House GOP proposes nearly $300 billion cut to SNAP over the next decade
'All 610,000 could be impacted by the proposed cuts,' Mark Lynch with the Indy Hunger Network said.
According to Lynch, the federal government provides more than 80% of food assistance dollars: the largest percentage within the nation's food insecurity safety net.
'Every community center like we're in today, every church, synagogue, and mosque; everyone who has tried to help: that's less than 20% of the total money and goods that are in the food insecurity system,' Lynch said.
'It's a nearly 30% cut to the program over the next decade,' Rachel West with The Century Foundation said.
If that cut comes to fruition, West said the average Hoosier on SNAP could lose between $110-$120 in monthly benefits, assuming they're not kicked off the program altogether.
'It's nearly a full week of benefits,' West said. 'Indiana families are in a worse position than many American families if these benefits go cuts go into effect.'
According to West, the GOP spending bill would pass SNAP costs onto states — something never before seen in the program's 50-year history.
'If the House cuts that they're proposing come to fruition, it would be a $356 million additional cost to the state of Indiana,' Lynch said.
This comes as the state decided not to opt into the popular Sun Bucks program — a summer EBT program that would have cost the state $2.8 million to administer this year.
'The state didn't feel comfortable with $2.8 million? I don't know how they would feel anywhere close to comfortable with $356 million,' Lynch said.
'A state that just passed a budget that exceeded $46 billion is not a poor state,' State Sen. Fady Qaddoura (D-Indianapolis) said.
Sen. Qaddoura submitted a request to legislative leaders for a review of Indiana's food insecurity safety net, and what options the state has should these cuts take place.
'Especially as we are hearing discussions within the community of economists across the United States that we are on the verge of a recession, and if that is the case, then we need to act quickly to be sure that no one is left behind,' Sen. Qaddoura said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
12 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘Beautiful' or ‘Ugly,' Trump's big bill shapes the battle for House control in 2026 midterms
WASHINGTON — Debate over President Trump's sweeping budget-and-policy package is over on Capitol Hill. Now the argument goes national. From the Central Valley of California to Midwestern battlegrounds and suburban districts of the northeast, the new law already is shaping the 2026 midterm battle for control of the House of Representatives. The outcome will set the tone for Trump's final two years in the Oval Office. Democrats need a net gain of three House seats to break the GOP's chokehold on Washington and reestablish a power center to counter Trump. There's added pressure to flip the House given that midterm Senate contests are concentrated in Republican-leaning states, making it harder for Democrats to reclaim that chamber. As Republicans see it, they've now delivered broad tax cuts, an unprecedented investment in immigration enforcement and new restraints on social safety net programs. Democrats see a law that rolls back health insurance access and raises costs for middle-class Americans while cutting taxes mostly for the rich, curtailing green energy initiatives and restricting some workers' organizing rights. 'It represents the broken promise they made to the American people,' said Rep. Suzan DelBene, a Washington Democrat who chairs the party's House campaign arm. 'We're going to continue to hold Republicans accountable for this vote.' Whether voters see it that way will be determined on a district-by-district level, but the battle will be more intense in some places than others. Among the 435 House districts, only 69 contests were decided by less than 10 percentage points in the 2024 general election. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has so far identified 26 Democratic-held seats it must defend vigorously, along with 35 GOP-held seats it believes could be ripe to flip. Republicans' campaign arm, the National Republican Congressional Committee, has so far listed 18 GOP incumbents as priorities, plus two districts opened by retirements. There are a historically low number of so-called crossover districts: Only 13 Democrats represent districts Trump carried in 2024, while just three Republicans serve districts Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris carried. Both committees are busy recruiting challengers and open-seat candidates and more retirements could come, so the competitive map will evolve. Still, there are clusters of districts guaranteed to influence the national result. California, despite its clear lean to Democrats statewide, has at least nine House districts expected to be up for grabs: three in the Central Valley and six in southern California. Six are held by Democrats, three by the GOP. Pennsylvania features four districts that have been among the closest national House races for several consecutive cycles. They include a suburban Philadelphia seat represented by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, one of just two House Republicans to vote against Trump's bill and one of the three GOP lawmakers from a district Harris won. Fitzpatrick cited the Medicaid cuts. Vice President JD Vance plans on Wednesday to be in Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan's northwest Pennsylvania district to tout the GOP package. Bresnahan's seat is a top Democratic target. Iowa and Wisconsin, meanwhile, feature four contiguous GOP-held districts in farm-heavy regions where voters could be swayed by fallout from Trump's tariffs. Beyond bumper-sticker labels – Trump's preferred 'Big Beautiful Bill' versus Democrats' 'Big Ugly Bill' retort – the 900-page law is, in fact, an array of policies with varying impact. Democrats hammer Medicaid and food assistance cuts, some timed to take full effect only after the 2026 midterms, along with Republicans' refusal to extend tax credits to some people who obtained health insurance through the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law; 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps, also known as SNAP benefits. 'Folks will die here in Louisiana and in other parts of the country,' House Minority Leader Jeffries warned last week during a town hall in Republican Speaker Mike Johnson's home state of Louisiana. Jeffries singled out vulnerable Republicans like California Rep. David Valadao, who represents a heavily agricultural Central Valley district where more than half the population is eligible for the joint state-federal insurance program. California allows immigrants with legal status and those who are undocumented to qualify for Medicaid, so not all Medicaid recipients are voters. But the program helps finance the overall health care system, including nursing homes and hospitals. Republicans highlight the law's tightened work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. They argue it's a popular provision that will strengthen the program. 'I voted for this bill because it does preserve the Medicaid program for its intended recipients — children, pregnant women, the disabled, and elderly,' Valadao said. 'I know how important the program is for my constituents.' The law includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. It makes permanent existing rates and brackets approved during Trump's first term. Republicans and their allies have hammered vulnerable Democrats for 'raising costs' on American households by opposing the bill. GOP campaign aides point to the popularity of individual provisions: boosting the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 (some families at lower income levels would not get the full credit), new deductions on tip and overtime income and auto loans; and a new deduction for older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. 'Everyone will have more take home pay. They'll have more jobs and opportunity,' Johnson said in a Fox News Sunday interview. 'The economy will be doing better and we'll be able to point to that as the obvious result of what we did.' Democrats note that the biggest beneficiaries of Trump's tax code are wealthy Americans and corporations. Pairing that with safety net cuts, Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz concluded, 'The cruelty is the point.' Immigration, meanwhile, was Trump's strongest issue in 2024. NRCC aides say that will continue with the new law's investments in immigration enforcement. Democrats believe the Trump administration has overplayed its hand with its push for mass deportation. The president is a titanic variable. Democrats point to 2018, when they notched a 40-seat net gain in House seats to take control away from the GOP. This year, Democrats have enjoyed a double-digit swing in special elections around the country when compared to 2024 presidential results. Similar trends emerged in 2017 after Trump's 2016 victory. Democrats say that reflects voter discontent with Trump once he's actually in charge. Republicans answer that Trump's job approval remains higher at this point than in 2017. But the GOP's effort is further complicated by ongoing realignments: Since Trump's emergence, Democrats have gained affluent white voters -– like those in suburban swing districts -– while Trump has drawn more working-class voters across racial and ethnic groups. But Republicans face a stiffer challenge of replicating Trump's coalition in a midterm election without him on the ballot. Democrats, meanwhile, must corral voters who are not a threat to vote for Republicans but could stay home. Jeffries said he's determined not to let that happen: 'We're going to do everything we can until we end this national nightmare.' Barrow, Cooper and Brook write for the Associated Press. Cooper reported from Phoenix. Brook reported from New Orleans. AP reporters Michael Blood in Los Angeles and Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.
UPI
12 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump threatens 100% secondary tariffs on Russia if no peace deal reached
July 14 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump warned Russia Monday that it may face "severe tariffs" if a peace deal with Ukraine isn't negotiated. Trump said the United States would impose 100% secondary tariffs on nations that engage in trade with Moscow. "We're very, very unhappy with them," Trump said. "And we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days." Trump shared this during a meeting and press conference in the Oval Office Monday with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in which he also explained how American weapons will now head to Ukraine. "We've made a deal today where we are going to be sending them weapons and they're going to be paying for them," Trump said, reiterating what he had said Sunday to the press at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on the same subject. "The United States will not be having any payment made," Trump added. "We're not buying it but we will manufacture it and they're going to be paying for it." Trump also explained some weaponry, including Patriot missile systems, will be in Ukraine "very soon, within days," and that the arms would first arrive in NATO countries before being transferred to Ukraine. Rutte added that the process will run through NATO's system, and that Ukraine will receive what it requires. "It will mean that Ukraine can get its hands on really massive numbers of military equipment," he explained. "For air defense, missiles, ammunition, etc." "So if I were Vladimir Putin today," Rutte continued, "I would reconsider if I should take negotiations with Ukraine more seriously."
Miami Herald
42 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
How immigration issues can affect Florida real estate. ‘I can't live here.'
Some buyers have the upper hand in Florida, with rising inventory and developers offering sales incentives. But immigration issues also are affecting the real estate market, with uncertainty leading some property owners to sell their homes quickly to capitalize on rising prices. 'There are people leaving, calling me ... to put their house up for sale. 'I'm going back, I can't live here,' ' Gisela Rojas, a broker with Caissa Realty Investment, told el Nuevo Herald. Rojas, based in Orlando but also active in the Miami area said that many of the new listings she is handling are 'people who are returning to Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela and are looking for other places like Spain to start a new life.' 'I'm seeing it up close; most of them are facing immigration uncertainty,' said Rojas, who has a prominent social media presence and appears on Telemundo and Univision. 'They had already achieved the American dream without being residents, with a lot of effort.' Many immigrants bought homes by taking advantage of federal FHA loans, which allow for low down payments of around 3.5%, and other assistance for first-time buyers. They also became homeowners when mortgage interest rates were lower than the current just-under 7%. In most of Florida, a single person needs to earn around $80,000 to own a home, and in more expensive cities like Miami, Doral, Pembroke Pines and Weston, it's closer to $140,000. In addition to the high prices in Miami-Dade, especially compared to wages, buyers in the Miami metropolitan area, which includes Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, are paying mortgage rates above the national average. Mortgages in a buyer-friendly market Those with undefined immigration status who bought property a few years ago now have significant equity in their homes and are selling quickly to take advantage of that, Rojas said. Rojas points out that at a time when properties are staying on the market for 90 to 120 days, buyers can get a lot of benefits from sellers and also from developers, who are trying to drive sales of new construction. 'Builders are offering incentives. Yesterday I was able to put a contract on a new home for $600,000, and they gave the buyer $38,000 for closing costs,' Rojas said. Property appraisals are also coming in below the asking price, sometimes $30,000 less, giving buyers more leeway to persuade sellers to lower the price, he said. With the market in their favor, buyers should look for alternatives to finance. Those who can't qualify for an FHA loan can try for a conventional loan. Other programs require a buyer to have low or limited income, such as HomeReady Mortgage and Home Possible. Offers and incentives for renting in Florida The rental market is trending downward, especially in Central Florida around Orlando, Rojas said. But she hasn't noticed price declines in Miami and other high-demand cities, although there is increasing inventory. 'There are a lot of new condos for rent, and they offer incentives, like three months of free rent and no deposit required,' Rojas said. The real estate agent also sees opportunities for investors, who can buy properties at a discount in areas that will later appreciate in value, while also earning a return on the monthly rent. 'We're talking about two realities because foreign investors are arriving,' Rojas said, 'looking for people desperate to get out of their properties.'
