
Patchwork fashion and bean-to-bar chocolate: meet the entrepreneurs shaking up Yorkshire's shopping habits
'My family thought I was mad leaving my comfortable graduate job to start a chocolate company at 21 years old – and rightly so!' recalls Max Scotford, the founder of Yorkshire's first bean-to-bar chocolate company, Bullion. But as it turns out, his hunch that craft chocolate was about to become the next big thing, was spot-on.
Now in his ninth year, Scotford, memorably titled chief chocolate officer, runs Bullion from a factory in Sheffield's Kelham Island, as well as the hot chocolate cafe Chocolate Bar in the prominent Heart of the City redevelopment, and a sister company Dough Boy (a bakery). Employing a total of 20 people in the local area, he says his success was expedited significantly thanks to help from his old university, Sheffield Hallam, where he graduated in events management in 2015.
'I was working in an events management role after university when the idea for a chocolate company came about,' he says. 'Food has always been something I've been passionate about – I'd gone to catering college and trained as a chef in a restaurant.'
It was after a TV show about craft chocolate caught his attention that the idea really took hold. 'They were making chocolate from scratch and, at the time, not many people were doing it. Coincidentally, I'd been making it at home, for fun. It was dubbed the next craft coffee or beer, which felt really exciting.'
An unexpected payday saw Scotford take the plunge. 'When I was 17, I'd briefly thought about making protein yoghurt and bought the trademark for 'Pro-Yo'. I quickly realised that I didn't have the infrastructure to make it happen, but just as the chocolate idea was taking hold, I was contacted out of the blue by one of the biggest yoghurt manufacturers in the country, making me an offer for it.' Scotford agreed to sell the trademark. 'I figured if ever I was going to get a chance to run my own business, it was now.'
With money but lacking the business knowhow, Scotford turned to his former university for help through its Enterprise Scheme. 'Returning to Sheffield Hallam meant I was stationed with 12 or so other businesses in a co-working space [The Hallam iLab] for about two years,' recalls Scotford. 'In those early days of setting up, you're completely green and full of questions. The university provided not just a place I could turn to, to hold my hand through that tricky first stage, but a group of like-minded peers to work alongside, too.'
There, Scotford made use of the facilities available, from a business mentor and networking groups, to office space and IT services. Help with ongoing funding was another advantage to the scheme, with Scotford winning the university's first ever Enterprise Award in 2017, securing him £5,000. The support via his mentor proved especially valuable and helped Bullion land its first retailer. 'My mentor really understood my vision, helping me make crucial connections and tap into the network and support I needed.'
As well as helping him raise initial funding, his mentor's insight made a huge difference later when cashflow became an issue, says Scotford. 'A chocolate business is very seasonal – we'll make a lot of our income at Christmas and over the summer it's more challenging. But summer is typically when we make Christmas products and need to buy packaging, for example. My mentor was incredibly helpful in helping me manage that. Without him, that sort of thing could easily send a new business under. We still speak every month now, nine years on.'
He is one of many students tapping into the expertise offered by university incubators. In the three years to 2028, an estimated 27,000 startups will be established with their support, according to Universities UK, which represents the bulk of UK universities.
Helen Armitage is the associate director of student futures and employability at Sheffield Hallam and oversees the university's careers, employability, enterprise and business incubation service. It's a service that offers support to current and former students through various channels, from 1:1 appointments and workshops to support in gaining work experience and sandwich-year placements. 'At 18 or 19 years old it takes a lot of confidence and self-belief to develop a business idea,' says Armitage. 'So doing it in a safe environment where failure can happen (because it will) and there's a support network of experienced staff and mentors to look at what went wrong and ask: 'How could we do this differently going forward?' is invaluable.
'Developing an entrepreneurial mindset is vital whether our students go on to run their own business or not, and having a strong peer support network and mentors are key to supporting progress in their working life. This is something we've been able to do, and the impact on our students has been fantastic.'
When asked why supporting entrepreneurship is such an important focus, she adds: 'We shape futures and prepare our students for whatever they choose to do in their career journey. Progressing into self-employment and entrepreneurial paths is an avenue any of our students may pursue – either while studying with us, or beyond. So ensuring we – as a university, an enterprise and business incubation service – can enable that means we know our students have the support needed to positively progress into their future.'
It's that kind of encouragement which helped make BA fashion design graduate Sarah Thompson one of Sheffield Hallam's success stories. She launched her sustainable fashion brand, TOM-O after graduating in 2021. TOM-O, which takes unwanted fabric and clothing to create bespoke patchwork pieces – all with sustainability at the forefront – secured a five-week pop-up at Selfridges flagship store on London's Oxford Street shortly after its launch.
She credits Hallam's support ('it was like a little family there') as being instrumental in those early days. 'During my time there, I had access to a wide range of equipment and facilities, which helped enhance my learning experience,' she says. 'We had numerous opportunities to apply our learning, such as workshops, projects, placements, events, field trips and guest lecturers. I took an internship year too, which was hugely valuable. All the technical skills I developed there have been crucial in creating clothes for my brand, from pattern cutting to sewing. Thanks to my time at Sheffield Hallam, I feel well-equipped to tackle whatever comes my way.'
Scotford wishes more people knew help of this kind was available. 'So many people finish university and it's incredibly competitive to find a job and know what to do. If graduates have an idea of doing their own thing and knew this kind of support was out there, maybe they'd be up for giving it a go – which would be fantastic, wouldn't it?'
Find out about careers, employability, enterprise and business incubation services at Sheffield Hallam
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'
Sir Keir Starmer has been put on notice of a fresh Labour rebellion over the Government's 'family farm tax'. More than 40 Labour MPs are said to be considering a bid to water down looming changes to agricultural and business inheritance tax relief. It comes after the Prime Minister performed a trio of embarrassing U-turns in recent weeks. Sir Keir has reversed his position on axing the winter fuel payment for millions of pensioners, a national grooming gangs inquiry, and welfare cuts. This has left Labour rebels feeling emboldened that they can force the Government into further policy changes. According to the Telegraph, a group of Labour backbenchers are considering using amendments to legislation to exempt small family farms from a planned tax raid. At last year's Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced farmers will pay a 20 per cent rate of inheritance tax on land and property they inherit worth more than £1million. The Government has insisted the measures - dubbed the 'family farm tax' and set to be in place from April 2026 - will only affect the wealthiest quarter of landowners. But the National Farmers' Union (NFU) and others say the impact of Ms Reeves' measures will be much more widespread. Critics claim the move could wipe out family-run farms with tight margins, as they will be forced to sell up in order to pay death duties. There have been months of demonstrations by farmers in response to the Chancellor's tax raid, including tractor protests in Wesminster. A 'rural growth group' of Labour MPs is now proposing the raising of the £1million cut-off point at which estates lose their tax reliefs. They have suggested estates receive full tax relief on the value of agricultural properties up to £10million, 50 per cent to £20million, and nil thereafter. Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, who is a member of the group, told the newspaper they would 'consider what amendments to put down'. Mr Rushworth said: 'We are all keen to avoid amendments. I don't want it to get to that point. I am a Labour MP and I broadly support the Government. 'I would like to see them bring forward different recommendations in the Bill.' Ex-Cabinet minister Louise Haigh, who was a leading rebel over the Government's now partially-reversed welfare cuts, has called for Sir Keir to 'reset' his relationship with the British public. 'I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the Government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy,' she told the BBC in the wake of the PM's climbdown on welfare changes. 'And I think that has been accepted from within government and a lot of people, both in the parliamentary Labour Party, but crucially, the country will really welcome that.' The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is the main disability payment in England. It also cut the health-related element of Universal Credit. But, after Sir Keir offered concessions to rebel MPs, the changes to PIP will now only be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only. All existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will also have their incomes protected in real terms. A Government spokesman said: 'Our reforms to agricultural and business property relief are vital to fix the public services we all rely on. 'Three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. 'We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers profits.'

Finextra
35 minutes ago
- Finextra
Deep Dive: Wise – Building a World of Money Without Borders: By Sam Boboev
Wise (formerly TransferWise) has quietly become one of fintech's biggest success stories, transforming how people and businesses send money across borders. From humble startup origins in 2011, Wise now moves over £145 billion internationally each year for 15+ million customers – at a fraction of the cost charged by banks. In doing so, Wise saved its users an estimated £2 billion in fees in FY2025 alone. It's a rare fintech that's both fast-growing and profitable, pursuing a bold mission encapsulated in its slogan: 'Money without borders – instant, convenient, transparent and eventually free.' This deep dive explores why Wise matters today – covering the massive market it's tackling, its journey and products, the technology and regulatory infrastructure under its hood, its recent financial performance, competitive landscape, and what customers and leadership are saying. A Massive Market Ripe for Disruption Moving money internationally has long been notorious for high costs and hassle. Over £22 trillion crosses borders each year, projected to reach £28 trillion by 2027 as globalization drives more migration, remote work, and global commerce. By Wise's own 2025 estimate, the number may be as high as £32 trillion annually. Historically, this market was dominated by big banks and legacy remittance providers relying on an antiquated correspondent banking network. International transfers often meant 'expensive, slow and inefficient service, reliant on outdated infrastructure,' as Wise's 2023 report bluntly puts it. Banks and incumbents like Western Union layered on fees and hidden exchange rate markups – profiting from customers' lack of transparency. The result: sending money abroad could cost 5-8% in fees (often not obvious upfront) and take days to arrive. Wise was founded to change this status quo. Its vision of 'Money Without Borders' is about making moving money 'as cheap, fast, and convenient as sending an email,' in the words of its co-founder. Wise's core innovation was using technology and clever account structures to eliminate intermediaries and hidden fees, giving users the real mid-market exchange rate and charging only a low upfront fee. As we'll see, this strategy is forcing the industry to evolve. Today, many fintechs and even banks are racing to offer cheaper, easier cross-border payments – yet traditional banks remain Wise's primary competitors, still handling the majority of cross-currency transactions. A growing field of digital challengers (from neobanks like Revolut to PayPal's Xoom and others) are also carving out niches. But Wise has a head start in scale, efficiency, and trust – built over a decade of singular focus on solving this problem. From Startup to Public Company Wise's origin story is a personal one. In 2011, two Estonian friends living in London – Kristo Käärmann and Taavet Hinrikus – grew frustrated with the 'massive problem' of bank fees on international transfers. They started TransferWise that year to help people send money abroad at the true exchange rate. The concept resonated: by 2014, having raised a $58 million Series C to expand globally, TransferWise launched in the US and Australia. The company hit major milestones quickly. It reached its first £1 billion transferred (cumulative) in 2014, and by 2017 was profitable with over £1 billion being moved every month through its platform – a rarity in fintech. Importantly, Wise also became an innovator in financial infrastructure early on. In 2016 it gained direct access to the UK's Faster Payments network (the first tech company to do so), showing a knack for working with regulators to improve speed and cost. Over time, TransferWise broadened its offerings beyond person-to-person remittances. In 2016 it launched its first business accounts for SMEs to send money internationally on better terms. By 2018 it rolled out a borderless multi-currency account and debit Mastercard, enabling customers to hold money in multiple currencies and spend it via card in different countries with low fees. The company's global footprint also expanded: it opened offices around the world (10 offices by 2019, including a European hub in Belgium to navigate Brexit) and set up an Asia-Pacific hub in Singapore in 2017. In 2021, reflecting its broadened mission, TransferWise rebranded to 'Wise.' That same year, Wise went public via a direct listing on the London Stock Exchange – notably, London's largest tech listing ever at the time. The listing valued Wise at ~$11 billion, signaling its arrival as a major fintech player. Today, Wise is truly international: over 6,500 employees ('Wisers') across 20+ offices serve customers in 170+ countries. Yet the company insists it's 'still solving only a fraction of the problem'. As CEO Kristo Käärmann wrote, 'Twelve years ago we set out to solve the massive problem people and businesses face in sending money around the world… While we're nowhere near mission complete, 16 million people and businesses are now helping us get closer every day.' In the next sections, we'll examine how Wise is attempting to fulfill that mission through its products and underlying infrastructure. --------- Source: Wise Annual Reports FY2023–FY2025; product pages and blog; CEO and executive statements from Wise reports; and Wise investor reports highlighting key metrics. All data and quotes are from official Wise materials. Disclaimer: Fintech Wrap Up aggregates publicly available information for informational purposes only. Portions of the content may be reproduced verbatim from the original source, and full credit is provided with a "Source: [Name]" attribution. All copyrights and trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. Fintech Wrap Up does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the aggregated content; these are the responsibility of the original source providers. Links to the original sources may not always be included. For questions or concerns, please contact us at


Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
A British Leyland of TV is the Government's worst idea yet
A show about a good-looking human rights lawyer who becomes a triumphant, reforming prime minister? Or a mini-series about a brilliant, glamorous economist who becomes Britain's first female chancellor? Perhaps a movie about a fiery red-head who works her way up from poverty to become the most powerful woman in the country? As the Government paves the way for a potential merger between ITV, Channel 4, and Channel 5 to create a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster, it is not hard to imagine the kind of shows it might commission. But hold on. A British Leyland of television is the Government's worst idea yet. What the industry actually needs is more competition – not less. It may still be a few years off. But Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Government is very clearly paving the way for a major consolidation of the British broadcasting industry. Last week, as part of its shiny new 'industrial strategy', it opened the door to removing the barriers that prevent a merger between the existing terrestrial broadcasters. Apparently, ministers will examine 'possible consolidation between broadcasters', along with 'closer strategic partnerships'. Meanwhile, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and Ofcom will be asked to review their definitions of 'television advertising' to include YouTube and Netflix, which again will make mergers easier. Add it all up, and it is not hard to see where this is going. We will need a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster to cope with a changing market, stand up to the American streaming giants, and preserve what used to be one of the UK's strongest industries. Heck, they could even bring in the marketing whizzes who gave us Great British Energy and Great British Railways to come up with the branding for Great British Television. Of course, we all understand that something needs to be done. In a world where streaming dominates, and with most people under 30 barely even aware of what traditional broadcasting through signals and aerials was, the industry is in an increasingly dire position. ITV, the biggest of the three, has seen its share price slump from 265p 10 years ago to just 80p now, and the broadcaster is only worth £3bn. There has already been plenty of speculation about a break-up, perhaps with a sale of its production unit, or else a full-scale takeover of the company, probably by a foreign buyer. Channel 4 has been slashing jobs and cutting back on its programming budget as it grapples with a declining advertising market. Meanwhile, Channel 5, which has never been a huge success since it was launched in 1997, is also potentially in play as its American owner Paramount prepares for a takeover by media company Skydance. Why not put all three together and create a new British-owned powerhouse in commercial broadcasting?