France examines sea options as it starts evacuating citizens in Iran and Israel via land
Mr Barrot also said that he had asked the ministry's crisis and support centre to present options for French citizens in Israel, believed to number a few thousand, to leave via the Mediterranean Sea. The air space of a dozen countries in the region remains closed.
The French decision comes days after some European countries made similar announcements.
"In this situation, France's voice is clear: it is peace and security for all," Mr Barrot said, as he called on a ceasefire between Iran and Israel and in Gaza.
French citizens in Iran were invited to travel to the Armenian or Turkish borders before flying to France. Those who cannot make it to the border by their own means will be accompanied by convoys "by the end of the week," Mr Barrot said.
France, which will deploy civil servants at borders to help evacuees, will also organise buses for citizens in Israel to travel to Jordan and Egypt. "A flight will be chartered from Amman by the end of the week, depending on the opening of border crossings," Mr Barrot said.
Yet diplomatic staff will not be evacuated, the minister added, saying they would remain on the ground "to support French communities, in Israel as in Iran, in the trying period that they are going through." Iranian strikes landed overnight "several dozen meters away" the French embassy in Tel Aviv, Mr Barrot said.
Lithuania on Thursday evacuated non-essential diplomatic staff and their families from Tel Aviv after an Iranian missile landed 200 metres from its embassy. A number of countries, including the UK, Croatia, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Hungary have also pulled out some staff and their families.
The UK is planning for a 'variety of scenarios and contingencies' for Britons stranded in Israel as the US said it was looking at evacuating Americans using cruise ships and flights.
Asked why the UK was not following the US example, a No 10 spokesman said: 'There's a huge amount of work being done in the background on contingency planning. It is a fast-moving situation and we keep all our advice and planning under constant review."
Mr Barrot has been entrusted by President Emmanuel Macron to put forward a diplomatic initiative in the coming days, in co-ordination with European partners, aimed at proposing a negotiated settlement to end the continuing conflict between Israel and Iran.
Details on the initiative are yet to be unveiled but Foreign Ministers from France, Germany and the UK – known as the E3 – are expected to meet their Iranian counterpart Abbas Arghchi in Geneva on Friday after a phone call on Monday.
Mr Barrot did not confirm the meeting, despite an announcement earlier in the day from Iranian state media and European diplomatic sources. The EU's foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, is also expected to attend the talks.
The E3 were the only European countries that took part in a failed 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran that collapsed when the US withdrew under President Donald Trump three years later. There is a "very strong unity" between Germany, the UK and France on Iran, Mr Barrot said.
Should Iran acquire a nuclear bomb, it would represent an "existential threat" to Israel, the region, and Europe, Mr Barrot said. Iran insists its nuclear programme has civilian, not nuclear, goals. Israeli strikes on Iran, which started last Friday, were described by Israeli leaders as designed to prevent Iran from acquiring a bomb.
Mr Barrot said France was keen to continue diplomatic discussions with Iran.
"We stand ready, as we have done in recent months and years, to present a formula that guarantees the security interests of Israel, the region, and Europe, which concerns both Iran's nuclear programme, its ballistic missile programme, and its regional destabilisation activities," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
17 minutes ago
- The National
Security guard at US Embassy in Oslo 'paid in Bitcoin to spy for Iran'
A Norwegian man has been charged with intelligence activities targeting his own nation and the US for Russia or Iran. The Oslo State Attorney's Office said he could face 21 years in prison, having disclosed information that 'individually or collectively' could 'harm fundamental national interests'. The defendant was working as a security guard at the US Embassy in Oslo when he allegedly began spying for the Russian and Iranian authorities. According to the indictment, the unnamed man shared vital information with both states. This included: A list of couriers from the national intelligence service, classified as restricted information Names, addresses, telephone numbers and vehicle details of embassy staff and diplomats, as well as their families Roles of the embassy staff Pre-booked visits to the embassy Security procedures Floor plans of the embassy Pictures of garage facilities and communication equipment The prosecutor believes the information the man shared posed an 'elevated risk' to the individuals, the embassy and 'American security interests'. The US working closely with Israel during the war in Gaza motivated him to contact Russian and Iranian intelligence, according to the indictment. Russian authorities are said to have paid him €10,000 (about $11,700) for information handed over in Norway and Serbia. Iranian authorities allegedly paid 0.17 Bitcoin (around $20,000) for the information. According to the indictment, it was handed over in Oslo and Turkey. The man tried to hide the money by depositing it in accounts belonging to his family and a friend, and then asked them to transfer the sums to him, the indictment alleges. He is also accused of hiding income from the Norwegian Tax Administration. In 2023, he was listed with an income of 57,000 kroner (about $5,600). According to the indictment, however, he had an income of more than 400,000 kroner from the US Embassy that year, which he did not report. He ran a security company with another person. The man has pleaded not guilty. Local reports said despite this the suspect acknowledged the facts of the case but denied any criminal responsibility. Officials said he has co-operated during the investigation and has identified a Russian agent to the authorities in Oslo. His trial is scheduled for August 19 in Oslo District Court, with two weeks set aside for the main hearing. Spying cases have become common across Europe. In the UK on Tuesday, a court found that 65-year-old Howard Phillips offered to pass information about former defence secretary Grant Shapps to two men he believed were Russian agents. The men were undercover British intelligence agents. Phillips offered to turn over Shapps' contact details as well as the location where he kept his private plane to 'facilitate the Russians in listening on British defence plans'. The defendant's ex-wife told Winchester Crown Court that Phillips 'would dream about being like James Bond' and watched films about the British secret services because he was 'infatuated with it'. Bethan David, head of the Crown Prosecution Service's counterterrorism division, said the conviction sent a clear message to anyone considering spying for Russia. 'Phillips was brazen in his pursuit for financial gain, and unbothered about the potential detriment to his own country,' Ms David said. A jury found Phillips guilty of assisting a foreign intelligence service under the National Security Act. He will be sentenced at a later date.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
In the absence of formal accountability for Gaza atrocities, it's critical to shout the truth loudly
July 17 marked International Criminal Justice Day – commemorating the 1998 adoption of the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC). For those of us working in the field of accountability – pursuing war criminals and justice for survivors – it should be a day of reflection and progress. Yet in 2025, it feels like an act of resistance just to believe that justice is possible. The odds are stacked against us. Criminals often walk free, shielded by powerful states. We see images of children in Gaza dying from malnutrition – victims of Israel's starvation policy as found by ICC prosecutors – while our mechanisms to stop it are blocked at every turn. The ICC Office of the Prosecutor has launched an investigation into Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the deliberate targeting of civilians and the use of starvation as a method of warfare. But progress is painfully slow. The Court has no jurisdiction over the US or Israel, and both actively obstruct it. During the 1998 Rome negotiations, the US refused to join, citing fears of 'politically motivated' prosecutions. Israel claims its military operates within the laws of war. Earlier this month, Mr Netanyahu travelled to Washington to meet with US President Donald Trump, defying international pressure. In retaliation for the ICC investigation, the US imposed sanctions on ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan – restricting his travel and freezing assets. The US has also targeted Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur, on the occupied Palestinian territories, who continues to speak out despite pressure. Journalists, investigators and human rights workers must keep the pressure high. It worked in Bosnia. It worked in Kosovo. It can work again While Mr Khan has remained largely silent, Ms Albanese has not. On the same day she was sanctioned, she condemned Italy, France, and Greece — ICC member states — for allowing Mr Netanyahu's aircraft to cross their airspace instead of arresting him. Meanwhile, the UN's top court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), has issued orders for Israel to allow humanitarian aid and halt military actions that risk genocide. Yet these rulings rely on enforcement by the Security Council—where the US has repeatedly used its veto to protect Israel from accountability. Still, the evidence grows. Just last week, renowned genocide scholar Omer Bartov, an Israeli Jew and former Israeli soldier, published an op-ed in The New York Times arguing that Israel is committing genocide. It was a watershed moment, not just for the clarity of his language but for where it was published. But even as the case against Israel strengthens, we must confront the painful truth: the very systems designed to deliver justice are being blocked or undermined. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres has issued some of the strongest statements I've seen from a UN leader, and his adviser Melissa Fleming continues to condemn Israel's attacks on civilians. Still, several Security Council votes calling for a ceasefire have been vetoed by the US. On July 20, the General Assembly overwhelmingly passed a resolution, drafted by Spain, condemning the use of starvation as a method of warfare. Yet even as that resolution passed, Israeli forces bombed a Catholic church in Gaza and continued killing hundreds daily, many of them women, children and people waiting at feeding stations. In short, it would appear that Mr Netanyahu is mocking international justice. But it is not hopeless – if we accept that justice is a long game. Since the Second World War, alternative pathways for accountability have evolved. This is where civil society must lead. My team at The Reckoning Project focuses on creative approaches to accountability. We combine international courts, third-state prosecutions, UN mechanisms, and civil society pressure. Justice is rarely linear, but it is possible. Everything hinges on political will. Countries such as Spain and Ireland are stepping up. But when the US, UK and Germany actively block legal mechanisms, they become complicit. Britain continues arms transfers to Israel, and recent revelations show it is also sharing battlefield intelligence. This is where advocacy matters. Journalists, investigators and human rights workers must keep the pressure high. It worked in Bosnia. It worked in Kosovo. It can work again. The ICC case can and must be strengthened – with robust documentation, clear evidence chains, and legal submissions under Article 15. We must link Netanyahu directly to command decisions and demonstrate intent. Countries with universal jurisdiction, such as Germany, Belgium, South Africa, and Argentina, can open domestic cases. These can be reinforced by the ICJ's initial findings and ongoing proceedings in the genocide case. Targeted sanctions, such as Magnitsky-style bans – that is, laws providing for governmental sanctions against foreigners who have committed human rights abuses or been involved in corruption – should be imposed by countries such as Norway, Ireland and Spain. But this depends on political will. Which brings me to the most powerful tool we have: the court of public opinion. The truth must be told, clearly and relentlessly. In the case of Gaza, the horror doesn't need exaggeration as the facts speak for themselves. Free press can drive public protest and shift political inertia. The alternative is complicity in what has been described by legal experts as genocide, and as shown in the mounting evidence before the ICJ. I have witnessed three genocides in my lifetime. I cannot remain silent as another unfolds. To look away would be to abandon our shared humanity.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Best photos of July 23: Funeral in Notre Dame to the Tesla Diner in LA
Senior Catholic clergy prepare to pay their respects at the funeral of cardinal and former archbishop of Paris Andre Vingt-Trois, at Notre-Dame Cathedral in the French capital. AFP
