SONA 2025 protesters slam hurdles to VP Sara Duterte impeachment
Several groups marched along Commonwealth Avenue in Quezon City to call for action from the government as Marcos delivered his fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA).
Former ACT Teachers party-list representative France Castro expressed disappointment over the developments in the vice president's impeachment case.
'Sino ang dapat na sisihin kung bakit nagkakaroon ng delay sa pagpapanagot sa impeachment? Si Marcos, ang liderato ng Senado. Dahil inuuna pa ang mga personal na mga posisyon, personal na mga interes laban sa hustisya. Ang Supreme Court, inuna pa ang kapakanan ni Sara Duterte,' she said.
(Who should be blamed for the delay in impeachment? Marcos, the leadership of the Senate. Because personal positions, personal interests are prioritized over justice. The Supreme Court put benefiting Sara Duterte welfare before it.)
'Hindi tayo titigil hangga't hindi mapatalsik si Sara Duterte. Patalksin si Sara Duterte, i-impeach si Sara Duterte. Tayo yung magsisilbing hukom at gagamitin ang buong lansangan para gawin nating korte. So tayo ay maniningil kay Sara Duterte, [at] kay Marcos na nagpabaya,' Castro added.
(We will not stop until Sara Duterte is ousted. Depose Sara Duterte, impeach Sara Duterte. We will serve as judges and use the streets as our court. So we will blame Sara Duterte, [and] Marcos for his dereliction.)
Kiko Aquino Dee, one of those who filed an impeachment complaint against Duterte, called out the government's slow action on what he called the misappropriation of funds.
'Simpleng ang mga tanong namin. Tama ba ang paglustay ng pera ng DepEd sa kalagitnaan ng isang krisis sa edukasyon? Tama ba ang pagbanta ng karahasan at pagpatay sa kahit sinong mamamayang Pilipino? Imbes na sagutin ang mga tanong na ito, pinaglaruan ng kamara ang impeachment complaint mula Disyembre hanggang Pebrero,' said Dee, referring to the questions of Duterte's handling of the education department's funds when she was secretary, and to her threats against Marcos.
(Our questions are simple. Was it right for the Department of Education to waste money in the middle of an education crisis? Is it right to threaten with violence and kill any Filipino citizen? Instead of answering these questions, the chamber toyed with the impeachment complaint from December to February.)
'Nagpatumpik-tumpik ang Senado mula Pebrero hanggang Hunyo at ginawang mas makitid ng Korte Suprema ang butas ng karayum na kailangan natin daanan para makapit ang hustisya ngayong Hulyo,' he added, in reference to the Supreme Court's ruling that the articles of impeachment against Duterte were unconstitutional.
(The Senate chose to relax from February to June and the Supreme Court narrowed the needle we must pass through to get justice this July.)
'Hanggang ngayon naghuhugas-kamay ang Malacañang dahil ang pagpapanagot sa isang mataas ng opisyal ay hindi raw makakatulong sa iisang Pilipino. Hindi talaga nakakatulong ang impeachment sa mga makapangyarihan. Pero baka nakakalimutan nila, hindi lang sila ang mga Pilipino, Pilipino tayong lahat. Habang hindi napapanagot ang mga katiwalian at impunity, Pilipino ang ninanakawan. Pilipino ang pinapapatay,' Dee added.
(Until now, Malacañang is washing its hands because it claims that holding a high official to account will not help a single Filipino. Impeachment does not really help the powerful. But maybe they forget, they are not the only Filipinos, we are all Filipinos. While corruption and impunity are not held accountable, Filipinos are the ones being robbed. Filipinos are being killed.)
'No bite'
For his part, Bayan president Renato Reyes Jr. said that Marcos' SONA was 'all bark but no bite.'
'The tough talk on corruption ignored the most crucial corruption issue today: the impeachment of the Vice President and the abuse of so-called confidential funds. Mr. Marcos had nothing to say about the elephant in the room—the House impeached the Vice President, the Senate stalled the trial and the Supreme Court derailed the trial. How could the president not comment on a matter involving massive corruption, conflict among the different branches of government and the miscarriage of justice? How will we even take his anti-corruption rhetoric seriously?' he said in a statement.
The SC's ruling is in relation to the consolidated petition filed by Duterte, lawyer Israelito Torreon, and others seeking to declare the Articles of Impeachment against her as null and void.
Supreme Court spokesperson Camille Ting clarified that the high tribunal "is not absolving" Duterte from the charges against her, but added that "any subsequent impeachment complaint" may only be filed starting February 6, 2026.
This is a day after the one-year anniversary of House of Representatives impeachment of Duterte, including its endorsement of the fourth complaint that constituted the Articles of Impeachment.
The SC decision is immediately executory. However, Ting said the House of Representatives may still file a motion for reconsideration.
Religious groups join action
Aside from progressive groups, members of the religious sector also joined the rally as they sought accountability from the Marcos administration on various issues.
Reverend Carleen Nomorosa, ordained deacon of United Methodist Church, was joined by more than 90 seminarians and pastors.
'Nandito kami dahil naniniwala kami na dapat i-convict si Sara Duterte at dapat singilin si Marcos sa kanyang pananahimik…at sa kanyang hindi pagtugon sa mga hinaing ng taong bayan,' she told reporters.
(We are here because we believe that Sara Duterte should be convicted and Marcos should be charged for his silence...and his failure to respond to the grievances of the people.)
For her part, Sister Shirley Mabunga of Missionaries of Perpetual Help said that joining the protests means being in one with the plight of the masses.
'Bilang isang taong simbahan, nakikiisa kami rito para sa boses ng mga mamayan na humihingi ng katarungan at katotohan dahil sa mga nangyaring issues sa ating bansa, dahil na rin sa mga dinanas na kahirapan ng ating mga kababayan lalo ng mga nakalipas na bagyo,' she told GMA News Online.
(As a church person, we are united here for the voice of the people who are asking for justice and truth because of the issues that happened in our country, also because of the hardships suffered by our countrymen especially in the past typhoons.) — BM, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
2 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Carpio: SC may still reverse decision on Sara Duterte's impeachment
Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio said Wednesday that there is still a possibility that the high court will reverse its decision declaring the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. Carpio said this, hinging on the plan of the House of Representatives to file a motion for reconsideration on the SC decision as the lower chamber argued that the ruling was based on incorrect findings that contradict official records. 'Theoretically, pwede [it's possible]. I mean, there's no rule or law, constitutional provision that say that they [cannot] correct themselves,' Carpio said at the Kapihan sa Manila Bay forum when asked of the possibility of the decision getting reversed even as the SC justices voted unanimously on it. According to the former SC associate justice, there had been many instances in the past when the high court 'completely reversed itself.' Meanwhile, Christian Monsod, one of the framers of the 1987 Constitution, said that the SC may 'correct itself on some parts' of their decision. 'It's not yet final, it's only executory but not yet final because the House still has motion for reconsideration. So I would think that the Senate should hold in abeyance any action because it's not yet final,' Carpio explained. 'Normally, you act when it's already final. Because it's not yet final, there's still a chance it could be reversed or changed because there's a motion for reconsideration,' he added. Carpio, however, emphasized that if the decision becomes final, the ruling must be followed because the Supreme Court is the final arbiter 'whether it's correct or not.' Voting 13-0, the Supreme Court earlier declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte as unconstitutional, saying that it was barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. The high court also found that the articles violated Duterte's right to due process. The SC decision is immediately executory but a motion for reconsideration may be filed. The high court also emphasized that it is not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her, but any subsequent impeachment complaint may only be filed starting February 6, 2026. House of Representatives spokesperson Princess Abante said the lower chamber is preparing to file a motion for reconsideration of the SC decision, noting that upon studying, the House found that the bases for it were alarming. 'Ang Kamara, matapos ang masusing pag-aaral, ay maghahain ng motion for reconsideration dahil ang desisyon na nagsasabing ang Articles of Impeachment na ipinadala sa Senado ay barred or unconstitutional ay nakaangkla sa mga factual premises o findings na mali at salungat sa opisyal na record ng Kamara,' Abante said. (The House, after thorough study, will file a motion for reconsideration because the decision declaring that the Articles of Impeachment transmitted to the Senate are barred or unconstitutional is based on factual premises or findings that are incorrect and contrary to the official records of the House.) Meanwhile, Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero announced Tuesday that the Senate will discuss the SC decision on August 6, 2025, 'in order to afford ample and sufficient time to the members to study the 97-page Supreme Court decision, excluding the concurring and separate opinions filed by five or six additional magistrates of the Supreme Court.'—AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Lawyers ask Supreme Court to cite Larry Gadon, others in contempt
Several lawyers, accompanied by supporters of the Duterte family, filed separate petitions asking the Supreme Court (SC) to cite in contempt critics of its ruling that barred the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. Lawyer Ferdinand Topacio filed his petition for indirect contempt against Presidential Adviser on Poverty Alleviation Larry Gadon, while Atty. Mark Tolentino and Rolex Suplico filed a similar petition against political analyst Richard Heydarian and Akbayan Representative Percival Cendaña. Topacio said he filed the petition over Gadon calling the SC a "tuta (lapdog)" of the Dutertes. "I was scandalized to be candid. Sapagkat, bagamat mayroon tayong freedom of expression, and sometimes I also criticize some decisions of the Court, there should be boundaries. Kapag ganoon na pong masyadong vitriolic na… masyadong maangas na. Libelous na po 'yun eh. Hindi po natin maaaring palampasin," Topacio said in an ambush interview. (I was scandalized to be candid. Because, although we have freedom of expression, and sometimes I also criticize some decisions of the Court, there should be boundaries. When it becomes that vitriolic… too arrogant. That's already libelous. We cannot let that pass.) In an interview prior to the fourth State of the Nation Address of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. last Monday, Gadon slammed the High Court for its decision declaring the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte as unconstitutional and null and void. The SC said the Articles of Impeachment are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3(5) of the Constitution. Further, the high court also found that the Articles of Impeachment violate due process of law, saying that the draft and its evidence were not made available to Duterte, denying her the opportunity to be heard by the members of the House of Representatives. "'Yun na nga 'yung Senate hearing, 'yun na nga 'yung magbibigay ng due process. Because that is precisely the trial. So anong pinagsasabi ng SC? Talaga kasing maka-Duterte sila… Wag na tayong magpaligoy-ligoy pa. Ang SC, tuta ng mga Duterte," Gadon said. (Exactly, that's the Senate hearing, that's what provides due process. Because that is precisely the trial. So what is the SC saying? They're really pro-Duterte… Let's not beat around the bush. The SC is a lapdog of the Dutertes.) 'Framed as beholden' Meanwhile, in their petition, Tolentino and Suplico noted Heydarian's Facebook post saying Duterte appointed majority of the justices of the SC. They said this "deliberately and maliciously framed the justices as beholden to President Rodrigo Duterte." On the other hand, Cendaña said the SC reduced itself to "being the Supreme Coddler of Sara Duterte." The Akbayan representative stood by his statement, saying moves to cite him in contempt is a Duterte "modus operandi" to silence legitimate criticisms. "In that moment, given the political context, I stand by that very apt description. It is a description of the moment. Sa dulo kasi, huwag nating gamitin itong mga ingay na ito for the Supreme Court to do the right thing, and that is to stand by the Constitution (In the end, this noise should not get in the way of the Supreme Court from doing the right thing, and that is to stand by the Constitution)," Cendaña told reporters. "If this is the consequence of making the Vice President accountable over misuse of public funds and abuse of power, then it's all worth it," Cendaña added. For his part, Gadon said he understood why Topacio filed a contempt case against him for supposedly "telling the truth" about the ruling. He also challenged Topacio to a one-on-one singing competition as a fund raising initiative, similar to the boxing match between Davao City Sebastian "Baste" Duterte and Philippine National Police (PNP) chief General Nicolas Torre III. This was rejected by Topacio. Meanwhile, Heydarian said he has "full confidence in our highest court and respected justices not to bother with such frivolity." "While it's true that the majority of our Supreme Court justices were appointed by the former president, it's unfair to make any automatic inferences about their decision-making," he said in a statement, citing his column in a news organization. — with a report from Llanesca T. Panti/ VDV, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 minutes ago
- GMA Network
EDSA rehab might be moved to 2027 — DPWH
The deferred rehabilitation of the Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA) — Metro Manila's busiest thoroughfare — which was supposed to start in June this year might be moved further to 2027, the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) said Wednesday. On the sidelines of the Post-State of the Nation Address (SONA) forum in San Juan City, Public Works Secretary Manuel Bonoan told reporters that the DPWH is now awaiting President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr.'s go signal for the agency to implement its recommendations to use a non-conventional construction technology to implement EDSA's rehabilitation. 'Ayaw ni Presidente na masyado mahaba 'yung pagsasara ng lanes sa EDSA,' Bonoan said. (The President does not want the closure of lanes at EDSA to take longer.) To recall, Marcos suspended the EDSA rehabilitation initiative that was supposed to begin on June 13, as the project needs to be studied for one month to know if there are new technologies that can be used to hasten the rehabilitation of the 23.8-kilometer road. In the original plan, EDSA would be reconstructed lane-by-lane, with each being replaced by a new road. The DPWH is now studying the 'time and motion' process where a layer would be placed above the surface of EDSA. Bonoan said it will not be practical to do the EDSA rehabilitation this second half of the year amid the rainy season. 'Mga next year na or 2027 kasi may ASEAN meeting eh,' he said. (It would be next year or 2027 because of the ASEAN meeting.) The Philippines is set to host the 43rd Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit next year, as it took the helm of the bloc's chairmanship. The DPWH chief said that using a new technology, the rehabilitation of EDSA would 'take about six months.' With this, Bonoan said that 'there will be slight changes in the [budget].' The whole project would cost between P8 billion and P17 billion. Bonoan, in an exclusive report by Joseph Morong on '24 Oras,' earlier said that the road's rehabilitation and the consequent implementation of the odd-even scheme will only begin in 2026 as 'it is already the rainy season in the country, which will be followed by the Christmas rush during the 'Ber' months. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
