Hugo Boss offer compromise to Merseyside pet store in trademark row
The fashion company, which has been contacted for comment, also wants to put limits on the Boss Pets branding.In a previous statement a Hugo Boss spokeswoman said the company had a responsibility "to monitor and protect our brand rights globally and address unclear cases where needed".
'Commonly used'
Mr McDonald, who has described himself as "just a lad from Bootle", said he had spent "every spare penny" on his new website for his pet-related products.His lawyer, Francis McEntegart of MC Legal, said Hugo Boss has been "very heavy handed" with his client but discussions "were moving in the right direction".He said Boss Pets would adhere to the requests "because we were already doing that"."I just want further confirmation from them that they aren't going to pursue or oppose the trademark," he added.A spokeswoman for Hugo Boss previously said the company was aware the English word boss "is commonly used".She said the firm "only approaches third parties where an overlap with our existing trademark rights occurs, and as a matter of principle we always seek for a dialogue in favour of an amicable solution for both sides".
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
Lenders must probe joint borrowers for signs of exploitation
Economic manipulation as a form of domestic abuse has attracted rising recent attention, but fears remain that the law is not protecting the most vulnerable. The Supreme Court highlighted the 'damaging effects' of the problem in a case ruling last month that a bank had a duty to investigate whether a woman faced undue influence from her partner when the couple took out a mortgage that would be used partly to pay off his debts. The judges ruled unanimously that staff at One Savings Bank knew that money loaned to allow Catherine Waller-Edwards to remortgage her home would be used in a way that did not benefit her financially and it should therefore have checked to determine whether Nicholas Bishop had put her under undue influence.
Times
20 minutes ago
- Times
Don't overlook crypto when splitting assets in divorce
As digital currencies such as bitcoin, ethereum and solana become common holdings among the wealthy, they are increasingly used to conceal assets in divorce cases. In many ways, crypto functions like a digital offshore account — decentralised, borderless and often anonymous. Its pseudonymous nature makes it uniquely difficult to trace, value, or even prove it exists. Unlike a share certificate or bank statement, a crypto wallet might exist on a USB stick in a drawer, or be locked behind a password and 12-word seed phrase known only to the holder. If someone claims they have lost access, that may be the end of the trail. Even when crypto is disclosed, it still poses difficulties. These assets can be highly volatile, particularly altcoins, so unless both parties agree to share that risk, valuing them fairly becomes problematic. It is also relatively easy for someone anticipating divorce to open a crypto exchange account on a phone and quietly move funds there, sometimes years in advance. Yet disclosure typically only covers the past 12 months unless there is a clear reason to investigate further. This murkiness creates a growing blind spot in divorce litigation. There is no consistent UK legal framework for disclosing crypto and limited case law to guide lawyers and judges. That opens the door to disputes and grey areas, particularly when disclosure is incomplete or suspected to be dishonest. For international cases, the complexity increases significantly. If digital assets are held on overseas exchanges, especially in jurisdictions that do not co-operate with UK courts, there may be no practical way to obtain information or enforce a financial settlement. Tracing crypto that has been moved, converted into privacy coins, or hidden through tumbling services — a process of mixing identifiable funds with nonidentifiable — can be incredibly difficult and sometimes impossible without specialist forensic expertise. Solicitors must look for tell-tale signs of concealment, undeclared exchange accounts or large unexplained transfers. And when red flags arise, lawyers increasingly rely on forensic investigators who understand blockchain analysis and can follow the money. But it is not just a technical problem, it is emotional too. When one party believes assets are being hidden in crypto, it fuels mistrust and escalates conflict. Relatively straightforward financial cases become emotionally charged battlegrounds once digital asset concealment is suspected. As more wealth is stored digitally, this will only grow as a challenge for the courts. Until the law catches up, crypto will continue to be a grey area that some exploit, others fear, and many don't fully understand. For divorcing couples, the message is clear: do not underestimate the role crypto may be playing in the financial Maguire is the managing director of Maguire Family Law
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Instant view: UK markets see 2022-style selloff as worries build over finance minister
LONDON, July 2 (Reuters) - British government bond prices fell by the most since October 2022 and the pound tumbled on Wednesday, after finance minister Rachel Reeves appeared visibly distressed in parliament, a day after the government sharply scaled back plans to cut benefits. The yield on the 10-year government bond, or gilt, rose as much as 22 basis points on the day at one point to around 4.68% , as investors ditched UK debt. That would be the largest one-day jump in the British benchmark yield since October 2022, in the aftermath of then-Prime Minister Liz Truss' mini-budget that cost her premiership. The pound dropped by over 1% to $1.3589 , while domestic mid-cap stocks tumbled (.FTMC), opens new tab. COMMENTS: LINDSAY JAMES, INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, QUILTER, LONDON: "The spike in gilt yields is seemingly a response to signals that have been taken by some to suggest that Rachel Reeves' job may be at risk – though the government has since said her tearful appearance in this afternoon's PMQ's was due to a personal matter. The rise in yields implies investors would be nervous if she were to go. Despite the regular criticism levied in her direction, unwavering commitment to her fiscal rules have generally been welcomed - in sharp contrast to the unfunded pledges from the Truss government. A sudden departure would be likely to prompt questions about the government's commitment to this approach, particularly in light of the recent U turn on planned cuts to welfare spending." MOHIT KUMAR, CHIEF FINANCIAL ECONOMIST EUROPE, JEFFERIES, LONDON: "The UK government faces a difficult choice. We have a negative view on the UK fiscal picture. Our view of growth is much lower than the official OBR forecasts (we are looking at 1-1.2% growth in the UK for the next three years, vs 1.7-1.9% which is the OBR forecasts). Lower growth will make the Chancellor's fiscal plans unrealistic. Even if we get higher taxes, we do not think that raising taxes will give as much revenue as the government would be hoping for. Thus the government would need hard choices in order to bring the deficit picture in line. Recent market reaction reflects the market concerns on the credibility of the government to bring down fiscal deficits." GORDON SHANNON, PORTFOLIO MANAGER, TWENTYFOUR ASSET MANAGEMENT, LONDON: "(The welfare U-turn) is signalling that the Labour Party is a lot less concerned about what the gilt market thinks." "I would have thought it was seared into politicians' memories what happened to Liz Truss." "I continue to view it as you've breached your own commitments and that sets fire to your credibility in a world where there is increasing focus on the solvency positions of governments." CHRIS SCICLUNA, HEAD OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, DAIWA CAPITAL MARKETS, LONDON: "Clearly the market is revaluating the outlook for fiscal policy and hence the significant steepening in the gilt curve. The vote in the House of Commons gives reason to think again about the likely outlook for public borrowing. "The market has understood for some time that the government was off track on borrowing and was anticipating corrective measures in the budget but if markets continue to move in the direction we see today, it might have to make some announcements on the revenue side than on public expenditure cuts. "The BoE is obviously reviewing QT and they will probably bring an end to asset sales in the autumn." JANE FOLEY, SENIOR FX STRATEGIST, RABOBANK, LONDON: "Since the savings from welfare reform that Chancellor Reeves had pencilled in have now evaporated, UK budget issues are back in the fore. The gilt curve steepened at the open this morning as concerns about supply returned. In addition, the UK press is speculating that a cabinet reshuffle could be in the pipeline. Some of this has hinted that Starmer could even replace Reeves as Chancellor." NEIL WILSON, UK INVESTOR STRATEGIST AT SAXOBANK, LONDON: "Gilt yields were moving up but started to spike during (Prime Minister's Questions) as Reeves looked utterly shaken." KATHLEEN BROOKS, RESEARCH DIRECTOR, XTB, LONDON: "The prospect of political turmoil is causing bond yields to rise. The market is pricing in the possibility of a replacement chancellor with a more left-leaning agenda, which is spooking the bond market and waking up the bond vigilantes from their slumber." DANNI HEWSON, HEAD OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, AJ BELL, LONDON: "It's about Rachel Reeves finding herself in a very difficult situation following a series of U-turns, which means that the savings that had been anticipated from the winter fuel payments and from the disabilities changes - well, they're not going to be had. And that leaves her with another black hole and the question now is, how does she deal with that? And of course, there's an awful lot of speculation that she will have to increase taxes, but if she were to do that after saying that she wasn't going to, then that is politically difficult for the Labour government. What's gone on in Parliament today has absolutely unsettled (investors)"
