Iron dome: How useful is Israel's shield?
America's intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict has not stopped missile exchanges and defence analysts remain agog with how Israel's 'iron dome' has held up as a shield. It hasn't proven foolproof, but Israel claims it has neutralized over 80% of Iran's projectiles.
Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | The US blasts in: A forever war in Iran?
This dome has three layers. The first, which foiled attacks from Gaza and Lebanon, uses relatively cheap interceptors for short-range volleys. But longer-range Iranian missiles have forced the use of its David's Sling and Arrow systems to intercept cruise and ballistic missile onslaughts with interceptors that cost over $1 million a pop.
Also Read: Donald Trump's war dilemma: Should America put boots on the ground in Iran or not?
While Iran's fusillades have flagged, rough estimates suggest Israel's shield ran up a nightly ammunition bill that peaked at $300 million. A high strike rate may make this seem worthwhile. Notably, Arrow can stop nukes too.
Also Read: Israel-Iran conflict: Echoes of history haunt West Asia
Yet, let's not forget why the US shelved its 'Star Wars' plan of the 1980s for a US-wide shield against nukes. While it would've been hugely costly to set up, it could not guarantee that no nuclear warhead would ever get through; no dome could be doom-proof. This drove home the point that, ultimately, peace via diplomacy is a country's only real security.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Says He Doesn't Expect to Extend July 9 Tariff Deadline
President Donald Trump said he doesn't think he'll need to extend the July 9 trade deadline he has imposed on countries to secure deals with the US to avoid higher tariffs. 'I don't think I'll need to,' he said in an interview on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo that was taped Friday. He then added, 'I could, no big deal.' The comments follow Trump's remarks on Friday that the administration could do 'whatever we want' with the deadline, including extending it or making it shorter. 'I'd like to make it shorter. I'd like to just send letters out to everybody, 'Congratulations, you're paying 25%,'' he told reporters Friday in a press briefing. Trump and his advisers earlier this year laid out ambitious plans for a negotiating period, and have said repeatedly they're in talks with dozens of trading partners on reducing trade deficits and eliminating barriers. On Friday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cast doubt on the timeline, saying 'we have countries approaching us with very good deals' but they all might not be finished by the date when Trump's April 2 country-based tariffs are set to kick back in. 'If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18 — there are another important 20 relationships — then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day,' Bessent said on Fox Business. It's also unclear how comprehensive the trade deals the administration is hoping to secure will be. The pact with the UK that Trump has touted as comprehensive still leaves critical points unresolved, and the recently inked China accord leaves questions unanswered with regard to fentanyl trafficking and US exporters' access to Chinese markets. Trump has suggested India is one nation that could be close to finalizing a deal. A team of Indian trade officials held meetings with officials in Washington last week. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Winners and losers in the Israel-Iran-US conflict
The destructive 12-day aerial duel between Iran and Israel may have paused, but the region is far from being peaceful. Normalcy is elusive, and the calm is tenuous. Israel will go for general elections next year and a new wave of muscular nationalism can divert people's attention from the exhausting campaign in Gaza (AP) The reason for such a cautious, albeit pessimistic outlook is the statements carelessly dished out by two of the three players of the West Asian roulette — US President Donald Trump and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. On Friday, Trump said that if Iran continues its uranium enrichment programme, then America will bomb again. A day before, Khamenei vowed in front of his people that if America attacks Iran again, it should be prepared to face severe punishment. Iran is now bent on pursuing its nuclear armament programme. Before the attack, Tel Aviv claimed Iran would soon make a nuclear bomb, and it would become a permanent threat to Israel's existence. Another reason given was that the Khamenei regime is not only unpopular, but is full of terrorists filled with religious hatred under the garb of just rule. America also jumped into the conflict when there was no moral or strategic rationale for it to intervene. Experts are now asking what the 12-day war achieved. Unconfirmed reports suggest that Iran still has 400 kilograms of enriched uranium, which can be converted into nuclear weapons in a few weeks. As for Khamenei, he's firmly in the saddle and has chosen his successor. A barrage of claims of victory and defeat have been unleashed from both sides. However, nobody knows the real extent to which each country has suffered or gained. Was Israel, the aggressor in this case, able to achieve its stated aims? Could Iran extract revenge in its counter-attacks? Why did America enter this conflict when it didn't even have a modicum of excuse? Iran's nuclear programme was tightly controlled under the terms and conditions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). To strengthen it further, it was in talks with the US. The next round of talks was proposed just two days after the day of the attack. Israel attacked, claiming that it had already taken the US into confidence. Is this the reason why the US intervened to bring this war to a swift and decisive end? Why did it use stealth bombers like the B-2 and huge GBU-57 bombs? The harsh truth is that this war had no moral basis. If you have any doubts, look at the facts. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has repeatedly said that Iran has not yet acquired the capability to make a nuclear bomb. However, that did not deter Israel and America from acting against Iran. It means something else is at play. Could it be that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is becoming increasingly unpopular at home due to the endless disaster in Gaza, orchestrated the conflict for a fresh lease of life in office? Israel will go for general elections next year and a new wave of muscular nationalism can divert people's attention from the exhausting campaign in Gaza. It seems Netanyahu has succeeded in his aim for the time being. Part of the blame lies with Iran, too. After the Islamic Revolution, it installed a clock at Tehran's main square displaying a countdown to the end of Israel. The time was ticking every moment. Who would tolerate such senseless hatred? However, the conflict has once again laid bare America's deceit. In the 1980s, Iran and Iraq were locked in a long, bloody border conflict that lasted for eight years. At that time, America and its allies, the western countries, sided with Iraq and armed it to the teeth. Vaults of destructive weapons were opened for Saddam Hussein till he delivered on bleeding Iran. Later, what America did to Iraq during the two Gulf wars is well known. Before attacking Iraq for the second time, the US claimed that Baghdad had weapons of mass destruction. After the removal of Saddam Hussein, international inspectors and the media found it to be a grand lie; neither did Iraq possess such weapons nor was it trying to make them. The same disinformation playbook is playing out in the case of Iran today. Will this stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons? Certainly not. Tehran has voted to quit NPT and has publicly vowed to continue its nuclear programme. If military operations against Iran resume, the chances are that other Gulf countries would be sucked into it. The bombs that Iran dropped on American bases in Qatar and Iraq on Monday night were not just an attack on America but also on the sovereignty of those countries. Qatar even vowed revenge. The US has eight military bases in this region, and all of them are within the range of Iranian missiles. Another important aspect is the attitude of China and Russia. While openly protesting in sharp language, both were secretly working towards a ceasefire. A day before Trump announced a ceasefire, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi was in Moscow. He had a long chat with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, and met President Vladimir Putin. It would be better if China, Russia, and the US keep the situation under control. But fresh statements by Khamenei and Trump are making global leaders and the population apprehensive. It looks certain that after Gaza and Ukraine, Iran will be a simmering issue for some time to come. Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan. The views expressed are personal.
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran asks UN to hold US, Israel accountable for war; demands compensation
Iran on Sunday submitted a formal request to the United Nations, calling on the Security Council to hold Israel and the United States responsible for the recent 12-day conflict between Tel Aviv and Tehran. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi put the demands in a letter to the UN secretary-general.(AFP) Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi also demanded that both countries pay compensation and reparations to Iran. These demands were outlined in a letter addressed to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. 'We officially request hereby that the Security Council recognise the Israeli regime and the United States as the initiators of the act of aggression and acknowledge their subsequent responsibility, including the payment of compensation and reparations,' the letter read. A surprise Israeli strike on June 13 killed several senior Iranian military and nuclear figures, roiling global markets and escalating fears of a broader regional war. The conflict lasted 12 days, with the US also entering briefly as it bombed three key Iranian nuclear sites, Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow. US President Donald Trump claimed the strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's atomic infrastructure, though a report from his own intelligence differed. A ceasefire agreement was reached on June 24, mediated by Qatar and the US. Iran sceptical about the ceasefire holding Both Iran and Israel have exchanged accusations of ceasefire violations, even as the truce has largely held so far. Iran says 627 people have been killed so far in Israeli attacks, while Israeli emergency services have reported 28 dead and more than 1,300 injured in Iranian strikes. But on Sunday, Tehran said it had serious doubts about the ceasefire holding for long. 'We have serious doubts about the enemy's commitment to its obligations, including the ceasefire. We are prepared to deliver a firm response if aggression is repeated,' Fars News Agency quoted Iran's armed forces chief of staff, Abdolrahim Mousavi, as saying. "We did not start the war, but we have responded to the aggressor with all our power,' he added.
