‘Powerful' punches led to war veteran's death 10 months after attack, trial told
British Army veteran Lee Woodward, 39, died in hospital 10 months after he was left brain damaged from an attack by 32-year-old Gregory Twigg in Trade Street, Stoke-on-Trent on the night of June 24 2022, Stafford Crown Court heard.
The defendant, who was jailed in September 2022 after pleading guilty to grievous bodily harm with intent for the attack on Mr Woodward, is now on trial accused of murder after Mr Woodward died from complications arising from his injuries on April 26 2023.
Twigg, who wore a black jumper and blue jeans for the start of the five-day trial on Tuesday, listened with the assistance of an intermediary in the dock as prosecution counsel David Mason KC outlined the case.
He told the jury of five men and seven women that Twigg, previously of Blurton in Stoke-on-Trent, had punched Mr Woodward, who had been on a night out with his fiancee Kate Griffin in Stoke, 'really hard, not once, not twice, but three times'.
He said: 'The first punch floored him. The second knocked him back into a car and the last completely knocked him out and he never recovered.
'When Gregory Twigg delivered this (final) punch, we say Lee Woodward was in no position to defend himself.
'He was increasingly vulnerable to a determined attack and as a direct result of this attack, he suffered a brain injury and arising medical complications that resulted in his death.
'There is no doubt that Gregory Twigg killed Lee Woodward, because it was his attack that caused him to die.
'We don't say he intended to kill Lee Woodward, but he intended to cause him really serious injury.'
CCTV of the lead-up and the attack itself was played to the jury, showing Mr Woodward leaving The Liquor Vaults pub in Trade Street at around 11pm before his fiancee and walking down towards Hill Street with a man who has not been identified.
As he reached Hill Street, he encountered a white Vauxhall Astra in which Twigg was a backseat passenger, before the car makes a sharp turn onto Trade Street and Mr Woodward appears to return to the road to meet them as the driver, Nathan Lockley, and some of the other four passengers get out.
While Mr Woodward is focused on speaking to Mr Lockley, Twigg approaches from the side and delivers a 'powerful' punch to his face, knocking him to the ground and leaving him looking 'like a highly dazed boxer' as he tried to regain his balance, Mr Mason said.
He told the jury: 'Gregory Twigg tracked his recovery to his feet and landed a second powerful and cowardly punch to his head. Lee Woodward would barely have seen it coming and was in no position to defend himself. It sent his head and body into the parked car this time.'
While Mr Lockley and some of the other female passengers tried to get Twigg to move away, he instead 'honed in' on Mr Woodward, landing a third punch to his head.
Mr Mason said: 'It was a devastating blow to his head with pinpoint precision, full power and that was it, lights out. He lay motionless on the road, out cold. It was immediately obvious he was very unwell.'
While the occupants in the Vauxhall got back in the car and left the scene, an unconscious Mr Woodward was rushed to hospital with a laceration to the back of his head and a CT scan revealed a subdural haematoma on the left side of his brain.
He was transferred to a high-dependency neurological ward by mid-July and he had developed a number of complications including an infection in his brain.
Mr Woodward underwent eight surgeries by August 2022, could only occasionally open his eyes, could not speak and would likely be bed-bound and require full-time care in a nursing home had he survived.
Mr Mason said: 'Moving into 2023 and Lee Woodward's injuries were sadly so serious he never recovered, he never left the hospital and he died in April 2023.
'He died from his injuries and the complications that arose from them. There is no doubt Gregory Twigg caused Lee Woodward's death.'
Addressing the jury, Mr Mason said: 'Gregory Twigg has pleaded not guilty to murder. He does accept he caused Lee Woodward's death, but he is going to deny that he intended to cause those really serious injuries.
'We say this matter is crystal clear. Gregory Twigg did intend to cause Lee Woodward really serious injury. He admitted that at Stoke Crown Court in 2022 and was sentenced for that in 2022.
'The intention he admitted to having when he was charged with GBH means he is guilty. Lee Woodward's death is a consequence that Gregory Twigg must now face.'
The trial continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Wannabe fraudster, 33, who tried to claim £74,000 after lorry smashed into his Porsche is caught out... because dashcam snapped him 'hiding in bushes'
A wannabe fraudster's £74,000 claim has been foiled after footage shows he was not inside his luxury Porsche when it was hit by a lorry - but instead seemingly hiding in the bushes. Terell Brooks, a 33-year-old account manager from Romford, claimed he was sat in the £81,000 car at the time of impact and suffered injuries as a result. However, dashcam footage shows Mr Brooks had parked his Porsche 911 Carrera GTS on the edge of the road on the A13 in Essex on August 19, 2022, when a lorry collided with the vehicle. His claim included £63,435 for alleged damage to the Porsche, £5,000 for personal injury, £2,400 for medical treatment, and a further £3,374 for loss of earnings. But the dashcam footage from the lorry revealed a different story. The video clearly shows the Porsche parked and unoccupied, with Mr Brooks visible several metres away in bushes behind a roadside barrier. It is unclear why he had exited the vehicle, but the footage confirmed he was not inside at the time of the incident. After the footage was put to Mr Brooks' solicitors, they withdrew from the case. Clyde & Co, representing AXA UK who insured the lorry, filed an Amended Defence stating the claim was 'founded on a false premise'. They asserted that both Mr Brooks and an alleged passenger knowingly gave false accounts to insurers, legal representatives, and medical professionals. Mr Brooks subsequently discontinued his claim and agreed to pay AXA's legal costs of £4,000. He signed a Tomlin Order formally admitting his claim was dishonest, confirming he was not in the vehicle at the time of the collision. Deborah Talbot, AXA claims operations manager, said: 'This case highlights how technology is helping us to fight claims fraud. 'The dashcam footage provided clear evidence that Mr Brooks wasn't in the car at the time of the collision, avoiding a potentially costly and lengthy court hearing.' Damian Rourke, partner at Clyde & Co, added: 'Mr Brooks claimed he was sitting in his Porsche, belted up and injured. 'The dashcam showed him in the bushes. 'We still don't know what he was doing there – but we do know he wasn't in the car. His story fell apart the moment the truth came to light. 'In every sense, the claim was caught short.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fraudster mum, 28, who faked pregnancy and stole £100,000 from her employers and boyfriend walks free from court
A mother-of-two who faked having cancer, being pregnant and stole nearly £100,000 from her employers has avoided jail. 'Selfish' Megan Reynolds, 28, racked up thousands on lavish gifts - including hotel stays, a five course dinner and clubbing in Amsterdam - using company cards before attempting to conceal them through fake invoices. She defrauded electrical machinery firm CSL Power Systems out of £78,000, who described her as a 'compulsive liar', between 2019 and 2021 before she was caught and dismissed by bosses, Maidstone Crown Court heard. But, just a month later she joined another firm, ATL Retail Limited, where she continued her behaviour - again fraudulently spending £18,500 of the company's cash on her own amenities. Her dishonest habits didn't stop there however, as the court also heard that Reynolds took out a finance agreement for over £1,000 using her boyfriend Callum Bishop's name and details without his consent. She also lied to Mr Bishop by telling him she was pregnant with a fake scan and faked having cancer to a family member to get time off work. Reynolds had initially denied the offences and a trial date was set for February this year but then, less than two weeks before she was due to take the stand, she changed her pleas to guilty. But she avoided prison after a judge decided that given her role as a mother to two small children and having not committed any further offences since being charged, it would be too harsh to put her behind bars. At her sentencing at Maidstone Crown Court on Friday, July 4, the court heard how Reynolds, of Fruit Fields Drive in Rainham, had pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud and a further three counts were ordered to lie on file. During her role at CSL Power Systems in Farningham, near Dartford, between November 6, 2019 and March 26, 2021, Reynolds undertook the book keeping and had access to the company credit cards and would assist colleges by making online purchases on their behalf. But instead, the court heard she was using the 11 company cards to make fraudulent transactions, and tried to conceal them using fake invoices. When an employee noticed a purchase did not have a matching receipt, she tasked Reynolds with reporting it to Barclaycard Bank - an action she did not take, instead providing 'fictional' updates to the company. But by February, 2021, when an employee found a bank statement for an EasyJet flight in her name, the police were called and discovered no fraud had been reported to the bank. That evening, while employees investigated, they found emails were being remotely deleted by Reynolds and she was told to stop. The prosecutor, Nick Sanders, explained how fraudulent payments included car insurance for her vehicle, bookings on and a five-course dinner, along with spending at a nightclub in Amsterdam. To cover her tracks, the court heard how an invoice for a spill kit, valued at £75.96 was used to cover-up a purchase of dog chews Reynolds had made. Meanwhile, an invoice for black frames actually matched the purchase of a 5-piece set of Tefal pans. The total amount of fraud at the company was £78,000, the court heard. But after being dismissed, within a month she was working at another firm in Sevenoaks, ATL Retail Limited, from April 26, 2021 until January 17, 2022. It was only through a chance meeting with someone from CSL that Reynolds' fraudulent past became knowledge to her new employer. ATL Retail Limited made Reynolds redundant and discovered a number of fraudulent transactions, totalling £18,500. But as well as deceiving the two businesses, the court heard how Reynolds had also been deceiving her former partner Callum Bishop from February 2019 until they split in October 2021. The night before he left he found a letter for a financial agreement from Creation Finance in his name for over £1,000 that he had never taken on. He rang the company and found out Reynolds' mobile number was linked to the loan. The prosecutor said: 'She abused her position of trust and was sophisticated in nature'. But Judge Julian Smith said: 'I do not think it is particularly sophisticated, more wounding and hurtful but not particularly sophisticated.' The court heard how the now 28-year-old, had been charged with six fraud offences, including two counts of fraud by abuse of position and four counts of fraud by false representation in 2023. Only three fraud offences, regarding CSL Power Systems, ATL Retail, and Callum Bishop were pursued by the Crown Prosecution Service and the other three charges were ordered to lie on file. The judge added: 'She had quite the network of dishonesty set up. £78,000 is a lot of money and certainly a lot of money whether it's personal or business. 'It's a very substantial impact and it is exploitative. She saw an opportunity and went after it again and again and again.' He said Reynolds was 'dishonest' and 'deceitful' and sought to enrich herself personally at others expense. 'She was given a fresh start and then did it again - straight away,' the judge added. Her defence solicitor, Lucy Kennedy, explained how the victim impact statements had caused Reynolds 'considerable distress' and that her actions were driven out of 'greed' and she is 'mortified'. Relaying Reynolds statements, the defence solicitor said: 'None of it was worth it. That is not me anymore. 'I am devastated that I have hurt them in such a way that they can't trust others in the way they used to and I am devastated that I have caused so much trauma to them.' The court heard Reynolds was 'petrified' to face her victims in the court room and has acknowledged she could be sent to prison, so had packed a small suitcase which she brought into the courtroom. The court heard how the 28-year-old now has a four-and-a-half month old baby who was born prematurely and is immunosuppressed while also being lactose-intolerant. And while the court heard that both baby's fathers are present in their children's lives, the judge considered the fact Reynolds was the 'principle' caregiver and was still breastfeeding her baby. Meanwhile, Ms Kennedy explained Reynolds' son, aged two, had undergone eye surgery for a squint and is due to have another surgery. While explaining that Reynolds' offence was a 'modern day fingers in the till' she then urged for a suspended sentence, keeping in mind her son, two, and her daughter, four-and-a-half months - adding 'that is not her anymore'. 'Keep the three of them together,' Reynolds solicitor said. In response, the prosecutor explained how Reynolds had often told lies in the past, such as pretending to a family member she had cancer to get time off work, telling Mr Bishop she was pregnant by providing a fake scan, and lying about her dog having cancer. While he said he did not doubt that Reynolds had children, the prosecutor referenced her perpetual lies to urge the judge to question information given by the mother-of-two. In his remarks, the judge said the three offences were examples of 'persistent dishonesty'. He said: 'Having faced the victims now, reflect on what it was about you to put your selfish wishes, superficial desires above everybody else. 'You were a fraudster. You were thieving,' he added. The judge handed the 28-year-old a suspended sentence of 24 months in prison for the first count, 15 months in prison for count two, and six months in prison for count three, all suspended for two years and to be served concurrently. She was given 15 rehabilitation activity requirement days and 200 hours unpaid work. Judge Julian Smith added: 'You are being given a chance today because of your two children. If you breach this order what you are telling the court is that you do not care.' A further hearing is set to organise a timetable of repayment for the money stolen. 'I do not expect to see you again. If I do, I am giving you a warning, do not let your children down,' the judge said. Following the conclusion of Friday's hearing her former employer CSL Power Systems recorded their disappointment at what they believe to be an unduly lenient sentence. 'As a company and on a personal level we are thoroughly disappointed with the sentencing ruling by the judge and feel it has sent out the wrong message in today's society,' a spokesperson for CSL Power Systems. 'Essentially you can steal 100K from honest businesses and walk away without ever seeing the inside of a cell as long as you have a well-timed pregnancy!' The company explained how the length of time between her crimes and sentencing has meant the victims had to wait four years for her to be brought to justice, while Reynolds had carried on with her life, in their view, 'without a care in the world'. The company claim Reynolds has never shown any remorse, or apologised for her actions. They described her as a 'compulsive liar', adding: 'We let Miss Reynolds into our lives, and after COVID she worked from offices in our home and we thought she was also a friend.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
The mushroom poisoning trial captivated Australia. Why Erin Patterson did it remains a mystery
The high-profile case of the so-called Death Cap Mushroom Cook is likely to remain a topic of conversation across Australia for years to come. For more than two months, the triple-murder trial has gripped the public's attention with details of how Erin Patterson murdered three of her estranged husband's relatives by deliberately serving them a lunch of poisonous mushrooms. It was no surprise that on Tuesday — the day after the guilty verdict was delivered by the court in Victoria — media websites, social media and podcasts were scrambling to offer analysis on what motivated her. Newspaper headlines described Patterson, 50, as a coercive killer with narcissistic characteristics. ' Cold, mean and vicious,' read one. Strict Australian court reporting laws prohibit anything that might sway jurors in a trial. Some news outlets had saved up thousands of words awaiting the verdicts: scrutiny of Patterson's past work history, behavior and psyche. The coverage tried to explain why the mother of two meticulously planned the fatal lunch and lured three people she said she loved to their deaths. Any certain answer, for now, remains a mystery. No motive After a nine-week Supreme Court trial in the state of Victoria, it took the jury six days to convict Patterson. She was found guilty of murdering her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, by serving them a lunch of beef Wellington pastries laced with poisonous mushrooms. She was also convicted of attempting to murder Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson, who survived the meal at Patterson's home in the rural town of Leongatha in 2023. Patterson denied poisoning them deliberately and contended that she had no reason to murder her beloved, elderly in-laws. But the jury rejected her defense that the inclusion of toxic mushrooms in the meal was a terrible accident. Prosecutors failed to offer a motive for Patterson's crimes and weren't required to do so. 'People do different things for different reasons. Sometimes the reason is obvious enough to others,' prosecutor Nanette Rogers told the jury. 'At other times, the internal motivations are only known by the person themselves.' But Rogers gave hints. At one point, the prosecutor had Patterson read aloud scathing messages she'd sent which highlighted past friction with her in-laws and tension with her estranged husband, who had been invited to the lunch but didn't go. 'You had two faces,' Rogers said. Patterson denied it. 'She had a dilemma' With guilty verdicts but no proven reason why, Australian news outlets published avid speculation Tuesday. 'What on earth was Erin Patterson's motive?' The Australian newspaper's editorial director Claire Harvey asked in a column. Harvey pointed at rifts in the killer's relationship with her estranged husband. Chris Webster was the first medical doctor to speak to Patterson after her four lunch guests had been hospitalized and testified in the trial. He told reporters Tuesday that he became convinced she deliberately poisoned her victims when she lied about buying the foraged mushrooms she had served from a major supermarket chain. 'She had a dilemma and the solution that she chose is sociopathic,' Webster told Nine Network television. Displayed no emotion The outpouring of scorn for Patterson reflects a national obsession with the case and a widespread view that she wasn't a sympathetic figure. It was an opinion Australians were legally required not to express in the media or online before the trial ended to ensure a fair hearing. But newspapers now don't have to hold back. Under the headline 'Death Cap Stare,' The Age reported how the 'killer cook' didn't flinch as she learned her fate, but stared at the jury as they delivered their verdict. Melbourne's Herald Sun newspaper's front page screamed: 'COOKED,' labelling Patterson 'Evil Erin' and a 'Cold-Blooded Killer.' During the trial, Patterson chose to testify in her own defense, a tactic considered risky in the Australian justice system and one which most observers said didn't serve her well. She joked awkwardly at times and became combative with the prosecutor. Journalist John Ferguson, who won a Melbourne Press Club award for breaking the story of the fatal lunch, said Patterson often cried or came close to tears during her trial. But when she was convicted, she displayed no emotion, he noted. 'What the court got on Monday was the full Erin. Cold, mean and vicious,' Ferguson wrote in The Australian Tuesday. Drama series, documentary and books The verdicts also prompted an online frenzy among Australians, many of whom turned citizen detectives during the trial. By late Monday, posts about the verdicts on local Reddit pages had drawn thousands of comments laced with black humor, including memes, in-jokes and photographs taken at local supermarkets where pre-packaged beef Wellington meals were discounted. Fascination about the case will linger. A drama series, documentary and books are planned, all of them likely to attempt an answer to the question of what motivated Patterson. She faces life in prison, with sentencing to come at a later date. From then, Patterson's lawyers will have 28 days to appeal. —- Graham-McLay reported from Wellington, New Zealand.
