that schools are required to use to enrol international students. Foreign students make up about a quarter of Harvard's student body. Losing access to the SEVP system effectively meant those students were no longer able to attend the school. Harvard challenged the Trump administration's ban on its foreign students in court and received a preliminary injunction that allows its international students to remain while the case plays out. But other hurdles have since emerged. Earlier this month, for instance, the Trump administration accused Harvard of civil rights violations and called for a review of its accreditation, the industry-wide quality standard that gives university diplomas their value. Meanwhile, news outlets have reported that officials from the Trump administration and Harvard continue to negotiate over whether a deal can be struck to defuse the ongoing tensions.
