
Bulgaria's government survives no-confidence vote brought by pro-Russia party
Bulgaria's government has survived a parliamentary vote of no-confidence brought by a pro-Russia opposition party over a supposed failure in the country's foreign policy.
The motion brought by the Vazrazhdane party and backed by two small nationalist groups criticised the government's pro-Western stance, its support for Ukraine and ongoing sanctions on Moscow.
The move was defeated in the 240-seat parliament with 150 votes against and 54 in favour.
Before the vote, analysts predicted the outcome, citing that the majority of Buglaria's lawmakers support the country's pro-European orientation.
Bulgaria has been a member of the EU since 2007.
"For Vazrazhdane, the vote is a tool to amplify Russian narratives in the hybrid war against Bulgaria — a war Moscow wages with disinformation and subversive political tactics," political analyst Ilian Vassilev said.
Related
Bulgarian consumers boycott major supermarkets to protest rising food prices
European Prosecutor suspends Bulgarian member pending probe
The centre-right party GERB, which leads the coalition government, condemned the no-confidence motion as an attempt to derail the adoption of the euro at the beginning of 2026, which would consolidate Bulgaria's European integration.
Speaking to the media after the vote, Prime Minister Rosen Zhelyazkov said the motion's defeat has "confirmed Bulgaria's European perspective and democratic development, which is what most of the Bulgarian people want".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
5 minutes ago
- Euronews
Elon Musk's X fails to deal with Russian disinformation, study says
More than 100 pieces of content published on X from Russian state media and disinformation actors that fail to comply with European rules still appear on the social media platform despite being reported to X, according to a new report. The report commissioned by German non-profit group WeMove Europe, which was shared exclusively with Euronews, found '125 clear sanction-violating posts' on the Elon Musk-owned platform. Some of the posts included programmes from the Russian state broadcaster Russia Today (RT), which has been banned by the European Union since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. In one instance, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs account on X shared an excerpt from a documentary produced by RT, which shared a false narrative about an Adolf Hitler collaborator who was 'elevated to the rank of national hero by the Kyiv regime'. The post also provided a link to bypass sanctions and access the full film on Telegram. The researchers behind the paper had reported to X all the content deemed illegal under Europe's Digital Services Act (DSA), the bloc's digital transparency rules. The report found that only 57 per cent of the reports of illegal content received acknowledgement receipts, which breaches the DSA. Among the 125 reports, only one post was removed by X. The company said that there was no violation of EU law. In some cases, X responded to the researchers' complaints within two minutes, the report said, suggesting that automation is playing a big role in X's content moderation. The European Commission, the EU's executive body, launched a formal investigation into X this year for breaching the DSA and said it would finalise the investigation before the summer recess, which begins on July 25. However, the Financial Times reported last week that the Commission will miss this deadline as it aims to conclude trade talks with the United States. Euronews Next has contacted the Commission for comment about the latest report and the X investigation but did not receive a reply at the time of publication. In January, French prosecutors also launched an investigation following allegations that X's algorithm was being used for the purposes of foreign interference. The researchers filed the reports to X on July 8 and 9, 2025. While they were met with automatic replies in most cases that X would look into their complaints, in the majority of them, they did not hear back. Euronews Next has also contacted X for comment about the report but did not receive a reply at the time of publication. Russia's online war Under the EU sanctions regime, it is prohibited to offer content hosting services for sanctioned entities, such as broadcasters or sanctioned individuals. Russia has intensified its disinformation campaign in Europe since it invaded Ukraine in 2022, the researchers said. Along with official Russian government accounts spreading fake news, there were also accounts likely operated by the 'Social Design Agency,' a Russian company known to produce Russia's influence campaign 'Operation Doppelgänger,' as well as anonymous users repeatedly posting such material. 'Overall, the volume indeed exploded [since the war]. It's much more significant,' said Charles Terroille, a project and investigative research officer at the fact-checking group Science Feedback who worked on the paper. 'A lot of the posts that we flagged to X are for instance, documentaries, if you can call them that, so 40-minute videos hosted on X that are Russia Today showing, for example, how Ukraine deserved it all or how [President] Zelenskyy and all the government people and officials in Ukraine are just fans of Nazi figures and all these widely false and reported stories that Russia is propping,' he told Euronews Next. Terroille said another Russian method is to fabricate pages that look like well-known Western media outlets and spread them on X. He added that fake news about public health and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines are still running, among other topics, such as misinformation about the environment and are 'absolutely weaponised' by Russia. For Taïme Smit Pellure, a digital campaigner at WeMove Europe who led the report, the most shocking part of the research was that the content is also translated into people's home languages, such as French, and is 'everywhere' on X. She told Euronews Next that both the Commission and X should be acting faster and that her organisation has reached out to the Commission but it has not had a 'positive response yet'. 'We know they are working on this, we know they are, it's not like they're looking away completely, just taking their time because they want to do it right and we completely understand that,' she said. Another recommendation for the Commission is for European governments to work together in a more coordinated manner to address this issue, said Saman Nazari, lead researcher of civic campaign group Alliance4Europe, who also worked on the paper. 'As long as we stay only working in our own little bubbles, we do not stand a chance against a multi-billion euro influence apparatus,' Nazari said. His recommendation for X is that 'there is not that much nuance. It's straight-up illegal content,' and that 'it doesn't take much time' to find such content and address it. 'This is incredibly low-hanging fruit,' he added.


Euronews
5 minutes ago
- Euronews
The Schengen Agreement turns 40. Can its raison d'être survive?
A good example of the current dilemmas the Schengen Treaty is facing is to be found along the German/Polish border on the border town of Görlitz (Germany) and Zgorzelec (Poland), merely divided by the river Lusatian Neisse. In 2023, citing its ongoing fight against illegal migration, Germany imposed temporary here as everywhere along its border with Poland. In turn, Polish authorities imposed temporary controls from July 7, 2025. Locals on both sides of the border are suffering the consequences, including huge traffic jams. Take for instance 37-year-old data analyst Jakub Woliński. He lives and works on the German side of this border town, but he was born on the Polish side. A frequent trans-border commuter, he is at the frontline of the new reality. 'There is no increased movement of people crossing the border illegally here. This is a completely unnecessary expression of distrust of the neighbors who live right across the river.', he says. On weekends or holidays, German controls often create havoc in streets on the Polish side. Even the Italian owner of an ice-cream parlour near the checkpoint is unhappy. 'The city becomes completely blocked. It practically makes it very difficult for us to work, because customers can't get here by car, so those who don't live nearby don't come', says Antonio Scaramozzino. Residents on the Polish side are collecting signatures for a protest petition addressed to the European Commission. Jakub has gone even further. He has sued the German government. 'I strongly believe that the decisions of the German authorities limit my freedom of movement on the border areas. If I could talk to representatives of the German government, I would like to ask them if does bearing all these costs really justify the benefits?' We transmit the question to the German Federal Police. They claim they are working hard to minimize the impact of their controls. But they say they have a legal mandate that so far has proven effective. 'In my department in May this year we have now reported over 175 people for not respecting the right of residence. However, we also reported 141 people for having committed other crimes', claims Michael Engler, spokesperson at the German Federal Police Despite those statistics, Jakub sees his lawsuit against Germany as a wake-up call for Schengen members and EU institutions to reconsider their current approach. 'If we, the citizens, do not take matters into our own hands, make it clear to our governments that this is an important issue to fight for, then I fear that the Schengen area may collapse', he says. Is this the end of the Schengen dream? States can indeed reinstate controls under strict conditions. The biggest legal -and symbolic- issue is not the decision itself, but its rationale and time frame, says Jolanta Szymańska, EU programme coordinator at the Polish Institute of International Affairs. She is an expert on EU migration and internal affairs policy. 'All the controls should be put on a specific time. And as the name is 'temporary introduction', it should not be like a stable situation. But in some countries, we´ve had a decade of border checks.' , she concludes.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
EU, Japan vow joint push for 'fair' global trade
Brussels and Tokyo announced a "competitiveness alliance" to increase bilateral trade, address unfair practices, and boost innovation, at a summit in the Japanese capital. "In today's world, competitiveness has to be built with trusted partners such as Japan," European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen told journalists after talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. "Together, Europe and Japan represent a fifth of global GDP and a market of 600 million people," she added. "So, we have the scale to shape global rules on trade and tech in line with our values of fairness and openness." Facing a swirl of speculation over his future following a weekend election debacle, Ishiba said the EU and Japan concurred to work together to strengthen a "stable and predictable rules-based free and fair economic order". Von der Leyen congratulated the prime minister on his "successful negotiations" to secure a tariff deal with Washington, a feat that has so far escaped the European Commission she leads. US President Donald Trump announced Tuesday a "massive" trade deal with Japan, as a deadline looms for the EU and other major US trade partners to strike agreements or face steep levies. Tokyo said the deal would see a tariff on Japanese car cut to 15 percent. The EU's top trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic is due to speak once again to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later on Wednesday. Von der Leyen's commission, the EU's top executive body, is in charge of trade policy for the 27-nation bloc. "In a world of growing uncertainty, we are also stepping up joint efforts to boost economic security and resilience," Antonio Costa told journalists in Tokyo. Costa heads the European Council representing EU member states. He said the EU and Japan -- who back Ukraine in its war with Russia -- would push to deepen cooperation between their defence industries. Costa and von der Leyen will visit Beijing next for talks with China's top leaders on Thursday. Beijing and Brussels will mark the 50th anniversary of their establishment of diplomatic ties. But differences over state subsidies, market access and China's support for Russia are set to overshadow the event. burs-ub/del/jj © 2025 AFP