Hotel CEOs' Outlook, Airlines' Climate Progress and Barry Sternlicht's Warning
Listen to the day's top travel stories in under four minutes every weekday.
Skift Travel Podcasts
Good morning from Skift. It's Wednesday. Here's what you need to know about the business of travel today.
Hotel CEOs believe the U.S. is wasting its tourism potential with the country facing a 50 billion dollar deficit in international travel, writes Senior Hospitality Editor Sean O'Neill.
Marriott CEO Anthony Capuano and other leaders said Washington needs to streamline visa processing and take other steps to ensure the U.S. is ready to host major sporting events in the next decade. Several hotel CEOs have called for more funding for Brand USA, the country's tourism marketing organization. And they hope President Trump and Congress will allot money to help with long-standing infrastructure and resource needs.
In addition, many hotel CEOs said they're focused on expansion abroad, especially India, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East.
Listen to This Podcast
Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Youtube | RSS
Next, Willie Walsh, director general of the International Air Transport Association, is blaming governments and fuel producers for aviation's slow process in reaching its climate goals, writes Climate Reporter Darin Graham.
Walsh said the European Union, in particular, has failed to provide the support needed to increase the production of sustainable aviation fuel. Walsh added that companies such as BP and Shell have cut back or delayed their investments in green fuel. The European Union's current policy requires airlines to use at least 2% sustainable aviation fuel in their fuel mix by 2030.
Fuels Europe said producers have rapidly scaled SAF output and lowered costs.
Finally, Starwood Hotels founder Barry Sternlicht says established hotel chains are facing growing pressure from independent brands, reports Senior Hospitality Editor Sean O'Neill.
Sternlicht, who sold Starwood to Marriott for 13 billion dollars in 2015, said newer brands are much easier to launch via social media. Sternlicht added that successful hotel brands must differentiate themselves and that hospitality remains fundamentally about service quality.
Sternlicht has officially rebranded his latest hotel management company as Starwood Hotels, reviving the name of the company he founded in 1991.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
11 minutes ago
- Washington Post
What Trump wants: More tariffs, less Epstein
President Donald Trump holds a chart as he delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event at the White House on April 2. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images) After months of threats, the Trump administration announced this week a slew of heavy tariffs, taxes on imported goods, for major trading partners such as India and Canada. The news came on the heels of the recent announcement of a new trade agreement with the European Union that was widely seen as a lopsided deal in favor of the United States. Despite angst over President Donald Trump's tariffs and aggressive approach to trade policy, major trading partners do appear to be ceding some ground to Trump. But how will these policies risk damaging alliances that are already frayed? And how could Trump's latest trade moves affect U.S. consumers? Today on 'Post Reports's' weekly politics roundtable, host Colby Itkowitz is joined by Washington Post White House reporter Cat Zakrewski and global economics correspondent David Lynch to discuss the consequences of Trump's tariffs.
Vox
an hour ago
- Vox
Trump actually has a tariff strategy this time. It could still go terribly wrong.
is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau. Four months after President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff hikes threw the global economy into chaos, we got a sequel — but there appears to be at least somewhat more of a method to Trump's tariff madness this time around. Trump is using the threat of steep tariffs to try to force dozens of countries to agree to make more concessions in bilateral trade agreements — and, specifically, to get them to make somewhat hazy commitments to buy more US goods or products. If Trump likes your concessions, you get a deal in which you'd stomach a new tariff of 15 percent or so. Alternatively, if Trump isn't satisfied with your concessions or is mad at you for some other reason, you get squeezed — slapped with tariffs of 30 percent or more, going into effect in a few days, to see if that will make you cave. Yet, as Trump's negotiating strategy has become somewhat more coherent than it first appeared, the legal and economic uncertainty around his tariffs has only deepened. An appellate court hearing Thursday on Trump's tariffs went poorly for the administration, renewing longstanding questions about whether these tariffs could all be struck down. And a weak jobs report Friday morning heightened concerns that the US economy was slowing — and that Trump's tariffs were one reason why. Trump's tariff negotiating strategy has come into focus Investors reacted to Liberation Day with such terror, because Trump's April tariffs seemed truly chaotic, impulsive, and bizarre — and because it was genuinely unclear what the president was even trying to achieve. Since then, though, we've gotten more clarity on the type of deals that meet Trump's approval — and generally, they involve commitments to buy US stuff or give the US money. In the last few days, the European Union, Japan, and South Korea pledged hundreds of billions of dollars toward US investments. Other countries made their own concessions; for example, Pakistan agreed to let US companies develop their oil reserves, and Bangladesh agreed to buy 220,000 tons of US wheat. We've seen that if a country or bloc makes commitments Trump deems sufficient — as in the cases of the European Union, Japan, and South Korea — Trump declares a deal has been reached, and they get spared the worst tariff hikes. (Though they still all got slapped with a 15 percent tariff on their exports to the US, that's significantly lower than the tariffs Trump is imposing on other countries.) However, if Trump isn't happy with the concessions on offer (as in the cases of India, Taiwan, and Switzerland), or if he is mad at countries for some other reason (like with Canada, South Africa, and Brazil), he tries to squeeze them, slapping on big tariffs in hopes they cave. Most of those big tariffs are set to go into effect on August 7, meaning there are a few days left for further negotiation. (Canada's 35 percent tariff went into effect today — sorry, Canada.) Finally, two other countries have gotten a sort of special 'kids gloves' treatment from Trump. China has actually won significant policy concessions from the US in recent weeks, while Mexico scored a 90-day extension on its trade deal deadline. What China and Mexico have in common is that they both have leverage over Trump. China's restrictions of rare earths exports earlier this year struck terror into the hearts of Trump officials, who faced the prospect of US auto manufacturing plants closing as a result. Mexico, for its part, has major influence on how many migrants make it to the US's southern border — and if they let up on enforcement, Trump could face a flood of new migrants. So, he's been treading more carefully with both of late. Trump's tariffs remain plagued with legal and economic uncertainty In narrow terms, Trump's negotiating strategy on tariffs has been surprisingly successful. He correctly perceived that he had the opportunity to shake down US trading partners and that most countries would simply roll over and take it to avoid being hit with exorbitant tariffs. One potential flaw in his plan, though, is that his tariffs could well be thrown out by the courts. Trump officials have insisted that a 1977 law gives the president broad powers to impose tariffs of his choosing so long as he declares there's a national 'emergency.' But judges have been deeply skeptical so far, viewing this as a usurpation of Congress's power — and an appellate court hearing Thursday reportedly did not go well for the president. This will eventually end up at the Supreme Court, and it's possible the Court's conservative majority will blanche at the prospect of overturning Trump's entire trade policy agenda and humiliating him on the world stage. Then again, perhaps they will rule on the law without regards to politics. Anything's possible, right? Separately, newly revised jobs numbers released by the Department of Labor Friday found that jobs growth was far smaller than previously thought in May and June. This could point to economic trouble — trouble that Trump's tariffs would deepen, since they make imports more expensive and slow economic growth.
an hour ago
Switzerland, the land of luxury brands, could see prices skyrocket from Trump's 39% tariffs
Prices for the eponymous Swiss watches, Swiss chocolate and Swiss cheese could skyrocket in a week as a result of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. Switzerland, home to some the world's most recognizable luxury brands, now faces an upcoming 39% tariff from the U.S. Industry groups on Friday warned that both Swiss companies and American consumers could pay the price. Trump signed an executive order Thursday placing tariffs on many U.S. trade partners — the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and alliances — that's set to take effect next Thursday. The order applies to 66 countries, the European Union, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands. In Switzerland, officials failed to reach a final agreement with the U.S. after Trump initially threatened a 31% tariff in April. Swiss companies will now have one of the steepest export duties — only Laos, Myanmar and Syria had higher figures, at 40-41%. The 27-member EU bloc and Britain, meanwhile, negotiated 15% and 10% tariffs, respectively. The Swiss government spent Friday — the country's National Day — reeling from the news. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter said that the 39% figure was a surprise, because negotiators had hashed out a deal last month with the Trump administration that apparently wasn't approved by the American leader himself. 'We will now analyze the situation and try to find a solution," Keller-Sutter told reporters. 'I can't say what the outcome will be, but it will certainly damage the economy.' The U.S. goods trade deficit with Switzerland was $38.5 billion last year, a 56.9% increase over 2023, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. Keller-Sutter said that she believes Trump ultimately chose the 39% tariff, because the figure rounded up from the $38.5 billion goods trade deficit. 'It was clear that the president was focused on the trade deficit and only this issue,' she said. For Swiss watch companies, whose products already come with price tags in the tens of thousands — if not the hundreds of thousands — of euros, a timepiece for an arm could cost a leg, too, come next week. The 39% figure was especially galling to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, because Switzerland in 2024 got rid of import tariffs on all industrial goods. 'As Switzerland has eliminated all custom duties on imported industrial products, there is no problem with reciprocity between Switzerland and the U.S.,' the federation said in a statement. 'The tariffs constitute a severe problem for our bilateral relations.' Swiss watch exports were already facing a prolonged slowdown, with significant declines in the United States, Japan and Hong Kong, according to the federation's June figures, the most recent available. Swatch and Rolex declined to comment Friday. Representatives for Patek Philippe, IWC and Breitling didn't respond to requests for comment. Multinational chocolatiers Nestlé and Lindt & Sprüngli said they have production lines in the U.S. for American customers. But small- and medium-sized Swiss companies are predicted to suffer under the tariffs. Roger Wehrli, chief executive of the Association of Swiss Chocolate Manufacturers. also known as Chocosuisse, said Switzerland exports 7% of its chocolate production to the U.S. It's not just the 39% tariff that's the issue. Once the manufacturers factor in the exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Swiss francs ($1 to 1.23 francs on Friday), Wehrli said, it's close to a 50% increase in costs for the Swiss companies. And that's a big number to pass on to American consumers, if the already-slim margins aren't further reduced. 'I expect that our industry will lose customers in the United States, and that sales volumes will decrease heavily,' he told The Associated Press. Wehrli said that he wants Swiss chocolatiers to sell to other markets around the globe to make up the difference. Still, he hopes American customers remember that Swiss quality beats cheaper quantity. 'I think even if prices for Swiss chocolate increase due to the very high tariffs, I think it's worth (it) to buy Swiss chocolate," he said. 'It's worth (it) to really eat it consciously and to really enjoy it instead of eating a lot.' Swiss pharmaceuticals powerhouse Roche says that it's working to ensure its patients and customers worldwide have access to their medications and diagnostics amid the Trump tariff war. 'While we believe pharmaceuticals and diagnostics should be exempt from tariffs to protect patient access, supply chains and ultimately future innovation, we are prepared for potential tariffs being implemented and confident in managing any impacts,' the statement said. The company in April Meanwhile, Novartis, another major Swiss pharmaceutical firm, said in a statement that it was reviewing Trump's executive order.
