NSW suburbs that outperform top super fund
NSW homeowners in over 200 suburbs could be building retirement wealth faster than their super fund, new research reveals.
Comparison site Finder has revealed how Australia's super funds compared to that of property price growth over the past ten years.
The research found that a shocking 23 per cent – equivalent to around 4.6 million people – said they didn't have enough money in their super fund or other investments to get by in retirement.
Australian Retirement Trust's super savings high growth fund had the highest returns, with a 8.79 per cent annual 10 year return, yet there were over 200 suburbs in NSW that out performed that.
Houses in Millfield, Lockhart, Brunswick Heads and Clareville were among the top performers, growing by an average of 11-16 per cent annually over the past 10 years.
MORE: 'They're off': $962m king's look into real estate woes
Retired publican lists $12m apartment
How you can save this end of financial year
The average 10-year performance across all super funds is 5.7 per cent a year, according to Finder, while Sydney's 10 year annual compound property growth rate was 6.4 per cent.
Finders money expert Richard Whitten said the more attention you give your superannuation now, the better off you'll be.
'It's truly a shame to reach retirement age only to find you have 'too little too late.' You can avoid this by taking proactive steps to engage with your super as soon as possible,' he said.
He added that to have a comfortable retirement, a single person might need around $595,000 in their super by 67.
'Many Australians are still well below the amounts suggested for a comfortable retirement, making proactive engagement even more critical.'
Ben Kingsley, managing director of Empower Wealth Advisory and co-author of 'How to retire on $3,000 a week,' said your return on investment could be higher with property, but warned there were always risks involved.
'If you're going to invest in property you don't want to be speculating, you want to be investing for the decades, not the short period of time,' he said.
MORE: Singles face impossible property reality
'One of the advantages of investing in property is it isn't locked away until you're in your 60s. It gives you the ability to leverage from those returns, to accelerate some growth in further returns – use the proceeds or equity to add to your initial property portfolio, which is something to consider.'
'(Super) is a sort of set and forget for most Australians, with property when you do have ownership you have control, you can tinker with the property itself you can add value to the property,' he added.
He noted it was important to diversify when it came to setting up for retirement.
'You can't save your way to retirement, you need to put your money to work, whether that's additional contributions to super, or investing in shares or property, you're better off starting to think about it in your 30s,' he said.
Canstar's director of data insights, Sally Tindall, said Aussie's shouldn't be choosing between a healthy super amount and a property, but should aim to invest in both.
'It comes down to personal preference, but open your mind to achieving both. Don't put all your eggs in one basket,' she said.
'It's not a simple comparison and there's a multitude of factors, there's tax implications on both sides, and whether you're purchasing as an investor or an owner-occupier,' she said.
Recent Labor government tax changes, which apply an additional 15 per cent tax on earnings for super balances exceeding $3 million, would affect an estimated 80,000 Australians (0.5% of super account holders).
MORE: Rare backyard find that can kill you
'It will be interesting to see how that plays out over time, as the government has said that $3m won't be indexed, which could then start to impact many more people in many years to come as the number of people with that sum starts to increase, so that's another factor in the equation.'
With the super guarantee increasing to 12 per cent on July 1, Ms Tindall said this may encourage some people to take the property route, knowing their employee is contributing more to their super.
'It's also not just the super vs. mortgage, there are plenty of other things like shares people could be putting their money into. It's important to understand what the mix is and understand the pros and cons and the sacrifice you might have to make, as well as the benefits you can get from each one.'
MORE: New builds vanish amid loan slump
TOP 20 NSW GROWTH SUBURBS OVER 10 YEAR AVERAGE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
23 minutes ago
- ABC News
When is tax time? When is my tax return due? Will I get a refund?
A new financial year begins tomorrow, meaning it's time to start thinking about your tax return. Some people look towards this time with dread, while those who bank on getting a tax refund may be rubbing their hands together with glee. Whatever the motivation, many of us just want to get it over and done with. Here's what you need to know before you start. Each new financial year starts on July 1 — which is tomorrow. It'll be the 2025-26 financial year. Technically, you can lodge your tax return for the 2024-25 financial year from tomorrow. But experts reckon it's best not to rush into it. "Wait until the end of July," Australian Taxation Office (ATO) assistant commissioner Rob Thomson says. "We'll have pre-filled a lot of the information in for you, [which] makes it easier to get it right the first time," Mr Thomson says. This might include your earnings for the last financial year from your employment and interest you've earned from your bank account. That depends on whether you're doing it yourself or if you're going through an accountant. If you're lodging your tax return yourself, it's due October 31. But if you're going through an accountant, you may get more time. "You need to make sure that you are on their books by October 31," an ATO spokesperson said. "You should contact your tax agent to discuss by when you will need to lodge your return." If you've already got a tax file number, you can find it in the federal government's myGov app if you've linked your account to the ATO. Tap the "Services" icon on the bottom right-hand corner and click the "Australian Taxation Office" link. The next screen that pops up should have a "Find my TFN" icon to press. But you can also find it on your tax returns from previous years, your pay slips or an account statement from your super fund. If you earned less than $70,000, you may be eligible for a free service called Tax Help. The program matches people up with accredited volunteers who help them lodge their tax returns online. You can find out more about this free service on the ATO's website. You can fix it after lodging. "If you forgot to report any income, capital gains or deductions, don't worry," the ATO said on social media. "You generally have up to two years to amend your tax return." That depends on your personal circumstances. You only get money from the ATO if you've paid more tax than you should have throughout the year. This money is called a tax refund. But if you've paid the right amount of tax, you won't get any money back from the ATO. And it's possible that your tax assessment will say you actually need to pay the ATO money and you'll end up with a tax bill. If that's the case, there are options available to you if you can't afford to pay your bill off in one go — this ATO website lists the ways you can get help coping with a bill. That depends on how you lodge your tax return. Here's how long the ATO says it generally takes to process tax returns: Once the ATO processes your return, you'll get what's called a notice of assessment. If you're entitled to a refund and you have provided the ATO with your bank details, that money will be transferred to your bank account. "We usually see payment processing times of around three business days from when we issue the notice of assessment," an ATO spokesperson said. "This timing is dependent on your bank and how long they take to process that into your account." But if you've gone via an agent and didn't pay an up-front fee, it might take longer. That's because some agents will instruct the ATO to pay the refund into their account, when they'll deduct their fee and then pass on the rest of the money to you. If you haven't given the ATO your bank details and are expecting your refund via cheque, you'll probably be affected by the new rules that came into effect in January. Those rules state that the ATO can hold on to your refund for up to 90 days while they contact you, asking for your bank details. If you give them your bank details — or your accountant's — the ATO will transfer your refund into that account. Otherwise, if you don't give the ATO your bank details within those 90 days, you'll eventually be sent a cheque. Yes. But it could take much, much longer this year because of the new 90-day rule we talked about above. This is part of the federal government's plan to phase out cheques. The ATO will stop issuing refunds via cheque in 2028. Its preferred method of paying out refunds is via what's called an electronic funds transfer (EFT) — which means putting the money directly into your bank account. "EFT payments are faster and more secure than cheques," the ATO's website says. But, in order to do this, the ATO needs your bank details so it can specify which account to put that money into. "We'll only use these account details to deposit refunds and ATO-held super," the ATO says. "We don't use them for direct debits."
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Pay rise for key election staff amid concerns over upcoming WA local government elections
WA taxpayers have spent nearly a quarter of a million dollars topping up the pay of key state election staff in the wake of the problem-plagued March poll. It comes after the ABC last week revealed the state electoral commission's top ranks had been further depleted ahead of the looming local government elections. The March state election was beset by a range of problems, with reports of long lines at polling places and some running out of ballot papers. Amid the ongoing fallout, Electoral Commissioner Robert Kennedy went on extended leave, with Department of Water and Environmental Regulation deputy director Dennis O'Reilly brought in to act in the role in late May. After his appointment, it's understood Mr O'Reilly reviewed the pay for returning officers, who are appointed to manage the election in each electorate. "It was determined that some tasks and responsibilities were more complex than initially scoped," a spokesperson told the ABC. "All 59 districts in the state were reclassified, and a higher payment fee applied as a result. The total cost of the redetermination was $240,547." In a letter to returning officers seen by the ABC, Mr O'Reilly wrote he understood "the work undertaken by returning officers exceeded initial expectations". "There were responsibilities not adequately scoped by the Western Australian Electoral Commission when determining the remuneration package for each district," he wrote. "As part of the preparations for the 2029 state election, the commission will be reviewing its methodology for determining returning officer payment fees. "Returning officers play a crucial role in the electoral process, and it is important that their contributions are appropriately acknowledged and compensated." Budget papers revealed the election cost $4 million more to execute than had been budgeted. The average cost per elector of running the election also rose significantly from $14.43 for the 2021 election to $23.70 for the 2025 election. An independent inquiry into what went wrong and why the commission decided to outsource much of the election's staffing to a private company recently handed its report to the government. On Tuesday, Premier Roger Cook told parliament the report would be reviewed by the State Solicitor's Office before being released publicly. "I know that some returning officers were concerned that because of some of the issues they faced in their electorate, which are probably to do with some of those issues that the special inquiry is looking into, they probably did more work than they thought they were going to," Electoral Affairs Minister David Michael told parliament when asked about the top-up payments. Last week the ABC revealed that in addition to Mr Kennedy being on extended leave, Deputy Electoral Commissioner Courtney Barron will take leave from the end of this month and is not expected to return, while election operations director Shani Wood has resigned from her role. It means the commission is now without half of the leadership team it had on polling day at the state election. The Road Safety Commission's director of innovation and technology, Rebecca Hamilton, was this week appointed to act as deputy electoral commissioner from next month. The lack of experienced high-level leadership raises concerns about the commission's ability to run local government elections in October. Mr Michael told parliament on Thursday additional staff would be brought in to ensure those elections ran smoothly. "The acting electoral commissioner has arranged for two senior officers from the Australian Electoral Commission to join the election operations team as a chief operating officer and a project manager," he said. "Subject matter experts" from the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries would also be brought in to help. Shadow Electoral Affairs Minister Shane Love said it was "deeply concerning" taxpayers had to fork out an extra $250,000 on top of what they already paid to PersolKelly, which is the labour hire company that election staffing was outsourced to. "The minister for electoral affairs confirmed in question time this week that the recent payments were made in response to the stress and dysfunction returning officers endured, an extraordinary admission of just how badly the process failed. "The opposition will be demanding answers during budget estimates this week."
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Hot Money Monday: Treasurers swap term deposits for Bitcoin as ASX firms dive in
More and more corporate treasuries are buying Bitcoin MicroStrategy's $63bn outmuscles nations Aussie minnows LOC and OPL dive in last week Corporate treasury chiefs used to fret about overnight rates and term deposit ladders; now they're sneaking a look at the Bitcoin price before the markets open. From Texas to Tokyo, listed companies are carving out room on the balance sheet for BTC, pitching it as digital gold or, at the very least, a way to dodge the fallout in an era of central bank money-printing. Michael Saylor's rebadged MicroStrategy sits at the top of the leaderboard with roughly 592,345 BTC (about $63 billion) after its latest nibble last week, a hoard bigger than the treasuries of many nation-states. The case for the trade sounds simple: Bitcoin's has a fixed supply of 21 million, making it a hedge against inflation and central-bank moves. It's also highly liquid, you hold it outright, and over any recent five-year stretch, BTC has pretty much thumped every mainstream asset class. But the flip side is harder to ignore. Price swings north of 50% in a single quarter can blow a hole in reported earnings. VanEck's digital-assets boss Matthew Sigel warned that relentless equity raisings to fund BTC buys can cross 'from strategy into shareholder harm' once a stock trades near net-asset value. The argument is that when a share price drifts down to roughly its net-asset value, any fresh equity deal brings in cash at little or no premium. Existing holders don't get the usual uplift; instead their slice of the company simply shrinks while the asset base stays more or less the same. 'Once you are trading at net asset value, shareholder dilution is no longer strategic. It's erosion,' said Sigel. That risk calculus explains why the Silicon Valley heavyweights keep ghosting the idea. At Meta's AGM four weeks ago, a proposal to shift even a slice of its US$72 billion cash pile into Bitcoin was torched: just 3.92 million votes for, nearly 5 billion against. Amazon and Microsoft have also fielded, and sunk, similar motions. Boards say the coin's volatility clashes with predictable cash-flow modelling and, frankly, they have enough fights already on the AI and metaverse fronts. ASX firms buying Bitcoins last week Smaller outfits are also willing to put their toes in the crypto surf. Japan's Metaplanet has just galloped past Tesla after scooping up another 1234 BTC, lifting its stash to 12,345 coins and elbowing Elon out of the global top five. Last week, that template washed up on Australia's shores in style. Locate Technologies (ASX:LOC), the last-mile delivery software minnow better known for plotting courier routes than investment theses, raised $239,000 via its at-the-market facility. It then promptly converted the bulk of the funds into 4 BTC at an average $156,560 a pop, taking its running tally to just over ten coins. LOC's stock price doubled in the days that followed; proof, at least for now, that markets love a bold narrative. Hot on its heels, clinical AI firm Opyl (ASX:OPL) announced on Thursday it had also picked up about two Bitcoin for $330,000 via DigitalX's (ASX:DCC) ETF. The company enlisted poker-pro-turned-crypto-whale Tony G as adviser, and secured a $2 million loan facility against the coin, giving itself a back-door war-chest without hitting shareholders for fresh equity. It's a pint-sized position compared with the Saylor playbook, but the symbolism is loud. Even niche life-science players seem to think holding a bit of digital gold could help offset future AI infrastructure costs. 'I urge our investors to take the time to fully understand these digital assets," said Tony G. 'With increasing endorsement by institutions and governments worldwide, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are emerging as a validated and forward-looking asset class.'
