
‘We bought a French vineyard – it took us seven years to turn a profit'
In the 15 years since David, 58, and his wife Amanda, 57, packed up three cats, two horses, two young daughters and a dog to start a new life in Bordeaux, they've often had to improvise.
The decrepit farmhouse and 10-hectare vineyard they bought for €370,000 (£320,000) in 2010 has needed years of hard graft, relentless optimism and cash to transform into the wine business it is today. They are still using much of the ancient, rusted machinery they bought from the previous owner.
'The house was a complete and utter wreck,' Amanda says. 'There was a bird's nest in the hall, and a macerating toilet behind a screen in the corner. Frogs would get in at night and wake the kids up.'
It's the kind of rustic blank slate that creeps into the daydreams of sun-starved wine-lovers sitting in their home offices in the suburbs.
David and Amanda, from Harrogate in North Yorkshire, are among the tiny minority to have turned the hazy idea into reality.
Their farmhouse is now a chicly furnished four-bedroom home with elegant oak beams and exposed limestone brickwork. They serve their wine to tourists in a renovated, high-ceilinged barn where paintings created by their daughter, an art student at the nearby University of Bordeaux, hang on the walls.
But becoming winemakers – or vignerons – was always going to be a financial gamble.
'We were really into wine – drinking it,' David says. 'We knew you could get three bottles for a tenner at Morrisons but we knew nothing on the side of viticulture.
'We had no idea how expensive it would be to farm grapes and make wine, let alone renovate the house and other buildings.'
The couple have ploughed around €250,000 (£217,000) into works on the property and vineyard, reinvesting most of their revenue back into the business.
Now they are grappling with a crisis engulfing France's wine industry. Production costs are ratcheting up while domestic and international demand has slumped. Cellars from Champagne to Provence are full of surplus stock.
The backdrop is a changing climate, making the weather more extreme and altering the character of vintages from the country's renowned wine-growing regions.
'We didn't have a plan'
Harsh economic conditions mean intrepid foreigners like David and Amanda are becoming harder to find in France.
Gilles Martin, of Vinea Transaction, an estate agency specialising in French vineyard sales, says the number of British buyers has collapsed since the heyday 20 years ago.
'Between 2000 and 2010 we would sell dozens of vineyards to British buyers. They represented around a third of all our sales. Last year we sold just three, and the share was down to 5pc.'
The financial crisis put an end to the boom. The pound plummeted against the euro, making French vineyards relatively more expensive. Brexit would later add an extra layer of bureaucracy for anyone tempted to take the plunge.
David and Amanda first started to think about moving to France in 2007 after David bought himself a tractor for his 40th birthday.
'It was a sort of midlife crisis,' he says with a smile. 'We were living in a beautiful house with some land. But ever since the two of us met, we had an itch to do something different.'
Back then, a pound was worth €1.50. By the time they came to sign for the vineyard three years later, the pound was approaching parity with the euro, and the cost of fulfilling their dream had risen sharply.
Even so, the vineyard purchase was covered by the sale of their Yorkshire home, leaving them with a modest cushion of around £40,000. They used the money to renovate the farmhouse, buy and repair the rusty machinery, and fund their lives while they worked to get the neglected vineyard into shape. They christened their new business 'The Naked Vigneron'.
David, a painter and decorator, did odd jobs on the side to help keep the family afloat in the 18 months before they sold their first bottle. Having only 'schoolboy French' and two daughters aged four and five didn't make things any easier.
'We didn't have a plan,' David adds. 'We didn't sit down and do a spreadsheet. We knew it wouldn't be easy but we were a little naive about the financial side of things.'
Their limited funds meant they decided to tend the vines, pick the grapes and make the wine themselves, without any professional help. David did all of the building work himself, meaning they only paid for the raw materials.
They discovered that the combination of climate and soil in their corner of eastern Bordeaux, just 200m from the Dordogne border, produced chalky, full-bodied reds.
But it took until 2017, seven years after starting the business, to turn a profit for the first time.
Like all French winemakers, the couple have had to contend with an increasingly unpredictable climate. Their first profitable year coincided with the vineyard's first major disaster, when a frost wiped out 95pc of the harvest.
In the eight years since, David and Amanda have had six 'dire' harvests, either frost or mildew, when evaporating rainwater rots the grapes.
Forced to diversify
In the couple's stone-walled winery, a bat flits between gnarled beams and disappears into the rafters. Six dusty bottles of the vineyard's early produce sit on a surface near a cast iron wine press. The battered wooden door is encrusted with snails.
'If we'd had a million, we'd have refurbished this place,' Amanda says. 'But we've grown to like working with the old gear. People who visit appreciate the rustic.'
David leans on a large burgundy-coloured storage vat with white numbers scratched on to it. 'In a normal, good harvest year, we would produce 25,000 litres of red,' he says. 'Last year this was down to 1,200 litres.'
In the early years, they sold a lot of wine in bulk (' en vrac ') to a négociant – a middleman who would mix their raw product with other wines and sell on the resulting blend.
These sales were the 'bread and butter' of the business, raking in as much as €42,000 a year – helped by the fact their wine was organic and commanded a premium.
The pandemic put an end to this lucrative source of revenue. Tourists stayed away, demand slumped and the wholesale market never recovered.
This new reality forced them to diversify. Most of the business's income now comes from tastings, tours and meals rather than bulk wine sales.
They have hosted a handful of weddings in the beautifully restored barn, and are planning to eventually rent out the whole property and grounds for big functions. They even sell organic waste, like seeds, and tiny quantities of wine, to cosmetics firms to add to perfumes.
Three quarters of the wine they sell is to fellow Brits. 'We've ended up moving to a very Anglicised area,' Amanda says. 'All our nearest neighbours are British.'
In a good year, the business just about reaches the €60,000 of turnover needed to break even.
British winemakers selling up
The Naked Vigneron is among thousands of French wineries facing an uncertain future.
Domestic wine consumption has collapsed from 120 litres per adult annually in the 1960s to just 40 litres today, as younger generations switch to whisky and beer. International competition and waning demand from previously big importers like China have also dented demand.
In a bid to cut the amount of wine flooding the market, the French government is offering winemakers €6,000 per hectare to dig up their vines and not replant them until at least 2029.
David and Amanda took up the offer this year, uprooting six of their 10 hectares of vines in exchange for €36,000. David did the digging himself to save money.
Other weary producers are simply calling it quits. Martin, of Vinea Transactions, has seen a rise in the number of British winemakers selling up in the last five years.
'In Bordeaux, in particular, there are no English buyers and the market is very down, it's very difficult,' he says. 'Some are approaching retirement age and their children are not interested in wine. Market conditions are also bad.'
Martin's clients are a mix of professional winemakers and enthusiastic amateurs looking for an idyllic plot at a reasonable price.
The vineyards he sells begin at around the €1m mark, rising to €20m in the prime appellations like the Loire, Languedoc and the Rhône Valley. But the wine crisis means some are selling at a hefty discount.
'There's a readjustment in the market. We have to explain to sellers that they will have to take a lower price.'
David and Amanda know three English couples who have sold up their French vineyards in the last few years. But the pair are determined to tough it out.
'We've never thought about throwing in the towel,' Amanda says. 'We love it here. Our kids hate the idea of us selling it.'
David looks across from a row of vines to a pale-stoned building plonked in the middle of an empty field. There are no windows and part of the tiled roof has caved in.
Their plan, he says, is to turn the ruin into a gîte with three bedrooms and a swimming pool – the latest venture to boost the vineyard's income.
David estimates the refurbishment will cost €50,000, including a new roof, and installing electricity and running water. They hope to fund some of the building work with the government grant.
It is ambitious given the economic climate and the hard labour required. But after years of defying the odds, David looks at the ruin and sees another opportunity.
'We're not a million miles away from 60 and it's not going to get much easier physically – but there's still a lot more we want to do,' he says.
'There's nothing like a bit of a struggle here and there. You wouldn't want it on a plate.
'Doing it all ourselves is very satisfying. Sometimes we sit here and pinch ourselves and look around and think: we made this.'
*Please note that by submitting your content to us you are consenting to The Telegraph processing your personal data where required by law. For further details please see our Privacy Notice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Best home security system without subscription
Finding the best home security system without a subscription is a priority for many homeowners who don't want to be tied into ongoing fees after the initial purchase. Paying hundreds of pounds for a full home security system is often only part of the story, since many companies charge a monthly or annual fee to make use of every feature. These fees often cover the cost of cloud video storage, making your home security camera and video doorbell recordings available online. Some companies also lock extra functionality, like battery and cellular backup systems, or facial recognition powered by AI, behind a paywall. Security specialists like Simplisafe and Verisure use your monthly payment to fund professional monitoring services. But what if you don't want to pay a monthly subscription fee for your home security system? You'll miss out on some of the features mentioned above, but in return you get an alarm and home security system that works without any ongoing costs. There are several companies – including Eufy, Blink, Yale and TP-Link – that sell security systems with no monthly fee. They often make cloud storage available as an optional extra, but since video recordings are recorded locally, on the system itself, the subscription is exactly that: optional. Why pay for a home security subscription? Before we get to the options for best home security system without a subscription, it's worth reminding ourselves why some systems demand a monthly or annual fee to unlock full functionality. Ring is perhaps the best-known example, since even its simplest video doorbells and security cameras require a subscription to work properly. Without paying the fee, Ring's cameras and doorbells don't store any video footage. They still stream live to the Ring app – so you can see who's at the door when they press the button. But past events can't be accessed, so you won't be able to see what motion triggered your security camera while you were asleep. Ring's alarm kit also requires a subscription to enable its cellular and battery-backup systems, which keep the system online during a broadband outage or power cut. Other systems, like those from Simplisafe and Verisure, charge a fee for cloud video storage, as well as for access to their 24/7 professional monitoring services. This is where trained agents respond to your alarm, make contact with you, and, if necessary, call emergency services. Best home security systems without a subscription At the time of writing, in mid-2025, my favourite home security system without a subscription is made by Eufy. This is because Eufy's security cameras and video doorbells all record footage locally, either to the device's own integrated storage, a microSD card, or to the company's HomeBase, which acts as a central hub with expandable storage. Eufy's third-generation HomeBase also adds artificial intelligence to your compatible cameras and doorbell, which helps your security system recognise friendly faces (like your family members) and not alert you when they're spotted. Cloud storage is offered by Eufy, priced from £3.99 to £12.99 a month, but it's purely optional. All other features are included in the up-front price of the hardware. It's a similar case with Yale, whose security system also works without a subscription. The Yale Smart Alarm kit is simpler than some rivals, with a fairly basic smartphone app. But it comes from a trusted brand and, unlike most other systems, includes a wireless external siren for mounting on an outside wall. The system can be expanded with more sensors, motion detectors and cameras, and a key benefit is how the devices have a 1km (0.62 mile) wireless range – far greater than that of Yale's rivals. Like Eufy, Yale offers an optional subscription. Called Secure Plan, this costs £9 a month and adds cellular backup to the alarm system, where it uses the mobile phone network to stay online if your broadband goes off. The plan also unlocks a system where up to three emergency contacts receive an automated call when your alarm is triggered; although, they are not contacted by a human, as with professionally monitored systems. Subscribing opens up cloud storage for Yale's cameras, too, and enables an AI-powered system for differentiating between the motion of people, pets, vehicles and package deliveries. Granted, it's a good-value package (and you get six months' free with some purchases), but Yale's system uses local storage by default, so paying the fee isn't strictly necessary. Without it, you still have a fully functional security system. Blink is another security system that runs without a subscription, but here things work a little differently. Blink cameras on their own require a cloud storage subscription, since they don't save footage locally. However, this changes if you also buy the Blink Sync Module 2, which costs £40 (or is often bundled with cameras for a discount) and acts as a hub for connecting multiple cameras and a doorbell. It also has a microSD card slot, into which you can fit up to 256GB of local storage – and avoid paying the monthly fee for saving footage in the cloud. Blink plans start at just £2.50 a month and unlock extra features, like improved live streaming, video sharing, photo capture and cloud storage, but paying isn't a necessity like it is with Ring, the other Amazon-owned security company. The pros and cons of not paying for a home security subscription Pros: Avoid ongoing costs (which also often increase over time) You control your recordings; no uploading to third-party servers Reduced feeling of being locked into a product ecosystem Keeps things simple, avoiding superfluous features Cons: No professional monitoring Misses out on extra functionality Limits your hardware choices Removes cellular backup (where available) Is paying a home security system subscription worth it? This depends on your budget and your security requirements. If all you want is a video doorbell on the front door and a security camera keeping an eye on your garden or drive, you'll be fine installing the devices and having them save footage locally. This even works if you want to build a larger system – perhaps even a whole home security platform with cameras, door sensors, sirens and motion detectors – if your primary goal is to be alerted to motion, then have that motion recorded. In this scenario, a subscription for extra features might not be worth it to you, especially if you pick Eufy products that have their own on-board storage and artificial intelligence. Subscriptions become worthwhile if you want more than these basics. If you want cloud storage, then paying a subscription is the only option, since companies don't offer this service for free. Similarly, if you want cellular backup for your Yale system, AI smarts from Blink, video storage from Ring or professional monitoring from Simplisafe and Verisure, then a subscription could be worth it.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Is this a good time to buy shares in Diageo?
The latest annual results from Diageo give every impression of papering over the cracks, reporting flat sales and lower profits, having lost a chief executive. Nik Jhangiani, the interim chief executive, produced as much positive spin as he could, even on the supercharged $625 million cost-saving programme, but could not disguise a 'challenging' environment led by rapidly changing tastes that, in the US at least, extends to competition from cannabis drinks. Operating profits fell 27.8 per cent to $4.3 billion, but before $1.4 billion of exceptional items the reduction was trimmed to 0.7 per cent, giving a healthy 21.4 per cent profit margin. The main exceptional was the sale of the US-based Ciroc subsidiary. Net profit was 39.1 per cent lower at $2.5 billion, translated into a similar-sized drop in earnings per share to 105.9 cents. That has just about let Jhangiani pay a 62.98 cents final dividend to maintain the annual payout at 103.48 cents. The stock market's reaction was to mark the shares up 89p to £19.04, suggesting investors were expecting worse. We will not have a clear picture of where the group is heading until the board confirms Jhangiani in the top job or hands it to someone else, probably in October. Whoever it is will have to do something drastic to halt Diageo shares' steady three-year decline. As Jhangiani said: 'We have a lot to do.' The stop-gap plan is to cut costs even more, promote the group's current winning brands — Guinness stout, Don Julio tequila, Johnnie Walker scotch and the blackberry-infused Canadian whisky Crown Royal — and move as quickly as possible to catch the surprisingly rapid transition to low-alcohol drinks. While no one brand can on its own put a rocket under annual sales of $20.2 billion, Jhangiani dropped hints yesterday that his researchers are stretching every sinew to come up with an alcohol- and calorie-light successor to longstanding hits such as Baileys Irish Cream. They have taken 40 per cent of the calories out of that with Baileys Deliciously Light, but so far have been unable to do without the alcohol. Meanwhile, Jhangiani is desperately trying to get his head around the unpredictable leisure habits of Gen Z, who are influenced by health considerations, other claims on their wallets and less compulsion to hit the bars on a night out. 'We need to make sure our offerings are tailored to social occasions,' he said. A lot of that boils down to moderation, the catch-all management term for no and low alcohol. While Guinness 0.0 has become a banker brand, the picture is fuzzy elsewhere. Price resistance is turning into shrinkflation with smaller spirits bottles in Asian supermarkets. And that is also influencing the alcohol content of ready-made cocktails. Overhanging the price question is President Trump's tariff campaign, which is due to add 10 per cent to UK exports to the US and 15 per cent on dispatches from Europe. Diageo reckons this could cost it $200 million a year at the operating profit level, mainly affecting the group's lucrative spirits brands. However, Jhangiani hopes to be able to offset as much as half of that with clever pricing. The Scotch Whisky Association buttonholed Trump on his recent Scottish visit to point out that if production were moved to the US, the product would no longer qualify as scotch. While gin, vodka and other spirits are a different matter, it will take years and plenty of capital to build distilleries in the US. However, Diageo has made a start with a factory in Alabama. Demand in the US and China is expected to be weaker for some time, and Europe is fragmenting. The group's former southern Europe sales force is being broken up into separate Spanish, French and Italian units to cater for different tastes. That adds to the costs that Jhangiani is trying to squeeze, while protesting that this need not mean job cuts. 'We want more feet on the street,' he said. Despite Monday's positive stock market response, in the face of strong headwinds for the next few years the company does not yet have a workable recipe to take the shares back up to anywhere near their 2022 level. Maybe it will have to turn into a full-blown soft drinks company. Advice AvoidWhy Future unclear until the CEO issue is sorted out


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The countries where you can earn more than the UK
Many Brits put in dozens of hours at work each week, while their wages barely grow. The average worker in the UK works for 1,524 hours a year, earning a median of £45,688, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Research by Remitly has revealed there are places abroad where Brits could bank the same while putting in hundreds of hours less. Eight out of the top ten countries are in Europe too, so British workers wouldn't need to travel far. Luxembourg ranked the highest, with an estimated hourly rate of £48.69 it's a big leap from the UK's average of £29.98. Workers in the Western European country only need to be at their desks for 125 days to bank the average UK salary. That's a huge 78 days difference in the number of working days needed in Britain. The average Luxembourger could work 480 hours less a year and still match the UK median wage, according to the analysis. However, it's important to note the cost of living in Luxembourg is 14% higher than in the UK. Iceland followed closely in second place, with employees banking £47.87 on average. Workers will only have to put in 127 days to match the British salary, meaning 76 days less. However, the cost of living is a whopping 41.5% higher compared to Britain. Norway came third, with an estimated hourly pay of £40.25, meaning employees could work 151 days and match the UK average salary. It may not stretch as far though, with the cost of living being 21% more in Norway. Denmark, Austria and Sweden were all similar, with 153, 155, 155, and 157 days needed to match Brits and their pay. In Germany, the cost of living is around 1% less than the UK and the hourly rate averages at £38.81. This means workers could put in 46 fewer days a year and still match the median British salary. America ranked eighth, followed by Australia and Sweden that have average hourly rates of £35.31, £32.23 and £32 respectively. Meanwhile, workers in Mexico would have to put in 6,211 hours to match the UK's salary. That's the same as more than 8.5 months of working every day, according to the study.