Newborn died within hours after doctor used ‘vacuum-assisted' delivery method, his ‘permanently wounded' parents claim
A newborn suffered a 'short life and prolonged death ' – within hours of his birth – after a Texas doctor attempted a vacuum-assisted delivery, according to a lawsuit.
The lawsuit, filed May 29 against the doctor, unnamed nurses, Kessler Women's Healthcare and the Methodist Dallas Medical Center, claims they were negligent in trying to deliver the child vaginally in April 2024, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported.
According to the suit, the boy, who was named Prime, died of internal brain bleeding caused by his delivery method, but may have lived if the doctor had performed a Cesarean section earlier, instead of attempting to deliver him via vacuum-assisted delivery.
The baby's parents, both teachers, headed to the hospital on April 4, 2024, when the 32-year-old mother's water broke, according to the lawsuit.
According to the lawsuit, the doctor the family had been seeing was not the one to deliver the baby.
While preparing to give birth, Prime's heart rate became abnormal and his mom was diagnosed with preeclampsia, a dangerous complication characterized by high blood pressure. She also had a 102.9 fever, according to the filing.
These risk factors, in addition to the baby's large head size and weight, meant the mother would likely have to receive a Cesarean section, the lawsuit claims.
However, instead of delivering the baby via C-section, the doctor decided to try vacuum-assisted delivery for a vaginal birth. The process involves using a suction-cup device that attaches to the baby's head to try and help the child down the birth canal, according to the lawsuit.
The doctor on call tried to deliver Prime four times, but the suction popped off twice, the family said.
The father 'recounted the very 'loud sound' produced by the pop-offs and noted that the force was so significant that it caused (the doctor) to push the chair backwards in the delivery room, suggesting that (she) exerted considerable force during the pulls,' the lawsuit says.
Once the newborn was delivered, he was taken to the neonatal intensive care unit.
When the mom saw what her son's neck looked like post-birth, 'she wanted to burst into tears,' the filing claims.
Prime 'suffered' for 24 hours before he died, according to the filing, which described those hours as a 'short life and prolonged death.'
The lawsuit claims the OB-GYN told the family their baby died from an E. coli infection he caught during labor. However, the doctor who conducted the autopsy found his real cause of death was brain hemorrhages from failed vacuum-assisted delivery.
'Permanently wounded, the couple for days, weeks and months have broken down and cried, often uncontrollably,' the lawsuit says. 'Prime's loss has haunted them with nightmares, sleeplessness and intrusive thoughts. Daily life was permanently altered for both, though, they will try to move forward.'
Another doctor who was conducting an independent review told the parents Prime may have been born 'healthy and whole' had a C-section been performed sooner, according to the filing.
The lawsuit blames the doctor and nurses for not recognizing the baby's distress during labor and taking the appropriate steps sooner.
The family also claims in the suit that the doctor never told them of the risks of vacuum-assisted delivery.
The couple is seeking damages, claiming negligence, lack of informed consent and their son's wrongful death, according to the report.
Methodist Health System said in a statement that it has a 'longstanding policy of not commenting on pending litigation.'
The doctor involved told The Dallas Morning News that she couldn't comment on specific patients, but said, 'I will simply say that I am committed to providing the highest quality medical care possible to my patients.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Iconic snack set for major change after pressure from RFK Jr
By Published: | Updated: Slim Jims — the iconic spicy, dried meat stick— are set for a major recipe overhaul. The company that makes them said it is removing all artificial dyes from its products by 2027 amid pressure from health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. Chicago-based Conagra Brands said Birds Eye frozen vegetables, Orville Redenbacher popcorn and Duncan Hines baking products will also be affected by the change. The coloring agents will likely be replaced with natural ingredients such turmeric or beet juice, which could change the look, change and texture of many iconic foods. The announcement follows similar plans from brands like Nestle, Kraft Heinz and General Mills, many of whom have said they also won't launch any new products with artificial dyes. Health officials have long called for the removal of dyes like Red 40 and Yellow 5 over concerns of hyperactivity and conditions like ADHD in children. Some studies have also linked them to cancer in animals and hormonal issues. Conagra said in its annoucement Wednesday it will remove all dyes from its frozen foods by the end of 2025 and stop selling products with artificial dyes in schools by the start of the 2026-2027 school year. By the end of 2027, it will fully discontinue use of synthetic dyes from all of its products. RFK Jr has outlined plans to strip eight petrolium-based dyes from the US food supply during his tenure as the head of the Department of Health and Human Services. Slim Jims don't specifically say on the packaging that they contain artificial dyes, though it's possible other additives like sodium nitrite could be removed. The push comes amid concerns in recent years over health effects of artificial dyes, including animal studies suggesting they can cause hyperactivity , cancer and other health problems. With a recipe change could also come differences in color, texture and taste, though it's unclear how subtle the shifts will be. Conagra said many of its products already use natural alternatives like turmeric and annatto, especially in items like pickles, frozen vegetables and popcorn. However, products like Duncan Hines frosting and Swiss Miss pudding still contain Red 40, Yellow 5 and Blue 1. Tom McCough, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Conagra Brands, said in a statement: 'Conagra Brands is known for innovating delicious, on-trend foods, and our transition away from FD&C colors is just one aspect of our broader strategy to modernize our portfolio to align with consumer preferences. 'Our leading portfolio of frozen brands, including Birds Eye, Healthy Choice, Marie Callender's and more, will be 100% free from FD&C colors by the end of 2025.' Health advocates have long called for the removal of artificial dyes from foods, citing studies indicating they can cause neurobehavioral problems, including hyperactivity and attention issues, in children. The FDA has maintained that the approved dyes are safe and that 'the totality of scientific evidence shows that most children have no adverse effects when consuming foods containing color additives.' The agency currently allows 36 food color additives, including eight synthetic dyes. However, it announced in January that Red 3 — used in candies, cakes and some medications — would be banned in food by 2027 because it caused cancer in laboratory rats. Several states, including California and West Virginia, have passed laws restricting the use of artificial colors in foods. FDA Commissioner Dr Marty Makary announced in April that the agency will phase out the use of eight artificial food dyes in America's food supply within the next two years.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Explosive increase' of ticks that cause meat allergy in US due to climate crisis
Blood-sucking ticks that trigger a bizarre allergy to meat in the people they bite are exploding in number and spreading across the US, to the extent that they could cover the entire eastern half of the country and infect millions of people, experts have warned. Lone star ticks have taken advantage of rising temperatures by the human-caused climate crisis to expand from their heartland in the south-east US to areas previously too cold for them, in recent years marching as far north as New York and even Maine, as well as pushing westwards. The ticks are known to be unusually aggressive and can provoke an allergy in bitten people whereby they cannot eat red meat without enduring a severe reaction, such as breaking out in hives and even the risk of heart attacks. The condition, known as alpha-gal syndrome, has proliferated from just a few dozen known cases in 2009 to as many as 450,000 now. 'We thought this thing was relatively rare 10 years ago but it's become more and more common and it's something I expect to continue to grow very rapidly,' said Brandon Hollingsworth, an expert at the University of South Carolina who has researched the tick's expansion. 'We've seen an explosive increase in these ticks, which is a concern. I imagine alpha-gal will soon include the entire range of the tick, which could become the entire eastern half of the US as there's not much to stop them. It seems like an oddity now but we could end up with millions of people with an allergy to meat.' The exact number of alpha-gal cases is unclear due to patchy data collection but it's likely to be a severe undercount as people may not link their allergic reaction to the tick bites. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has said around 110,000 cases have been documented since 2010 but acknowledges the true number could be as high as 450,000. Cases will rise further as the ticks spread, aided by their adaptability to local conditions, according to Laura Harrington, an entomologist and disease specialist at Cornell University. 'With their adaptive nature and increasing temperatures, I don't see many limits to these ticks over time,' she said. Alpha-gal is a confounding condition because it doesn't cause an immediate allergic reaction, unlike a peanut allergy, with symptoms often appearing several hours after consuming meat. The syndrome is not caused by a pathogen but spurs an allergy to a sugar molecule found in mammals and an array of other things, from toothpaste to medical equipment. Researchers think the condition can wane over time but is also worsened by further tick bites. This leads to a confusing and fraught experience for the growing number of Americans with alpha-gal, who are now girding for another expected hot summer full of ticks. 'The ticks are rampant this year, I've pulled 10 ticks off me this season alone, it feels like they are uncontrollable at the moment,' said Heather O'Bryan, a horticulturist in Roanoke, Virginia, who has alpha-gal. 'They are so disgusting. I'm not afraid of a lot, but I'm afraid of ticks.' In 2019, O'Bryan suffered full body hives and struggled to breathe after eating a pork sausage. 'It was terrifying experience, I didn't know I had an allergy but it almost killed me,' she said. She now avoids products containing mammal-derived elements, such as certain toothpastes and even toilet paper, due to adverse reactions. Dairy, another mammalian product, is also off limits. 'I've learned what I can eat now, but I was so sad when I realized I couldn't have pizza again, I remember crying in front of a frozen pizza in the supermarket aisle,' she said. There is now an 'almost constant' stream of new members to the Facebook alpha-gal support groups that O'Bryan is part of, she said, with her region of Virginia now seemingly saturated by the condition. 'Everyone knows someone who has it, I talk a friend off a ledge once a month when they've been bitten because they are so afraid they have it and are freaking out,' she said. Lone star ticks are aggressive and can speedily follow a human target if they detect them. 'They will hunt you, they are like a cross between a lentil and a velociraptor,' said Sharon Pitcairn Forsyth, a conservationist who lives in the Washington DC area. A particular horror is the prospect of brushing up against vegetation containing a massed ball of juvenile lone star ticks, know as a 'tick bomb', that can deliver thousands of tick bites. 'They are so tiny you can't see them but you have to take it seriously or you'll never get them off you,' said Forsyth, who now carries around a lint roller to remove such clusters. After being diagnosed with alpha-gal, Forsyth set up online resources about the condition to help spread awareness and advocate for better food labeling to include alpha-gal warnings. 'I get calls from doctors asking questions about this because they just don't know about it,' she said. 'I'm not a medical professional, so I just send them the research papers.' As the climate heats up, due to the burning of fossil fuels, ticks are able to shift to areas that are becoming agreeably warm for them. Growing numbers of deer, which host certain ticks, and sprawling housing development into natural habitats is also causing more interactions with ticks. 'Places where houses push up against habitats and parks where nature has regrown are where we are seeing cases,' said Hollingsworth. But much is still unknown, such as why lone star ticks, which have long been native to the US, suddenly started causing these allergic reactions. Symptoms can also be alarmingly varied – Forsyth said she rarely eats out now because of concerns of contamination in the food and even that alpha-gal could be carried to her airborne, via the steam of cooked meat. 'Some people are scared to leave the house, it's hard to avoid,' she said. 'Many people who get it are over 50, so the first symptom some of them have is a heart attack.' So how far can alpha-gal spread? Cases have been found in Europe and Australia, although in low numbers, while in the US it's assumed lone star ticks won't be able to shift west of the Rocky mountains. But other tick species might also be able to spread alpha-gal syndrome – a recent scientific paper found the western black legged tick and the black legged tick, also called the deer tick, could also cause the condition. Hanna Oltean, an epidemiologist at Washington state department of health, said it was 'very surprising' to find a case of alpha-gal in Washington state from a person bitten by a tick locally, suggesting the western black legged tick could be a culprit. 'The range is spreading and emerging in new areas so the risk is increasing over time,' Oltean said. 'Washington state is very far from the range and the risk remains very low here. But we don't know enough about the biology of how ticks spread the syndrome.' The spread of alpha-gal comes amid a barrage of disease threats from different ticks that are fanning out across a rapidly warming US. Powassan virus, which can kill people via an inflammation of the brain, is still rare but is growing, as is Babesia, a parasite that causes severe illnesses. Lyme disease, long a feature of the US north-east, is also burgeoning. 'We are dealing with a lot of serious tick-borne illnesses and discovering new ones all the time,' said Harrington. 'There's a tremendous urgency to confront this with new therapies but the problem is we are going backwards in terms of funding and support in the US. There have been cuts to the CDC and NIH (National Institutes of Health) which means there is decreasing support. It's a major concern.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Who is in charge at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?
Who is in charge at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)? The answer is more complicated than it may seem. With no confirmed or acting CDC director, Robert F Kennedy Jr has direct control over the agency, allowing him to sign off – or not – on vaccine recommendations, according to legal experts. Yet Kennedy, the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), testified before a Senate committee in May that someone else is running the agency – creating confusion that could lead to legal challenges. 'There's not a CDC director or acting director. Essentially, RFK Jr is the director of the CDC,' said Paul Offit, professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. Kennedy now has 'a lot more opportunity to actually influence the outcome of these decisions and to take actions in the absence of a Senate-confirmed director', said Renée Landers, professor and director of the health law program at Suffolk University Law School in Boston. The dismissal of 17 independent vaccine advisers and their replacement with less experienced advisers, some of whom have histories of anti-vaccine activism, is 'very concerning', especially given Kennedy's rejection of germ theory and his own anti-vaccine activism, Landers said. On Thursday, the independent vaccine advisers appointed by Kennedy voted to ban thimerosal, a preservative (also known as thiomersal) with a demonstrated safety record, from 4% of flu vaccines in the US. The remaining 96% of flu vaccines, as well as all other childhood vaccines, were already free of thimerosal out of an abundance of caution, despite decades of research indicating the preservative's safety. The move will make it harder for some people to access the flu vaccine. The recommendation would normally be taken up by the CDC director, either to reject, or to implement as official, guidance from the agency. But for now, those decisions go directly to Kennedy, who has already exercised these capabilities before. On 13 May, 'with pending confirmation of a new CDC Director', the health secretary adopted the recommendations for Chikungunya vaccines to be officially recommended by the CDC, according to the agency's website. Kennedy did not sign off on the committee's votes for two other vaccines against RSV and meningitis. Those vaccines, recommended in April by the independent advisers whom Kennedy dismissed this month, still have not gotten official CDC recommendations; it's not clear whether or when they will. Kennedy also recently directed the CDC to change its Covid vaccine recommendations, softening the recommendation for children and ending it for pregnant people entirely, despite strong evidence that pregnancy is a major risk factor for severe illness and death. 'It is concerning that the power vacuum leaves open his ability to make these decisions that are inconsistent with scientific consensus,' Landers said. Congress introduced a new law in 2023 that directors of the CDC must now undergo Senate confirmation. This appointment is the first time the CDC director has gone through the process. 'It is a little bit of uncharted waters,' Landers said. David Weldon was first nominated and then withdrawn hours before his Senate confirmation hearing in March. Susan Monarez served as acting director from 23 January until she was nominated on 24 March, at which point she stepped down. Once someone has been nominated for director, they cannot serve as acting director. Monarez testified in her Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday, but it's not clear when lawmakers will vote on the nomination, In the absence of an acting director, the head of HHS has control of the agency, according to the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. Signing off – or not – on CDC recommendations cannot be 'delegated down' to other officials under the vacancies act, said Anne Joseph O'Connell, a professor at Stanford Law School; 'it can only go up' to the HHS secretary. 'What's unusual about this situation is that we generally think having exclusive duties go 'up' to the agency head when there is a lower-level vacancy is a good thing. But here many don't trust the secretary on these matters,' O'Connell said. Kennedy put forth a different name for who is in charge of the CDC in May testimony before the Senate's health, education, labor and pensions committee. 'Who is the acting CDC director?' Lisa Blunt Rochester, the Democratic senator from Delaware, asked. 'The acting director was Susan Monarez, but she is now up for permanent director, so she's been replaced by Matt Buzzelli,' Kennedy said, describing Buzzelli as 'a public health expert'. But there's no indication that Buzzelli, a lawyer who is listed as chief of staff in the office of the CDC director, is acting director, nor is he qualified for the position. 'Buzzelli cannot be the acting CDC head,' O'Connell said. He's not the first assistant to the CDC director, he's not Senate-confirmed, and he did not serve 90 days in the year before the last director of the CDC left, O'Connell said: 'There is no wiggle room.' The lack of clarity is compounded by the Trump administration's non-compliance with information requirements, experts said. The CDC, along with other agencies, is required to update each year an office of personnel management site about who holds which jobs, a deadline the agencies missed in March. Buzzelli 'has been carrying out some of the duties of the CDC Director as the Senior Official, as necessary, and is surrounded by highly qualified medical professionals and advisors to help fulfill these duties as appropriate', Andrew Nixon, HHS director of communications, told Stat News in May. (HHS did not respond to the Guardian's media inquiry.) Such actions could open the officials up to legal challenges. Without official documentation naming Buzzelli and other decision-makers to official positions, they would not have the designated authority to make certain decisions, which means their actions could be challenged. For instance, they may not be authorized to enter into new contracts or end prior agreements early with state, local, tribal and territorial governments – potentially opening up any such actions to lawsuits. 'The person who takes the action has to be someone lawfully appointed to the position. To the extent that agencies try to skirt that kind of requirement, it does leave the decisions vulnerable to legal challenge,' Landers said.
