
Budget 2025: The 10 things you need to know, from pay equity savings to subsidising private schools
Let's cut to the chase. Going into Budget 2025, one of the key questions on the minds of analysts' was how much money the Government would save through its tightening up of the pay equity scheme and changes to how the Government approached the funded sector.
The answer? Well $12.8b previously set aside over the forecast period has been returned.
'Significant Budget savings have resulted from fixing Labour's flawed pay-equity regime and removing an assumption that the Government would fully-fund potential settlements involving non-Government employers,' Finance Minister Nicola Willis said.
'Taken together, these changes have increased the funding available for Budget 2025 by $11b operating over the forecast period and an additional $1.8b allocated for capital investment. This funding has been redirected to support investments in frontline health, education and other government services.'
Willis said funding would remain in contingency to settle future pay equity claims that will still be raised by government employees. Future pay equity settlements will only be awarded where pay discrepancies are proven to be the result of sex-based discrimination, she said.
Over the entire forecast period, $21.4b in operating savings are expected from 116 initiatives. Willis said that without these savings, new initiatives would need to be funded from extra taxes or more borrowing, both of which would put New Zealand's economic recovery at risk.
2. When do we get to surplus?
The Government has moved to using what it calls OBEGALx - essentially this is the traditional deficit or surplus measure, but excluding the revenue and expenses of ACC (because it has a massive deficit).
Under that measure, New Zealand will return a surplus by 2029, but the current deficit is expected to expand before it gets better.
The 2025 forecast is $10.2b in deficit, which is better than what was projected back in December at the half-yearly update ($12.9b). However, it's expected to worsen to a $12.1b deficit in 2026. While core Crown revenue is expected to pick up, partly reflecting economic activity, this is outpaced by the expected growth in core Crown expenses. Some of the factors affecting this are an ageing population lifting benefit expenses and borrowing costs rising.
In the 2029 year, the surplus is expected to be very thin - just $200 million. That's even slimmer than the $1.9b surplus forecast in December.
However, while getting to a surplus under OBEGALx is expected to be promoted by the Government, using the traditional OBEGAL measure, no surplus is found in the forecast years. In fact, New Zealand is still expected to have a $3b deficit in 2029.
3. Investment Boost
At the centre of the Government's Budget is a new tax incentive called Investment Boost. It allows for businesses to deduct 20% of the cost of new assets immediately from their taxable income on top of normal depreciation. In short, that means a lower tax bill for businesses buying equipment.
The Government expects this will lift levels of business investment, with longer-run benefits including increasing the level of GDP by 1%, capital stock by 1.6% and wages by 1.5% over the next 20 years. At least half of those benefits are expected over the next five years.
But it's costly. Projections show that over the forecast period it will cost more than $6.6b - about $1.7b per year.
'Investment Boost starts today and applies to new assets purchased in New Zealand as well as new and used assets imported from overseas,' said Willis.
'It includes commercial buildings, but excludes land, residential buildings and assets already in use in New Zealand.'
There's no cap on the value of eligible investments and all businesses can benefit.
'Now is the right time to support New Zealand's economic recovery by making it easier for businesses to invest, hire more workers, pay them better and contribute more to our long-term prosperity.'
4. Big KiwiSaver changes
The annual contributions the Government makes to KiwiSaver accounts will be halved. Currently, people saving in KiwiSaver can get $521 a year from the taxpayer. This has been cut to $260.72 a year.
For those earning $180,000 a year or more, there will be no Government contribution. These two changes are expected to save the Government $2.46b over four years.
Alongside those cuts, the Government will try to get KiwiSaver users to front up more money themselves by lifting the default rate of employees and matching employer KiwiSaver contributions from 3% to 4%, although people will be able to opt to stay at 3% if they choose.
The new rate is going to be phased in. So from next year it will go to 3.5% and then on April 2028, it will shift to 4%.
Younger people will also be able to contribute with eligibility extended to 16 and 17 year olds, who will get employer and Government contributions.
The Government is keen to personalise these changes and will be launching a calculator to show Kiwis what they will mean to people's savings over their lifetime.
'Putting these changes together, the KiwiSaver balances of employees contributing at the new 4% default rate will grow faster than they do at the current 3% default rate, providing a larger balance at age 65 and a larger deposit when people use KiwiSaver to buy their first home,' Willis said.
5. Families affected
Around 142,000 families will get an extra $14 a fortnight on average under the Government's latest Working for Families changes.
It's also changing the abatement threshold for eligible families from $42,700 to $44,900 and the rate from 27% to 27.5%.
'The current threshold has been unchanged since 2018, despite inflation and wage growth. This means the scheme has become less effective at supporting low and middle-income families,' said Social Development Minister Louise Upston.
She said families with incomes close to the new threshold will get greater additional payments (about $23 a fortnight).
The Government will partly fund changes by income testing the first year of the Best Start tax credit (as it is already does with for the second and third year).
Upston said payments would start to diminish for families with an income of $79,000 and cutting off entirely when a family earns more than $97,000 per year. The changes will affect families of children born before April 1 next year.
Willis said the move to means-test Best Start was to ensure money went to families who needed it the most.
6. Parents need to step up
The Government is sending a message to parents: Support your unemployed children, don't expect the state to.
Under changes being announced today, parents - rather than the Government - will be responsible for unemployed 18 and 19-year-olds who can't support themselves.
From July 2027, eligibility for Jobseeker Support and the Emergency Benefit will be tightened by introducing a parental assistance test for single 18- and 19-year-olds not in work or study. How much this test will be has yet to be disclosed.
'Young people can't expect to go automatically onto a benefit and parents must be ready to help. This change strengthens financial incentives to enter employment, education and training,' said Upston.
She said young people who do require support from the Ministry of Social Development will still be able to access it.
'For instance, in some cases 18- or 19-year-olds may not be able to rely on parental support. If they meet all other relevant eligibility criteria, they will be able to access some supports.'
People under 20 who are married, in a civil union, or in a de facto relationship will not be subject to a parental assistance test.
7. Longer medicine prescriptions
The duration of a prescription will be extended from three months to 12 months under a change in this year's Budget, expected to cost $91m over four years.
The move is predicted to save up to $105 per year in GP fees for patients who have historically had to get their doctor's approval to continue their prescriptions four times over a year.
Expected to be available in the first quarter of next year, prescribers would be able to issue prescriptions for up to 12 months 'if it is clinically appropriate and safe to do so', Health Minister Simeon Brown said.
The allocated funding would cover the cost of additional medicines, given it was likely more would be dispensed as a result of the change.
The funding was part of a $7b increase in Government spending on health in Budget 2025, which included major upgrades to Nelson Hospital and a new emergency department in Wellington Hospital.
8. Learning support
Budget 2025 is allocating around $2.5 billion in education including hundreds of millions in what the Government is lauding as the 'largest boost to learning support in a generation'.
Of that education total, about $380 million will fund additional learning support and early intervention programmes for students who need additional help or have high and complex needs.
Funding has also been set aside to help schools and kura access specialists like speech language therapists, educational psychologists and teacher aides focused on students with social, emotional, and neurodiverse needs.
But it comes at a cost. The Government will disestablish the Kahui Ako programme with its $375 million in funding over four years shift to the leaning support pot.
9. Specific industries benefit
There's a number of subsidies found in Budget 2025, including in private schools and tertiary education. There's 'co-investment' in gas fields and support for local journalism (though not for RNZ).
Budget 2025 invests $15.7 million over four years to increase the subsidy available for independent schools. It will see annual funding increase by 11% from $41.6 million to $46.2 million.
This is the first time the subsidy has increased since 2010 despite a growth in private schools' roll of more than 5000 students and inflation. In the future, funding for private school funding will automatically be considered annually to accommodate roll growth.
'Independent schools are an important part of New Zealand's education landscape, offering diversity and choice to parents,' said associate Education Minister David Seymour. 'If parents want to send their children to independent schools, they should be able to.'
'Often parents are making big sacrifices because they would prefer to send their child to an independent school. They pay just as much tax as anyone else, yet the money that comes back for their kids' education has effectively been getting smaller over the last 15 years.'
There's also $200 million being set aside over four years as a tagged contingency for co-investment in new gas fields. The details are still being worked through, but there is a willingness for the Crown to take a commercial stake of up to 10-15% in gas field developments that feed into the domestic market to address sovereign risk.
'Natural gas will continue to be critical in delivering secure and affordable energy for New Zealanders for at least the next 20 years. We are already feeling the pain of constrained supply,' said Resources Minister Shane Jones.
He said the Government would not sit on the sidelines and watch industries or manufacturing dwindle because of energy security concerns.
'Talk is cheap but having skin in the game as a cornerstone investor in production demonstrates our own commitment to our future gas needs. We are looking to take a stake in the development of the next Pohokura, Kupe, Mangahewa, or Turangi to accelerate the investment needed to support our energy system.'
Local journalism is expected to benefit through new funding for NZ on Air totalling $6.4 million over four years. That will go towards council, community and court reporting through programmes like Open Justice and Local Democracy Reporting.
But Radio New Zealand's funding will be cut. After it saw increases in recent years, Budget 2025 reduces RNZ's funding by about $18 million over four years - equivalent to 7% of its annual Crown operating Budget of $67 million.
'This saving initiative recognises that government-funded media must deliver the same efficiency and value-for-money as the rest of the public sector,' said Media Minister Paul Goldsmith.
'I expect RNZ to improve audience reach, trust, and transparency. I am confident the organisation can do so while operating in a period of tightened fiscal constraint.'
Budget 2025 puts an additional $398 million into tertiary education over four years, including to provide a 3% increase in tuition and training subsidies across many subjects from 2026. On top of that, there's 1.75% lift in subsidies for STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Maths) subjects.
10. Boot camps funded
More than $30m is being devoted to new military-style academies for recidivist youth, also known as boot camps, even though the Government is not proving its impact on re-offending.
About $33m over four years will be used to fund future boot camps, while a further $33m will be spent on safety and quality upgrades of the country's youth justice residences.
About $16m would go towards ensuring the Government's Young Serious Offender category - necessary in order to send youth to a boot camp - was adopted in legislation.
Oranga Tamariki is currently running a 12-month boot camp pilot in Palmerston North, set to conclude in July.
Many children's advocates have warned against military-themed programmes to address youth crime. There have been several re-offending incidents over the pilot, including the tragic death of one of the 10 participants in a car accident.
Oranga Tamariki has repeatedly refused to release information on how many participants had re-offended while in the programme, citing privacy concerns.
Do you have questions about the Budget? Ask our experts - business editor at large Liam Dann, senior political correspondent Audrey Young and Wellington business editor Jenee Tibshraeny - in a Herald Premium online Q&A here at nzherald.co.nz at 9.30am, Friday, May 23.
Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald Press Gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub Press Gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
Job cuts as part of Govt's polytech reform necessary
Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds says a reduction of 600 roles across different polytechnics is necessary to address unsustainable financial deficits as the Government dismantles Te Pūkenga. Ten polytechnics will be re-established from next year 2026, Simmonds announced last week, with differing fates for six other institutions. Simmonds told Q+A the net job losses were necessary to address unsustainable deficits. "It depends where they're coming from. When you've got institutions that are running $11.3 million deficits, you simply cannot carry on with that," she said. "You look at what's causing those deficits. In the WelTec/Whitireia situation, the arts centre here in the middle of Wellington, they were running at a ratio of one staff member to 5.6 students. No school gets that advantage. ADVERTISEMENT "You've got to have a look at where the staff are going to come from, and in some cases, it's just they shouldn't be operating at that ratio." She confirmed "there would be a reduction this year" of roles at some institutions. "There will be further redundancies." Minister confident changes will prove worth Treasury has previously suggested the reforms could risk repeating past failures, saying plans remained focused on supporting institutions' financial viability, "with no clear evidence of how the needs of learners and employers have been considered". Simmonds responded when read the advice: "Treasury gave a range of advice, which Cabinet looked at along with lots of other advice. "We've got evidence over the last five decades of polytechnics being able to be successful to reflect the needs of industries and their community, and so I relied on the history that we'd seen of polytechnics being able to do that successfully." ADVERTISEMENT Before entering politics, the Vocational Education Minister and National MP served as the chief executive of the Southern Institute of Technology. Treasury officials also posited the reforms could create a financial situation "similar, if not worse, than the situation faced by [educational institutions] pre-Te Pūkenga". Asked about assurances that further bailouts wouldn't be needed, she said the institutions "will be set up in the best possible way that they can be". "They will have their debt addressed. They will have their financial pathway to viability. It's then up to communities to make sure that the right people are in the governance roles and the right people are in the management roles, and that they integrate with the community." Simmonds was also pressed about whether some institutions gaining independence were in worse financial positions than those entering federation. "No, not a worse financial position, no. So, some of them will get to sustainability. They'll get to a surplus. In the time they'll take to get to a surplus, they have reserves that can cover them during that time." Labour says new model will drain regions ADVERTISEMENT In response to the Q+A interview, Labour's education spokesperson Shanan Halbert said, the whole point of Te Pūkenga was to make the polytechnic sector more financially viable and ensure more training opportunities and employment in our regions. "The changes announced today will only return the polytechnic sector to a model that was never financially viable – and the result will be major job losses in local areas." Halbert said the Government "could have simply addressed some of the issues" the existing model to avoid the "uncertainty this has had on staff and students". The changes to amalgamate polytechnics and institutes of technology were introduced by the previous Labour government. In her interview, Simmonds was also asked about delays to a ban on single-use plastics, how she had managed her environment portfolio, and on Gore's recent tap water issues. For the full interview, watch the video above Q+A with Jack Tame is made with the support of New Zealand On Air


Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Political cosyism behind 3rd medical school decision-making
On 21 May I was introduced to two new words (always a moment of light excitement for me) by Dr Bryce Edwards, Director of the newly established Integrity Institute which publishes regular Integrity Briefings. On this occasion the new word was 'chumocracy' and 'cosyism': Chumocracy and cosyism. He was referring to the work of Auckland University Professor of Economics Robert MacCulloch who was calling out 'soft corruption' by political and business elites in Aotearoa New Zealand. His focus included government, banks, big business and the rightwing 'thinktank' New Zealand Initiative. Such was the strength and persistence of the hostile response from these elites that he felt sufficiently pressured to close his website. The core of MacCulloch's argument is that New Zealand is run by a 'chumocracy' of elites who are connected by what he calls 'cosyism'. Third medical school announcement These were the words that I began to think about after absorbing the announcement by Health Minister Simeon Brown and Universities Minister Shane Reti early in the afternoon of 21 July that it was proceeding with the proposed third medical school at Waikato University: Official announcement. Later that the same day I was interviewed about the decision on Radio New Zealand's The Panel where my main focus was on the poor process which was likely to lead to an eventual poor outcome: Medical school decision based on poor process. Nearly two years earlier I had outlined my concerns about the Waikato University proposal in an article published by BusinessDesk (26 August 2023): Third medical school caution. What is the third medical school The new medical school is to provide a four-year medical degree for students who already are graduates with a non-medical degree to work as general practitioners (or as other rural doctors) in regional and rural areas. The medical degree at the existing two medical schools, Auckland and Otago, is five years. The advocated expectation is that the proposed Waikato Medical School will be graduating 120 doctors a year once it is up and running. With its opening scheduled for 2028 the first graduates should start working as general practitioners or other rural doctors at the earliest in 2037. This gap comprises both the time at the medical school and the time as resident (junior) doctors in training. Last year the Ministry of Health commissioned a report which advised that that Waikato's teaching model would be similar to the model in Wollongong University, south of Sydney. Reportedly 45% of the latter's graduates become GPs of which around 30% proceeded to work in rural areas. In 2017 the Auckland and Otago medical schools had proposed that they be allowed to jointly establish a new joint 'school of rural medicine'. However, while the previous Labour-led government and Ministry of Health was favourably disposed to this initiative, progress was understandably impeded by the Covid-19 pandemic. In a memo to then Health Minister Shane Reti in September last year, Treasury recommended that Auckland and Otago Medical Schools be asked to present a counter-factual argument to the Waikato proposal. However, it appears that no such invitation was made. Analysis by the Integrity Institute The best commentary I have seen on this decision has come from Bryce Edwards in another Integrity Briefing published the same day as the Government's announcement and after my The Panel interview (21 July): Costly case study in policy capture. Edwards also drew upon the excellent investigative work of Radio New Zealand's Guyan Espinar. Consistent with his above-mentioned piece on 'chumocracy' and 'cosyism' he describes the decision as: … not, at its core, a decision about health policy. It is a decision about political power, influence, and the erosion of good process. This project serves as a textbook case study of policy capture, where the interests of a well-connected institution, amplified by high-powered lobbyists, have overridden expert advice, fiscal prudence, and superior alternatives. Later in his piece he adds: This lack of transparency and due process is antithetical to good governance. The entire Waikato med school saga has unfolded via secret contracts, private lobbying meetings, and politically wired relationships – all largely hidden from the public until journalists and watchdogs pried it into the light. Backing this up Edwards draws upon many questionable process features including: Waikato Vice-Chancellor Professor Neil Quigley working 'hand-in-glove' in 'partisan coordination' with Shane Reti before the last election and promising the proposed school would be 'a 'present' to a future National government'. Waikato University helping pay for the National party's campaign announcement of the medical school plan (about $5,000). Government officials seeing 'red flags' in the proposal including alarm bells ringing from Treasury, the Tertiary Education Commission and the Ministry of Education warning of bloated costs, duplication risks and logistical hurdles. The use of two of the most well-connected lobbyists: initially former Labour senior adviser Neale Jones and more substantially former National cabinet minister Steven Joyce. Joyce's firm was paid about $1 million over three years by Waikato for 'consultancy' (le, leveraging his political influence). Questionable procurement in the way Waikato University hired Joyce leading to a public 'scolding' by the Auditor-General John Ryan. Ignoring the arguably better alternative of expanding the existing Auckland and Otago medical schools which were already running rural immersion schemes and satellite programs geared toward rural health. Edwards does not hold back: At its core, the Waikato medical school saga is an illustration of how not to make public policy. The process has failed every basic test of transparency, public accountability, and evidence-based decision-making. A public university and eager politicians cooked up a major spending initiative as a political favour, greased by lobbyists and implemented via dubious means. The normal checks and balances – open procurement, independent policy analysis, genuine stakeholder consultation – were subverted or ignored. It's the kind of deal that breeds public cynicism in politics, the sense that big decisions are made on behalf of the powerful or the connected, not the public. Further: By greenlighting this project in July 2025, ministers have signalled that political paybacks matter more than prudent spending. They have effectively rewarded a campaign of lobbying and pressure that sidestepped the usual contest of ideas. That sets a horrible precedent. It tells every other vested interest: hire the right insiders, make the right donations or deals, and you too can get the government to write a big cheque, officials' advice be damned. And: The Waikato medical school greenlight might be a political win for a few, but it's a loss for New Zealand's standards of governance. It undermines confidence that our health investments are made wisely and fairly. And it should prompt some soul-searching in Wellington: if this is how we make big decisions now, what does that say about who really runs the country? Unconvincing contrary views There have been contrary analyses supporting the Government's decision which I find unconvincing. Luke Malpass, Stuff Political, Business & Economics Editor and formerly holding a leadership role in the New Zealand Initiative expressed a negative view of current medical schools describing them emotively, but without substantiation, as a 'duopoly'. Writing in The Post (22 July; paywalled) in a flaky critique he dismisses those critical of the process, presumably including Bryce Edwards, as 'weird': Flaky rather than investigative. Two days later Waikato University ethics professor and philosopher Nick Algar wrote a paywalled opinion piece in The Post abstractly arguing that those critical of the Government's were guilty of 'sloppy thinking'. This reminded me of the expression 'pot calling the kettle black': Sloppy thinking in the debate over Waikato medical school | The Post Sloppy analysis of 'sloppy thinking'. He also reminded me of Oscar Wilde on philosophy although without the latter's famous and infamous wit: 'My philosophy? I'm always right and you are wrong.' The last word Let's leave the last word to the action of the Government in releasing its redacted 'cabinet business case' material at 6.45pm last Friday as reported by the Otago Daily Times the following day: Politically expedient timing of third medical school case. This timing has been a common practice of successive governments recognising that this is the most difficult time for media scrutiny before it is taken over by other news. If the difficult to substantiate claim of $50 million savings per year stood up to rigorous scrutiny it would have been released at a time convenient for media scrutiny. But 'chumocracy' and 'cosyism' necessitated otherwise. Ian Powell Otaihanga Second Opinion is a regular health systems blog in New Zealand. Ian Powell is the editor of the health systems blog 'Otaihanga Second Opinion.' He is also a columnist for New Zealand Doctor, occasional columnist for the Sunday Star Times, and contributor to the Victoria University hosted Democracy Project. For over 30 years , until December 2019, he was the Executive Director of Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, the union representing senior doctors and dentists in New Zealand.


NZ Herald
14 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Winston Peters immigration comments labelled ‘divisive rhetoric', ‘cynical politicking'
The remarks have not gone down well with two of the Opposition parties. The Greens' immigration spokesman Ricardo Menendez March said Peters' 'tired, decades-old playbook of blaming migrants' was a 'distraction' from other actions the coalition Government had taken, such as changes to pay equity rules and tightening emergency housing settings, which critics argue has led to an increase in homelessness. 'We aren't waiting for [Prime Minister Christopher] Luxon to show leadership and shut down this divisive rhetoric, which is why we are fighting to create 40,000 new jobs through a Greens Job Guarantee, build enough public housing and restore pay equity claims,' the Green MP told the Herald. 'We will also ensure every migrant worker is treated with respect and is free from exploitation.' The Greens' Ricardo Menéndez March was critical of the comments. Photo / Mark Mitchell Phil Twyford from Labour told Newstalk ZB it was 'cynical politicking' by Peters. 'Instead of focusing on the things that I think are important to New Zealanders, like the cost of living, they are resorting to imported culture wars that, frankly, New Zealand just doesn't need,' Twyford said. While he said there was always more to be done to improve the system, Twyford said New Zealand 'is completely reliant on immigration for our economy to work and for our society to work'. 'Migrants make a hugely positive contribution to this country. They enrich our communities. It's not helpful for politicians, for their own political purposes, to be trying to divide the community and turn one group of people against another.' Luxon on Sunday said it was important immigration was linked to 'our economic agenda and our ability to support immigration with good infrastructure'. 'Those are the three things that have to come together for any country, and certainly here in New Zealand as well,' the Prime Minister said. 'We have accelerated pathways for residency through the Green List for when we have got job shortages that we desperately need to get into our communities.' Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said immigration needed to be linked to the country's economic agenda. Photo / Mark Mitchell Peters told the Herald NZ First believed immigration should not be used as an 'excuse for our failure to train, skill and employ our own people'. That was one of the party's founding principles 32 years ago and remained 'as much a principle now as it was back then', Peters said. 'We, like wise countries, have always believed we should be training and employing our own people first and not use immigration as an excuse not to do that. That is still our plan.' He said New Zealand still didn't have strong enough initiatives to 'take people from secondary school into employment' and stressed the need for appropriate infrastructure to be in place to support migrants. 'There was a time when we were getting people from around the world putting down £10 to get here. They were coming to a job and a house and infrastructure, schooling, everything. Teachers and doctors and all sorts of people were coming here.' In the year to May 2025, there was a net migration gain of 15,000, driven by 140,000 arrivals and offset by 125,000 departures. The number of arrivals is down from a peak of roughly 235,000 in late 2023, but still above the long-term average of 119,000. However, due to the large number of departures, the net gain is below the average of nearly 28,000. Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.