SNAP Recipients Get Extra Money This Month in California
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients in California will be getting some extra money this month.
Why It Matters
More than 40 million low-income Americans benefit from SNAP, which allows them to use EBT cards on qualifying food purchases at their local grocery stores.
During the summer, SNAP recipients may face additional financial hardship as children no longer benefit from free or reduced lunch that's offered at public schools. The extra money in California's SNAP benefits this month could mark the difference between a child going hungry or not.
What To Know
Roughly 4 million California children are set to receive automatic "SUN Bucks" food benefits via an EBT card that will be mailed out later this month. The food benefits are an extra $120, with additional grocery funds going out in monthly $40 installments through the fall.
"We are proud that California was one of the first states in the nation to launch this new federal program last year, which is helping families in need across California," California Department of Social Services (CDSS) Director Jennifer Troia said in a statement. "Last year, nearly $500 million in food purchases were made using SUN Bucks food benefits by families and caregivers in California."
Households are automatically enrolled if their child receives free or reduced-price school meals or if the family already receives CalFresh, California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids or Medi-Cal benefits. Children in foster care, experiencing homelessness, or part of a migrant family are also automatically enrolled.
Children who aren't automatically enrolled can apply by submitting a school mail application or Universal Benefits Application to their school by September 2.
Fruit and vegetables are seen at a Walmart supermarket in Houston on May 15.
Fruit and vegetables are seen at a Walmart supermarket in Houston on May 15.
RONALDO SCHEMIDT/AFP via Getty Images
What People Are Saying
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "While most students look forward to summer break, for some, the period is not without hardships. For some children, accessibility to affordable food may present problems. Under SNAP, California has developed a system for the summer months where SUN bucks are issued to help eligible families cover the costs of some food purchases."
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "This will definitely help, although you are only providing $6/day to feed an eligible individual based on a 20/day month. Many won't see this as enough but it definitely helps."
What Happens Next?
All "SUN Bucks" cards should be sent by the end of July. All SUN Bucks funds must be used within 122 days.
"This extra funding ensures children who receive free or reduced meals during the school year can be provided for at the dinner table during the months when classes aren't in session," Beene said. "California is not alone in this, as other states have attempted similar programs to provide meals to the most vulnerable during the summer months. It's a good trend."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Research Shows that Snapchat Delivers Better Results for E-commerce Brands
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. Snapchat has shared some new data on the performance of e-commerce brands in the app, and how Snap ads can help to drive purchase activity. In order to glean more insight on this element, Snapchat recently commissioned Triple Whale to conduct a study of 20,000 Snap advertisers, with a cumulative $3 billion ad spend, in order to get a better understanding of how Snap ads are performing for online retailers. The results? As per Snap: 'The research reveals that despite being a smaller platform by spend share, Snapchat achieved a 7.5% ROAS improvement while most platforms declined. And, for this cohort of advertisers, Snapchat had the lowest CPA across all platforms.' So better bang for your buck than other apps, despite Snap being a smaller platform, in terms of overall reach. The data also showed that apparel advertisers saw the highest ROAS in the app, with visual storytelling being the key driver of Snapchat engagement. Expanded Snap data further indicates that: 77% of Snapchatters agree that visual search helps find apparel items faster and easier, compared to only 50% of non-Snapchatters. Over 80% of Snapchatters say that social is a primary way to keep up with the latest fashion trends. So if you're looking to sell fashion items, Snapchat should be a key consideration, especially if you're looking to reach a younger audience. Though presentation remains key, and you do need to familiarize yourself with what drives engagement on Snap specifically, in order to maximize promotional performance. Or you can look to partner with a Snap creator, and use their platform nous to drive more responsive, engaging campaigns. However you go about it, the data shows that e-commerce brands, and fashion brands in particular, should be considering Snapchat promotions in their content mix. Worth factoring into your end-of-year campaign planning. You can read more from Snapchat's latest report here. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Retail sales jumped more than expected last month
Americans are still opening their wallets, even as President Donald Trump's tariffs start to take a bite. Retail sales rose 0.6% in June from the prior month, the Commerce Department said Thursday, rebounding from the steep 0.9% decline in May. June's number was much stronger than the 0.2% gain economists projected in a FactSet poll. Spending climbed across categories last month, including at car dealerships, which saw one of the biggest monthly increases. Those sales were up a robust 1.2% in June. However, the figures aren't adjusted for inflation, and some goods already began to get more expensive because of tariffs last month. After factoring in June's 0.3% increase in consumer prices, retail sales were up a more modest 0.3%. Retail sales are adjusted for seasonal swings. Still, there were some signs in the latest retail spending report that Americans aren't quite yet cutting back. Sales at restaurants and bars — often seen as a barometer of discretionary spending — rose a solid 0.6% in June. Whenever consumers cut back, spending on eating out and alcoholic drinks is usually first on the chopping block. A measure of retail spending that strips out sales at gas stations, car dealerships and of building materials — known as the 'control group,' which provides a clearer picture of spending — was up 0.5% in June, also beating economists' expectations. US stocks were slightly higher on Thursday. The Dow opened lower before jumping higher by 75 points, or 0.17%. The S&P 500 was flat and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite gained 0.1%. Investors and economic policymakers are keeping a close eye on whether Americans continue to spend as Trump's tariffs begin to push up prices, since consumer spending powers about two-thirds of the US economy. 'Don't count the American consumer out yet,' Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, wrote in commentary issued Thursday. 'There's still a lot of trepidation about tariffs and likely price hikes, but consumers are willing to buy if they feel they can get a good deal.' Businesses say spending has weakened only slightly Consumer spending was 'softening slightly overall' in early July, according to businesses across the country surveyed by the Federal Reserve for its latest 'Beige Book' report. The survey, released Wednesday, was conducted in the weeks leading up to July 7, and most businesses indicated that consumers are seeking bargains these days. For example, a few stores in the Richmond Fed's district said that 'advertised discounts helped drive up foot traffic and sales.' 'There were robust overall sales gains at discount stores and warehouse clubs, while spending on apparel and footwear softened noticeably,' the report said, referring to trends in the Chicago Fed's district. But not every retailer is seeing tepid spending. A department store chain in the Northeast said that there were 'improving sales, with strong sales in denim and fine jewelry.' Restaurant visits in New York City, especially in Brooklyn, 'have continued to pick up,' the report said. A resilient labor market bodes well for spending Unemployment remains relatively low, layoffs aren't picking up, and employers have continued to add jobs at a steady pace — all of which could bode well for consumer spending. A separate report from the Labor Department released Thursday showed that new applications for unemployment benefits in the week ending July 12, the fifth consecutive weekly decline, to 221,000. That's the lowest level since mid-April and a historically low level. In June, employers added 147,000 jobs as the unemployment rate dipped to 4.1% from 4.2%, Labor Department figures show, both beating economists expectations, according to their estimates on FactSet. However, for workers without a job, today's US labor market is anything but exceptional. Ongoing worker filings for jobless benefits — those who have received payments for more than one week — edged higher in the week ending July 5, to 1.956 million. That's slightly below a 3.7-year peak reached in mid-June. 'Unemployed workers are finding it difficult to find new jobs in a labor market where hiring is slow,' Nancy Vanden Houten, lead economist at Oxford Economics, wrote in an analyst note Thursday. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Dallas laps New York City in the housing race — fueling the Texas boom
A straightforward description of New York City's affordable-housing lottery system sounds like one of Ronald Reagan's Soviet jokes. The program, which distributes below-market housing to randomly selected New Yorkers, received almost 6 million applications last year for just 10,000 available units — a process so unlikely to yield an apartment that it seems more like a Powerball drawing than a real policy. While New York's bureaucracy administers the housing Hunger Games, Dallas's skyline is dotted with cranes. Advertisement Amid a surge in jobs and residents, Dallas has kept rents affordable and quietly cemented its status as a premier destination for ambitious Americans. The contrast could not be starker — or more instructive. With greater Dallas on track to surpass the tristate area in economic might by the turn of the century, it's up to Gotham to deregulate its housing market if it wants to remain the nation's leading city. Advertisement New York's affordable-housing lottery is overseen by the Department of Housing Preservation and Development. It's one among numerous dubious initiatives to combat Gotham's cost-of-living crisis. Most of the lottery's 'affordable' units require that applicants earn incomes well above those of the working class. Only the most lucky and persistent applicants ever win, and while their prize often includes a luxury tower with commendable amenities, rents — which start at $2,490 — still consume a large chunk of their paychecks. Advertisement The lottery is a symptom of Gotham's failure to build new housing. The city's zoning laws, environmental reviews and endless layers of bureaucracy have made new construction difficult. Developers must navigate a maze of restrictions, community board approvals and political horse-trading just to break ground. The city, which already had a chronic housing shortage, effectively rations the remaining units to the ultra-wealthy or ultra-lucky. Advertisement By contrast, Greater Dallas, including neighboring Fort Worth, is booming. The region's pro-growth and pro-housing policies have it on track to be the only US metropolitan area to house two cities with populations over 1 million in the next five years. New York apologists will claim that Gotham, with its density and history, could never replicate Dallas' model. New York's obstacle, however, is not geography but political will. States and cities with the most restrictive zoning and land-use rules also have the highest housing prices, while those that embrace deregulation see greater affordability and economic growth. New York City's leaders would rather be powerful in a broken system than incidental in an effective one. Embracing lessons from cities like Dallas is essential if New York wants to remain America's economic engine. Advertisement For Gotham, that means abolishing exclusionary zoning, slashing permitting timelines and letting the market do what it does best: build. Radical deregulation is not a panacea, but it is the only path to restoring affordability and opportunity in New York's housing market. Without it, the city risks becoming a museum — a collection of neat galleries, manicured universities, compelling theaters and world-class restaurants, preserved for the wealthy but abandoned by the ambitious. Wealthy New Yorkers who consider that vision appealing should note the fate of world-leading cities that abandon dynamism. Advertisement Take Vienna: Tourists can visit the Austrian capital to see Freud's bust, hear Mozart at the Opera House and enjoy the world's best strudel. But the city merely reruns the hits of a century past, while larger, faster-growing European cities provide the continent with innovations in ideas, music, art and food. Dallas is striving to supplant New York, and it's attracting the kinds of companies, families and innovators who once flocked to Gotham. Between 2021 and 2022, the Dallas-Fort Worth region added more residents than any other US metro, along with 265 relocated or expanded businesses. Advertisement While Dallas' residential population grew 5.7% from 2020 to 2023, New York's fell by 2.5%. One analysis predicts that Dallas-Fort Worth will 'eclipse New York City as the biggest metro area by the year 2100.' Gotham has always prided itself on being a city where anyone with grit and determination can succeed. Advertisement But that promise is fading, as the housing lottery illustrates. It's time to stop gambling with the city's future and start preparing New York for another world-leading century. Tim Rosenberger is a Legal Policy Fellow at The Manhattan Institute, where Vilda Westh Blanc is a Collegiate Associate. From City Journal.
