DOJ drops charges against Utah doctor accused of throwing away COVID vaccines, distributing fake vaccination cards
Michael Kirk Moore Jr. and three of his associates were indicted by a federal grand jury in January 2023 and accused of discarding more than $28,000 worth of government-provided COVID-19 vaccines and of distributing nearly two thousand fraudulent COVID-19 vaccination cards in exchange for cash or required 'donations.'
The indictment also alleged that Moore and his associates administered saline shots to children, at the request of the parents, so the children would think they were receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.
The trial began a week ago in Salt Lake City, but Bondi announced Saturday that the DOJ would dismiss the charges.
'At my direction @TheJusticeDept has dismissed charges against Dr. Kirk Moore,' Bondi wrote in a post on the social platform X.
'Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so,' she continued. 'He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. It ends today.'
The case has become a rallying cry for many in the GOP, who have railed against the charges filed under the Biden administration.
The announcement also comes as Bondi has faced growing scrutiny by members of Trump's right-wing base for her handling of the case related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The DOJ put out a memo on Monday concluding there was no so-called client list that Epstein kept to blackmail high-profile associates, refuting popular conspiracy theories suggesting otherwise. The memo also said there was no evidence to suggest foul play was involved in Epstein's death, which had previously been ruled a suicide.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) thanked Bondi for 'dropping the WRONGFUL charges against Dr. Kirk Moore,' whom Greene called 'a hero who refused to inject his patients with a government mandated unsafe vaccine!'
'We can never again allow our government to turn tyrannical under our watch,' she continued. 'Thankfully, as soon as I told Pam Bondi about Dr. Moore's case she swiftly moved to drop the charges against him. This is a big win!'
Bondi acknowledged the role Greene played in the decision.
'This would not have been possible without @RepMTG who brought this case to my attention. She has been a warrior for Dr. Moore and for ending the weaponization of government,' Bondi wrote in a subsequent post on X.
She also thanked Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), saying on X he 'has been a champion for advocating to end the weaponization of government, including to Dr. Moore.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says any 'credible' Epstein files should be released
President Donald Trump said Tuesday the US Justice Department should release all "credible" information from its probe into notorious sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein as he sought to douse a firestorm of criticism from his supporters over his handling of the case. Trump is facing the most serious split of his political career from his famously loyal right-wing base over suspicions that his administration is covering up lurid details of Epstein's crimes to protect rich and powerful figures they say are implicated. "The attorney general has handled that very well," the Republican leader said of Pam Bondi, who leads the Justice Department, when he was asked about the case at the White House. Trump repeated his claim that the Epstein files were "made up" by his Democratic predecessors in the White House -- even though he said multiple times during the election campaign that he would "probably" release them. "She's handled it very well, and it's going to be up to her," Trump said. "Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release." Trump's latest comments mark a softening of his stance -- he had voiced frustration in the Oval Office and online about his supporters' fixation on Epstein and pleaded with them to move on. "I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody," Trump told reporters Tuesday night, adding: "It's pretty boring stuff." The president's "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement has long held as an article of faith that "Deep State" elites are protecting Epstein's most powerful associates in the Democratic Party and Hollywood. Trump has faced growing outrage since his administration effectively shut down Epstein-related conspiracy theories, which have become MAGA obsessions. The Justice Department and FBI said in a memo made public earlier this month there is no evidence that the disgraced financier kept a "client list" or was blackmailing powerful figures. They also dismissed the claim that Epstein was murdered in jail, confirming his death by suicide, and said they would not be releasing any more information on the probe. - 'Let the people decide' - It marked the first time Trump's officials had publicly refuted the stories -- pushed for years by numerous right-wing figures, notably including the FBI's top two officials, before Trump hired them. Beyond angering supporters, the issue has opened a schism within his administration, sparking a fiery blow-up between Bondi and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, who is said to be considering resigning. Trump's attempts to take the sting out of the controversy have largely failed, with far right influencers continuing to criticize him online. Even his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, a Fox News host, has called for "more transparency" from the administration. Trump's most powerful ally in the US Congress, House Speaker Mike Johnson, pushed Tuesday for the administration to release more information about the case, and his stance has been echoed by multiple Republicans. "We should put everything out there and let the people decide," he told MAGA influencer Benny Johnson's internet show, calling on Bondi to "come forward and explain" apparent discrepancies in her statements about the case. Bondi told Fox News in February a list of Epstein clients was on her desk for review, before backtracking and saying that no such list existed. Epstein died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019 after being charged with sex trafficking. Trump -- who has denied visiting the US Virgin Islands home where prosecutors say Epstein sex trafficked underage girls -- said ahead of his election he would have "no problem" releasing files related to the case. Asked whether Bondi had told him if his name appeared in a file related to Epstein, Trump said "no," adding that Bondi has "given us just a very quick briefing." ft/jgc/dw
Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
Inside Hakeem Jeffries' embrace of the Epstein strategy
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is shocking some colleagues by fully embracing efforts to exploit divisions between President Trump and his MAGA base over the administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Why it matters: Amid demands from the liberal grassroots that Democrats take off the gloves with Trump, the Democratic leader has shifted from vowing not to swing at every pitch to adopting a " more is more" strategy. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told Axios he has been "very closely in coordination" with Jeffries' office and that "all indications we've gotten is support from the leadership on this." Zoom out: The Democratic leader has long been known for his often taciturn approach to salacious stories of the day, preferring to remain disciplined and on-message in his public communications. But he has signaled to allies he sees the Epstein story as part of the "more is more" approach and that it fits neatly into a broader narrative about alleged corruption in the Trump administration, sources told Axios. "He's not going to let go of Epstein," one senior House Democrat, who had initially predicted Jeffries wouldn't touch the issue, told Axios on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly about internal discussions. State of play: Democrats have spent the last week gleefully needling Trump and his Republican allies in Congress after the Justice Department said that Epstein had no "client list" and died by suicide. That claim runs counter to popular, longstanding conspiracy theories on the right, prompting backlash from much of the GOP grassroots. Several Democrats quickly weighed in by alleging that the Trump administration was engaged in an intentional coverup of the Epstein matter. Driving the news: What began as individual efforts to squeeze the Trump administration into releasing all documents related to Epstein morphed into a fully leadership-sanctioned campaign in less than 24 hours. Reps. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) and Khanna introduced measures that would demand and force the DOJ to publish the documents, respectively. Jeffries said Monday night he had not spoken to either lawmaker or evaluated their proposals, but hours later his members on the House Rules Committee were trying to get both measures to the floor. On Tuesday, Democratic leadership made its support clear by trying to pass a procedural motion that would force a vote on Khanna's bill. Both efforts failed. What they're saying: Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.), who was among the first members to weigh in on Epstein last week, told Axios "it seems like leadership is full steam ahead. ... I'm surprised. I felt like I was kind of out there by myself." Said House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.): "I think you've heard the leader himself, his posture is the same as ours: [Republicans] have been the ones obsessed with this ... and now they want to run away from it." What we're hearing: Even as Jeffries has given his blessing, he has cautioned not to abandon other messaging tactics that the party sees as fruitful — part of his "more is more" strategy. In a meeting of House Democrats' steering committee on Monday night, Jeffries urged lawmakers to keep hammering the administration on issues like the cost of living, according to two lawmakers who were present. "This is something he does really well, is trying to keep us focused," said one of the members. The bottom line: "It's a clear fit in something that's a huge priority for us, which is the corruption," a second senior House Democrat told Axios.
Politico
30 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate GOP needs Vance on recissions vote
Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will bring the first procedural vote to the floor Tuesday on the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion in spending. It's not clear he has even the 51 votes necessary to start debate on the package. Congress needs to approve the request before it expires Friday, or the administration will have to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended. That deadline is looming large as several GOP senators insist the administration clarify what spending it is actually seeking to rescind. They'll question President Donald Trump's budget director Russ Vought during senators' closed-door lunch Tuesday afternoon. 'We still are lacking the level of detail that is needed to make the right decisions,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins told reporters Monday evening. 'It's extremely unusual for any senator to not be able to get that kind of detailed information.' The Maine Republican is concerned not just over the administration's proposal to scale down the global AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR, but also about broader cutbacks in overseas public health. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told POLITICO he's particularly interested in protecting funding for global food aid programs like Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program. It's increasingly evident the rescissions package will have to be changed in order to pass the Senate, and Thune told reporters as he left the Capitol on Monday that leadership is working with wary senators to 'see what a path forward on amendments looks like.' Senate leaders expect a vote-a-rama on amendments to start Wednesday, teeing up a final vote late Wednesday or early Thursday. If senators are able to advance a package with tweaks, House GOP leaders plan to put the package on the floor Thursday; they have already started to clear away procedural hurdles that would prevent them from passing the spending cut proposal ASAP. Throwing another wrinkle into it all, though, is that House GOP leaders don't want the Senate amending the package at all, knowing their members will be jammed with changes they don't like and be forced to choose between passing a watered-down product or missing the deadline to act. 'I think you got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did, so I hope that's what we get back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday. 'There are two big categories of rescissions, and I'm not sure either of them should be subject to dispute.' It's also unclear whether an amended rescissions package would even have the support in the Republican House. Fiscal hawks are already drawing red lines, with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) going as far as telling POLITICO he won't support a rescissions package that is 'a penny less' than the House-approved version. MEANWHILE, IN OTHER FUNDING FIGHTS — Senate appropriators remain at a standstill on moving a funding bill forward for the Commerce and Justice departments. They're trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the administration's rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Maryland, according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), whose stand against Trump's desire for a site in the District of Columbia derailed a markup of the bill last week. But Van Hollen insists that even if the FBI assures senators that the Washington location is a secure site, he won't back off his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the agency's campus to Maryland. Across the Capitol: House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said that House leaders began whipping votes Monday night as the chamber prepares to take its vote on the $831.5 billion defense appropriations bill later this week. While defense appropriations bills have been bipartisan in the past, Republicans are expecting this measure to be a largely party-line affair. What else we're watching: — Epstein meltdown: We'll see if Republican leaders' headache from their members over the DOJ's failure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein continues. Rep. Norman voted Monday in favor of a Democratic amendment in the House Rules Committee that would have forced a floor vote on the DOJ releasing more materials from the federal case. — Russia sanctions timeline: The bipartisan Russian sanctions bill might stall in the House and Senate after Trump announced secondary tariffs on countries trading with Russia. Thune said Monday he would hold off on advancing the bill for now. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise also said a vote could be delayed to post-August recess. — Dems' last stand against a controversial Trump pick: Senate Democrats are making a final bid to draw the spotlight to a whistleblower's allegations that Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, urged defiance of the same judicial branch he is seeking to join. Democrats want the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, to testify before senators prior to their confirmation vote on Bove, which is set for Thursday morning. Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes, Meredith Lee Hill and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.
