Hardcore birders and casual sparrow spotters: Science needs you
The team is seeking volunteers in California, Oregon and Washington to collect data from July through November, the duration of the official West Coast fire season.
Volunteers need to choose a comfortable, familiar spot - a backyard, a balcony, a favorite local park - and spend 10 minutes there each week noting any bird activity they hear or see. They then enter their observations on the online platform eBird.
No bird knowledge or expertise is required, said program director Olivia Sanderfoot, a UCLA ornithologist. Beginners especially are welcome, in fact, as they're more apt to notice common species and behaviors that longtime bird watchers might overlook.
"Whether you are an expert birder who has been birding your whole life or you have never thought about birds, you are welcome to join Project Phoenix," Sanderfoot said. "We want this program to be accessible."
This is the third consecutive year of the study, which began in 2023 with about 300 volunteers tracking bird behavior over a three-month period.
The study aims to understand the effects of wildfire smoke on birds, an understudied component of the ever-expanding Western fire season. The more data volunteer observers gather, the better ornithologists can understand how fires affect these animals and what steps can be taken to help them.
Participants can commit to the whole season or just a few weeks. Researchers will cross-check volunteers' notes against fire and smoke distribution data to look for patterns in animal behavior. For those who struggle to tell a bushtit from a barn owl, the team has assembled resources to help distinguish between common local species and can answer individual questions via email. Volunteers' notes are also reviewed by a team of expert birders before being passed on to researchers, who will follow up with further questions about any highly unusual birds or behavior noted.
What may feel like casual observations to a backyard birder are actually valuable data points, Sanderfoot said.
From the first two years of project data, scientists have already noticed that the presence of soot particles - a major component of wildfire smoke - changes the probability that certain bird species will be observed in a given area, Sanderfoot said. The reason why isn't yet clear.
Are scrub jays showing up in parks where they typically aren't spotted? They may be relocating to avoid sooty skies. Is the action at a backyard feeder getting surprisingly heated? It's possible that birds aggravated by smoke are becoming more territorial. Scientists want to know if birds are actually flying to new locations when air quality declines, or if they are changing their behaviors in ways that make them harder or easier for human bird-watchers to spot.
"These are the hypotheses we are hoping to test with the data we collect in 2025," Sanderfoot said. "The more people we have engaged, the more likely that we will have people in place to capture these impacts where they occur. It requires people power."
Signups are at www.projectphoenix.study.
The bird-watching is also fun, volunteers said.
"I've enjoyed being able to slow down and just stop to observe for 10 minutes," said Carrie Brown-Kornarens, a Los Feliz ceramicist and wildlife enthusiast who has volunteered for Project Phoenix since the study's launch. "Staying in one spot brings the birds to you, and it's a peaceful experience."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Air pollution and herbal medicines could be behind lung cancer in non-smokers, study finds
Air pollution and traditional herbal medicines could be major risk factors contributing to the development of lung cancer in people with no history of smoking, a groundbreaking new study has found. While smoking is a major risk factor for lung cancer, rates of the malignancy appear to be increasing among those who have never smoked, even with tobacco use declining globally. Previous studies have shown that lung cancer disproportionately affects non-smoking women, particularly those with Asian ancestry, and is more prevalent in East Asia than in Western nations. Now, a new study, published on Wednesday in the journal Nature, provides compelling evidence that air pollution and herbal medicines could be behind genetic mutations linked to the development of lung cancer in non-smokers. 'We are seeing this problematic trend that never-smokers are increasingly getting lung cancer, but we haven't understood why,' said Ludmil Alexandrov, an author of the study from the University of California San Diego. 'Our research shows that air pollution is strongly associated with the same types of DNA mutations we typically associate with smoking.' Most lung cancer prevalence studies haven't separated data of smokers from that of non-smokers, providing limited insights into potential causes in those patients. The latest study collected data from never-smokers worldwide and used genomics to find environmental factors likely behind these cancers. 'This is an urgent and growing global problem that we are working to understand regarding never-smokers,' said Maria Teresa Landi, co-author of the study from the US National Cancer Institute. While previous studies have shown a potential link between air pollution and lung cancer in never-smokers, the new research goes further by revealing a genomic link. In this comprehensive study, scientists analysed lung tumours from 871 never-smokers living in 28 regions with different levels of air pollution across Africa, Asia, Europe and North America. Researchers used genome sequencing methods to identify distinct patterns of genetic mutations which act like molecular fingerprints of past exposures. They then compared the genomic data with pollution estimates based on satellite and ground-level measurements of fine particulate matter. This helped them estimate long-term exposure of the patients to air pollution. The study found that never-smokers living in more polluted environments had significantly more mutations in their lung tumours, particularly the kinds which directly promote cancer development. Scientists also found more molecular signatures in this group, which are linked to cancer and serve as a record of all past exposures to mutation-causing environmental factors. For instance, these individuals had a nearly 4-fold increase in a mutational signature molecule linked to tobacco smoking and a 76 per cent increase in another signature linked to ageing. 'What we see is that air pollution is associated with an increase in somatic mutations, including those that fall under known mutational signatures attributed to tobacco smoking and ageing,' said Marcos Díaz-Gay, co-author of the study. Scientists found that the more pollution someone was exposed to, the more mutations were found in their lung tumours, as well as greater signs of their cells undergoing accelerated ageing. Another environmental risk unravelled by the study was aristolochic acid, a known cancer-causing chemical found in some traditional Chinese and Ayurvedic herbal medicines. This chemical, extracted from plants of the birthwort family, was found linked to a signature mutation in lung tumours of never-smokers from Taiwan. Although ingestion of this plant chemical has been linked previously to bladder, gut, kidney, and liver cancers, the latest study is the first to report evidence that it may contribute to lung cancer. 'This raises new concerns about how traditional remedies might unintentionally raise cancer risk,' Dr Landi said. 'It also presents a public health opportunity for cancer prevention, particularly in Asia.' The study also found an intriguing new mutation signature which appears in the lung tumours of most never-smokers but is absent in smokers. 'We don't yet know what's driving it,' Dr Alexandrov said. 'This is something entirely different, and it opens up a whole new area of investigation.'
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Air pollution may be raising risk of lung cancer in ‘never-smokers': Study
Exposure to air pollution, other contaminants and traditional herbal medicines may be contributing to the development of lung cancer in people who have little or no history of smoking, a new study has found. Contact with these substances can be linked to the same genetic mutations that are associated with smoking and that promote lung cancer development, according to the study, published on Wednesday in Nature. 'We're seeing this problematic trend that never-smokers are increasingly getting lung cancer, but we haven't understood why,' co-senior author Ludmil Alexandrov, a professor of bioengineering and cellular and molecular medicine at the University of California San Diego, said in a statement. Even as tobacco use has plunged in many parts of the world, lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked is proportionally on the rise, the researchers noted. Those effects, they noted, are particularly pronounced in women of Asian ancestry and are more prevalent in East Asia than in Western nations. Although previous research has identified an epidemiological link between air pollution and link cancer in never-smokers, the current study authors went a step further in establishing a genomic reason behind this phenomenon. To do so, they analyzed lung tumors from 871 never-smokers in 28 regions with varying levels of air pollution, across Africa, Asia, Europe and Norther America. Utilizing whole-genome sequencing, the scientists identified specific patterns of DNA mutations — or 'mutational signatures' — that serves as molecular fingerprints for past exposures responsible for changes in DNA. After combining their genomic data with satellite and ground-level pollution measurements of fine particulate matter, they were able to estimate the long-term exposure levels of their participants. The scientists found that never-smokers living in more polluted environments developed much more mutations in their lung tumors — especially the types of mutations that directly drive cancer development. These individuals also showed more mutational signatures linked to cancer, per the study. This cohort of participants demonstrated a 3.9-fold surge in mutational signature that is typically linked to tobacco smoking. Meanwhile, the scientists also determined that the more air pollution a person endured, the more tumors were found in their lungs. These tumors also had shorter telomeres —the protective caps on the ends of chromosomes — a warning sign of accelerated cellular aging. Although the researchers identified this genetic link between air pollution exposures and lung cancer, they did not find a strong correlation when it came to secondhand smoke. Exposure to secondhand smoke is a known cancer risk, but its mutational impacts were far less acute than those identified with air pollution — generating just a small rise in such changes, according to the study. 'If there is a mutagenic effect of secondhand smoke, it may be too weak for our current tools to detect,' co-first author Tongwu Zhang, a biostatistician at the National Institutes of Health's National Cancer Institute, said in a statement. In addition to focusing in on air pollution, the researchers also examined the effects of aristolochic acid, a carcinogen present in certain traditional Chinese herbal medicines. They flagged a specific mutational signature associated with the acid that was present almost exclusively in lung cancer cases of Taiwanese never-smokers. While aristolochic acid and previously been linked to bladder, gastrointestinal, kidney and liver cancers from ingestion, the researchers said they suspect that the inhalation of the substance could be connected to the lung cancer cases — though they recognized a need for further research. 'This raises new concerns about how traditional remedies might unintentionally raise cancer risk,' co-senior author Maria Teresa Landi, an epidemiologist at the National Cancer Institute, said in a statement. 'It also presents a public health opportunity for cancer prevention — particularly in Asia.'
Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
Hardcore birders and casual sparrow spotters: Science needs you
LOS ANGELES - Attention would-be warbler watchers and pigeon peepers: Ornithologists at UCLA and the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County are recruiting volunteers for Project Phoenix, a multiyear citizen science initiative investigating birds' response to wildfire. The team is seeking volunteers in California, Oregon and Washington to collect data from July through November, the duration of the official West Coast fire season. Volunteers need to choose a comfortable, familiar spot - a backyard, a balcony, a favorite local park - and spend 10 minutes there each week noting any bird activity they hear or see. They then enter their observations on the online platform eBird. No bird knowledge or expertise is required, said program director Olivia Sanderfoot, a UCLA ornithologist. Beginners especially are welcome, in fact, as they're more apt to notice common species and behaviors that longtime bird watchers might overlook. "Whether you are an expert birder who has been birding your whole life or you have never thought about birds, you are welcome to join Project Phoenix," Sanderfoot said. "We want this program to be accessible." This is the third consecutive year of the study, which began in 2023 with about 300 volunteers tracking bird behavior over a three-month period. The study aims to understand the effects of wildfire smoke on birds, an understudied component of the ever-expanding Western fire season. The more data volunteer observers gather, the better ornithologists can understand how fires affect these animals and what steps can be taken to help them. Participants can commit to the whole season or just a few weeks. Researchers will cross-check volunteers' notes against fire and smoke distribution data to look for patterns in animal behavior. For those who struggle to tell a bushtit from a barn owl, the team has assembled resources to help distinguish between common local species and can answer individual questions via email. Volunteers' notes are also reviewed by a team of expert birders before being passed on to researchers, who will follow up with further questions about any highly unusual birds or behavior noted. What may feel like casual observations to a backyard birder are actually valuable data points, Sanderfoot said. From the first two years of project data, scientists have already noticed that the presence of soot particles - a major component of wildfire smoke - changes the probability that certain bird species will be observed in a given area, Sanderfoot said. The reason why isn't yet clear. Are scrub jays showing up in parks where they typically aren't spotted? They may be relocating to avoid sooty skies. Is the action at a backyard feeder getting surprisingly heated? It's possible that birds aggravated by smoke are becoming more territorial. Scientists want to know if birds are actually flying to new locations when air quality declines, or if they are changing their behaviors in ways that make them harder or easier for human bird-watchers to spot. "These are the hypotheses we are hoping to test with the data we collect in 2025," Sanderfoot said. "The more people we have engaged, the more likely that we will have people in place to capture these impacts where they occur. It requires people power." Signups are at The bird-watching is also fun, volunteers said. "I've enjoyed being able to slow down and just stop to observe for 10 minutes," said Carrie Brown-Kornarens, a Los Feliz ceramicist and wildlife enthusiast who has volunteered for Project Phoenix since the study's launch. "Staying in one spot brings the birds to you, and it's a peaceful experience." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
