logo
Nifty 50 jumps 8% YTD: Five key risks that could derail Indian stock market rally in H2CY25

Nifty 50 jumps 8% YTD: Five key risks that could derail Indian stock market rally in H2CY25

Mint14 hours ago

Defying global turmoil and tariff-related uncertainties, the Indian stock market is set to wrap the first half of calendar year 2025 (H1CY25) with a healthy gain. The Nifty 50 has gained 8 per cent this year so far even as it hit a 52-week low of 21,743.65 on April 7.
The index maintained its upward march despite US President Donald Trump's tariff policies, weak earnings, stretched valuations, foreign capital outflow, geopolitical turmoil and faltering global economic growth.
The Nifty 50 is now just 640 points, or 2.4 per cent below its all-time high of 26,277.35 hit on September 27 last year.
The Nifty 50 has been in the green since March this year. Stocks such as BEL, Bajaj Finance, SBI Life Insurance and Bajaj Finserv have surged 30-40 per cent this year so far. Heavyweights such as Reliance Industries, HDFC Bank, Bharti Airtel, Maruti Suzuki and ICICI Bank have gained 10-25 per cent this year.
However, shares of TCS, Trent, Infosys, IndusInd Bank, Sun Pharma, Wipro and HCL Tech have declined 10-15 per cent this year.
The resilience of the Indian stock market could be attributed to India's durable economic growth and healthy domestic demand.
"Strong domestic demand, government-led capex, and steady sectoral growth, especially in banking and infrastructure, have supported investor confidence," Pawan Jain, the founder and chairman of Ashika Group, told Mint.
The medium-term outlook of the Indian stock market remains positive. However, there are also risks that investors should not overlook.
Although markets have largely priced in existing trade agreements between the US and its key trading partners, any unforeseen developments could rattle investor sentiment.
Trump on Friday said that the White House was looking into an agreement that would give it the 'right to go in and trade' with India.
"A key risk on the horizon is the looming 9th July'25 deadline when the US could begin imposing the steep 26 per cent reciprocal tariffs on Indian goods—unless an interim agreement is signed or the tariff pause is extended," said Divya Agrawal, Research Analyst & Advisory (Fundamental), Wealth Management, Motilal Oswal Financial Services.
Madhavi Arora, Lead Economist at Emkay Global, pointed out that "while it's widely believed that this 'second trade war' would play out differently than the China+1 dynamics, some scepticism remains over India's ability to scale meaningfully, given infra/other limitations."
Experts say a spike in US inflation could aggravate foreign capital outflow and delay the US Fed rate cut. If foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) go on a prolonged selling spree, the domestic market could come under pressure.
"The US inflation and consequently the Fed rate cut constraints are the only risks, in our opinion, to watch out for," said Vikas Gupta, CEO and Chief Investment Strategist at OmniScience Capital.
Gupta, however, believes the chances of a spike in US inflation are low because of the US-China trade deal.
Vinit Bolinjkar, the head of research of Ventura, underscored that the market has discounted two US Fed rate cuts by December. Fed officials are now openly debating whether only one or none is needed if tariffs keep core inflation sticky.
"A hawkish surprise would push up global bond yields, drain emerging-market liquidity and revive FPI outflows from India," said Bolinjkar.
Concerns over tensions in the Middle East have eased significantly. However, experts point out that geopolitical uncertainty and its potential to drive crude oil prices higher remain a key risk for the Indian market.
"A renewed flare-up in any of several geopolitical flashpoints—ranging from a fraying Middle East cease-fire to fresh Russia–Ukraine escalations—could push Brent crude back toward the USD 90–95/bbl range," said Bolinjkar.
Bolinjkar pointed out that historically, every USD 10 per barrel increase widens India's current account deficit by roughly 0.4 percentage points of GDP and raises consumer inflation by 30–40 basis points, eroding real incomes, pressuring the rupee, and squeezing corporate margins, just as market valuations appear stretched.
"Any renewed escalation in the Middle East could trigger risk-off sentiment, impacting FII flows and driving crude oil prices higher. A sustained rise in oil prices above $90/barrel could widen India's current account deficit, fuel inflation, and compel the RBI to turn to a hawkish policy stance, reducing the likelihood of future rate cuts. This could negatively impact investor sentiments and put a pause on the ongoing market rally," said Agrawal of Motilal Oswal Financial Services.
Upcoming earnings will be perhaps the biggest trigger for the domestic market. Experts say if Q1FY26 earnings come out weaker-than-expected, the domestic market may see a deeper correction of about 10 per cent due to EPS growth-valuation mismatch.
"The Nifty's forward PE sits a standard-deviation above its 10-year mean, while mid-caps trade at a 40 per cent premium to large-caps. At the same time, 72 per cent of index constituents have seen FY26 EPS cuts, and street-wide growth expectations have slipped to nearly 12 per cent. Any miss in the June-quarter numbers could trigger a derating," said Bolinjkar.
Agrawal said that on the earnings front, FY26 is expected to follow a two-speed trajectory—with muted growth in H1 and a pick-up in H2.
"Any delay or disappointment in the anticipated H2 recovery could hurt investor sentiments and derail current market momentum," said Agrawal.
An even monsoon could increase food inflation risk and cap the prospects of further rate cuts by the RBI.
"The IMD still projects an above-normal season overall, yet large deficits (-40% to -70%) are developing in parts of Marathwada and Vidarbha. Any sustained shortfall would revive cereal and pulse inflation, erode rural demand and cap the RBI's newfound easing room," said Bolinjkar.
Read all market-related news here
Read more stories by Nishant Kumar
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions, as market conditions can change rapidly, and circumstances may vary.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's expanding strategic presence in Indian Ocean Region is a challenge for India: Parliament Committee Report
China's expanding strategic presence in Indian Ocean Region is a challenge for India: Parliament Committee Report

The Hindu

time35 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

China's expanding strategic presence in Indian Ocean Region is a challenge for India: Parliament Committee Report

The growing presence of extra-regional players in the India Ocean Region (IOR), especially China gaining a foothold in the region, is one of the strategic challenges for India, reads the report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs. The report, released earlier this week, further reads that China has been undertaking several infrastructure projects focusing on ports, airports and the logistics sector for dual-use purposes, in addition to deploying research and survey vessels in the region to augment maritime domain awareness, and collect sensitive oceanography and marine data. Explained | China's moves in the Indian Ocean On the extent of inroads made by China in the IOR, how aggressive China is, and how secure India's position is, the report reads that China has expanded its naval power in the region by increasing the number of vessels and duration of deployment. This has been facilitated by establishing a military base in Djibouti in 2017 and the creation of dual-use infrastructure astride critical maritime choke points in the IOR to serve logistics support functions. The report further reads that as part of this strategy, China is also developing ports and other infrastructure facilities in the littoral countries of the IOR, including in the vicinity of India's maritime boundary, and has a stated goal of becoming a maritime power. India has been working closely with partner countries in the region and sensitising them on China's activities and the long-term implications for their internal and regional security. In December 2024, Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake reiterated his country's stated position of not permitting its territory to be used in any manner inimical to the security of India, as well as towards regional stability. While the Indian government is aware of China's engagements with other countries, including Sri Lanka, India's relations with these countries stand on their own footing and are independent of the relations of these countries with third countries, the report reads. Also Read: All eyes are now on the Indian Ocean region Replying to the government's perception towards China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its debt-trapped diplomacy, the report mentioned that the Government of India has had a principled position on the initiative. Their concerns arise inter alia from the inclusion of the so-called illegal China-Pakistan Economic Corridor as a flagship project of BRI, which impinges on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India. The so-called illegal 'China-Pakistan Economic Corridor' passes through parts of the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, which are under the illegal occupation of Pakistan. The government has conveyed its concerns to the Chinese side on multiple occasions and has asked them to cease such activities. 'We have been clear that militarisation of the Indian Ocean Region is not desirable and it will adversely impact security of the Indian Ocean and the wider Indo-Pacific,' the report mentioned regarding potential military use of ports and infrastructures by China developed in IOR.

I'll be disappointed if Gill doesn't go places: Ravi Shastri
I'll be disappointed if Gill doesn't go places: Ravi Shastri

Indian Express

time37 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

I'll be disappointed if Gill doesn't go places: Ravi Shastri

Shubman Gill, as the captain of the Indian Test side, has lost the first game by five wickets against England at Leeds in Headingly. Taking the reins in the absence of experienced veterans like Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli, Gill has been handed over a stern first assignment to play a five-match Test series against England. Former Indian coach Ravi Shastri, despite the disappointment in the first Test, it would be a surprise if Gill does not go places in a few years. 'I'll be disappointed if Gill doesn't go places. Languid, lazy elegance, and he's got a regal element of being regal out there when he's batting. If he can learn with exposure and adapt to conditions, I think that's the one name I can see,' he said, speaking to 'He's matured a lot. The way he handles the media, the way he talks at press conferences, at tosses, he's matured a lot. Let him be there for three years. Don't chop and change irrespective of what happens in the series. Stick with him for three years and I think he will deliver for you,' the former India head coach reckoned.' Shastri added. With India claiming 38.5% of ICC's total revenue share for the 2024-27 cycle, former player Shastri defended the decision saying India should get an even bigger share considering their contribution to the cricket body's revenue. 'I would want more because most of the money that's generated comes from India. So it's only fair that they get their share of pound of flesh. It's relative, it's economies, if tomorrow there might be another economy that's stronger. Money might come from there like it did in the 70s, 80s and the chunk of the money went somewhere else. So I think it's only fair and, it just shows in the revenues,' Shastri said on Wisden. 'When India travel, look at the television rights, look at the television income that comes for an India series. So it's only fair that they get. Whatever they're getting now, if not more,' he added.

Amazon awarded ₹23.7 crore in damages, ₹77 crore towards legal costs by Singapore arbitration body in Future Group case
Amazon awarded ₹23.7 crore in damages, ₹77 crore towards legal costs by Singapore arbitration body in Future Group case

Mint

time41 minutes ago

  • Mint

Amazon awarded ₹23.7 crore in damages, ₹77 crore towards legal costs by Singapore arbitration body in Future Group case

Amazon has been awarded a sum of ₹ 23.7 crore by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) in damages linked to the tech giant's prolonged battle with Kishore Biyani-led Future Group, a new report has said. As per a report by Bar and Bench, the SIAC ruled that Future Group had breached its contractual obligations to Amazon when it entered into an agreement with Reliance, which was in violation to the terms of the pre-existing agreement. Livemint could not independently verify the details of the sum awarded to Amazon. This article will be updated once there is a confirmation. Amazon had originally sought ₹ 1,436 crore in damages — which is the amount it invested in Future Coupons Private Limited. However, it has only been awarded ₹ 23.7 crore. The company had also sought the legal costs it incurred in the arbitration proceedings as well as cases it had fought before courts and tribunals in India. According to sources quoted by Bar and Bench, the three-member SIAC tribunal held that the Future Group had indeed breached the contract and awarded 60 per cent of the legal costs that Amazon incurred during arbitration proceedings. It also refused to grant any costs related to the initiation or defence of allied proceedings. As per estimates quoted by the legal publication, Amazon awarded ₹ 77 crore and ₹ 6 crore in legal costs and arbitration fees, as opposed to the ₹ 125 crore it spent. The three-member tribunal comprised Prof Albert Jan van den Berg, Prof Jan Paulsson and Senior Counsel Michael Hwang. Future Group and Amazon had been locked in a bitter battle for over a year following a decision by the Indian retailer to sell its Big Bazaar business to Reliance Retail, a subsidiary of Reliance Industries. The deal was opposed by NV Investment Holdings LLC on grounds that its investment of ₹ 1,400 crore in Future Coupons, which is one of promoters of Future Retail, does not allow Future to sell retail assets to certain companies, including Reliance. At stake was whether Amazon can become a bigger force in a $900 billion retail market, with 1.3 billion consumers, than Reliance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store