Jan. 6 rioter pardoned by Trump gets life in prison for plot on FBI
Edward Kelley was one of the first rioters to breach the Capitol. Nearly two years later, he made plans with another man to attack the FBI office in Knoxville, Tenn., using improvised explosive devices attached to vehicles and drones, according to prosecutors.
Last November, a jury convicted Kelley of conspiring to murder federal employees, solicitation to commit a crime of violence and influencing federal officials by threat.
Kelley, 36, received a pardon from U.S. President Donald Trump for his Jan. 6 convictions, but a judge agreed with prosecutors that Trump's action did not extend to Kelley's Tennessee case. That makes Kelley, who is from Maryvale, Tenn., one of only a few Capitol riot defendants remaining in prison after Trump's sweeping act of clemency.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Varlan handed down Kelley's life sentence during a hearing in Knoxville, according to court records. The judge denied a request for Kelley to be released pending the outcome of an appeal.
Prosecutors had recommended a life sentence for Kelley, saying he was remorseless and incapable of rehabilitation.
"On the contrary, Kelley not only believes the actions for which he was convicted were justified but that his duty as a self-styled 'patriot' compelled him to target East Tennessee law enforcement for assassination," they wrote.
Kelley served in the Marine Corps for eight years. He was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan before his 2015 discharge from the military.
On Jan. 6, 2021, Kelley was captured on video helping two other rioters throw a Capitol Police officer onto the ground and using a piece of wood to damage a window, according to the FBI. He was the fourth person to enter the Capitol through a broken window, the FBI said.
After a trial without a jury, a federal judge in Washington convicted Kelley last November of 11 counts stemming from the riot. Before Kelley could be sentenced, Trump pardoned him and hundreds of other convicted Capitol rioters.
Kelley argued that his pardon was broad enough to cover his conduct in the Tennessee case, but the judge disagreed. Varlan said Kelley's crimes in the Tennessee case were separated from Kelley's conduct on Jan. 6 "by years and miles." Prosecutors reached the same conclusion.
In other Jan. 6 cases, however, Trump's Justice Department has argued that the pardons apply to separate convictions. For instance, prosecutors concluded that a Kentucky man's pardon for storming the Capitol also covered his conviction for illegally possessing guns when FBI agents searched his home for the Jan. 6 investigation.
Kelley has been jailed since December 2022. His lawyer, Mark Brown, said Kelley did not hurt anybody or directly threaten anybody with violence. Brown urged the judge to reject prosecutors' request to apply a "terrorism enhancement" in calculating his client's sentence.
Pardoned Jan. 6 rioters released from prison
5 months ago
Duration 2:14
Less than 24 hours after being pardoned by U.S. President Donald Trump, some of the convicted Jan. 6 rioters were released from prison. On his first day in office, Trump pardoned roughly 1,600 offenders and commuted the sentences of more than a dozen people.
"Kelley does not deserve the same sentence as an actual 'terrorist' who injured or killed hundreds or thousands of America citizens," Brown wrote.
Kelley's co-defendant, Austin Carter, pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge in January 2024. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Aug. 4.
Kelley created a list of 36 law enforcement officers to target for assassination and shared it with Carter, calling it their first "mission," according to prosecutors. All the officers were involved in Kelley's May 2022 arrest on Capitol riot charges and the FBI's search of his home.
"The proof at trial established that Kelley targeted law enforcement because of their anticipated role in the civil war that Kelley hoped to initiate and because of his animus towards those who participated in his May 2022 arrest and search of his home," prosecutors wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
10 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump's massive spending bill is set to become law. Now, the reckoning begins
From the start, U.S. President Donald Trump wanted Congress to deliver a 'big, beautiful' spending bill. The measure approved on a deeply fractured Capitol Hill Thursday was indisputably big. As for the other word in the President's formula, beauty is in the eyes of the beholders. Or, as Shakespeare taught in Love's Labour's Loss, 'Beauty is bought by judgement of the eye,/Not utter'd by base sale of chapmen's tongues.' In this case, the chapmen − a term derived from the Middle English word meaning salesman, an apt description of Mr. Trump himself − are the White House officials who demanded the spending and tax cuts in the 1,000-page piece of legislation in a frantic race to meet the President's Independence Day deadline. What's really in Trump's big spending bill? But at full flower, this is not an American beauty rose for an unlikely, ungainly collection of lawmakers and activists: The Republican rebels − reluctant warriors wrangled by the President into supporting the package but who remain aghast at the failure to reign in the budget debt; Democrats who again failed to have even a glancing effect on the process or content and revile the US$4.5-trillion in tax cuts, mainly for the wealthy; advocates for the poor recoiling at the cuts in services, especially for the 11 million who may lose health coverage; and Republican strategists who believe that the administration's signature domestic initiative betrays the new GOP constituency of workers. This isn't a case where the virtue of compromise can be espied in the fact that no one is entirely happy. In this case, no one, beside Mr. Trump and his most loyal subalterns, is the least bit happy. Except in one dimension: Everyone involved in this monster piece of legislation − which includes work requirements for medical assistance for the poor, tax cuts for employees paid largely in tips, and increased border-security and defence spending − is glad that it is over. In his landmark 1885 book on Congress, written 28 years before he became president, Woodrow Wilson spoke of 'the dance of legislation,' saying analysts 'must struggle through its mazes as best you can to its breathless end.' This time, the dance was unusually lacking in grace and fluid movement. 'It's especially messy this time because members found ways around the usual legislative discipline,' said Sarah Binder, a George Washington University expert on Congress. 'Republicans found new ways to stretch rules and pack in their priorities. The sausage-making looked especially bad.' Now, the reckoning begins. There are massive cuts in food-assistance programs, in health care subsidies, and in federal programs splayed across almost every element of American life, including environmental initiatives to battle climate change. Though the administration argued that it was an attack on spending and an assault on the estimated US$36-trillion federal debt, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office projects it adds nearly US$4-trillion to it. Republican rebels were particularly aggrieved by the failure to trim the US$1.3-trillion annual federal deficit. That's because some of the tax cuts in the budget package are the result of making permanent the temporary reductions in levies passed in the first Trump administration. Additionally, the measure increases the level of state and local taxes Americans can deduct from their net income when preparing their federal tax forms next April. The details − some arcane, and many barely if at all known to the lawmakers themselves − are examples of how the Trump ascendancy is a radical departure from American tradition. For all their brave anti-spending rhetoric consistent with the Republican ethos of their respective eras, Dwight Eisenhower didn't dent the Franklin Roosevelt New Deal and though Ronald Reagan shrunk the size of the federal government by about 5 per cent, over-all federal spending in his White House years was up by nearly 70 per cent. The final days of the negotiations included 16 hours in which the legislation was drearily read aloud in the Senate chamber and a record-breaking 8-hour and 45-minute delaying speech by Democratic House Leader Hakeem Jeffries. They won their party no benefit and only provided the White House more time to placate skeptics. The end result of the lobbying was a vivid affirmation of the 'all-politics-is-local' aphorism popularized by former House Speaker Thomas 'Tip' O'Neill. Senator Lisa Murkowski, a key GOP resister, won special nutrition-assistance and medical benefits for her Alaska constituents, while Maine's Susan Collins insisted on raising the level of federal support for rural hospitals, but failed to prevail and ended up opposing the bill. There were additional dramas playing out as the lawmakers wrestled, wrangled and warred over specific elements of the package. One was the personal agony of Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, whose resistance to many Trump entreaties won him the enduring enmity of the President. He finally succumbed to the pressure, which included a classic Trump social-media denunciation of a fellow Republican ('Tillis is a talker and complainer, NOT A DOER!'), and announced he wouldn't seek re-election, thus avoiding a bruising primary against a Trump-endorsed surrogate. Another was how, in their drive to win approval of the spending package, Republican members of the legislative branch tested the boundaries of rules and customs much the way the President has done in the executive branch. One example: a dodge permitting the extension of the US$3.8-trillion of the tax cuts not to count against the budgetary cost of the bill. A third was the renewal of the feud between Mr. Trump and Elon Musk, who threatened to start a third party if the legislation were passed. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' He wrote on his X platform. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The response from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: 'I admire Elon's leadership on rockets. I will take care of the finances.' That, too, will be a matter of contention in this age of contention.
CTV News
12 minutes ago
- CTV News
Mexican boxer Chavez Jr. arrested by U.S. immigration officers, DHS says
Canelo Alvarez, right, of Mexico, gets hit by Julio Cesar Chavez Jr., of Mexico, during their catch weight boxing match, Saturday, May 6, 2017, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/John Locher) Mexican boxer Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. has been arrested by U.S. immigration officers and is being processed for expedited removal from the country, the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement on Thursday. The DHS said Chavez, a Mexican citizen, had an active arrest warrant against him in Mexico for what it said was his involvement in organized crime and trafficking firearms, ammunition, and explosives. 'Under President Trump, no one is above the law - including world-famous athletes,' said DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. Brendan O'Brien, Reuters
Global News
31 minutes ago
- Global News
U.S. Congress passes Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill,' now set to become law
U.S. House Republicans propelled President Donald Trump's $4.5 trillion tax breaks and spending cuts bill to final congressional passage Thursday, overcoming multiple setbacks to approve his signature second-term policy package before a Fourth of July deadline. The tight roll call, 218-214, came at a potentially high political cost, with two Republicans joining all Democrats opposed. GOP leaders worked overnight and the president himself leaned on a handful of skeptics to drop their opposition and send the bill to him to sign into law. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York delayed voting by holding the floor for more than eight hours with a record-breaking speech against the bill. 'We have a big job to finish,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. 'With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before.' The outcome delivers a milestone for the president, by his Friday goal, and for his party,. It was a long-shot effort to compile a lengthy list of GOP priorities into what they called his 'one big beautiful bill,' an 800-plus page measure. With Democrats unified in opposition, the bill will become a defining measure of Trump's return to the White House, aided by Republican control of Congress. Story continues below advertisement 1:59 Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passes U.S. Senate, but still faces hurdles Tax breaks and safety net cuts At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. Story continues below advertisement There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. 'This was a generational opportunity to deliver the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history, and that's exactly what we're doing,' said Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the House Budget Committee chairman. Democrats united against 'ugly bill' Democrats unified against the bill as a tax giveaway to the rich paid for on the backs of the working class and most vulnerable in society, what they called 'trickle down cruelty.' Tensions ran high in the chamber. Story continues below advertisement Jeffries began the speech at 4:53 a.m. EDT and finished at 1:37 p.m. EDT, 8 hours, 44 minutes later, a record, as he argued against what he called Trump's 'big ugly bill.' 'We're better than this,' Jeffries said, who used a leader's prerogative for unlimited debate and read letter after letter from Americans writing about their reliance of the health care programs. 'I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene,' Jeffries said. 'It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people.' And as Democrats, he said, 'We want no part of it.' 1:58 'Deal with the devil': AOC slams Trump's megabill in House speech Hauling the package through the Congress has been difficult from the start. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way quarreling in the House and Senate, and often succeeding only by the narrowest of margins: just one vote. Story continues below advertisement The Senate passed the package days earlier with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie vote. The slim majority in the House left Republicans little room for defections. Political costs of saying no Despite their discomfort with various aspects of the sprawling package, in some ways it became too big to fail — in part because Republicans found it difficult to buck Trump. As Wednesday's stalled floor action dragged overnight Trump railed against the delays. 'What are the Republicans waiting for???' the president said in a midnight post. 'What are you trying to prove???' 3:05 'He's flat out wrong': Musk's comments on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' stirs ire of Republicans Johnson relied heavily on White House Cabinet secretaries, lawyers and others to satisfy skeptical GOP holdouts. Moderate Republicans worried about the severity of cuts while conservatives pressed for steeper reductions. Lawmakers said they were being told the administration could provide executive actions, projects or other provisions in their districts back home. Story continues below advertisement The alternative was clear. Republicans who staked out opposition to the bill, including Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, were being warned by Trump's well-funded political operation. Tillis soon after announced he would not seek reelection. Rollback of past presidential agendas In many ways, the package is a repudiation of the agendas of the last two Democratic presidents, a chiseling away at the Medicaid expansion from Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, and a pullback of Joe Biden's climate change strategies in the Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that cuts to Medicaid, which some 80 million Americans rely on, would result in lives lost. Food stamps that help feed more than 40 million people would 'rip food from the mouths of hungry children, hungry veterans and hungry seniors,' Jeffries said. Republicans say the tax breaks will prevent a tax hike on households and grow the economy. They maintain they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. Story continues below advertisement The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired. Associated Press writers Kevin Freking, Joey Cappelletti and Matt Brown contributed to this report.
